Content Validity of the Spanish Adaptation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised

BACKGROUND

To the best of our knowledge, there are no validated neonatal pain assessment scales in Spanish. Given the need for such a scale, a study was undertaken to adapt and validate the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scale. After translation and back-translation, content validity was addressed, a crucial phase in validation studies, in which researchers examine whether the items that make up the scale represent the content that the scale is intended to assess.

AIMS

The aim was to provide evidence for the content validity of the Spanish adaptation of the PIPP-R scale.

METHOD

The study used the Delphi technique with 10 experts. Data collection was anonymous and was conducted through an online platform. It was an ad hoc survey consisting of four questions, with a five-point Likert scale for each item on the scale and for the instruction table. An item-content validity index (I-CVI) and a scale-content validity index (S-CVI) were calculated for the analysis.

RESULTS

After two rounds of the survey, all items exceeded an I-CVI of 0.9. The S-CVI value was 0.98 (±0.03) for the scale, and 1 for its instruction table. The kappa index yielded values indicating an excellent degree of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish version of the PIPP-R obtained a high degree of content validity according to the expert group and the Delphi technique.

Translation and validation of the Comfort Behaviors Checklist in hospitalized children with chronic diseases

BACKGROUND

Different tools have been developed to measure patients' comfort. This study aims to translate, validate, and apply the Comfort Behaviors Checklist to hospitalized children with chronic diseases.

METHODS

Validity and reliability are assessed using face and content validity, construct validity (known-groups technique and Principal Component Analysis), internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability. The study takes place in a children's hospital in Iran, involving 220 children aged 4 to 6.

RESULTS

The Comfort Behaviors Checklist demonstrates acceptable face and content validity. Construct validity is supported by the lack of correlation between behavioral comfort scores in known groups. The Principal Component analysis results in five components, explaining 70.39% of the total variation. The checklist exhibits acceptable reliability, with a total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.835.

CONCLUSION

The Comfort Behavior Checklist is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the level of comfort in Iranian children with chronic diseases.

Validity and Reliability of Pain and Behavioral Scales for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the instruments used to assess behavior, stress, and/or pain in preterm newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and verify the validity and reliability of these instruments.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), and EBSCOhost Research Platform. 12,295 records were found.

REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS

37 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.  The COnsensus-based Standards for selecting health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to assess the quality assessment and measurement properties.

RESULTS

We identified 25 scales that assessed behavior, pain, and/or stress in preterm newborns. The Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIPP), Crying, Requires Oxygen, Increased Vital Signs, Expression, Sleeplessness (CRIES), Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP), and Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) had scored "very good" in quality data. The PIPP and PIPP-R scales received the "very good" classification in validity assessment. The Evaluation Enfant Douleur (EVENDOL), Children's and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS), PIPP-R, Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS), Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates (BPSN), Faceless Acute Neonatal Pain Scale (FANS), BIIP, and Pain Assessment Scale for Preterm Infants (PASPI) obtained an assessment classified as excellent on reliability, both for inter-rater reliability and internal consistency, and the BPSN demonstrated a very strong value to intra-rater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the assessments of inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and quality of scales by COSMIN, the BIPP, and PIPP-R, were the scales considered appropriate.

Investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Neonatal Pain, agitation, and sedation scale

BACKGROUND

The Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) is a tool that, in addition to assessing pain, also considers the level of sedation in infants. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of pain and sedation parts of the N-PASS in neonates.

METHODS

Two evaluators observed 70 non-intubated and 30 intubated infants admitted to the neonatal ward and neonatal intensive care unit. Totally, 1000 observations were done to assess discriminant and criterion validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

The discriminant validity of both the sedation and pain parts of the Persian version of N-PASS (PN-PASS) was confirmed by significantly increasing the pain score during the painful procedures compared to the rest time. The criterion validity of the PN-PASS was approved by the high correlation (r = 0.85) between the Premature Infant Pain Profile and the PN-PASS. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two evaluators was in the range of r = 0.71-0.92, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient during non-painful and painful procedures was in the range of α = 0.57 and α = 0.86.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the Persian version of N-PASS is valid and reliable in assessing pain and sedation in term and preterm infants. There were an increase in some items' scores is more related to the mechanism of the procedures than to the painful nature of the stimuli.

The Predictors of Postoperative Pain Among Children Based on the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms: A Descriptive-Correlational Study

PURPOSE

Postoperative pain (POP) is a common outcome of surgical interventions among children. Identifying POP contributing factors can help identify children who are at risk for POP and facilitate POP management. The aim of the study was to determine the predictors of POP based on the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive-correlational study was conducted in 2018-2019 on 153 children purposively recruited. Data were collected using a personal characteristics questionnaire, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Child Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, and a Visual Analogue Scale for Pain. The SPSS software (v. 21.0) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve participants were excluded and final data analysis was done on the data obtained from 141 participants. Most of participants were male (65.2%), underwent abdominal surgery (53.2%), and experienced POP (86.5%). Their age mean was 8.58±2.23. Linear regression analysis revealed that the physiological factors of heart rate, preoperative pain, and surgery duration as well as the psychological factors of anxiety and coping strategies were significant predictors of POP among children. All these factors collectively explained 34% of the total variance of POP. Situational factors (such as age, gender, and ethnicity) had no significant effects on POP.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart rate, preoperative pain, surgery duration, anxiety and coping as predictive factors of POP can be considered when designing effective POP management strategies.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The findings provide a better understanding about the predictors of POP and can be used to develop pain management among children.

Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised-PIPP-R

This methodological study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity-reliability and selectivity-sensitivity of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised Form (PIPP-R). 200 newborn infants with gestational age of 26-42 weeks followed up in the neonatal unit of a university hospital. Necessary permissions were obtained from the responsible author, the institution, and the ethics committee before starting the study. Language validity, content validity, and construct validity studies were conducted for the validity of PIPP-R. For the content validity, the opinions of 10 experts were asked and the content validity index was found as 0.88. The factor analysis method was used to determine the construct validity of the scale and it was determined that the PIPP-R consisted of three factors. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient from the internal consistency analysis was calculated for the reliability of the scale and the scale was determined to be highly reliable with the value of 0.840. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used in determining the observer reliability and the agreement between three observers was found to be very good (0.944-1.000). In the analyses conducted for the sensitivity and selectivity of the scale, it was determined that the sensitivity of the scale was 91% and its selectivity was 88%. In accordance with the obtained results, PIPP-R was determined to be a valid, reliable, selective, and sensitive measurement tool to be used for the pain assessment of the Turkish population.