Sleep disturbances in infants and young children following an acquired brain injury

Characteristics and Neural Mechanisms of Sleep-Wake Disturbances After Traumatic Brain Injury

Sleep-wake disturbances (SWDs) are one of the most common complaints following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The high prevalence and socioeconomic burden of SWDs post-TBI have only been recognized in the past decade. Common SWDs induced by TBI include excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), hypersomnia, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Sleep disturbances can significantly compromise quality of life, strain interpersonal relationships, diminish work productivity, exacerbate other clinical conditions, and impede the rehabilitation process of TBI patients. Consequently, the prompt regulation and enhancement of sleep homeostasis in TBI patients is of paramount importance. Although studies have shown that abnormal neural network function, neuroendocrine changes, disturbance of sleep-wake regulators, and immune inflammatory responses related to brain structural damage induced by TBI are involved in the development of SWDs, the exact neuropathological mechanisms are still poorly understood. Therefore, we systematically review the current clinical and experimental studies on the characteristics and possible neural mechanisms of post-TBI SWDs. Elucidating the neural underpinnings of post-TBI SWDs holds the potential to diversify and enhance therapeutic approaches for these conditions. Such advancements could hasten the recuperation of TBI patients and ameliorate their overall quality of life. It is our aspiration that departments specializing in neurosurgery, rehabilitation, and neuropsychiatry will be able to recognize and address these conditions promptly, thereby facilitating the healing journey of affected individuals.

Sleep as a driver of pre- and postnatal brain development

In 1966, Howard Roffwarg proposed the ontogenic sleep hypothesis, relating neural plasticity and development to rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, a hypothesis that current fetal and neonatal sleep research is still exploring. Recently, technological advances have enabled researchers to automatically quantify neonatal sleep architecture, which has caused a resurgence of research in this field as attempts are made to further elucidate the important role of sleep in pre- and postnatal brain development. This article will review our current understanding of the role of sleep as a driver of brain development and identify possible areas for future research. IMPACT: The evidence to date suggests that Roffwarg's ontogenesis hypothesis of sleep and brain development is correct. A better understanding of the relationship between sleep and the development of functional connectivity is needed. Reliable, non-invasive tools to assess sleep in the NICU and at home need to be tested in a real-world environment and the best way to promote healthy sleep needs to be understood before clinical trials promoting and optimizing sleep quality in neonates could be undertaken.

Post-PICU sleep efficiency and quality of life in infants and toddlers with acquired brain injury

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the use of sleep efficiency (SE) as a measure of sleep disturbance in infants and toddlers with acquired brain injury (ABI) and evaluate associations between SE and child health-related quality of life and family outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 101 children ages 3-36 months who survived critical care for ABI. SE was quantified from the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire as a ratio of nighttime sleep to total time in bed; poor SE was defined as < 80%. Outcome measures included the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Core Total Score (health-related quality of life) and Family Impact Module Total Score. Spearman's correlation quantified associations between SE and outcomes. Multivariable linear regression tested association between poor SE and health-related quality of life controlling for significant covariates (age, diagnosis, comorbidities, worsening Functional Status Scale).

RESULTS

Following ABI, median SE was 91.7 (interquartile range = 83.3, 95.5). Nineteen (19%) children had poor SE (< 80%). SE correlated significantly with quality of life (Spearman's correlation = .307) and Family Impact Module (Spearman's correlation = .309; both P < .01). When controlling for covariates, poor SE significantly increased risk for lower health-related quality of life (β-coefficient = -7.0; 95% confidence interval= -13.4, -0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

One in five infants and young children with ABI have poor SE that is associated with poorer child and family health outcomes. Our study underscores the potential importance of sleep following ABI to optimize recovery and the need for additional investigation of SE in infants and young children.

CITATION

Klapp JM, Hall TA, Riley AR, Janzen D, Williams CN. Post-PICU sleep efficiency and quality of life in infants and toddlers with acquired brain injury. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):75-83.