Exploring Multiple Perspectives on Pharmacy Students' Readiness for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences

Assessment of Patient Care Activities and Readiness for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences in Revised Third-Year Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of a revised third-year (P3) introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) curriculum on student opportunities for direct patient care and to evaluate student and preceptor perceptions of advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) readiness.

METHODS

An intentional, structured curriculum redesign shifted 50 IPPE hours from each the 1st- and 2nd-years into the P3 year. A survey was developed and administered to students in the graduating classes of 2023 (original curriculum) and 2024 (revised curriculum) at the end of their first APPE rotation. The survey quantified the frequency of patient care activities completed during P3 IPPEs and assessed student perceptions of the effectiveness of P3 IPPEs in preparation for APPEs. At the conclusion of the first APPE, preceptors answered a single question assessing student APPE readiness.

RESULTS

A total of 213/226 (94%) students responded to the optional survey. A significantly higher proportion of students in the 2024 cohort had the opportunity to complete several direct patient care activities compared to the 2023 cohort in community, institutional, and elective IPPEs. Additionally, the 2024 cohort was provided with greater access to the electronic health record (EHR). Although the 2024 cohort had higher perceived APPE readiness in areas of navigating the EHR and administering vaccines, student- and preceptor-perceived overall APPE readiness was similar between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Transferring more IPPE hours into the last didactic year can increase student opportunities for direct patient care while promoting APPE readiness. Activity quantification could be used by other pharmacy programs to optimize IPPEs.

You'll have to call the attending: Impact of a longitudinal, "real-time" case-based infectious diseases elective on entrustable professional activities to enhance APPE readiness

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Transitioning from the didactic to experiential setting is challenging for student pharmacists, perhaps due to lack of experiences providing "real-time" clinician interaction. We describe findings from a semester-long infectious diseases (ID) didactic elective that utilized a national cohort of preceptors and faculty across the United States to mimic clinician interaction and "real-time" ID management of various disease states. The mechanics of this elective provide a framework for others to implement to enhance advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) readiness.

EDUCATION ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Students enrolled in an ID elective course at a school of pharmacy participated in "real-time" acute care scenarios. They assisted in multidisciplinary management of a patient's infection, mimicking "rounds" on an APPE, via interaction with external pharmacist volunteers (playing the roles of other healthcare personnel). Additionally, students formally presented and discussed their cases within the class, further promoting learning while optimizing presentation skills. Pharmacist volunteers were surveyed to assess student performances as measured by four entrustable professional activities (EPAs).

FINDINGS

A total of 48 volunteer opportunities occurred during two course offerings. Results from 43 surveys were analyzed (90% response rate). Of those responses, 22/24 (92%) played the role of attending physician, and 19/24 (79%) played the role of technician. Volunteers agreed that students met the four EPAs evaluated (agreement was 85-100%).

SUMMARY

This semester-long elective provided "real-time" experience and feedback for pre-APPE students to enhance APPE readiness and reinforce EPAs. Students are likely to benefit from mimicked intra-professional interaction and augmented critical thinking skills that could be adapted to various disease states within pharmacy curricula.

A scoping review of advanced pharmacy practice experience readiness assessment measures across schools of pharmacy

BACKGROUND

The development and implementation of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness assessments has been an area of increased interest to the academy since the publication of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards in 2016. This scoping literature review aims to provide an updated summary of current APPE readiness assessment practices among ACPE-accredited institutions in the United States (US).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted between 2022 and 2024 using the terms "APPE student readiness," "APPE readiness assessment," "APPE preparedness," "APPE student preparedness," "pharmacy" AND "readiness assessment", "pharmacy" AND "practice readiness," and "pharmacy" AND "student practice readiness" in Pubmed and Embase. The websites for the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning were also searched using these terms. Abstracts for all results were reviewed. Abstract only and poster presentations were excluded, as well as articles centered on non-US and/or non-ACPE-accredited institutions. Data was collected regarding the outcomes assessed, type of assessment activity, and how the assessment was implemented. Results were reviewed by a second author to ensure consistency in reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 289 unique abstracts were reviewed by author pairs for inclusion based on relevance to the review objectives. A total of 13 articles were included in the final analysis. Each institution measured different knowledge areas, abilities, and entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Most programs had a summative component, with APPE readiness being primarily assessed in the final didactic year of the pharmacy curriculum. Most programs report at least one source of validity.

IMPLICATIONS

Given the lack of specific APPE readiness assessment requirements in the ACPE Standards 2016, the different assessment methods among programs were not surprising. However, the commonalities identified can be leveraged with the release of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) 2022 to promote a standardized definition of APPE readiness. Future research should focus on formative assessment methods embedded throughout the didactic curriculum to identify "at-risk" students prior to a "high-stakes" summative assessment at the end of the didactic curriculum that impedes student progression to the APPE year.

Pharmacy faculty experiences with student academic entitlement: a multinational study from the Arab world

Academic Entitlement (AE) is the expectation by students to receive high grades or preferential treatment without significant effort. Exploring AE from faculty perspective has not been investigated in Arab colleges of pharmacy. The aim of this study was to explore experiences and perceptions towards student AE among pharmacy faculty in the Arab World. A cross-sectional, self-administered, anonymous, electronic survey was sent to pharmacy faculty across pharmacy colleges in Arab countries. The survey collected demographic data, an AE measure including 17 items reflecting seven AE components, and faculty perceptions and perceived reasons for AE. A total of 345 responses were collected. The AE level was moderate (46.05 ±7.29), and the highest scores among its components were for customer service expectation (62%) and responsibility avoidance (59%). In multiple linear regression, AE showed positive significant association with faculty in clinical pharmacy departments and those having fewer years of experience. Most common complaints heard by faculty from students were requests to turn in assignments late (90%), while the most common communication issues faculty faced with students were unprofessional verbal communication (58%) and unprofessional messages on social media (57%). Poor admission criteria (40%) and existence of multiple private colleges of pharmacy (37%) were the most common perceived reasons for AE by participating faculty. This study reveals moderate AE experienced by pharmacy faculty in the Arab World, as well as common complaints, communication issues, and AE reasons. In collaboration with other stakeholders, faculty play an important role in indicating expectations from students regarding AE, and research is warranted to check if such interventions reduce AE among pharmacy students.

Predictors of student preparedness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences

BACKGROUND

A capstone course often serves as the final checkpoint of student readiness before the commencement of experiential training. The purpose of this study was to determine if the assessment components from the capstone course can serve as predictors of student performance during their Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs).

METHODS

Student data was analyzed to observe the correlation between performance in the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA), student performance in the capstone course, and the overall grade point average (GPA) earned during APPEs. Spearman rank correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between the overall APPE GPA and students' capstone course grade, top drug competency exam score, pharmacy calculation competency exam score, and PCOA exam score. A significant regression equation was obtained during the analysis: (F(5, 97) = 5.62, p < 0.001), with an R2 = 0.225 (adjusted R2 = 0.185). In the linear regression model, capstone GPA emerged as a significant predictor (β = 0.155; p = 0.019) of APPE GPA amongst the tested variables. Additionally, students scoring < 73% on the top drug competency exam in the capstone course or less than the reference group in the PCOA exam were found to have significantly lower GPA during their APPEs compared to other students.

CONCLUSION

Performance on the top drug competency exam and the PCOA exam can serve as potential predictors of success during APPEs.

Navigating power dynamics between pharmacy preceptors and learners

Pharmacy preceptors are crucial in pharmacy experiential education. They help develop learners during didactic learning, experiential learning, and post-graduate training. Preceptors hold a position of authority over learners as they are responsible for providing feedback and ultimately completing evaluations that determine whether the student passes or does not pass the rotation. Preceptor status, behavior, and communication style may cause students to feel intimidated. Preceptors should be aware of this power differential and keep generational, gender, cultural, and other factors in mind when providing feedback. Preceptors should also receive training and be open to constructive feedback from learners to ensure the experience meets the needs of the learner and allow for adjustments on the experiential rotation. Students should be empowered to provide open and honest feedback to preceptors in a psychologically safe environment without fear of repercussions.

Validation of Longitudinal Progression Examinations for Prediction of APPE Readiness

OBJECTIVE

To study curricular outcomes for the purpose of holistic improvement of the curriculum.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study evaluated 3 cohorts of Doctor of Pharmacy students entering the program through performance in Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) rotations. Assessment scores and pass/fail outcomes were collected from the 3 examinations to use as predictors, and the numbers of "needs improvement" (NI) and "unsatisfactory" (U) ratings from preceptors during the APPE rotations served as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Pharmacy mathematics competency and Milemarker 1 (MM1) examination first-time scores, but not those from Milemarker 2 (MM2), were significantly associated with NI or U scores on required APPE rotations. Significant correlations for all examinations (pharmacy mathematics competency, MM1, and MM2) were found for the Acute Care/Inpatient APPE rotation for each cohort and the combined cohorts. Significant correlations were also found between all examinations and the APPE rotation courses Advanced Hospital and Ambulatory Care, with the exception of the 2021 cohort. Performance in the Advanced Community rotation was not associated with any of the examinations. MM1 and MM2 are both reliable measures of competence in our didactic curriculum and predictive of scoring an NI or U rating in the APPE Acute Care/Inpatient rotation.

CONCLUSION

The longitudinal milestone examinations used in our institution provide a mechanism to identify students likely to struggle in required APPE rotations and target them for remediation activities.

Determining preceptor perceptions of APPE readiness through the use of entrustable professional activities

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacy programs are required to demonstrate that students are advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) ready, but neither a professionally recognized definition of nor a consistent approach to assess APPE readiness exists.

METHODS

APPE preceptors were surveyed about the relationship of EPAs to APPE readiness in three domains, including: (1) each EPA's relative importance, (2) indicators that a student is not ready to begin APPEs, and (3) each EPA's expected level of entrustment on the first day of the first APPE. We determined consensus of EPA importance and expected level of entrustment by adapting previously published thresholds. We analyzed the association between preceptor or practice setting characteristics with ranking of EPA importance.

RESULTS

Of the 431 preceptors queried, 31% responded. Ten EPAs, primarily those reflecting the first three steps of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP), were identified as important with strong consensus. Ambulatory care preceptors placed higher importance on EPAs, primarily in the final steps of the PPCP and within the public health domain. Professionalism issues were most often cited as reasons for a lack of APPE readiness. There was considerable variability (weak or moderate consensus) in preceptors' expected level of entrustment per EPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy programs can consider prioritizing EPAs in the domains of patient care and information master when developing APPE readiness plans; professionalism should also be emphasized. Further work is needed to better understand what level of entrustment preceptors expect of an APPE ready student.

Implementation of a series of advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) preparatory topics into a skills lab curriculum

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) play a significant role in readying students for professional practice. Factors beyond traditional knowledge and skills taught in the didactic curriculum may play a role in APPE success. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe an activity implemented within a third-year skills lab focused on APPE preparedness, the methods used, and student feedback related to the series.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Experiential and skills lab faculty collaborated to generate advice for students regarding common misconceptions or areas of difficulty encountered on APPEs. The advice was developed into short topics that were paired with and presented at the start of most lab sessions with impromptu contributions from faculty and facilitators integrated at the time of delivery.

FINDINGS

One hundred twenty-seven third-year pharmacy students (54% of the cohort) consented to complete a follow-up survey and provided feedback on the series. Most students agreed or strongly agreed with the elements evaluated, providing positive feedback for all ranked statements. Feedback from free-text response questions indicated that many students found all topics presented to be beneficial and suggested that topics of interest for the upcoming semester included advice regarding residencies/fellowships/employment, wellness, and communication with preceptors.

SUMMARY

Student feedback indicated an overall perception of benefit and value from most respondents. Implementation of a similar series in other courses is a potential area for future study.

Exploring the Effect of Virtual Education on Student Pharmacists’ Confidence toward APPE Readiness

A drop in confidence in Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness was observed in students in the Class of 2022 prior to starting APPEs. We aim to investigate potential causes of students’ low confidence in APPE preparedness to provide solutions and to prevent this outcome with future students. We evaluated students’ perceived confidence to start APPEs and compared this to curricular changes, employment obligations, and the impact of COVID-19 on delivery of the pre-APPE and APPE curriculum. Students’ low confidence with APPE readiness was not indicative of the following factors: (1) delivery of the didactic curriculum, (2) students’ performance in the didactic curriculum, or (3) number of summative assessments in key didactic courses. Rather, the low confidence perception may have been due to differences such as a fully remote didactic experience in the P3 year, more virtual Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences (IPPEs), a reduced course load in the P3 spring semester, and changes to a pre-APPE preparatory course compared to other class years. The students’ self-reported midpoint scores during their first APPE block and preceptor’s evaluations on their performance contrasted their pre-APPE perceptions. Frequent in-person and on-site skills assessments throughout the didactic curriculum seem to reinforce confidence before APPEs.

Mapping Course Assessments to Canadian Pharmacy Educational Outcomes to Ensure Pharmacy Students' Practice Readiness

Objective. The entry-to-practice PharmD degree is designed to meet the Educational Outcomes of the Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada (AFPC). We set out to evaluate how assessment strategies in a "capstone" course align with AFPC educational outcomes, their respective key and enabling competencies, and whether enough assessments exist for students to demonstrate achievement of competencies prior to embarking on advanced pharmacy practice experiences.Methods. We mapped each assessment's objectives, content, and methods to the key and enabling competencies of each role of a pharmacist. The number of enabling competencies mapped represents the extent to which the assessment addressed the associated key competency and broader role. Deidentified student performance data were analyzed to identify achievement of competencies despite failed assessments.Results. Of the seven role descriptions, the roles care provider, communicator, and collaborator were the most comprehensively assessed. The roles leader-manager and health advocate were assessed to a limited extent. The role scholar was not covered to a great depth across assessments. The role professional was not represented in most assessments except for the final examination. Students with failed assessments generally had ample opportunity to demonstrate competencies through other assessments.Conclusion. Mapping assessments to AFPC educational outcomes is an essential step to demonstrate direct evidence that students have achieved the intended learning outcomes. Our map revealed that the assessments sufficiently overlapped with most AFPC educational outcomes with a few exceptions. It is important to create multiple opportunities within a course for students to demonstrate achievement of competencies to ensure practice readiness.