Contrast CT Scans in the Emergency Department Do Not Increase Risk of Adverse Renal Outcomes

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) among trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a standard imaging technique employed for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the prevalence of PE among the trauma patients undergoing CTPA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science yielded 13 studies encompassing 5,570 individuals conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Studies that used CTPA for the detection of PE among the trauma patients were selected. This resulted in an evaluation of prevalence, trauma types, clinical manifestations, radiological findings, and mortality rates of PE among traumatic patients undergoing CTPA.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of PE among trauma patients undergoing CTPA was 18% (95% CI = 13-24%). After pooling the existing data, femur fractures were determined to be the most prevalent trauma type (12%). The most prevalent clinical manifestations of PE among trauma patients included shortness of breath, chest pain, and altered vital signs. Radiological findings encompassed various pulmonary abnormalities, such as opacity, ground-glass opacities, and pleural effusions. Mortality rates of PE among the trauma patients ranged from 0% to 29.4% across the included studies.

CONCLUSION

This study provides comprehensive insights into the prevalence, clinical manifestations, radiological findings and mortality of PE among trauma patients undergoing CTPA. According to our findings, lower threshold for CTPA is recommended in patients with lower extremity or spine fractures.

Investigation in image quality and immediate patient safety using pre-dual-flow injection for low-contrast dose spectral pulmonary artery CT angiography

Purpose

The patient safety of iodine contrast-enhanced pulmonary artery CT angiography (CTPA) is widely concerned. This study aimed to investigate the image quality and immediate patient safety of spectral CTPA using a lower-contrast dose pre-dual-flow injection method.

Methods

This retrospective study included 120 patients with suspected pulmonary embolisms who received spectral CTPA between February and December 2022. Patients were divided into normal contrast injection (Group A, n=60) and pre-dual-flow group (Group B, n=60). CT values of pulmonary arteries (PAs) at different levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), arteriovenous separation performance, and beam hardening artifact (BHA) index of two sets of images were measured or calculated. The subjective image quality and immediate patient safety were also scored using the three-point method.

Results

Group B had a contrast dose reduction by 42.5 % (60 vs. 34.5 mL). Radiation exposure dose was not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). CT values of different-level PAs on group B images were higher than those on group A images (P<0.05). Group B images had higher SNR and CNR, better arteriovenous separation between PA trunk and pulmonary vein, and lower BHA index on soft tissue and PA (all P<0.05). For subjective evaluation of image quality, group B had a better score in beam hardening artifact (P<0.05). For immediate patient safety, the score in comfortability was statistically higher in group B, with P<0.05.

Conclusions

Comparing with the normal injection method, pre-dual-flow spectral CTPA with a lower contrast dose injected results in better image quality and shows potential in patient-safety promotion.

Intravenous CT Contrast Media and Acute Kidney Injury: A Multicenter Emergency Department-based Study

Background Although the historical risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after intravenous administration of contrast media might be overstated, the risk in patients with impaired kidney function remains a concern. Purpose To investigate whether intravenous contrast media administration during CT is associated with a higher risk of AKI and further hemodialysis compared with the risk in patients undergoing unenhanced CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent contrast-enhanced or unenhanced CT in five Taiwanese emergency departments between 2009 and 2016. The outcomes were AKI within 48-72 hours after CT, AKI within 48 hours to 1 week after CT, or further hemodialysis within 1 month after CT. The associations between contrast media exposure and outcome were estimated by using an overlap propensity score weighted generalized regression model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results The study included 68 687 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 53-74 years; 39 995 men) with (n = 31 103) or without (n = 37 584) exposure to contrast media. After propensity score weighting, contrast media exposure was associated with higher risk of AKI within 48-72 hours after CT (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.29; P = .007) but no significant risk at 48 hours to 1 week after CT (OR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.08; P = .90). Among patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m², exposure to contrast media was associated with a higher AKI risk (48-72 hours after CT: OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .007) (48 hours-1 week after CT: OR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.27, 1.74; P < .001) and a higher risk of hemodialysis (OR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.70; P = .008). For patients with eGFR greater than 45 mL/min/1.73.m², contrast media exposure was not associated with higher AKI risk (P > .05). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced CT was associated with higher risk of acute kidney injury and further hemodialysis among Taiwanese patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m² but not those with an eGFR of more than 45 mL/min/1.73 m². © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Contrast associated nephropathy after intravenous administration: what is the magnitude of the problem?

Intravenous contrast media (CM) is often used in clinical practice to enhance CT scan imaging. For many years, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was thought to be a common occurrence and to result in dire consequences. When treating patients with abnormal renal function, it is not unusual that clinicians postpone, cancel, or replace contrast-enhanced imaging with other, perhaps less informative tests. New studies however have challenged this paradigm and the true risk attributable to intravenous CM for the occurrence of CIN has become debatable. In this article, we review the latest relevant medical literature and aim to provide an evidence-based answer to questions surrounding the risk, outcomes, and potential mitigation strategies of CIN after intravenous CM administration.

Creatinine level variation in patients subjected to contrast-enhanced tomography: a meta-analysis

Variation in the creatinine levels of patients who have undergone contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has been adopted as a practical method for assessment of possible kidney damage caused by the contrast. Criteria employed include an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase ≥ 25% as indicative of possible renal disorders, such as contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Our objective was to analyze the incidence of CIN by means of a meta-analysis of nine articles related to incidence of kidney damage caused by contrast, calculating odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (95%CI) using RStudio. The overall incidence of CIN in patients who had CT scans was 11.29%, with an OR of 1.38 (95%CI 0.88–2.16). Non-ionic contrasts are safer than other types of contrast, and volumes exceeding 115 mL may be associated with CIN. Preexisting kidney disease had a statistically significant relationship with worse CIN rates.

Association of Intravenous Radiocontrast With Kidney Function: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Radiocontrast has long been thought of as nephrotoxic; however, a number of recent observational studies found no evidence of an association between intravenous contrast and kidney injury. Because these studies are at high risk of confounding and selection bias, alternative study designs are required to enable more robust evaluation of this association.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intravenous radiocontrast exposure is associated with clinically significant long-term kidney impairment, using a study design that permits stronger causal interpretation than existing observational research.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included all emergency department patients aged 18 years or older undergoing D-dimer testing between 2013 and 2018 in the Canadian province of Alberta. A fuzzy regression discontinuity design was used, exploiting the fact that individuals just either side of the eligibility cutoff for computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA)-typically 500 ng/mL-have markedly different probabilities of contrast exposure, but should otherwise be similar with respect to potential confounders.

EXPOSURES

Intravenous contrast in the form of a CTPA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) up to 6 months following the index emergency department visit.

RESULTS

During the study period 156 028 individuals received a D-dimer test. The mean age was 53 years, 68 206 (44%) were men and 87 822 (56%) were women, and the mean baseline eGFR level was 86 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients just above and below the CTPA eligibility cutoff were similar in terms of measured confounders. There was no evidence for an association of contrast with eGFR up to 6 months later, with a mean change in eGFR of -0.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, -4.9 to 4.0) associated with CTPA exposure. There was similarly no evidence for an association with need for kidney replacement therapy (risk difference [RD], 0.07%; 95% CI, -0.47% to 0.61%), mortality (RD, 0.3%; 95% CI, -2.9% to 3.2%), and acute kidney injury (RD, 4.3%; 95% CI, -2.7% to 12.9%), though the latter analysis was limited by missing data. Subgroup analyses were potentially consistent with harm among patients with diabetes (mean eGFR change -6.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, -15.4 to 0.2), but not among those with other reported risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy; these analyses, however, were relatively underpowered.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Using a cohort study design and analysis that permits stronger causal interpretation than existing observational research, we found no evidence for a harmful effect on kidney function of intravenous contrast administered for CTPA in an emergency setting.

Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology/Canadian Association of Radiologists Best Practice Guidance for Investigation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism, Part 1: Acquisition and Safety Considerations

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a well-recognized cause of circulatory system compromise and even demise which can frequently present a diagnostic challenge for the physician. The diagnostic challenge is primarily due to the frequency of indeterminate presentations as well as several other conditions which can have a similar clinical presentation. This often obliges the physician to establish a firm diagnosis due to the potentially serious outcomes related to this disease. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has increasingly cemented its role as the primary investigation tool in this clinical context and is widely accepted as the standard of care due to several desired attributes which include great accuracy, accessibility, rapid turn-around time and the ability to suggest an alternate diagnosis when APE is not the culprit. In Part 1 of this guidance document, a series of up-to-date recommendations are provided to the reader pertaining to CTPA protocol optimization (including scan range, radiation and intravenous contrast dose), safety measures including the departure from breast and gonadal shielding, population-specific scenarios (pregnancy and early post-partum) and consideration of alternate diagnostic techniques when clinically deemed appropriate.

Approach to pulmonary embolism: A clinical care pathway

ABSTRACT

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition that is often underdiagnosed due to its ambiguous and generalized symptoms. As such, nurse practitioners (NPs) may struggle to respond in a timely and accurate manner to clients presenting with acute PE. Given the complexities of diagnosing and managing PE, we propose a visual clinical care pathway to support NPs in recognizing and stratifying clients' risks of PE. The article provides guidance regarding PE diagnostic testing and offers a summary of effective, evidence-based treatment options for adult clients, including those with cancer.

Iodinated contrast medium: Is there a re(n)al problem? A clinical vignette-based review

As we were taught, for decades, that iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury should be dreaded, considerable efforts were made to find out effective measures in mitigating the renal risk of iodinated contrast media. Imaging procedures were frequently either downgraded (unenhanced imaging) or deferred as clinicians felt that the renal risk pertaining to contrast administration outweighed the benefits of an enhanced imaging. However, could we have missed the point? Among the abundant literature about iodinated contrast-associated acute kidney injury, recent meaningful advances may help sort out facts from false beliefs. Hence, there is increasing evidence that the nephrotoxicity directly attributable to modern iodinated CM has been exaggerated. Failure to demonstrate a clear benefit from most of the tested prophylactic measures might be an indirect consequence. However, the toxic potential of iodinated contrast media is well established experimentally and should not be overlooked completely when making clinical decisions. We herein review these advances in disease and pathophysiologic understanding and the associated clinical crossroads through a typical case vignette in the critical care setting.

Cumulative iodinated contrast exposure for computed tomography during acute kidney injury and major adverse kidney events

OBJECTIVES

To determine if contrast-enhanced CT imaging performed in patients during their episode of AKI contributes to major adverse kidney events (MAKE).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis of 1127 patients with AKI defined by KDIGO criteria was done. Their mean age was 63 ± 16 years with 56% males. A total of 419 cases exposed to CT contrast peri-AKI were matched with 798 non-exposed controls for 14 covariates including comorbidities, acute illnesses, and initial AKI severity; outcomes including MAKE and renal recovery in hospital were compared using bivariate analysis and logistic regression. MAKE was a composite of mortality, renal replacement therapy, and doubling of serum creatinine on discharge over baseline; renal recovery was classified as early versus late based on a 7-day timeline from AKI onset to nadir creatinine or cessation of renal replacement therapy in survivors.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients received cumulatively > 100 mL of CT contrast, 143 patients had > 50-100 mL, and 214 patients had 50 mL or less; MAKE occurred in 34%, 17%, and 21%, respectively, as compared with 20% in non-exposed controls (p = 0.008 for patients with > 100 mL contrast versus none). More contrast-exposed patients experienced late renal recovery (27% versus 20%) and longer hospital days (median 10 versus 8) than non-exposed patients (all p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, cumulative CT contrast > 100 mL was independently associated with MAKE (odds ratio 2.39 versus non-contrast, adjusted for all confounders, p = 0.005); cumulative CT contrast under 100 mL was not associated with MAKE.

CONCLUSIONS

High cumulative volume of CT contrast administered to patients with AKI is associated with worse short-term renal outcomes and delayed renal recovery.

KEY POINTS

• Cumulative intravenous iodinated contrast for CT imaging of more than 100 mL, during an episode of acute kidney injury, was independently associated with worse renal outcomes and less renal recovery. • These adverse outcomes including renal replacement therapy were not more frequent in similar patients who received cumulatively 100 mL or less of CT contrast, compared with non-exposed patients. • More patients with CT contrast exposure during acute kidney injury experienced delayed renal recovery.

Is the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy a real contraindication to perform intravenous contrast enhanced Computed Tomography for non-traumatic acute abdomen in Emergency Surgery Department?

BACKGROUND

Contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CCT) is the most used imaging test to investigate acute abdominal clinical conditions, because of its high sensitivity and specificity. It is mandatory to make a correct and prompt diagnosis when life threatening abdominal diseases as mesenteric ischemia are suspected. Contrast medium administration was linked to acute renal failure, therefore radiologist often prefer to perform CCT without contrast in patients needing to undergo the exam with increased serum creatinine.  The aim of the review was to focus on the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy in patients presenting non-traumatic acute abdominal clinical conditions, who underwent CCT with intravenous contrast agent administration in emergency setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P). Quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

The strongest currently available evidence on the incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI) following intravenous contrast agent administration consists in a meta-analysis of observational studies. Data extracted from meta-analyses demonstrate that, compared with non-contrast CT, CCT was not significantly associated with AKI. Moreover, the risk of AKI (RR=0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.02; P=.07), death (RR=0.95; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.67; P=.87), and dialysis (RR=0.88; 95% CI: 0.23, 3.43; P=.85) is similar, compared with the risk of AKI in the non-contrast medium group. Furthermore, intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material is a nephrotoxic risk factor, but not in patients with a stable SCr level less than 1.5 mg/dL, therefore many factors other than contrast material could affect PC-AKI rates.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of diagnostic information gained from contrast enhanced TC in assessing AA are fundamental in some clinical scenarios. The risk of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is negligible in patients with normal renal function but the incidence appears to rise to as high as 25% in patients with pre-existing renal impairment or in the presence of risk factors such as diabetes, advanced age, vascular disease and use of certain concurrent medications. The incidence of CIN/AKI after intravenous contrast administration is very low in general population. Radiologists and referring physicians should be familiar with the risk factors for renal disease, CIN and preventing measures.

Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update

Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation and management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the current standard of care and provides accurate diagnosis with rapid turnaround time. CT also provides information on other potential causes of acute chest pain. With dual-energy CT, lung perfusion abnormalities can also be detected and quantified. Chest radiograph has limited utility, occasionally showing findings of PE or infarction, but is useful in evaluating other potential causes of chest pain. Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan demonstrates ventilation-perfusion mismatches in these patients, with several classification schemes, typically ranging from normal to high. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also provides accurate diagnosis, but is available in only specialized centers and requires higher levels of expertise. Catheter pulmonary angiography is no longer used for diagnosis and is used only for interventional management. Echocardiography is used for risk stratification of these patients. In this article, we review the role of imaging in the evaluation of acute PE.

Patient-Centered Communication Behaviors That Correlate With Higher Patient Satisfaction Scores

Background:

With increased emphasis on improving the patient experience, clinicians are being asked to improve their patient-centered communication behaviors to improve patient satisfaction (PS) scores.

Local Problem:

The relationship between clinician communication behaviors and PS is poorly studied in the emergency department (ED) setting. The purpose of this study was to identify whether specific communication behaviors correlate with higher PS scores in the ED setting.

Methods:

During a quality improvement project, we performed 191 bedside observations of ED clinicians during their initial interaction with patients and recorded the frequency of 8 positive communication behaviors as defined by the PatientSET tool.

Interventions:

The frequency of use of the PatientSET communication behaviors was compared between known high performers in Press Ganey PS scores versus low performers.

Results:

Being a high Press Ganey performer was associated with a significantly higher frequency of performance in 6 of the 8 PatientSET communication behaviors.

Conclusions:

Positive communication behaviors such as those in the PatientSET tool occurred more frequently in ED clinicians with higher PS scores.

Acute Kidney Injury After Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT) is an important imaging modality used in the diagnosis of a variety of disorders. Imaging quality may be improved if intravenous contrast is added, but there is a concern for potential renal injury. Our goal is to perform a meta-analysis to compare the risk of acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement, and total mortality after contrast-enhanced CT versus noncontrast CT.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Academic Search Premier for relevant articles. Included articles specifically compared rates of renal insufficiency, need for renal replacement therapy, or mortality in patients who received intravenous contrast versus those who received no contrast.

RESULTS

The database search returned 14,691 articles, inclusive of duplicates. Twenty-six unique articles met our inclusion criteria, with an additional 2 articles found through hand searching. In total, 28 studies involving 107,335 participants were included in the final analysis, all of which were observational. Meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared with noncontrast CT, contrast-enhanced CT was not significantly associated with either acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 1.07), need for renal replacement therapy (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.16), or all-cause mortality (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.36).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences in our principal study outcomes between patients receiving contrast-enhanced CT versus those receiving noncontrast CT. Given similar frequencies of acute kidney injury in patients receiving noncontrast CT, other patient- and illness-level factors, rather than the use of contrast material, likely contribute to the development of acute kidney injury.