Lower Doses of Bosentan in Combination With Sildenafil Might be Beneficial in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Bosentan monohydrate and sildenafil base as two companions in enabling formulations

HYPOTHESIS

Sildenafil base and bosentan monohydrate are co-administered in a chronic therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Both drugs are poorly soluble in water, and their bioavailability is limited to ca. 50 %. Since bosentan is a weak acid, whereas sildenafil is a weak base, we assumed that their co-amorphization could: (i) improve their solubility in the gastrointestinal fluids, (ii) enable to reach supersaturation and (iii) ensure stabilization of supersaturated solutions. If successful, this could accelerate the development of new fixed-dose combination drugs.

EXPERIMENTS

The co-amorphous formulations were prepared using high energy ball milling. Their solid state properties were assessed using XRD, DSC, FT-MIR, and dielectric spectroscopy. Particle size distribution and surface wetting were also analyzed. Polarizing optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were applied to assess the microstructure of these powders. A new HPLC-DAD method was developed for a simultaneous quantification of both drugs.

FINDINGS

It was shown that binary formulations in which bosentan was molecularly dispersed in sildenafil base (Tg = 64-78 °C) could be manufactured in the high energy ball milling process. When the sildenafil load was below 50 wt. %, the formulations showed the greatest thermal stability and formed long-lasting bosentan supersaturation in PBS.

[Organ Bath Experiments on Human Pulmonary Vessels: Assessment of Drug Efficacy for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension]

Various vasodilator medications are used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) or phosphodiesterase-5-(PDE-5-)inhibitors. In a human ex vivo model, we investigated whether the combination of two substance classes could achieve a higher effect or - without loss of vasodilatation - a lower dosage of the individual substances might be sufficient. We established an ex vivo organ bath model to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of ERA and PDE-5-inhibitors on pulmonary vessels harvested from patients who underwent surgery (lung resection/transplantation). We compared the combined use of both substance classes with administration of one class of drugs alone. Due to the limitations of the experimental design, it is not possible to extrapolate our results to the conditions in vivo. Nevertheless, organ bath proved to be helpful in evaluating the dose-dependent effects of ERA and PDE-5 inhibitors, which is not practical in everyday clinical practice. In this setting, the effectiveness of the combination therapy and the potential for dose reduction depended on the concentrations used and on the influence of previous illnesses on blood vessel function. This article describes the most important results of our experimental investigations and suggestions for future projects.

Effect of Combination Therapy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonist and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor on Clinical Outcome and Pulmonary Haemodynamics in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor having different biological targets has become an integral part of the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, several clinical studies have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After performing a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from seven relevant articles (publications till December 2018). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. The odds ratio and mean difference were calculated to estimate the difference in clinical worsening, 6-minute walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide between the groups. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool and a meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size.

RESULTS

The random-effect model analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76; p = 0.0002] for clinical worsening, mean difference of 15.64 (95% CI 2.67-28.61; p = 0.02) for 6-minute walking distance, - 1.66 (95% CI - 3.82 to 0.50; p = 0.13) for pulmonary vascular resistance and - 21.04 (95% CI - 26.87 to - 15.22; p < 0.00001) for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between the dose and duration of treatment and outcomes (odds ratio of clinical worsening and mean difference of 6-minute walking distance).

CONCLUSIONS

In pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved 6-minute walking distance, clinical worsening and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide compared with the monotherapy but did not offer any advantage in improving pulmonary vascular resistance.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42018091133.

Transition from Ambrisentan to Bosentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Background and objective: Two endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRAs), bosentan and ambrisentan, are approved for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, there is little information about the transition strategy between these two ETRAs. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy from ambrisentan to bosentan. Methods: Twenty PAH patients were enrolled into the single-center, open-labelled prospective study. Echocardiogram, WHO functional class (WHO-FC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), right heart catheterization, and hemotology were collected. After receiving oral 5 mg ambrisentan daily initially for one year, the patients were divided into two arms: eight patients switched to bosentan, while the remaining 12 patients continued ambrisentan. Characteristics at baseline, 1-and 2-year follow-up points were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in echocardiogram, WHO-FC, hemodynamics, demographics and liver function at baseline, 1-and 2-year points in both arms. 6MWD in bosentan group was significantly shorter at baseline. But there were no significant differences of 6MWD at 1- and 2-year points.

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe for stable PAH patients to transition from ambrisentan to bosentan without hemodynamic or hematologic deterioration.