Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

Safety, Functional Disability, Healthcare Utilization, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Elderly Receiving Alteplase and Tenecteplase: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial

BACKGROUND

Older age has been associated with overall poorer outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. We compared (1) outcomes in various health-related domains among patients <80 years and ≥80 years presenting with acute ischemic stroke and (2) whether outcomes differ between intravenous TNK (tenecteplase) versus alteplase.

METHODS

Data are from patients included in AcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), a pragmatic, registry-linked, phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing TNK with alteplase. Outcomes included functional disability (per 90-day modified Rankin Scale), safety (24-hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 90-day mortality rates), health care utilization (discharge destination, length of stay, thrombectomy rate), and quality of life measures (EQ-5D-5L). With an a priori plan, patients aged <80 years were compared with those ≥80 years at symptom onset. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to assess (1) the association of age with outcomes and (2) if these associations were modified by thrombolytic administered (TNK versus alteplase), after adjusting for sex, and baseline stroke severity.

RESULTS

Of the 1577 patients, 1034 (65.6%; 520: TNK and 514: alteplase) were <80 years and 543 (34.4%; 286: TNK and 257: alteplase) were ≥80 years of age. Baseline characteristics in the 2 groups were similar except for sex 40% female in <80 years group versus 62.8% female in ≥80 years. There was no difference in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.5% versus 3.1%). Patients in the ≥80 years group had significantly lower rates of excellent functional outcome, return to baseline status, higher mortality, and lower quality-of-life outcomes as compared with the <80 years group. Length of hospital stay was similar between the 2 groups but, patients in the ≥80 years age group had significantly lower rates of endovascular treatment utilization. Type of thrombolytic agent (TNK versus alteplase) did not modify the association between age and primary clinical outcome (Pinteraction=0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to alteplase, increasing age was associated with poorer functional outcomes with TNK. Rates of angiographic and bleeding outcomes were similar between patients <80 and ≥80 years.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Unveiling synergies: Integrating TCM herbal medicine and acupuncture with conventional approaches in stroke management

This review explores the mechanisms and treatment strategies of ischemic stroke, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Ischemic stroke results from the obstruction of blood flow to the brain, leading to significant neurological impairment. The paper categorizes ischemic stroke into subtypes based on etiology, including cardioembolism and large artery atherosclerosis, and discusses the challenges of current therapeutic approaches. Conventional treatments like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and surgical interventions are limited by narrow windows and potential complications. The review highlights the promise of acupuncture, which offers neuroprotective benefits by promoting cerebral ischemic tolerance and neural regeneration. Integrating acupuncture with conventional treatments may enhance patient outcomes. Emphasis is placed on understanding the pathophysiology to develop targeted therapies that mitigate neuronal damage and enhance recovery.

Tenecteplase: biochemical and clot lysis activity comparisons

Introduction

In the last decades, the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase has been the standard fibrinolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and acute ischemic stroke. An optimized version of alteplase, tenecteplase, has been developed by exchanging six amino acids to increase half-life, achieve higher fibrin selectivity and increase resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Meanwhile, several products containing tenecteplase exist. The aim of this study was to compare the fibrinolytic activity and overall product quality of the 25 mg/vial presentation of tenecteplase originator Metalyse® (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co., KG, Ingelheim, Germany) to the 16 mg/vial formulation of the tenecteplase copy Mingfule® (CSPC Recomgen Pharmaceutical, Guangzhou, Co., Ltd.).

Methods

We have systematically analyzed and evaluated the biochemical and fibrinolytic differences between Metalyse® and Mingfule® using a wide range of routine quality testing assays, supplemented by mass spectrometry analysis and surface plasmon resonance assays. Additional host cell protein quantification and clot lysis testing following plasmin incubation over time were performed.

Results

Several key differences in biochemical composition and clot lysis activity were observed between the two tenecteplase variants. Versus Metalyse®, Mingfule® exhibited lower clot lysis activity and contained less of the two-chain form of tenecteplase. In addition, there were differences in sialic acid content, galactosylation, and fucosylation patterns, with Mingfule® exhibiting more bi- and less tri- and tetra-antennary glycosylation, leading to a different charge and size heterogeneity profile. Furthermore, Mingfule® displayed highly dissimilar binding to the three clearance receptors (LRP-1, ASGR, and mannose receptor) compared with Metalyse®. Purity analysis showed that Mingfule® contained a lower monomer content and, in contrast to Metalyse®, substantial amounts of host cell protein.

Discussion

Taken together, these data demonstrate that the tenecteplase copy Mingfule® has several meaningful fibrinolytic and biochemical differences compared with Metalyse®. This raises the question of whether data from clinical studies with one of the products can be generalized for all tenecteplase variants.

"Intraosseous administration of tenecteplase for thrombolysis of an acute ischemic stroke"

INTRO

Current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke recommend timely administration of intravascular thrombolytic therapy to promote functional and neurologic outcomes. Tenecteplase is an emerging off-label therapy for this indication and being utilized by various institutions due to its simpler administration strategy. In emergent situations in which intravenous access cannot be obtained, intraosseous access is a viable option for medication administration. However, there has been minimal published cases to support the efficacy and safety of intraosseous administration of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke.

CASE

We describe the case of a 51-year-old woman who developed acute ischemic stroke within our institution. Due to difficulty achieving intravenous access and time-dependent efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, the decision was made to administer tenecteplase by the intraosseous route. Stroke symptoms improved within 48 hours following administration without complication.

CONCLUSION

Intraosseous administration of tenecteplase may be considered for treatment of acute ischemic stroke if intravenous access is unattainable.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes; however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials.

DESIGN

TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) over nonthrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ⩽ 5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 h of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial, and full recanalization on follow-up computed tomography angiogram.

CONCLUSION

Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

Data will be available upon reasonable request.

Worldwide Survey on Approach to Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

Background and Objectives

With recent trials suggesting that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone may be noninferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase and EVT and that tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase in treating acute ischemic stroke, we sought to understand current practices around the world for treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) depending on the center of practice (IVT-capable vs IVT and EVT-capable stroke center).

Methods

The electronic survey launched by the Practice Current section of Neurology: Clinical Practice included 6 clinical and 8 demographic questions. A single-case scenario was presented of a 65-year-old man presenting with right hemiplegia with aphasia with a duration of 1 hour. Imaging showed left M1-MCA occlusion with no early ischemic changes. The respondents were asked about their treatment approach in 2 settings: the patient presented to (1) the IVT-only capable center and (2) the IVT and EVT-capable center. They were also asked about the thrombolytic agent of choice in current and ideal circumstances for these settings.

Results

A total of 203 physicians (42.9% vascular neurologists) from 44 countries completed the survey. Most participants (55.2%) spent ≥50% of their time delivering stroke care. The survey results showed that in current practice, more than 90% of respondents would offer IVT + EVT to patients with LVO stroke presenting to either an EVT-capable (91.1%) or IVT-only-capable center (93.6%). Although nearly 80% currently use alteplase for thrombolysis, around 60% would ideally like to switch to tenecteplase independent of the practice setting. These results were similar between stroke and non-stroke neurologists.

Discussion

Most physicians prefer IVT before EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to large vessel occlusion independent of the practice setting.

Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Individuals with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion are at increased risk of poor outcomes. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase might improve outcomes in this population. We aimed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase over non-thrombolytic standard of care in patients with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, parallel group, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were included at 48 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the UK. Eligible patients with minor acute ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5) and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality were enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or non-thrombolytic standard of care (control). Primary outcome was a return to baseline functioning on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group and who did not withdraw consent to participate) assessed at 90 days. Safety outcomes were reported in the ITT population and included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398656, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

The trial was stopped early for futility. Between April 27, 2015, and Jan 19, 2024, 886 patients were enrolled; 369 (42%) were female and 517 (58%) were male. 454 (51%) were assigned to control and 432 (49%) to intravenous tenecteplase. The primary outcome occurred in 338 (75%) of 452 patients in the control group and 309 (72%) of 432 in the tenecteplase group (risk ratio [RR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·04, p=0·29). More patients died in the tenecteplase group (20 deaths [5%]) than in the control group (five deaths [1%]; adjusted hazard ratio 3·8; 95% CI 1·4-10·2, p=0·0085). There were eight (2%) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in the tenecteplase group versus two (<1%) in the control group (RR 4·2; 95% CI 0·9-19·7, p=0·059).

INTERPRETATION

There was no benefit and possible harm from treatment with intravenous tenecteplase. Patients with minor stroke and intracranial occlusion should not be routinely treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

FUNDING

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the British Heart Foundation.

Impact and determinants of door in-door out time for stroke thrombectomy transfers in a large hub-and-spoke network

INTRODUCTION

The mantra "time is brain" cannot be overstated for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke. This is especially true for those with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) requiring transfer to an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) capable center. We sought to evaluate the spoke hospital door in-door out (DIDO) times for patients transferred to our hub center for EVT.

METHODS

Individuals who first presented with LVO to a spoke hospital and were then transferred to the hub for EVT were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database from January 2019 to November 2022. DIDO was defined as the time between spoke hospital door in arrival and door out exit. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared, dichotomizing DIDO at 90 minutes based in the American Heart Association goal for DIDO ≤90 minutes for 50% of transfers. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for determinants of the 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and DIDO.

RESULTS

We identified 194 patients transferred for EVT with available DIDO. The median age was 67 years (IQR 57-80), and 46% were female. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 16 (10-20), 50% were treated with intravenous thrombolysis at a spoke, and TICI 2B-3 reperfusion was achieved in 87% at the hub. The median DIDO was 120 minutes (97-149), with DIDO ≤90 minutes achieved in 18%. DIDO was a significant determinant of 90-day ordinal mRS (B = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.001-0.012, p = 0.013), even when accounting for the last known well-to-spoke door in, spoke door out-to-hub arrival, hub arrival-to-puncture, puncture-to-first pass, age, NIHSS, intravenous thrombolysis, TICI 2B-3, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Importantly, determinants of DIDO included Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (B = 0.918, 95% CI = 0.010-1.826, p = 0.048), atrial fibrillation or heart failure (B = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.257-1.329, p = 0.004), and basilar LVO location (B = 2.528, 95% CI = 1.154-3.901, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Spoke DIDO was the most important period of time for long-term outcomes of LVO stroke patients treated with EVT. Targets were identified to reduce DIDO and improve patient outcomes.

Time to Treatment With Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Importance

The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke declines with longer time from symptom onset, but it is not known whether a similar time dependency exists for IVT followed by thrombectomy.

Objective

To determine whether the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone decreases with treatment time from symptom onset.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Individual participant data meta-analysis from 6 randomized clinical trials comparing IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone. Enrollment was between January 2017 and July 2021 at 190 sites in 15 countries. All participants were eligible for IVT and thrombectomy and presented directly at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (n = 2334). For this meta-analysis, only patients with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion were included (n = 2313).

Exposure

Interval from stroke symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and treatment with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome analysis tested whether the association between the allocated treatment (IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone) and disability at 90 days (7-level modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]; minimal clinically important difference for the rates of mRS scores of 0-2: 1.3%) varied with times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT.

Results

In 2313 participants (1160 in IVT plus thrombectomy group vs 1153 in thrombectomy alone group; median age, 71 [IQR, 62 to 78] years; 44.3% were female), the median time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was 2 hours 28 minutes (IQR, 1 hour 46 minutes to 3 hours 17 minutes). There was a statistically significant interaction between the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and the association of allocated treatment with functional outcomes (ratio of adjusted common odds ratio [OR] per 1-hour delay, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97], P = .02 for interaction). The benefit of IVT plus thrombectomy decreased with longer times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT (adjusted common OR for a 1-step mRS score shift toward improvement, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.96] at 1 hour, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.49] at 2 hours, and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.23] at 3 hours). For a mRS score of 0, 1, or 2, the predicted absolute risk difference was 9% (95% CI, 3% to 16%) at 1 hour, 5% (95% CI, 1% to 9%) at 2 hours, and 1% (95% CI, -3% to 5%) at 3 hours. After 2 hours 20 minutes, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy was not statistically significant and the point estimate crossed the null association at 3 hours 14 minutes.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients presenting at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone was time dependent and statistically significant only if the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was short.

Informed consent practices for acute stroke therapy: principles, challenges and emerging opportunities

IMPORTANCE

Informed consent (IC) plays a crucial yet underexplored role in acute stroke treatment, particularly in the context of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This narrative review examines data on current IC practices in acute ischemic stroke management, specifically for patients treated with IVT or EVT, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement and strategies to enhance the IC process.

OBSERVATIONS

IC practices for IVT vary significantly among hospitals and physicians with the frequency of always requiring consent ranging from 21 to 37%. Factors influencing IC for IVT include patient decision-making capacity, standard of care, time sensitive nature of treatments, legal and moral obligations, risk of complications, physician age and speciality, treatment delays, and hospital size. Consent requirements tend to be stricter for patients presenting within the 3-4.5-h window. The content and style of information shared as part of the IC process revealed discrepancies in the disclosure of stroke diagnosis, IVT mechanism, benefits, and risks. Research on IC practices for EVT is scarce, highlighting a concerning gap in the available evidence base.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review underscores the significant variability and knowledge gaps in IC for EVT and IVT. Challenges related to decision-making capacity assessment and the absence of standardised guidance substantially contributes to these gaps. Future initiatives should focus on simplifying information delivery to patients, developing formal tools for assessing capacity, standardising ethical frameworks to guide physicians when patients lack capacity and harmonizing IC standards across sites. The ultimate goal is to enhance IC practices and uphold patient autonomy, while ensuring timely treatment initiation.

Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in comparison to alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Alteplase is the standard medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who present within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Tenecteplase is a modified alteplase variant with pharmacological and practical advantages over alteplase. Many trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase against alteplase. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase to alteplase across randomized controlled trials.

METHOD

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were used to search the related articles until February 20, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase against alteplase for AIS patients were included. Screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included, with a total of 5123 patients. There was no significant difference between the two interventions in modified rankin scale 0-1 (mRS 0-1) (RR= 1.04, 95% CI [0.99-1.10], P = 0.11, I2 =0%) and early neurological improvement (RR= 1.06, 95% CI [0.97-1.15], P = 0.21, I2 =35). There was no difference in the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR= 1.18, 95% CI [0.84-1.65], P = 0.35, I2 = 0%). Tenecteplase was associated with significantly higher complete recanalization rate compared to alteplase (RR= 1.17, 95% CI [1.00-1.36], P = 0.05, I2 =0%). For large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients assigned to tenecteplase, there was a significant improvement in mRS 0-1 (RR= 1.28, 95% CI [1.07-1.52], P = 0.006, I2 =0%).

CONCLUSION

Based on our meta-analysis, tenecteplase has similar efficacy and safety to alteplase, with a more promising effect in patients with LVO.

Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, as one of the drugs for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the clinical application of tenecteplase is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases until February 15, 2023 was conducted to identify eligible articles. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17 were used to perform the meta-analysis and detect publication bias, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were reported for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 1326 records were retrieved in this meta-analysis. As a result of the limited reports on tenecteplase in patients with AIS and the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and considering the impact of publication bias, we did not include any of these studies published before 2015. Ultimately we included 16 RCTs with a total of 7508 patients, including 3940 patients treated with alteplase and 3568 patients treated with tenecteplase. Tenecteplase was associated with better early neurological improvement (RR 0.10; 95% CI 0.00-0.19; P = 0.04), recanalization of blood vessels (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.40; P = 0.01), and 90-day excellent neurological recovery (RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.01-0.24; P = 0.04). In addition, there were no significant differences in other efficacy and safety outcomes between the two groups. The funnel plot and Begg's as well as Egger's tests showed no significant publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that tenecteplase was not inferior to alteplase in early thrombolytic therapy in patients with AIS, and was even better than alteplase on some efficacy outcomes with no significant differences in safety. However, as a result of some inherent limitations of this study, more high-quality prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.

A comprehensive review of stroke-related signaling pathways and treatment in western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine

This review provides insight into the complex network of signaling pathways and mechanisms involved in stroke pathophysiology. It summarizes the historical progress of stroke-related signaling pathways, identifying potential interactions between them and emphasizing that stroke is a complex network disease. Of particular interest are the Hippo signaling pathway and ferroptosis signaling pathway, which remain understudied areas of research, and are therefore a focus of the review. The involvement of multiple signaling pathways, including Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/antioxidant response element (ARE), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), PI3K/AKT, JAK/STAT, and AMPK in pathophysiological mechanisms such as oxidative stress and apoptosis, highlights the complexity of stroke. The review also delves into the details of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapies such as Rehmanniae and Astragalus, providing an analysis of the recent status of western medicine in the treatment of stroke and the advantages and disadvantages of TCM and western medicine in stroke treatment. The review proposes that since stroke is a network disease, TCM has the potential and advantages of a multi-target and multi-pathway mechanism of action in the treatment of stroke. Therefore, it is suggested that future research should explore more treasures of TCM and develop new therapies from the perspective of stroke as a network disease.