Faecal intestinal permeability and intestinal inflammatory markers in older adults with age-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previous findings to uncover potential faecal intestinal permeability and intestinal inflammatory markers in older adults. A comprehensive literature search led to the identification of ten eligible studies with findings of potential faecal intestinal permeability (zonulin and alpha-1-antitrypsin) and intestinal inflammatory markers [calprotectin, lactoferrin and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)]. Most of the cases (n > 2) [Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)] exhibited higher faecal alpha-1-antitrypsin, zonulin and calprotectin levels. The present meta-analysis confirmed significantly higher faecal alpha-1-antitrypsin in older persons with PD compared to non-PD [MD = 22.92 mg/dL; 95 % CI = 14.02-31.81, p < 0.00001; I2 = 0 % (p = 0.73)]. There was, however, no significant difference in faecal zonulin between PD and non-PD individuals [MD = 26.88 ng/mL; 95 % CI = -29.26-83.01, p = 0.35; I2 = 94 % (p < 0.0001)]. Meanwhile, faecal calprotectin was higher in older adults with GI symptoms, multiple system atrophy (MSA) or PD than the healthy controls [MD = 9.51 μg/g; 95 % CI = 0.07-18.95, p = 0.05; I2 = 84 % (p < 0.00001)]. Altogether, faecal calprotectin appears to be a potential intestinal inflammatory marker whereas previous findings on faecal alpha-1-antitrypsin as an intestinal permeability marker remain limited and require further validation.

Composite Assessment Using Intestinal Ultrasound and Calprotectin Is Accurate in Predicting Histological Activity in Ulcerative Colitis: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Beyond endoscopic remission, histological remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) is predictive of clinical outcomes. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) may offer a noninvasive surrogate marker for histological activity; however, there are limited data correlating validated ultrasound and histological indices.

AIM

Our aim was to determine the correlation of IUS activity in UC with a validated histological activity index.

METHODS

Twenty-nine prospective, paired, same-day IUS/endoscopy/histology/fecal calprotectin (FC) cases were included. Intestinal ultrasound activity was determined using the Milan Ultrasound Criteria, histological activity using the Nancy Histological Index, endoscopic activity using Mayo endoscopic subscore and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity, and clinical activity using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Score.

RESULTS

Histological activity demonstrated a significant linear association with overall IUS activity (coefficient 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.25; P = .011). Intestinal ultrasound activity was also significantly associated with endoscopic activity (0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49; P < 0.001), total Mayo score (0.31; 95% CI, 0.02-0.60; P = .036) but not FC (0.10; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.21; P = .064) or clinical disease activity (0.04; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.28; P = .768). A composite of IUS and FC showed the greatest association (1.31; 95% CI, 0.43-2.18; P = .003) and accurately predicted histological activity in 88% of cases (P = .007), with sensitivity of 88%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 95%, and negative predictive value 57%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intestinal ultrasound is an accurate noninvasive marker of histological disease activity in UC, the accuracy of which is further enhanced when used in composite with FC. This can reduce the need for colonoscopy in routine care by supporting accurate point-of-care decision-making in patients with UC.

Role of Fecal Calprotectin in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain with or without Diarrhea or Rectal Bleeding

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Abdominal pain is a frequent reason for admission to the Emergency Department. It may be a symptom of an underlying "organic" disease or a "functional" manifestation without an underlying anatomic or physiologic alteration. The evaluation of patients with abdominal pain is a challenge for the emergency physician and the selection of patients for second-level radiological examinations or endoscopic procedures is not always easy to perform. Faecal calprotectin could be a useful diagnostic marker to distinguish between "organic" or "functional" form and its determination could be helpful to select patients for further examinations in the context of an emergency setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an observational and retrospective study on 146 patients with abdominal pain and/or diarrhea (with or without rectal bleeding) admitted to the Emergency Department of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, who collected a fecal sample to evaluate fecal calprotectin. We evaluated and correlated the level of fecal calprotectin with the final diagnosis they received.

RESULTS

50/146 patients (34,24%) received a diagnosis of acute diverticulitis, in particular, 14/50 (28%) were complicated and 36/50 (72%) were uncomplicated; 4/146 (2,7%) were cholangitis, 32/146 (21,9%) were colitis, 6/146 (4,1%) gastritis, 42/146 (28,7%), Irritable bowel syndrome and 12/146 (8,2%) Inflammatory bowel disease. For the differential diagnosis between Irriable or inflammatory bowel diseses, our study showed a VPP and a VPN of 100% meanwhile for the differential diagnosis between Acute complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis, our study showed a VPP of 40% and a VPN of 84%.

CONCLUSION

In the emergency setting, faecal calprotectin could be a helpful marker to select patients with abdominal pain who need second-level radiological examinations or endoscopic procedures, guiding the emergency physician in the evaluation of such a complex and wideranging symptom.

Fecal Calprotectin and Organic Gastrointestinal Disease: A Systematic Review

This review aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of fecal calprotectin (FCP) for identifying organic gastrointestinal disease (OGID) in patients undergoing colonoscopy for gastrointestinal discomfort or active progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Studies published between January 2013 and December 2022 evaluating the clinical efficacy of FCP for differentiating OGID against functional gastrointestinal disease (FGID) were identified using PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Clinical diagnostic studies involving individuals with lower gastrointestinal symptoms; using FCP as a diagnostic biomarker either in primary, secondary, or tertiary healthcare centers conducted either prospectively or retrospectively using stool samples (index test), contrasting FCP with a reference test, such as colonoscopy, or endoscopy, and assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were reviewed. The included studies were subjected to the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for assessing the methodological quality by two independent authors. An initial literature search yielded 545 articles rendering 417 records after removing the duplicate records. After reading the abstracts and titles, 89 articles were eligible for full-text screening. The qualitative synthesis resulted in 20 articles. The efficient use of FCP for differentiating IBD from irritable bowel syndrome was investigated in 15 studies.Two of the included studies assessed the diagnostic ability of FCP to distinguish OGID from FGID, two studies utilized patients with ulcerative colitis, and one study involved patients with Crohn's disease. Overall study quality was high for 65% of studies,moderate for 25% of studies, and low for 10% of studies. The review outlined the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive FCP assessment for OGID in various clinical scenarios and in individuals of various ages. FCP is used as a tool for screening and monitoring in clinical practice for determining the need of further comprehensive investigations, thereby reducing the redundant use of invasive techniques.

Fecal Calprotectin in Gastrointestinal Disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprises a group of chronic conditions characterized by relapsing and remitting inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence is increasing worldwide, and the therapeutic options for management are expanding. Endoscopy is the gold standard investigation for diagnosis of IBD and for assessing mucosal healing, which is increasingly being used as a measure of disease control. However, it is an invasive procedure that is unpleasant for patients and expensive and time-consuming for hospitals. Fecal calprotectin has been shown to be an accurate surrogate marker of gastrointestinal inflammation in IBD.

CONTENT

Fecal calprotectin was initially used for the diagnosis of IBD but is now recognized as having a role in assisting in assessment of disease activity, prediction of relapse, and informing decisions around therapy and may help to minimize requirement for endoscopy. However, there are various preanalytical and analytical factors that can affect interpretation of the results; these need to be understood to optimize clinical care.

SUMMARY

Preanalytical and analytical factors that can potentially influence fecal calprotectin concentrations are examined, and an overview is provided of clinical situations in which fecal calprotectin is commonly measured.

The usefulness of fecal hemoglobin and calprotectin tests in diagnosing significant bowel diseases: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Although colonoscopy remains the gold standard for determining bowel diseases, it's invasive and expensive. New non-invasive diagnostic methods are urgently needed as an initial screening modality. We aimed to investigate the value of fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in differentiation of significant and non- significant bowel diseases.

METHODS

In this prospective study, consecutive individuals were included if they underwent colonoscopy for symptoms of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, positive fecal occult blood test, surveillance for IBD or colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic value of FC and FIT in discriminating significant bowel diseases (advanced neoplasia, active inflammatory bowel diseases or bowel inflammation due to other causes) and non-significant bowel diseases (normal, asymptomatic diverticulum, non-adenomatous polyp, or non-advanced neoplasia) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 201 individuals included, 107 patients had significant bowel diseases. FC and FIT had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.653-0.792) and 0.797 (95%CI 0.734-0.860), respectively, for determining significant bowel diseases. Combination of FC and FIT predicted significant bowel diseases with an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.832 (95% CI 0.775-0.890), 77.6%, 74.5%, and 76.1%, respectively. Moreover, combination of FC and FIT was more sensitive among patients with lower GI symptoms than asymptomatic individuals (80.8% vs. 74.1%) to identify significant bowel diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

A single measurement of FC or FIT is not sufficiently accurate to identify patients with significant bowel disease. However, combination of FC and FIT can help increase the sensitivity, especially in patients with lower GI symptoms.

Diagnostic Utility of Non-invasive Tests for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Umbrella Review

Background

This study aims to consolidate evidence from published systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the diagnostic performances of non-invasive tests for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in various clinical conditions and age groups.

Methods

Two independent reviewers systematically identified and appraised systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the diagnostic utility of non-invasive tests for IBD. Each association was categorized as adults, children, and mixed population, based on the age ranges of patients included in the primary studies. We classified clinical scenarios into diagnosis, activity assessment, and predicting recurrence.

Results

In total, 106 assessments from 43 reviews were included, with 17 non-invasive tests. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal lactoferrin (FL) were the most sensitive for distinguishing IBD from non-IBD. However, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and FL were the most specific for it. FC and FL were the most sensitive and specific tests, respectively, to distinguish IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), IgA, were the best test to distinguish Crohn’s disease (CD) from ulcerative colitis (UC). Interferon-γ release assay was the best test to distinguish CD from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB). Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) were both sensitive and specific for disease activity, along with the high sensitivity of FC. Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) had the highest sensitivity, and FC had the highest specificity for operative CD recurrence.

Conclusion

In this umbrella review, we summarized the diagnostic performance of non-invasive tests for IBD in various clinical conditions and age groups. Clinicians can use the suggested non-invasive test depending on the appropriate clinical situation in IBD patients.

Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin in predicting significant gastrointestinal diseases

Background and Aim

It is often unreliable to triage patients for timely endoscopic investigations based on symptoms alone. We need an objective assessment to differentiate between organic gastrointestinal diseases and functional bowel symptoms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin (FC) in predicting organic gastrointestinal diseases.

Methods

In a prospective observational study, consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy to the Department of Medicine and Geriatrics at the Kwong Wah Hospital in Hong Kong were recruited. Stool samples were collected within 24 h before colonoscopy. FC was measured by a commercial kit. Upper endoscopy investigations were then proceeded if normal colonoscopy but elevated FC.

Results

Two hundred and seventy out of 429 patients had FC above 50 μg/g. Eighty‐six out of 270 with elevated FC had significant colonoscopy pathological findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FC test for diagnosing a significant organic colonoscopy or upper endoscopy disease were 91.7, 55.6, 57.0, and 91.2%, respectively. The NPV of FC for colorectal cancer, high risk polyp, and colon inflammation were 98.7, 96.2, and 98.1%, respectively. The NPV of FC in the condition of altered bowel habit or abdominal pain in predicting colorectal cancer and inflammation were 93.8 and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

FC is a reliable marker of ruling out organic bowel diseases. A single negative FC test could be used as a triage tool to prioritize the need and urgency of further investigation, particularly in the setting of altered bowel habits and abdominal pain.

B cell-activating factor (BAFF) in children with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Assessing the inflammation is important in the follow-up of paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aim to evaluate the value of B cell-activating factor (BAFF) in paediatric IBD as a potential biomarker for follow-up.

METHOD

We determined BAFF in serum and faeces and faecal calprotectin (CP) in 32 IBD children-16 Crohn's disease (CD) and 16 ulcerative colitis (UC). Twenty-six healthy children and 10 children with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were included as controls.

RESULTS

No differences were found in serum BAFF between IBD, IBS, and healthy group: 1037.35, 990.9 and 979.8 pg/ml, respectively, all p > 0.05, but faecal BAFF was higher in the IBD group: 15.1, 8.5 and 8.2 pg/ml, respectively, p < 0.05, and higher in the UC group (55.975 pg/ml) compared to the CD group (10.95 pg/ml), p = 0.015. Splitting the IBD group in relation to the CP level, the serum BAFF had no significantly different values between the subgroups, but the faecal BAFF was significantly higher in the >250 μg/g subgroup. Cut-off values of BAFF were calculated.

CONCLUSION

Faecal BAFF is a promising marker for monitoring the children with IBD, higher levels of BAFF being correlated with high CP.

IMPACT

Faecal BAFF is a promising marker in monitoring the children with IBD, higher levels of BAFF being correlated with high faecal calprotectin. To our knowledge, this is the first paediatric study concerning BAFF evaluation in IBD. Faecal BAFF levels could be considered a potential non-invasive marker in monitoring IBD activity in paediatric population with clinically mild or inactive disease.

Inpatient usage of faecal calprotectin in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Faecal calprotectin is a highly sensitive non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation that has evidence-based roles in outpatient diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. This study aimed to examine indications for faecal calprotectin (FCP) in a tertiary inpatient population, and its role in inpatient management and subsequent investigations.

METHODS

An electronic database was used to identify all patients over the age of 18 years who had faecal calprotectin performed during a hospital admission over a three year period from March 2016 to the end of March 2019. Electronic records and case notes were reviewed with follow up to March 2020, seeking indication for testing, health care units requesting, and subsequent investigations and treatment resulting from FCP.

RESULTS

Over a three year period 111 faecal calprotectin inpatient results were identified. There were three changes in management based on the FCP result that led to further investigations that did not lead to any clinically significant pathology. There was no observable difference in the number of colonoscopies performed based on FCP level. The numerical FCP value was associated with clinically significant findings on colonoscopy. Negative predictive value of faecal calprotectin level (<= 50 ug/g) for clinically significant finding on colonoscopy was 64%.

CONCLUSION

Non-guideline based hospital inpatient usage of faecal calprotectin rarely changes inpatient management and had no observable difference in the usage of subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy. Regardless the faecal calprotectin level remained a strong predictor of clinically significant pathology on colonoscopy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Diagnostic accuracy of faecal calprotectin in a symptom-based algorithm for early diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease adjusting for differential verification bias using a Bayesian approach

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic delay in IBD is a major problem and diagnosis is frequently arrived when irreversible damage has already occurred. This study evaluated accuracy of faecal calprotectin (fCAL) integrated with diagnostic criteria for early diagnosis of IBD in a primary care setting.

METHODS

General practitioners (GPs) were trained to recognize alarm symptoms for IBD classified as major and minor criteria. Fulfilment of one major or at least two minor criteria was followed by free fCAL testing and a visit by an IBD specialist and follow-up over 12 months. All patients with positive fCAL testing, i.e., ≥70 μg/g underwent colonoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of fCAL was estimated after adjusting for differential-verification bias following a Bayesian approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-four GPs participated in the study and 133 patients were tested for fCAL between July 2016 and August 2017. Positivity of fCAL was seen in 45/133 patients (34%) and a final IBD diagnosis was made in 10/45 (22%). According to the threshold of 70 μg/g, fCAL achieved a sensitivity of 74.8% (95%CI: 39.10-96.01%), a specificity of 70.4% (95%CI: 61.76-78.16%) and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 70.6% (95%CI: 61.04-78.37%). As for prognostic accuracy, despite positive predictive value being low, 21.9% (95%CI: 11.74-35.18%), the negative predictive value was definitely higher: 96.2% (95%CI: 84.96-99.51%).

CONCLUSIONS

fCAL with a threshold set at 70 μg/g seems to represent a potentially reliable negative test to be used in primary care settings for patients with symptoms suggestive of IBD.

Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in Devon, UK

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We sought to define temporal changes in prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in East Devon, UK, in order to facilitate service planning over the next 5 years.

METHODS

Multiple primary and secondary care databases were used to identify and verify cases. Point prevalence and incidence of IBD were reported in April 2017 and from 2008 to 2016, respectively. Future prevalence and healthcare activity requirements were estimated by linear regression.

RESULTS

Prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) were 479.72, 265.94 and 35.34 per 100 000 persons, respectively. In 2016, the incidence rates of UC, CD and IBDU were 15.4, 10.7 and 1.4 per 100 000 persons per year, respectively. There were no significant changes in the incidence of CD (p=0.49, R=0.26) or UC (p=0.80, R=0.10). IBD prevalence has increased by 39.9% (95% CI 28.2 to 53.7) in the last 10 years without differences in the rate of change between UC and CD. Overall, 27% of patients were managed in primary care, a quarter of whom were eligible but not receiving endoscopic surveillance. Outpatient clinics, MRI and biologic use, but not helpline calls, admissions, or surgeries increased over and above the change in IBD prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

We report one of the highest prevalence and incidence rates of IBD from Northern Europe. Overall, IBD incidence is static, but prevalence is increasing. We estimate that 1% of our population will live with IBD between 2025 and 2030.

Aeromedical retrievals for gastrointestinal disorders in rural and remote Australia: the need for improved access to specialist advice

The Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) provides medical care to populations without access to traditional health-care services. From 2014 to 2018 the RFDS conducted 6007 (≈1201/year) aeromedical retrievals for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. More detailed research is needed to determine specific GI disorders that contributed to this caseload, and in particular inform whether the establishment of a GI specialist service is justified.