Diagnostic studies for thrombophilia in women on hormonal therapy and during pregnancy, and in children

Family history unawareness of blood clot risk: links to misdiagnoses and illness uncertainties in personal and expert realms

The difficulty of diagnosing blood clots makes salient the question, "What role does family history awareness have for guiding lay and expert actions?" The authors examine the in-depth life reflection interviews of 20 women who experienced a first venous blood clot between the ages of 18 and 50 years, identifying causal attributions the women made for thrombosis after the event. Twelve participants described an understanding of the cascade of events linked to thrombosis, revealing that there is seldom a single cause. The other eight identified belief in a single determining cause for their thrombosis. The authors reflect on the symptoms the women experienced during the course of the clotting event, patterns of care that they executed to self-manage their blood clot, and their misdiagnoses associated with symptoms and care. The women recalled the patterns of care received through formal health care systems and the reported misdiagnoses linked to these interactions. The recollections reveal that the subtle nature of venous blood clot symptoms contributes to lay and expert misdiagnoses. Use of antibiotics and pain killers in the wake of misdiagnosis masks symptoms, contributing to costly delays in accurate diagnoses. Four women were aware of a family history of clotting when the event occurred, 13 had such a history but lacked awareness until the clotting event, and three had no known history. Among women with awareness of their family history, blood clot diagnosis occurred sooner, promoting survival and efficiencies in health care. Implications for communicating about family history of thrombosis are considered.

Role of investigating thrombophilic disorders in young stroke

Our knowledge about various inherited and acquired causes of thrombophilic disorders has increased significantly during the past decade. Technology for various diagnostic tests for these rare disorders has matched the rapid advances in our understanding about the thrombophilic disorders. Inherited thrombophilic disorders predispose young patients for various venous or arterial thrombotic and thromboembolic episodes. Our understanding has also improved about various gene-gene and gene-environment interactions and their impact on the resultant heterogenous clinical manifestations. We describe various thrombophilic disorders, their diagnostic tests, pathogenic potential in isolation or with other concurrent inherited/acquired defects and possible therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. Better understanding, optimal diagnostic and screening protocols are expected to improve the diagnostic yield and help to reduce morbidity, disability, and mortality in relatively younger patients harbouring these inherited and acquired thrombophilic disorders.

Maternal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) homozygosity and neonatal outcome: follow-up of 42 pregnancies at risk

From February 2006 to March 2008, 42 pregnant women homozygous for the 677CT-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) allele were recruited in our obstetrics service for pregnancy at risk. All had antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-dose aspirin and/or low-molecular-weight heparin, supplemented with folic acid. In all, 2 women lost the fetus and 4 were lost to follow-up before delivery. A total of 36 women delivered term infants who all underwent transfontanellar ultrasonography within 24 hours of birth. Six (16.6%) had ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral lesions. No differences were observed in gestational age, birth weight, or umbilical cord pH between the 30 healthy infants and the 6 with cerebral lesions. Neonatal outcomes were negative in spite of maternal folic acid supplementation and antithrombotic prophylaxis during pregnancy. This suggests a relationship between maternal homozygous mutation in the 677CT-MTHFR allele and neonatal cerebral lesions.

Thrombosis in the pediatric population

Whereas thrombotic events in critically ill children do not occur as commonly as in adults, they are being recognized with increasing frequency in the pediatric intensive care unit. The reasons for this are not clear but likely include an increased awareness of the problem and the ability to make a diagnosis using relatively noninvasive tests. In this section, I attempt to define the extent of the problem, summarize and discuss the relevant literature (pointing out where published experience in the pediatric population differs from that in adult patients), and suggest some guidelines regarding thrombophilia treatment and the management of thrombotic events.

Inherited Thrombophilia

Inherited thrombophilia can be defined as a genetically determined predisposition to the development of thromboembolic complications. Since the discovery of activated protein C resistance in 1993, several additional disorders have been described and, at present, it is possible to identify an inherited predisposition in about 60 to 70% of patients with such complications. These inherited prothrombotic risk factors include qualitative or quantitative defects of coagulation factor inhibitors, increased levels or function of coagulation factors, defects of the fibrinolytic system, altered platelet function, and hyperhomocysteinemia. In this review, the main inherited prothrombotic risk factors are analyzed from epidemiological, laboratory, clinical, and therapeutic points of view. Finally, we discuss the synergism between genetic and acquired prothrombotic risk factors in particular conditions such as childhood and pregnancy.

Genetic variations and their influence on risk and treatment of venous thrombosis

Venous thrombosis (VT) is a highly prevalent disease. Risk factors can be genetic or acquired. The well-established genetic polymorphisms predisposing to thrombophilic disorders can be divided into rare 'loss-of-function mutations' in anticoagulant proteins and common 'gain-of-function mutations' in procoagulant proteins, which are weaker risk factors. In addition to functional polymorphisms, defects in common pathways affecting biosynthesis or clearance of plasma coagulation factors and their relations to VT risk have been detected. Recently, investigations regarding genetic variations and response to drug treatment, relevant for the pathogenesis as well as therapy of venous thromboembolism have been performed. The methodical advances in genetic research have led to the identification of a number of new variants with still unclear association to VT. This review aims to discuss the established genetic risk factors as well as some candidate predictors of VT. Further, the recent developments in pharmacogenomics are reviewed.

Thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome

This article focuses on the clinical evaluation and management of women who have thrombophilia-related placental vascular complications, including fetal loss, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine fetal growth restriction, and placental abruption. All are major causes of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes.

Inherited Thrombophilia: Key Points for Genetic Counseling

With the evolution of medical genetics to focus on highly prevalent, multifactorial conditions, it is inevitable that genetic counselors will be called upon to participate in the evaluation and counseling of individuals with inherited thrombophilia. The purpose of this review is to educate the genetic counselor on key issues related to risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary thrombophilia. The information contained in this document is derived from an extensive review of the literature, as well as the author's personal expertise. Upon completion of this review, the genetic counselor will be able to: a) describe inherited and acquired risk factors for thrombosis, b) collect and interpret personal and family histories to assess risk related to hereditary thrombophilia, c) discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of thrombophilia testing, including psychosocial aspects and implications for medical management, and d) identify educational and support resources for patients and families.

Hereditary thrombophilia

Thrombophilia can be defined as a predisposition to form clots inappropriately. Thrombotic events during infancy and childhood are increasingly recognized as a significant source of mortality and morbidity. The predisposition to form clots can arise from genetic factors, acquired changes in the clotting mechanism, or, more commonly, an interaction between genetic and acquired factors. Since the turn of the last century, there has been extensive research focusing on both the genetic and acquired causes of thrombophilia, with particular focus on clotting events in the venous circulation. This review describes clinically relevant aspects of genetic venous thrombophilia, which include well-established, lesser known, and suggested causes of inherited thrombophilias.

Thrombophilia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

This article focuses on the clinical evaluation and management of women who have thrombophilia-related placental vascular complications, including fetal loss, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine fetal growth restriction, and placental abruption. All are major causes of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes.

Results of a Survey of Hospital Coagulation Laboratories in the United States, 2001

Context.—Coagulation and bleeding problems are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and inappropriate testing practices may lead to bleeding or thrombotic complications.

Objective.—To evaluate practices reported by hospital coagulation laboratories in the United States and to determine if the number of beds in a hospital was associated with different practices.

Design.—From a sampling frame of institutions listed in the 1999 directory of the American Hospital Association, stratified into hospitals with 200 or more beds (“large hospitals”) and those with fewer than 200 beds (“small hospitals”), we randomly selected 425 large hospitals (sampling rate, 25.6%) and 375 small hospitals (sampling rate, 8.8%) and sent a survey to them between June and October 2001. Of these, 321 large hospitals (75.5%) and 311 small hospitals (82.9%) responded.

Results.—An estimated 97.1% of respondents reported performing some coagulation laboratory tests. Of these, 71.6% reported using 3.2% sodium citrate as the specimen anticoagulant to determine prothrombin time (81.3% of large vs 67.7% of small hospitals, P < .001). Of the same respondents, 45.3% reported selecting thromboplastins insensitive to heparin in the therapeutic range when measuring prothrombin time (59.4% of large vs 39.8% of small hospitals, P < .001), and 58.8% reported having a therapeutic range for heparin (72.9% of large vs 53.2% of small hospitals, P < .001). An estimated 96.3% of respondents assayed specimens for activated partial thromboplastin time within 4 hours after phlebotomy, and 89.4% of respondents centrifuged specimens within 1 hour of collection. An estimated 12.1% reported monitoring low-molecular-weight heparin therapy, and to do so, 79% used an assay for activated partial thromboplastin time (58% of large vs 96% of small hospitals, P = .001), whereas 38% used an antifactor Xa assay (65% of large vs 18% of small hospitals, P = .001).

Conclusions.—Substantial variability in certain laboratory practices was evident. Where significant differences existed between the hospital groups, usually large hospitals adhered to accepted practice guidelines to a greater extent. Some reported practices are not consistent with current recommendations, showing a need to understand the reasons for noncompliance so that better adherence to accepted standards of laboratory practice can be promoted.

The factor V G1691A mutation is a risk for porencephaly: A case-control study

This study was initiated to investigate prothrombotic risk factors in children with porencephaly. 76 porencephalic and 76 healthy infants were investigated for factor V (FV) G1691A mutation, factor II G20210A variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype, lipoprotein (a), protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Only the FV mutation (p = 0.005) and combinations of two or three different risk factors (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with porencephaly. These data give evidence that the FV G1691A mutation and a combination of prothromboic factors play a major role in the development of childhood porencephaly.

Sex and gender issues and venous thromboembolism

At least 250,000 episodes of VTE leading to hospitalization or death are estimated to occur in the United States each year. A number of clinical and demographic risk factors for VTE are recognized,with the latter including both age and race. Overall,the incidence of VTE does not appear to vary significantly by sex, as evidenced by a lack of consistency in the magnitude and even direction of effect of sex in a variety of epidemiologic studies of varying design. Several studies have shown a higher incidence among women than men during childbearing age. The issue of a gender effect on the natural history of VTE has not been well studied. The main influence of gender on VTE is the relationship between female gender and several well-recognized clinical risk factors for VTE:oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, estrogen receptor modulator therapy, and pregnancy. Hormonal therapies are associated with a twofold to threefold increase in VTE incidence. Risk is higher with some formulations than others, during initial use, and among women who are obese, smoke, or have one of several forms of heritable thrombophilia. The pregnant state is associated with a threefold to fivefold increase in VTE risk, and thromboembolism is a major cause of peripartum death. Heritable thrombophilias are also important co-determinants of VTE risk in pregnancy. The mechanisms through which pregnancy and hormonal therapies increase VTE risk have not been definitively established, but hormonal effects on levels of coagulation and anticoagulation factors likely play a role. Venous compression and venous injury also contribute to increased risk during pregnancy and the puerperium. Approaches to diagnosis of VTE in the pregnant woman are largely the same as in the nonpregnant patient, but special treatment considerations do apply. Warfarin is embryopathic, particularly between the 6th and 12th weeks of pregnancy, and should be avoided in favor or heparin or low-molecular weight heparin when treatment of the pregnant woman is necessary. Guidelines have been published to assist the clinician in decision making about prophylaxis of pregnant women at increased risk or pregnancy-related or post-partum VTE.

Clinical management of thrombophilia-related placental vascular complications

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state with an increased thrombotic risk throughout gestation and the postpartum period. Women with thrombophilia may have a further increased risk of placental vascular complications, including pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and placental abruption. Preliminary data suggest that maternal antithrombotic prophylaxis may result in improved gestational outcome. Randomized trials are under way and hopefully will optimize maternal and neonatal outcome.

Stroke in newborn infants

The few days before and after birth are a time of special risk for stroke in both mother and infant, probably related to activation of coagulation mechanisms in this critical period. Arterial ischaemic stroke around the time of birth is recognised in about one in 4000 full-term infants, and may present with neurological and systemic signs in the newborn. Neonatal seizures are most commonly the clinical finding that triggers assessment. In other children, perinatal stroke is recognised only retrospectively, with emerging hemiparesis or seizures after the early months of life. Risk factors for perinatal stroke include hereditary or acquired thrombophilias and environmental factors. Perinatal stroke underlies an important share of congenital hemiplegic cerebral palsy, and probably some spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and seizure disorders. There is much to be learned about the natural history of perinatal stroke, and there are as yet no evidence-based strategies for prevention or treatment.

Role of the geneticist in testing and counseling for inherited thrombophilia

Within the past decade, the identification of two mutations that are relatively prevalent among the white population (the factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations) has paved the way for a number of large cohort studies that have greatly advanced our understanding of the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is clearly a multigenic disorder, with well-characterized examples of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions underlying its pathogenesis. Increasing numbers of patients are being referred for testing, and many more diagnoses of inherited thrombophilia are being made. The purpose of this article is to discuss the practical applications of both diagnostic testing and genetic counseling for the major inherited thrombophilias: inherited resistance to activated protein C/factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antithrombin deficiency. A description of each entity is included along with a discussion of the indications for testing, selection of the most appropriate screening test, and proper interpretation of test results. Informed consent for testing, screening of asymptomatic individuals in special circumstances (such as during pregnancy or before initiation of estrogen therapy), screening of family members, and posttest education are also addressed. This article emphasizes that these polymorphisms should be regarded as risk factors for thrombosis whose clinical expression generally depends on the coexistence of additional thrombophilic mutations or environmental conditions that provoke the development of VTE.

College of American Pathologists Consensus Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia

OBJECTIVES

To review the state of the art relating to laboratory testing for thrombophilia, as reflected by the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field, and to make recommendations regarding laboratory testing (whom to test, when to test, what tests to perform, rationale for testing, and other issues) in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients and their family members.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the medical literature (primarily from the last 10 years) and the experience and opinions of experts in the field were used as data sources.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Participating authors evaluated the medical literature and prepared manuscripts with specific proposed recommendations. Drafts of all of the manuscripts were prepared and circulated to every participant in the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia prior to the conference. Each of the conclusions and associated recommendations was then presented for discussion. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of 70% or more of the 27 experts attending the conference was reached. The results of the discussion were then used to revise the manuscripts and recommendations into final form.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was reached on 179 recommendations, all of which are presented in articles in this issue of the Archives. Detailed discussion of the rationale for each of these recommendations is found in the text of the respective articles, along with citations to justify the level of evidence for the recommendations. This is an evolving area of research, and it is certain that further clinical studies will change many of the recommendations, cause some to be deleted, and add others in the future.