Effects of various cone-beam computed tomography settings on the detection of recurrent caries under restorations in extracted primary teeth

Performance of different cone-beam computed tomography scan modes with and without metal artifact reduction in detection of recurrent dental caries under various restorative materials

Purpose

We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan modes with and without the application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) option under 5 different restorative materials.

Material and methods

Our research was an in vitro study with 150 caries-free premolars and molars. The teeth were randomly divided into experimental (with artificially induced caries, n = 75) and control (without caries, n = 75) groups and were prepared based on 5 types of restorative materials, including conventional composites (Filtek Z250, Gradia), flow composite, glass ionomer, and amalgam. The teeth were examined under 2 CBCT scan modes (high-resolution [HIRes] and standard) with and without MAR application. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy index values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], sensitivity, and specificity) were calculated.

Results

The AUC of standard scan mode with the MAR option was significantly lower than that of HIRes with MAR (p = 0.018) and without MAR option (p = 0.011) in detecting recurrent caries. Also, without MAR option, the diagnostic accuracy (AUC) of the standard mode was significantly lower than that of the HIRes (p = 0.020). Similar findings were observed for sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, diagnostic performance of standard and HIRes scan modes with and without MAR in the amalgam group was lower than that in other restorative material groups.

Conclusions

Diagnostic performance of HIRes CBCT mode was higher than that of standard mode for recurrent caries and remained unaffected by MAR application. However, the accuracy in detecting recurrent caries was lower in the amalgam group compared with other restorative material groups.

Potential impact of metal crowns at varying distances from a carious lesion on its detection on cone-beam computed tomography scans with several protocols

Purpose

This study evaluated the impact of artifacts generated by metal crowns on the detection of proximal caries lesions in teeth at various distances using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, the diagnostic impacts of tube current and metal artifact reduction (MAR) were investigated.

Materials and Methods

Thirty teeth were arranged within 10 phantoms, each containing 1 first premolar, 1 second premolar, and 1 second molar. A sound first molar (for the control group) or a tooth with a metal crown was placed. Of the 60 proximal surfaces evaluated, 15 were sound and 45 exhibited enamel caries. CBCT scans were acquired using an OP300 Maxio unit (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland), while varying the tube current (4, 8, or 12.5 mA) and enabling or disabling MAR. Five observers assessed mesial and distal surfaces using a 5-point scale. Multi-way analysis of variance was employed for data comparison, with P<0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

The area under the curve (AUC) varied from 0.40 to 0.60 (sensitivity: 0.28-0.45, specificity: 0.44-0.80). The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly affected by the presence of a metal crown, milliamperage, or MAR (P>0.05). However, the overall AUC and specificity were significantly lower for surfaces near a crown (P<0.05).

Conclusion

CBCT-based caries detection was not influenced by the presence of a metal crown, variations in milliamperage, or MAR activation. However, the diagnostic accuracy was low and was further diminished for surfaces near a crown. Consequently, CBCT is not recommended for the detection of incipient caries lesions.

Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm for CBCT diagnosis of temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact: inadequate to reduce false-positive rate

OBJECTIVES

It was recently found that when cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to examine temporary anchorage device (TAD)-tooth root contact, it tends to yield high false-positive (FP) diagnoses. This study investigated whether application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size can remediate this problem.

METHODS

18 fresh pig cadaver mandibles underwent TAD placement bilaterally at first molar lingual furcation regions. CBCT scans were taken under varied MAR (absence, presence) and voxel-size (400 µm, 200 µm) settings. Then, TADs were removed and a micro-CT scan (27 µm voxel-size) of the TAD placement site was performed. Three raters, blinded of CBCT scan setting, independently diagnosed whether TADs were in contact with roots. The reliability and accuracy of CBCT diagnoses using micro-CT as the gold-standard were statistically examined.

RESULTS

Generally, CBCT diagnoses had intrarater (Cohen's κ: 0.54-1) and interrater (Fleiss' κ: 0.73-0.81) reliability, within the moderate to excellent range, which did not vary with MAR setting or scan voxel-size. For diagnostic accuracy, FP rate among all raters was mostly in the 15-25% range and did not change with MAR or scan voxel-size settings (McNemar tests, p > 0.05) while false-negative rate was relatively minimal and only occurred to one rater (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

When using CBCT to diagnose possible TAD-root contact, applying a currently available Planmeca MAR algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size from 400 µm to 200 µm may not decrease FP rate. Further optimization of the MAR algorithm for this purpose may be needed.

In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries

OBJECTIVE

To assess the in vitro performance of high-definition (HD) US, CBCT and periapical radiography for the visibility of proximal and recurrent caries in teeth with and without restoration.

METHODS

A total of 240 molar teeth were divided into eight groups each comprised of 30 teeth. Control groups consisted of teeth without caries (Group 1-4; N = 120), whereas diseased groups consisted of teeth with proximal caries (Group 5-8; N = 120 teeth). Finally, a total of four image sets were obtained as follows: i) PSP periapical radiography, ii) CBCT 0.075 mm voxel size, iii) CBCT 0.2 mm voxel size and iv) HD US images. The image sets were viewed separately by four observers by using a 5-point confidence scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. The areas under the ROC curves were compared using chi-square tests. Significance level was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Intraobserver agreement for both readings for the four observers ranged between 0.848 and 0.988 for CBCT (0.075 mm) images; 0.658 and 0.952 for CBCT (0.2 mm) images; 0.555 and 0.810 for periapical images; 0.427 and 0.676 for US images. Highest AUC values were found for CBCT (0.075 mm) images and lowest for US images. Statistically significant differences were found among CBCT (0.075 mm) images and US images (p < 0.001), CBCT (0.2 mm) images and US images (p < 0.001) and periapical images and US images (p < 0.001) for the detection of proximal caries.

CONCLUSION

Periapical and CBCT images outperformed HD US imaging in the detection of proximal dental caries.

Three-dimensional diagnosis of dentin caries beneath composite restorations using swept-source optical coherence tomography

The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for detection of caries beneath composite restorations and to compare the results with those obtained by radiography. Flat dentin surfaces with and without natural caries were bonded with 1- or 2-mm thick composite restorations. SS-OCT scanning was performed over the composite restorations to construct three-dimensional (3D) images of the resin-dentin interface. Images were chosen from the 3D constructions to detect caries beneath the restorations. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative predictive values for caries detection, and Az values from receiver-operating characteristic analysis were calculated and compared with those of digital dental radiography at a significance level of α=0.05. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility was compared between SSOCT and radiography. SS-OCT could detect caries, which appeared as a bright zone beneath composite up to 2-mm thick. SS-OCT provided greater diagnostic accuracy than radiography.