Sleep Misperception in Chronic Insomnia Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Implications for Clinical Assessment

A scoping review of sleep discrepancy methodology: What are we measuring and what does it mean?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine how past studies have conceptualised sleep discrepancy and identify and evaluate the methods used for its measurement and analysis.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in April 2022 for studies comparing self-report and objective measures of sleep. Methodological information was extracted from relevant studies and included measures of self-report and objective sleep, sleep variables (e.g., total sleep time), derived discrepancy indices (e.g., difference scores), handling of repeated measurements, and methods of measure comparison (e.g., Bland-Altman analyses).

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-four relevant records were identified. Studies varied according to objective sleep measure; actigraphy algorithm, software, and rest interval; polysomnography setting and scoring criteria; sleep variables; self-report sleep measure; number of nights of objective recording; time frame of self-report measure; self-report sleep variable definition; sleep discrepancy derived index; presence and handling of repeated measurements; and statistical method for measure comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep discrepancy was predominantly conceived as discordance in sleep states or sleep time variables, and various forms of this discordance differed in their conceptual distance to sleep misperception. Furthermore, studies varied considerably in methodology with critical conceptual and practical implications that have received little attention to date. Substantive methodological issues were also identified relating to the use of derived indices for operationalising sleep discrepancy, defining objective sleep onset latency, calculating actigraphy rest intervals, measuring correlation and concordance, averaging sleep variables across nights, and defining sleep quality discrepancy. Solutions and recommendations for these issues are discussed.

Exploring the Factors Associated with Sleep Concerns and Perceived Need for Treatment among Patients with Sleep Disorders

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting patient perceptions of sleep concerns and the need for treatment to understand and enable effective management.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed data collected between November 2018 and October 2022 at the sleep clinic of a tertiary hospital. Adults aged > 19 years who completed sleep questionnaires and polysomnography (PSG) were included. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between demographic, clinical, and social factors, sleep questionnaire responses, and PSG data with self-reported sleep concerns (n = 3,457) and perceived need for treatment(n = 3,135).

RESULTS

Insomnia-related symptoms affect both sleep concerns and need for treatment, and sleep maintenance is the most influential factor in both sleep concerns (odds ratio[OR] = 19.74, 95% confidence interval[CI] 6.17-63.20) and need for treatment (OR = 3.84, 95% CI 2.19-6.73). Young age (OR = 2.66, 95% CI 1.38-5.12), employment status, and daily life dysfunction were determinants of treatment readiness. None of the PSG parameters showed an independent association with sleep concerns or need for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep maintenance problems had the most profound effect on sleep concerns and the need for treatment. Social needs are key factors in seeking treatment. A discrepancy has been noted between the effects of subjective and objective factors on sleep concerns and the need for treatment; therefore, patient management should pay attention to subjective sleep complaints.

Sleep misperception in women with myofascial temporomandibular disorder

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) were linked to poor sleep on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), whereas polysomnography revealed no major sleep disturbances, implying sleep state misperception. This study investigates sleep state misperception in TMD and control participants; correlates sleep state misperception with objective short sleep duration (SSD), depression symptoms, daytime sleepiness, and orofacial pain; and compares objective SSD between the groups.

METHODS

General linear models were used to compare second-night polysomnography total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset with homologous PSQI-derived variables in 124 women with myofascial TMD and 46 age and body mass index matched controls. PSQI variables were regressed onto objective SSD, depression symptoms, daytime sleepiness, and pain. Lastly, objective SSD was related to TMD presence.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, TMD cases misperceived SE (P = .02); depression symptoms explained PSQI-derived SE (P = .002) and mediated the effect of pain (P < .001). PSQI variables were unrelated to respective polysomnography measures or objective SSD, except a significant self-reported-objective correlation in SE among controls only (P = .002). Objective SSD was more frequent in TMD cases (P = .02, odds ratio = 2.95), but it was unrelated to depression symptoms, daytime sleepiness, or prepolysomnography pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates misperception of SE among TMD cases, which was accounted for by depression symptoms. Objective SSD nearly tripled in TMD cases; however, it was unrelated to PSQI variables, depression, daytime sleepiness, or pain, suggesting that sleep state misperception and objective SSD are 2 independent sleep features in TMD.

CITATION

Chan C, Dubrovsky B, Bouchard M, Tartter VC, Raphael KG. Sleep misperception in women with myofascial temporomandibular disorder. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(1):55-64.

Multi-Night Home Assessment of Total Sleep Time Misperception in Obstructive Sleep Apnea with and Without Insomnia Symptoms

Total sleep time (TST) misperception has been reported in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, previous findings on predictors were inconsistent and predominantly relied on single-night polysomnography, which may alter patients' sleep perception. We leveraged advances in wearable sleep staging to investigate predictors of TST misperception in OSA over multiple nights in the home environment. The study included 141 patients with OSA, 75 without insomnia symptoms (OSA group), and 66 with insomnia symptoms (OSA-I group). Objective TST was measured using a previously validated wrist-worn photoplethysmography and accelerometry device. Self-reported TST was assessed using a digital sleep diary. TST misperception was quantified with the misperception index (MI), calculated as (objective - self-reported TST)/objective TST. MI values differed significantly between the OSA (median = -0.02, IQR = [-0.06, 0.02]) and the OSA-I group (0.05, [-0.02, 0.13], p < 0.001). Multilevel modeling revealed that the presence of insomnia symptoms (β = 0.070, p < 0.001) and lower daily reported sleep quality (β = -0.229, p < 0.001) were predictive of higher MI (TST underestimation), while a higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was predictive of lower MI (TST overestimation; β = -0.001, p = 0.006). Thus, insomnia symptoms and AHI are associated with TST misperception in OSA patients, but in opposite directions. This association extends over multiple nights in the home environment.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Efficacy for Co-Morbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea (COMISA): Evidence from Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

OBJECTIVES

A multitude of physical and mental challenges are being faced in the population with Co-morbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea (COMISA). Unfortunately, research about clinical characteristics and management of COMISA based on quantitative evidence is lacking.

METHOD

Standard procedures for literature retrieval, selection and quality assessment, data extraction, analysis, and interpretation were conducted step by step. For studying the sleep characteristics, common complications and widely recognized treatment options for COMISA, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) and Odds Ratio (OR) were applied to assess the mean and risk differences between compared groups. Outcomes included sleep health parameters and secondary impairments in physical and mental well-being.

RESULTS

COMISA showed worse sleep quality than OSA only by PSQI (WMD = 3.38 point) and heavier sleep fragmentation (WMD = 11.46 min) than insomnia only. Besides, COMISA patients showed a higher risk for depression (OR [95%CI] = 5.03[2.31, 10.93]) and PTSD (OR [95%CI] = 3.96[1.85, 8.46]) in comparison with OSA alone. Compared to insomnia alone, COMISA patients suffered from more than two times higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and diabetes. In treating COMISA patients, combining CBTI with PAP treatment can enhance the improvement of insomnia severity (ISI, WMD [95%CI] =-3.26[-4.51, -2.00] point) and sleep efficiency (WMD [95%CI] = 6.39[1.97, 10.81] %) compared to PAP alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired sleep domains in COMISA cover sleep quality and sleep structure. Also, COMISA has a higher risk for cardiometabolic diseases and mental disorders. Combining CBTI with PAP can be a recommended treatment to relieve sleep impairments for COMISA.

Multi-night home assessment of sleep structure in OSA with and without insomnia

OBJECTIVE

To explore sleep structure in participants with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid insomnia (COMISA) and participants with OSA without insomnia (OSA-only) using both single-night polysomnography and multi-night wrist-worn photoplethysmography/accelerometry.

METHODS

Multi-night 4-class sleep-staging was performed with a validated algorithm based on actigraphy and heart rate variability, in 67 COMISA (23 women, median age: 51 years) and 50 OSA-only (15 women, median age: 51) participants. Sleep statistics were compared using linear regression models and mixed-effects models. Multi-night variability was explored using a clustering approach and between- and within-participant analysis.

RESULTS

Polysomnographic parameters showed no significant group differences. Multi-night measurements, during 13.4 ± 5.2 nights per subject, demonstrated a longer sleep onset latency and lower sleep efficiency for the COMISA group. Detailed analysis of wake parameters revealed longer mean durations of awakenings in COMISA, as well as higher numbers of awakenings lasting 5 min and longer (WKN≥5min) and longer wake after sleep onset containing only awakenings of 5 min or longer. Within-participant variance was significantly larger in COMISA for sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, mean duration of awakenings and WKN≥5min. Unsupervised clustering uncovered three clusters; participants with consistently high values for at least one of the wake parameters, participants with consistently low values, and participants displaying higher variability.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COMISA more often showed extended, and more variable periods of wakefulness. These observations were not discernible using single night polysomnography, highlighting the relevance of multi-night measurements to assess characteristics indicative for insomnia.

Estimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveys

Accurate measurement of habitual sleep duration (HSD) is crucial for understanding the relationship between sleep and health. This study aimed to assess the bias and agreement limits between two commonly used short HSD self-report methods, considering sleep quality (SQ) and social jetlag (SJL) as potential predictors of bias. Data from 10,268 participants in the International COVID Sleep Study-II (ICOSS-II) were used. Method-Self and Method-MCTQ were compared. Method-Self involved a single question about average nightly sleep duration (HSDself), while Method-MCTQ estimated HSD from reported sleep times on workdays (HSDMCTQwork) and free days (HSDMCTQfree). Sleep quality was evaluated using a Likert scale and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to explore its influence on estimation bias. HSDself was on average 42.41 ± 67.42 min lower than HSDMCTQweek, with an agreement range within ± 133 min. The bias and agreement range between methods increased with poorer SQ. HSDMCTQwork showed less bias and better agreement with HSDself compared to HSDMCTQfree. Sleep duration irregularity was - 43.35 ± 78.26 min on average. Subjective sleep quality predicted a significant proportion of variance in HSDself and estimation bias. The two methods showed very poor agreement and a significant systematic bias, both worsening with poorer SQ. Method-MCTQ considered sleep intervals without adjusting for SQ issues such as wakefulness after sleep onset but accounted for sleep irregularity and sleeping in on free days, while Method-Self reflected respondents' interpretation of their sleep, focusing on their sleep on workdays. Including an SQ-related question in surveys may help bidirectionally adjust the possible bias and enhance the accuracy of sleep-health studies.

Reconsidering sleep perception in insomnia: from misperception to mismeasurement

So-called 'sleep misperception' refers to a phenomenon in which individuals have the impression of sleeping little or not at all despite normal objective measures of sleep. It is unknown whether this subjective-objective mismatch truly reflects an abnormal perception of sleep, or whether it results from the inability of standard sleep recording techniques to capture 'wake-like' brain activity patterns that could account for feeling awake during sleep. Here, we systematically reviewed studies reporting sleep macro- and microstructural, metabolic, and mental correlates of sleep (mis)perception. Our findings suggest that most individuals tend to accurately estimate their sleep duration measured with polysomnography (PSG). In good sleepers, feeling awake during sleep is the rule at sleep onset, remains frequent in the first non-rapid eye movement sleep cycle and almost never occurs in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. In contrast, there are patients with insomnia who consistently underestimate their sleep duration, regardless of how long they sleep. Unlike good sleepers, they continue to feel awake after the first sleep cycle and importantly, during REM sleep. Their mental activity during sleep is also more thought-like. Initial studies based on standard PSG parameters largely failed to show consistent differences in sleep macrostructure between these patients and controls. However, recent studies assessing sleep with more refined techniques have revealed that these patients show metabolic and microstructural electroencephalography changes that likely reflect a shift towards greater cortical activation during sleep and correlate with feeling awake. We discuss the significance of these correlates and conclude with open questions and possible ways to address them.

Predicting the Risk of Sleep Disorders Using a Machine Learning-Based Simple Questionnaire: Development and Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Sleep disorders, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA), and insomnia are common and can have serious health consequences. However, accurately diagnosing these conditions can be challenging as a result of the underrecognition of these diseases, the time-intensive nature of sleep monitoring necessary for a proper diagnosis, and patients' hesitancy to undergo demanding and costly overnight polysomnography tests.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to develop a machine learning algorithm that can accurately predict the risk of OSA, COMISA, and insomnia with a simple set of questions, without the need for a polysomnography test.

METHODS

We applied extreme gradient boosting to the data from 2 medical centers (n=4257 from Samsung Medical Center and n=365 from Ewha Womans University Medical Center Seoul Hospital). Features were selected based on feature importance calculated by the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. We applied extreme gradient boosting using selected features to develop a simple questionnaire predicting sleep disorders (SLEEPS). The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve.

RESULTS

In total, 9 features were selected to construct SLEEPS. SLEEPS showed high accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of greater than 0.897 for all 3 sleep disorders, and consistent performance across both sets of data. We found that the distinction between COMISA and OSA was critical for accurate prediction. A publicly accessible website was created based on the algorithm that provides predictions for the risk of the 3 sleep disorders and shows how the risk changes with changes in weight or age.

CONCLUSIONS

SLEEPS has the potential to improve the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders by providing more accessibility and convenience. The creation of a publicly accessible website based on the algorithm provides a user-friendly tool for assessing the risk of OSA, COMISA, and insomnia.

Sleep structure in patients with COMISA compared to OSA and insomnia

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia frequently co-occur, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. We investigated differences in sleep structure between patients with OSA, insomnia, and comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) to identify characteristics that can be used to improve the diagnosis of COMISA.

METHODS

We obtained polysomnography data of 326 patients from the Sleep and OSA Monitoring with Non-Invasive Applications database. The group included patients with OSA (n = 199), insomnia (n = 47), and COMISA (n = 80). We compared statistics related to sleep structure between the 3 patient groups.

RESULTS

Wake after sleep onset was significantly shorter for the OSA group (median: 60.0 minutes) compared to the COMISA (median: 83.3 minutes, P < .01) and the insomnia (median: 83.5 minutes, P = .01) groups. No significant differences were found in the total number of awakenings and the number of short (up to and including 2 minutes) and medium-length awakenings (2.5 up to and including 4.5 minutes). However, the number of long awakenings (5 minutes or longer) and wake after sleep onset containing only long awakenings was significantly lower for patients with OSA (median: 2 awakenings and 25.5 minutes) compared to patients with COMISA (median: 3 awakenings, P < .01 and 43.3 minutes, P < .001) or with insomnia (median: 3 awakenings, P < .01 and 56.0 minutes, P < .001). Total sleep time was significantly longer and sleep efficiency was significantly higher for the OSA group (median: 418.5 minutes and 84.4%) compared to both the COMISA (median: 391.5 minutes, P < .001 and 77.3%, P < .001) and the insomnia (median: 381.5 minutes, P < .001 and 78.2%, P < .001) groups. The number of sleep-stage transitions during the night for patients with COMISA (median: 194.0) was lower compared to that for patients with OSA (median: 218.0, P < .01) and higher compared to that for patients with insomnia (median: 156.0, P < .001). Other sleep architectural parameters were not discriminative between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with COMISA show specific characteristics of insomnia, including prolonged awakenings. This variable is distinctive in comparison to patients with OSA. The combination of prolonged awakenings and the presence of sleep-disordered breathing leads to increased sleep disturbance compared to patients having only 1 of the sleep disorders.

CITATION

Wulterkens BM, Hermans LWA, Fonseca P, et al. Sleep structure in patients with COMISA compared to OSA and insomnia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(6):1051-1059.

Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Sleep State Misperception in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on sleep misperception in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Sleep state perception was measured by subtracting the objective total sleep time from the subjective sleep duration. Sleep underestimation and overestimation were defined as ± 60 minutes sleep perception. Insomnia and depressive symptoms were assessed using questionnaires. Finally, nonparametric statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 339 patients with OSA included in the study, 90 (26.5%) and 45 (13.3%) showed sleep underestimation and overestimation, respectively. Overall, a significant underestimation of sleep was noted during CPAP titration comparing to a diagnostic PSG (P < 0.001). OSA patients with insomnia or depressive symptoms did not show any changes in sleep perception between diagnostic and CPAP titration studies, whereas those without insomnia or depressed mood showed significantly underestimated sleep duration during CPAP titration. Patients with OSA and either underestimated or overestimated misperception showed perceptual improvements during CPAP titration regardless of the presence of insomnia or depressive symptoms. However, of 204 patients with normal sleep perception, 138 (67.6%) and 10 (4.9%) had underestimation and overestimation of sleep during CPAP titration.

CONCLUSION

CPAP titration may improve sleep perception with moderate to severe OSA who have sleep misperception. However, CPAP titration may result in sleep misperception especially underestimation of sleep in those who have normal sleep perception.

Bidirectional Relationship Between Sleep Disturbances and Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease (AD). Both diseases share common clinical and pathological features: the gradual progression of neurological and psychiatric symptoms caused by neuronal dysfunction and neuronal cell death due to the accumulation of misfolded and neurotoxic proteins. Furthermore, both of them are multifactorial diseases in which both genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to the disease course. Non-genetic factors are of particular interest for the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches for these diseases because they are modifiable; of these, sleep is a particularly intriguing factor. Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent among both patients with AD and PD. To date, research has suggested that sleep disturbances are a consequence as well as a risk factor for the onset and progression of AD, which implies a bidirectional relationship between sleep and AD. Whether such a relationship exists in PD is less certain, albeit highly plausible given the shared pathomechanisms. This review examines the current evidence for the bidirectional relationship between sleep and PD. It includes research in both humans and animal models, followed by a discussion of the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Finally, potential avenues of research toward achieving disease modification to treat or prevent PD are proposed. Although further efforts are crucial for preventing the onset and slowing the progress of PD, it is evident that sleep is a valuable candidate target for future interventions to improve the outcomes of PD patients.

Polysomnographic Characteristics of the Patients Having Chronic Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Evidence for Paradoxical Insomnia and Comorbid Insomnia with OSA (COMISA)

Background

Sleep state misperception (SSM) is seen among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as well as those having insomnia. Moreover, OSA and insomnia can also be comorbid. This study aims at finding the proportion of SSM and "Comorbid Insomnia with OSA" (COMISA) among patients of OSA and chronic insomnia. Macroachitecture of sleep was also compared across groups.

Methods

This study utilized the retrospective laboratory and medical records of two groups of patients: chronic insomnia and OSA. Sleep disorders were diagnosed according to standard criteria. Daytime sleepiness was examined using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Diagnosis of SSM was based on the difference between subjective and objective sleep onset latency (Subjective SOL > 1.5 × Objective SOL).

Results

Sixteen adult subjects were included in each group. Based on the difference between subjective and objective sleep onset latency, SSM was reported by 62.5% subjects of chronic insomnia and 56.25% subjects having OSA (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.31-5.33; P = 0.79). The proportion of COMISA in subjects with chronic insomnia was 18% and among subjects with OSA, it was 43%. Effect size for the proportion was calculated as odds ratio (33.96; 95% CI = 7.48-154.01; P < 0.0002). Thus, the odds for COMISA were higher among subjects with OSA than those with chronic Insomnia. The three groups (OSA, COMISA and Chronic Insomnia) were comparable with regard to the macro-architecture of sleep.

Conclusion

SSM is common among subjects with OSA and chronic insomnia. COMISA was commoner among patients with OSA compared to those with chronic insomnia. Macro-architecture of sleep is comparable among groups.

Sleep Misperception and Associated Factors in Patients With Anxiety-Related Disorders and Complaint of Insomnia: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Data on sleep parameters by polysomnography (PSG) in patients with anxiety-related disorders are limited. Although the disturbance and risk factors of sleep misperception have been implicated in psychopathology, its role in anxiety-related disorders remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to explore the characteristics and sleep parameters in patients with anxiety-related disorders and different sleep perception types, and to explore the associated factors for sleep misperception.

Methods

Patients with anxiety-related disorders who had complaint of insomnia for more than 3 months were collected at Wuhan Mental Health Center between December 2019 and July 2021. Patients underwent a two-night PSG monitoring and completed a self-reported sleep questionnaire. Behaviors were assessed using 30-item Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE-30). Patients were divided into normal sleep perception (NSP), positive sleep perception abnormality [PSPA; overestimation of total sleep time (TST) >60 min], and negative sleep perception abnormality (NSPA; underestimation of TST >60 min) groups. PSG indicators and NOSIE-30 scores were compared among groups using the one-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the associated factors for misperception index.

Results

The subjective and objective TST were 5.5 ± 1.9 h and 6.4 ± 1.7 h in 305 patients, respectively. Sixty-nine (22.6%) had PSPA, 80 (26.2%) had NSP, and 156 (51.1%) had NSPA. Subjective TST and objective sleep parameters were significantly different among groups. No statistical differences in NOSIE-30 subscale and total scores were observed among groups. Sex, rapid eye movement (REM)/TST (%), sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, Non-rapid eye movement of stage 2 sleep (NREM)/TST (%), REM spontaneous arousal times, sleep latency, diagnosis, social competence, and manifest psychosis were associated with sleep misperception.

Conclusion

Sleep misperception is common in patients with anxiety-related disorders. Various sleep perception types have different PSG profiles, but similar personal and social behaviors. These data may be helpful to conduct personalized treatment.

Associations of actigraphy derived rest activity patterns and circadian phase with clinical symptoms and polysomnographic parameters in chronic insomnia disorders

We explored the associations of actigraphy-derived rest-activity patterns and circadian phase parameters with clinical symptoms and level 1 polysomnography (PSG) results in patients with chronic insomnia to evaluate the clinical implications of actigraphy-derived parameters for PSG interpretation. Seventy-five participants underwent actigraphy assessments and level 1 PSG. Exploratory correlation analyses between parameters derived from actigraphy, PSG, and clinical assessments were performed. First, participants were classified into two groups based on rest-activity pattern variables; group differences were investigated following covariate adjustment. Participants with poorer rest-activity patterns on actigraphy (low inter-day stability and high intra-daily variability) exhibited higher insomnia severity index scores than participants with better rest-activity patterns. No between-group differences in PSG parameters were observed. Second, participants were classified into two groups based on circadian phase variables. Late-phase participants (least active 5-h and most active 10-h onset times) exhibited higher insomnia severity scores, longer sleep and rapid eye movement latency, and lower apnea-hypopnea index than early-phase participants. These associations remained significant even after adjusting for potential covariates. Some actigraphy-derived rest-activity patterns and circadian phase parameters were significantly associated with clinical symptoms and PSG results, suggesting their possible adjunctive role in deriving plans for PSG lights-off time and assessing the possible insomnia pathophysiology.

The Effect of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) on Subjective–Objective Sleep Discrepancy in Individuals with Co-Morbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnoea: A Randomised Controlled Trial

People with insomnia frequently underestimate the duration of their sleep compared to objective polysomnography-measured sleep duration. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the most effective treatment for insomnia and also reduces the degree of sleep underestimation. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent sleep disorder characterised by frequent narrowing (hypopnoea) and closure (apnoea) of the upper airway during sleep. Comorbid insomnia and sleep apnoea (COMISA) is a prevalent and debilitating disorder. No study has investigated subjectively (sleep diary) versus objectively (polysomnography) measured sleep discrepancies (SOSD) in individuals with COMISA before or following CBT-I. This randomised waitlist-controlled trial investigated SOSD in 145 participants with COMISA before and 6-weeks after CBT-I (n = 72) versus control (n = 73). All participants were studied prior to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for sleep apnoea. At baseline, participants underestimated their total sleep time (mean ± SD −51.9 ± 94.1 min) and sleep efficiency (−9.6 ± 18.3%), and overestimated sleep onset latency (34.5 ± 86.1 min; all p = < 0.001). Mixed models indicated a main effect of time on reduction of SOSD in both groups, but no between-group difference in the reduction of any SOSD parameters. These findings may indicate that untreated OSA contributes to a discrepancy between perceived and objective sleep parameters in people with COMISA that is not amenable to CBT-I alone (ACTRN12613001178730).

Sleep EEG characteristics associated with total sleep time misperception in young adults: an exploratory study

Background

Power spectral analysis (PSA) is one of the most commonly-used EEG markers of cortical hyperarousal, and can help to understand subjective–objective sleep discrepancy (SOD). Age is associated with decreased sleep EEG activity; however, the PSA of young adults is currently limited. Thus, this study aimed to examine the correlation of spectral EEG power with total sleep time (TST) misperception in young patients.

Methods

Forty-seven young adults were recruited and underwent a polysomnography recording in a sleep laboratory. Clinical records and self-report questionnaires of all patients were collected, and were used to categorize patients into a good sleeper (GS) group (n = 10), insomnia with a low mismatch group (IWLM, n = 19) or participant with a high mismatch group (IWHM, n = 18). PSA was applied to the first 6 h of sleep.

Results

IWHM patients exhibited a higher absolute power and relative beta/delta ratio in the frontal region compared to the GS group. No significant difference was observed between the IWLM and GS groups. No significant difference in the above parameters was observed between the IWHM and IWLM groups. Moreover, The SOD of TST was positively correlated with frontal absolute power and the relative beta/delta ratio (r = 0.363, P = 0.012; r = 0.363, P = 0.012), and absolute beta EEG spectral power (r = 0.313, P = 0.032) as well as the number of arousals.

Conclusions

Increased frontal beta/delta ratio EEG power was found in young patients with a high mismatch but not in those with a low mismatch, compared with good sleepers. This suggests that there exists increased cortical activity in IWHM patients. In addition, the frontal beta/delta ratio and the number of arousals was positively correlated with the SOD of TST.

Factors associated with sleep state misperception in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

Little is known regarding the prevalence of sleep state misperception and the factors related to this in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with OSA defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥ 5 and used the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Epworth sleepiness scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Underestimation and overestimation of sleep state perception were defined as < 80% and > 120%, respectively, of the ratio between subjective and objective total sleep time. An ISI score > 14 indicated clinically significant insomnia and an AHI ≥ 30 indicated severe OSA. A multinomial logistic regression was conducted with the category of sleep state perception as an outcome variable.

RESULTS

Of the 707 patients with OSA, underestimation and overestimation of sleep state perception were noted in 22.5% and 10.6% of subjects, respectively. The median absolute differences (and percentages of the ratio) between subjective and objective total sleep time were 116 min (66.9%) and 87 min (127.3%) in the underestimated and overestimated perception groups, respectively. In the adjusted model, the underestimated group was more likely to have an ISI score > 14 (OR = 1.812, P = .006). The overestimated group was more likely to be older (OR = 1.025, P = .025) and has severe OSA (OR = 1.729, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

There are two patterns of sleep state misperception in patients with OSA: underestimation associated with comorbid insomnia symptoms and overestimation associated with severe OSA. These findings enhance understanding of the pathophysiology of sleep state misperception in patients with OSA.

Approach to Common Sleep Disorders

Sleep disorders are highly relevant in clinical practice given their prevalence as well as their impact on health outcomes and quality of life. The most common concerns are excessive daytime sleepiness, insomnia, disordered breathing, and abnormal movements or behaviors during sleep. A detailed but targeted history is vital, particularly from the sleep partner/witness. In-laboratory sleep testing (polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test) remains vital in the diagnosis of certain sleep disorders (such as sleep-disordered breathing and central hypersomnia) and in specific populations (such as in children and individuals with comorbid medical disorders). Advances in technology have allowed for a variety of methods in assessing a patient's sleep, from compact devices to evaluate for sleep apnea, wrist actigraphy, and mobile device-based applications. As the pathophysiology of various sleep disorders becomes better elucidated, disease-specific medications have been developed for these conditions. Nonetheless, a multidisciplinary approach to management is necessary, including improving sleep hygiene and cognitive behavioral therapy.

Profile of subjective-objective sleep discrepancy in patients with insomnia and sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Although subjective-objective sleep discrepancy has long been observed in patients with insomnia, the profiles of this discrepancy are poorly understood. Further, sleep discrepancy in insomnia with sleep comorbidities remains underexplored. We sought to better characterize sleep discrepancy among patient groups with and without insomnia and comorbid conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Using data from the Sleep Heart Health Study, we conducted a secondary analysis describing (1) the profile of self-reported and objective sleep measures in patients with insomnia (IS group; n = 73) and comorbid OSA (IS + OSA group; n = 143), compared with individuals with OSA only (OSA group; n = 296) and normal sleep control patients (NSC group; n = 126); (2) the comparative magnitude of sleep misperception between these 4 groups; and (3) the self-reported quality of life (QOL) in the 4 groups.

RESULTS

Subjective-objective sleep discrepancy existed in all 4 groups, including the NSC group. Controlling for age, sex, mental health conditions, sleep apnea severity, and objectively measured sleep time, the presence of self-reported insomnia had the strongest association with sleep discrepancy. In patients with insomnia, sleep onset latency was overestimated (7.8 ± 36.8 min in the IS group; P < .001 when compared to the NSC and OSA groups), with the largest differences seen in the comorbid IS + OSA group (15.0 ± 56.8 min). Insomnia conferred the most negative impact on QOL, with the combined IS + OSA group reporting the lowest QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported insomnia is associated with sleep discrepancy and negative QOL. Those with comorbid OSA reported the greatest sleep discrepancy and the lowest QOL. Future research is warranted to further understand individual profiles of misperception and insomnia phenotypes.

CITATION

Ma Y, Goldstein MR, Davis RB, Yeh GY. Profile of subjective-objective sleep discrepancy in patients with insomnia and sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(11):2155-2163.

Gender-related sleep duration perception in a Brazilian sleep clinic cohort

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate if gender influences the sleep duration perception in adults referred for polysomnography (PSG).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken from December 2019 to January 2021. Total sleep time was objectively assessed from the overnight PSG and subjectively estimated. The sleep perception index (SPI) was defined by the ratio of subjective and objective values. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was based on an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5.0/h. Insomnia was defined by the presence of one or more specific complaints: difficulty falling asleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, and/or waking up earlier than desired. The association between continuous variables and SPI was assessed by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 2,004 outpatients (56% men) who were grouped into four subsamples: controls (n = 139), insomnia (n = 154), OSA (n = 912), and insomnia comorbid with OSA [COMISA] (n = 799). In women, the median SPI differed among groups and ranged from 89 to 102% (p = 0.001); while in men, it ranged from 90% to 99% (p = 0.007). However, no gender-related SPI value differences emerged within each of the subgroups: controls (p = 0.907), insomnia (p = 0.830), OSA (p = 0.070), and COMISA (p = 0.547). The presence of insomnia (β, - 0.101, p < 0.001) or OSA (β, - 0.082, p = 0.001), but not gender (β, - 0.017, p = 0.612), were independent predictors of the SPI.

CONCLUSION

In a clinical referral cohort, no evidence of sex dimorphism emerged for SPI irrespective of the underlying sleep diagnosis.

Sleep state misperception: is there a CNS structural source?

Introduction

We describe a case of sleep state misperception in a patient with a neurotoxoplasmosis lesion in the left nucleocapsular region.

Case report

A 40-year-old female patient presented relating sleeplessness over the past 2 years, concurrent with progressive headaches, dizziness and motor and sensory deficits in the right upper and lower limbs. She had a history of AIDS, on irregular antiretroviral therapy and neurotoxoplasmosis. A polysomnography confirmed the hypothesis of sleep state misperception, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a residual lesion in the left nucleocapsular region.

Conclusion

Different models consider that the sleep state misperception could be correlated to structural abnormalities of the central nervous system. A recent study showed that the medial prefrontal cortex had a lower activation in patients with unrefreshing sleep due to chronic fatigue syndrome. This case report highlights the possibility of sleep state misperception having - at least partially - an anatomical substrate in the left nucleocapsular region.

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Polysomnography Indicators of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Patients Based on Sleep Perception Types

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics of different sleep perception types of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients and to analyze the correlation between sleep perception and polysomnography (PSG) indicators in OSAHS patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 355 patients diagnosed with OSAHS by PSG at the Sleep Medicine Center of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. Patients saw a doctor due to snoring and daytime sleepiness from March 2017 to March 2018. We excluded the patients who are <18 years old, had a history of OSAHS treatment, had other sleep and psychiatric disorders, and could not provide complete data. According to the patients' explanation, medical history, PSG indicators, and morning questionnaire after PSG, the patients were divided into normal sleep perception (NSP), positive sleep perception abnormality (PSPA), and negative sleep perception abnormality (NSPA). We analyze the demographic characteristics and PSG of the three groups with ANOVA and non-parametric tests. In addition, we conducted correlation analysis between sleep perception and PSG indicators. Results: Of OSAHS patient, 55.5% had sleep perception abnormalities, of which 35.5% were positive-perception abnormalities and 20% were negative-perception abnormalities. From the analysis of PSG indicators, the sleep perception abnormality was related to the frequency of spontaneous arousal of the patient (P = 0.003) and was not related to the slight arousal caused by respiratory events, oxygen desaturations, and limb movement events. OSAHS patients with PSPA had a higher oxygen desaturation index (P = 0.046) but no significant difference in post hoc test. PSPA group had significantly lower rapid eye movement (REM) latency and sleep efficiency and more wake after sleep onset (WASO) than had the other sleep perception groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses after adjusting for age and sex revealed that sleep perception was related to lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2), TS90%, sleep efficiency, and WASO. Conclusion: Sleep perception abnormality is common in OSAHS patients. OSAHS patients with different sleep perception types have different PSG profiles. The OSAHS patients with PSPA have more severe hypoxia levels at night that require timely personalized treatment.

Perception of sleep duration in adult patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

Discrepancies between subjective and objective measures of total sleep time (TST) are frequent among insomnia patients, but this issue remains scarcely investigated in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed to evaluate if sleep perception is affected by the severity of OSA.

METHODS

We performed a 3-month cross-sectional study of Brazilian adults undergoing overnight polysomnography (PSG). TST was objectively assessed from PSG and by a self-reported questionnaire (subjective measurement). Sleep perception index (SPI) was defined by the ratio of subjective and objective values. Diagnosis of OSA was based on an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5.0/h, being its severity classified according to AHI thresholds: 5.0-14.9/h (mild OSA), 15.0-29.9/h (moderate OSA), and ≥ 30.0/h (severe OSA).

RESULTS

Overall, 727 patients were included (58.0% males). A significant difference was found in SPI between non-OSA and OSA groups (p = 0.014). Mean SPI values significantly decreased as the OSA severity increased: without OSA (100.1 ± 40.9%), mild OSA (95.1 ± 24.6%), moderate OSA (93.5 ± 25.2%), and severe OSA (90.6 ± 28.2%), p = 0.036. Using logistic regression, increasing SPI was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of presenting any OSA (p = 0.018), moderate/severe OSA (p = 0.019), and severe OSA (p = 0.028). However, insomnia was not considered as an independent variable for the presence of any OSA, moderate/severe OSA, and severe OSA (all p-values > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In a clinical referral cohort, SPI significantly decreases with increasing OSA severity, but is not modified by the presence of insomnia symptoms.

The paradox of paradoxical insomnia: A theoretical review towards a unifying evidence-based definition

Paradoxical insomnia is one of the most intriguing yet challenging subtypes of insomnia. Despite being recognized for a long time by the international community, it is still unclear whether this entity really exists, which are its features and boundaries. Much of the debate is fuelled by the lack of a consensus on its precise definition. To help filling some of the existing gaps, a systematic review of the literature was conducted, through which 19 different quantitative definitions were obtained. These definitions were then applied to two distinct datasets. The first consisted of 200 chronic primary insomnia patients, diagnosed according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. The second consisted of 200 age- and sex-matched healthy persons without insomnia. For each dataset, available data from the objective sleep parameters and their subjective estimation were imported and analysed in MATLAB. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of paradoxical insomnia ranged from 8 to 66%, while agreement between different definitions ranged from -0.19 to 0.9 (using Cohen's kappa coefficient). Based on the results garnered, necessary features for a quantitative definition of paradoxical insomnia were identified. Several open questions remain, such as whether there is a minimum number of hours a patient should sleep to fulfill the criteria for a diagnosis of paradoxical insomnia, and whether sleep latency can be used in the definition along with total sleep time. We conclude by advocating continued study of paradoxical insomnia and sleep state misperception and by providing specific directions for future research. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The current understanding of paradoxical insomnia and, more broadly, of sleep state misperception, is greatly hampered by the lack of agreement on a quantitative and evidence-base measure of the discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep evaluation. The current study provides a critical analysis about the strength and the limitations of the available definitions, using both a data-driven and a theory-driven approach. The overarching goal is to motivate a rigorous discussion involving the main experts of the field, to build a consensus, and develop an evidence-based measure of sleep state misperception and/or of paradoxical insomnia.

Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?

OBJECTIVE

To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea.

RESULTS

The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients' perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients.

CONCLUSION

Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients.

Discordant sleep parameters among actigraphy, polysomnography, and perceived sleep in patients with sleep-disordered breathing in comparison with patients with chronic insomnia disorder

PURPOSE

Although the clinical usefulness of actigraphy (ACT) in chronic insomnia disorder (CID) is extensively investigated, the evaluation on the utility of ACT in sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is limited and the report of comparison with perceived sleep by patients and polysomnography (PSG) is scarce.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with SDB and 30 with CID underwent PSG and ACT, and they reported perceived sleep time and latency simultaneously. Sleep parameters (total sleep time [TST], sleep onset latency [SOL], sleep efficiency, and wakefulness after sleep onset [WASO]) were compared. Agreement among parameters was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

ACT overestimated TST and underestimated SOL and WASO relative to PSG in both groups. Perceived sleep was commonly undervalued relative to PSG or ACT. In post hoc analyses, perceived sleep was significantly shorter and SOL significantly longer compared to PSG and ACT in both groups. Perception of sleep time by PSG was significantly higher than perception by ACT. In the CID group, all sleep parameters were significantly correlated between ACT and PSG (ICC = 0.627-0.813). In the SDB group, only TST was significantly correlated (ICC = 0.804).

CONCLUSION

ACT is useful to monitor sleep and sleep quality in patients with CID. In patients with SDB, TST by ACT is reliable. However, ACT is insufficient to assess sleep quality due to its low agreement with PSG. Significantly lower sleep perception relative to PSG and ACT should be considered in the treatment of sleep disorders.