High-Throughput Comprehensive Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Common Drugs and Metabolites (62 Compounds) in Human Urine

In recent years a multitude of LC-MS/MS assays have been widely reported in commercial and clinical literature demonstrating the simultaneous analyses of dozens of drugs of abuse in human samples. The utility of such assays is meant to supplant the indirect detection based on the classical spectral library approach. Direct and simultaneous analysis via LC-MS/MS technology is made possible by fast acquisition rates in multiple reaction monitoring, as well as sensitivity and high selectivity of the technology for each individual analyte in a complex mixture. Hence, unlike immunoassays, which are not well-suited for the analyses of mixtures, and which may also be prone to false positives from potential interferences, quantitative LC-MS/MS analyses are feasible for complex patient mixtures of drugs of abuse. We hereby present a robust clinical LC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous and semi-quantitative analysis of up to 62 drugs of abuse in human urine, representing major classes that include opiates, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, etc. The assay utilizes dilute and shoot, whereby the sample is diluted ten times in internal standard reagent and thereafter submitted to the LC-MS instrument, i.e., reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to the electrospray ionization multiple reaction monitoring analysis, via the TSQ Endura triple-quadrupole instrument. The assay employs stable isotope-labeled internal standards with a linear response in the 30-300 ng/mL range, effectively semi-quantitative, since this analytical range is well within typical immunoassay cutoffs for most drugs.

Swab-in-Capillary Electrospray Ionization and a Miniature Mass Spectrometer for In Situ Drug Analysis

In situ analysis of drugs has been in increasing demand in many fields. As an updated version of capillary-in-capillary electrospray ionization (CC-ESI) developed previously, a disposable swab-in-capillary electrospray ionization (SC-ESI) source was designed in this study. With a micro medical swab for sampling and an integrated filter membrane for online filtration, SC-ESI was able to directly sample and MS analyze complex samples without the need for pretreatment. Coupled with a miniature mass spectrometer, SC-ESI was applied for direct analysis of effective ingredients in therapeutic drugs (in tablet, capsule, and liquid droplet) and drugs in saliva and quantitation of therapeutic drugs in blood. The limits of detection in absolute amounts were obtained as 1 ng for fentanyl and 0.5 ng for cocaine in saliva. Combining with an internal standard method, SC-ESI acquired linear quantitation ranges of 100-5000 ng/mL for imatinib in whole blood and 100-2000 ng/mL for clozapine in serum with high accuracies and precisions. The entire analysis process, from sampling to data acquisition, can be completed in less than 2 min. As demonstrated as a cheap, portable, and sampling-effective ionization source, SC-ESI has shown great potential for in situ drug analysis, especially in border drug screening and clinical therapeutic drug monitoring.

The North American opioid epidemic: opportunities and challenges for clinical laboratories

Since 1999, the opioid epidemic in North America has resulted in over 1 million deaths, and it continues to escalate despite numerous efforts in various arenas to combat the upward trend. Clinical laboratories provide drug testing to support practices such as emergency medicine, substance use disorder treatment, and pain management; increasingly, these laboratories are collaborating in novel partnerships including drug-checking services (DCS) and multidisciplinary treatment teams. This review examines drug testing related to management of licit and illicit opioid use, new technologies and test strategies employed by clinical laboratories, barriers hindering laboratory response to the opioid epidemic, and areas for improvement and standardization within drug testing. Literature search terms included combinations of "opioid," "opiate," "fentanyl," "laboratory," "epidemic," "crisis," "mass spectrometry," "immunoassay," "drug screen," "drug test," "guidelines," plus review of PubMed "similar articles" and references within publications. While immunoassay (IA) and point-of-care (POC) test options for synthetic opioids are increasingly available, mass spectrometry (MS) platforms offer the greatest flexibility and sensitivity for detecting novel, potent opioids. Previously reserved as a second-tier application in most drug test algorithms, MS assays are gaining a larger role in initial screening for specific patients and DCS. However, there are substantial differences among laboratories in terms of updating test menus, algorithms, and technologies to meet changing clinical needs. While some clinical laboratories lack the resources and expertise to implement MS, many are also slow to adopt available IA and POC tests for newer opioids such as fentanyl. MS-based testing also presents challenges, including gaps in available guidance for assay validation and ongoing performance assessment that contribute to a dramatic lack of standardization among laboratories. We identify opportunities for improvement in laboratory operations, reporting, and interpretation of drug test results, including laboratorian and provider education and laboratory-focused guidelines. We also highlight the need for collaboration with providers, assay and instrument manufacturers, and national organizations to increase the effectiveness of clinical laboratory and provider efforts in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use and misuse.

Synthetic opioids: a review and clinical update

The term 'opioids' refers to both the natural compounds ('opiates') which are extracted from the opium poppy plant (Papaver somniferum) and their semi-synthetic and synthetic derivatives. They all possess relatively similar biochemical profiles and interact with the opioid receptors within the human body to produce a wide range of physiological effects. They have historically been used for medicinal purposes, their analgesic and sedative effects, and in the management of chronic and severe pain. They have also been used for non-medicinal and recreational purposes to produce feelings of relaxation, euphoria and well-being. Over the last decade, the emergence of an illegal market in new synthetic opioids has become a major global public health issue, associated with a substantial increase in unintentional overdoses and drug-related deaths. Synthetic opioids include fentanyl, its analogues and emerging non-fentanyl opioids. Their popularity relates to changes in criminal markets, pricing, potency, availability compared to classic opioids, ease of transport and use, rapid effect and lack of detection by conventional testing technologies. This article expands on our previous review on new psychoactive substances. We now provide a more in-depth review on synthetic opioids and explore the current challenges faced by people who use drugs, healthcare professionals, and global public health systems.

Performance of Two Fentanyl Immunoassays against a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method

Rapid and automated fentanyl screening assays are in need due to the prevalence of fentanyl abuse. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of two FDA-cleared automated fentanyl immunoassays, the Immunalysis SEFRIA fentanyl assay and the ARK fentanyl assay. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) was used as a gold standard. Two groups of urine specimens were tested, including 225 specimens from patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) for whom urine drugs of abuse screens were ordered and 57 specimens from patients in chronic pain management programs. The SEFRIA assay generated higher assay imprecision than ARK assay (intraday CV%, 7.15 vs. 4.7%; interday CV%, 6.6 vs. 5.3%). Clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of fentanyl exposure were 100 and 96% for the ARK assay and 95 and 80% for the SEFRIA assay. An 'auto-repeating' issue was observed for some validation specimens flagged with high absorbance values (OD > 3.0), generating false repeat results. The frequency of auto-repeating was lower in the ARK assay than SEFRIA (0.7 vs. 15.5%). Auto-repeating occurred for only previously frozen specimens in the ARK assay, but 9% of fresh specimens were also flagged and repeated in the SEFRIA assay. Positive predictive value (PPV) of the ARK assay was 73% in the ED population and 67% in the non-ED populations. The concentrations of fentanyl and norfentanyl were higher in specimens from ED patients than patients from pain management programs. High prevalence of morphine, methamphetamine, benzoylecgonine and 6-MAM was observed in specimens positive for fentanyl in both populations.

Advances in drugs of abuse testing

Drugs of abuse testing is widely used clinically and forensically. Urine is the preferred type of specimen for drugs of abuse screening, but saliva, sweat, hair, and meconium are emerging types of specimens. GC-MS has been used as a gold standard for confirmatory drug testing, but LC-tandem-MS can analyze more diverse types of analytes than GC-MS. Thus, LC-tandem-MS becomes a new gold standard for confirmatory drug testing. Unlike GC-MS, LC-tandem-MS is not suited for non-targeted comprehensive drug screening. But with the advent of high-resolution-MS such as Tof-MS, which can discriminate the compounds of similar molecular masses but with different formulas, LC-hybrid-Tof-MS is usable for non-targeted comprehensive drug screening. Another technical advancement is the advent of miniature ambient ionization MS, which can analyze biological specimens including urine within one minute. Thus these mass spectrometers are promising for rapid drugs of abuse testing in a POC setting.

Vortioxetine use may cause false positive immunoassay results for urine methadone

BACKGROUND

Urine immunoassays are frequently employed for methadone screening because they are relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, immunoassays are notoriously prone to false positives. We report that the use of vortioxetine (Trintellix® in the USA and Canada, Brintellix® worldwide) could cause false positives in the Roche KIMS Methadone II Urine immunoassay (MDN2).

METHODS

We performed a spiking study using a parent drug vortioxetine concentration of 7500 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Urine specimens from seven patients on typical vortioxetine doses tested positive for methadone in the Roche assay but negative for methadone in a confirmatory (GC/MS) assay and two other immunoassay platforms. Because of the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine and the high cross-reactivity of a metabolite in the MDN2 assay, routine use of the drug could cause false positives even without detectible parent drug in the urine.

CONCLUSIONS

Vortioxetine is commonly prescribed for mood disorders, which have high prevalence in patients treated for opioid addiction. For that reason, it is important that clinicians are aware of this interference.