Prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer: A 2022 update on current developments, evidence, and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and validate the recent and emerging data for prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search from January 2015 to March 2022 was performed using the key terms breast cancer, clinical practice guidelines, gene mutations, genomic assay, immune cancer therapy, predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers, and targeted therapies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, seminal articles, and published evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines in the English language were identified, reviewed and evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Breast cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease, leading to wide variability in treatment responses and survival outcomes. Biomarkers for breast cancer are evolving from traditional biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (IHC) such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) to genetic biomarkers with therapeutic implications (e.g. breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 [BRCA1/2], estrogen receptor α [ESR1] gene mutation, HER2 gene mutation, microsatellite instability [MSI], phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit 3Cα [PIK3CA] gene mutation, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] gene mutation). In addition, current data are most robust for biomarkers in immunotherapy (e.g. programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 [PD-L1], microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR]). Oncotype DX assay remains the best validated gene expression assay that is both predictive and prognostic whereas MammaPrint is prognostic for genomic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker-driven therapies have the potential to confer greater therapeutic advantages than standard-of-care therapies. The purported survival benefits associated with biomarker-driven therapies should be weighed against their potential harms.

Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 15-20 % of all breast carcinomas. These tumors are usually high-grade which often correlates with reduced overall survival and increased rates of recurrence. In a retrospective review, we identified 19 cases of unexpectedly HER2 positive (by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in-situ hybridization) invasive breast carcinomas on core needle biopsies from a registry at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. These cases included low-grade tumors, invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type, and invasive carcinomas with special subtype features. Twelve of the tumors were histologic grade 1 and 7 were histologic grade 2. One of the grade 1 tumors had tubular features (8 %), 1 had cribriform features (8 %), 2 had mucinous features (17 %), 2 were invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (17 %), and the rest were invasive carcinoma, no special type (50 %). The histologic grade 2 tumors included 5 invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (71 %) and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas with mucinous features (29 %). By immunohistochemistry, 13 (65 %) were HER2 score 3+, 7 were score 2+ (35 %), and reflex fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) testing showed amplification in 6 cases, with 1 equivocal case amplified on excision. Despite the HER2 positive status in the selected cases, no unique morphologic features that would indicate aggressive behavior were identified. In clinical follow up, two patients were found to have recurrences, five had lymph node metastasis, and one had distant metastasis. None of the patients with recurrent disease were treated with trastuzumab, despite their positive HER2 results. These findings support that our population of HER2 positive carcinomas showed a similar rate of lymph node metastases and recurrence as poorly-differentiated tumors, supporting HER2 positivity as a poor prognostic indicator, irrespective of morphologic features. We recommend continuing to test all breast cancers, regardless of grade or special subtype features, to provide the most comprehensive treatment and prognostic information for both clinicians and patients.

HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization signal degradation: a 10-year retrospective study

CONTEXT

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis is recommended for invasive breast carcinomas with equivocal (2+) immunohistochemical expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, existing guidelines for the retention and storage requirements for HER2 FISH slides vary widely among countries and laboratories.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degradation rate of HER2 FISH signals, and the optimal retention time and storage conditions for HER2 FISH slides.

DESIGN

Dual-probe HER2 FISH slides from March 2009 to June 2019 were retrieved from the archive to assess the presence, intensity and quantity of the green chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP 17) and orange HER2 signals. Per the institutional policy, FISH slides are placed in slide boxes and stored in - 80 °C freezers for up to 4 years, whereas older slides are stored at room temperature.

RESULTS

After excluding HER2 FISH slides that were deemed uninterpretable due to technical issues, a total of 6255 slides were assessed. Slides from 2009 to 2014 were stored at room temperature, while slides from 2015 to 2019 were stored in - 80 °C freezers. Slides stored in freezers showed retention of both the green and the orange signals. Slide stored at room temperature demonstrated significant decrease in the signal retention rate and the loss of signal did not progress in a linear fashion. The CEP17 signal was quenched much faster than the HER2 signal.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first to demonstrate HER2 FISH signal degradation with time and slide storage conditions. Storing HER2 FISH slides in a -80 °C freezer allows for retention of both HER2 and CEP17 signals. At room temperature, the signals start to degrade with CEP17 signals lost at a faster rate. The results of the study may be used in official guidelines for storage conditions and retention time for HER2 FISH slides.

Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes

OBJECTIVE

Dual probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer provide a ratio of HER2 to chromosome 17. The ratio may be skewed by copy number alterations (CNA) in the control locus for chromosome 17 (CEP17). We analyzed the impact of alternative chromosome 17 control probes on HER2 status in a series of breast cancers with an emphasis on patients reclassified as amplified.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry (2+) and equivocal FISH with CEP17 were included. Reclassification of HER2 status was assessed with alternative chromosome 17 control probes (LIS1 and RARA).

RESULTS

A total of 40 unique patients with 46 specimens reflexed to alternative chromosome 17 probe testing were identified. The majority (>80%) of patients had pT1-2, hormone receptor-positive tumors with an intermediate or high combined histologic grade. There were 34/46 (73.9%) specimens reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, corresponding to 29/40 (72.5%) patients. Of the patients reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, 34.5% (10/29) received HER2-targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this series, the majority of breast cancers tested with alternative chromosome 17 control probes under the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines were converted to HER2-amplified. The treatment data and the clinicopathologic profile of the tumors suggest that most of these patients will neither receive nor benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The findings support the recommendation in the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines to discontinue the use of alternative chromosome 17 probes.