Pathology of Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Clinical Implications

Allysine-Targeted Molecular MRI Enables Early Prediction of Chemotherapy Response in Pancreatic Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy is routinely used in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but not all tumors respond to this treatment. Current clinical imaging techniques are not able to precisely evaluate and predict the response to neoadjuvant therapies over several weeks. A strong fibrotic reaction is a hallmark of a positive response, and during fibrogenesis, allysine residues are formed on collagen proteins by the action of lysyl oxidases. Here, we report the application of an allysine-targeted molecular MRI probe, MnL3, to provide an early, noninvasive assessment of treatment response in PDAC. Allysine increased 2- to 3-fold after one dose of neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX in sensitive human PDAC xenografts in mice. Molecular MRI with MnL3 could specifically detect and quantify fibrogenesis in PDAC xenografts. Comparing the MnL3 signal before and 3 days after one dose of FOLFIRINOX predicted subsequent treatment response. The MnL3 tumor signal increased by 70% from day 0 to day 3 in mice that responded to subsequent doses of FOLFIRINOX, whereas no signal increase was observed in FOLFIRINOX-resistant tumors. This study indicates the promise of allysine-targeted molecular MRI as a noninvasive tool to predict chemotherapy outcomes. Significance: Allysine-targeted molecular MRI can quantify fibrogenesis in pancreatic tumors and predict response to chemotherapy, which could guide rapid clinical management decisions by differentiating responders from nonresponders after treatment initiation.

Application of plasma circulating KRAS mutations as a predictive biomarker for targeted treatment of pancreatic cancer

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations in circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) have been reported as representative noninvasive prognostic markers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here, we aimed to evaluate single KRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive biomarkers, with an emphasis on potential therapeutic approaches to PDAC. A total of 128 patients were analyzed for multiple or single KRAS mutations (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12R, G12S, G12V, and G13D) in their tumors and plasma using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Overall, KRAS mutations were detected by multiplex ddPCR in 119 (93%) of tumor DNA and 68 (53.1%) of ctDNA, with a concordance rate of 80% between plasma ctDNA and tumor DNA in the metastatic stage, which was higher than the 44% in the resectable stage. Moreover, the prognostic prediction of both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was more relevant using plasma ctDNA than tumor DNA. Further, we evaluated the selective tumor-suppressive efficacy of the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib in a patient-derived organoid (PDO) from a KRAS G12C-mutated patient using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. Sotorasib showed selective inhibition in vitro and in vivo with altered tumor microenvironment, including fibroblasts and macrophages. Collectively, screening for KRAS single mutations in plasma ctDNA and the use of preclinical models of PDO and PDX with genetic mutations would impact precision medicine in the context of PDAC.

A neoadjuvant therapy compatible prognostic staging for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To improve prediction, the AJCC staging system was revised to be consistent with upfront surgery (UFS) and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for PDAC.

BACKGROUND

The AJCC staging system was designed for patients who have had UFS for PDAC, and it has limited predictive power for patients receiving NAT.

METHODS

We examined 146 PDAC patients who had resection after NAT and 1771 who had UFS at Changhai Hospital between 2012 and 2021. The clinicopathological factors were identified using Cox proportional regression analysis, and the Neoadjuvant Therapy Compatible Prognostic (NATCP) staging was developed based on these variables. Validation was carried out in the prospective NAT cohort and the SEER database. The staging approach was compared to the AJCC staging system regarding predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The NAT cohort's multivariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation and the number of positive lymph nodes independently predicted OS. The NATCP staging simplified the AJCC stages, added tumor differentiation, and restaged the disease based on the Kaplan-Meier curve survival differences. The median OS for NATCP stages IA, IB, II, and III was 31.7 months, 25.0 months, and 15.8 months in the NAT cohort and 30.1 months, 22.8 months, 18.3 months, and 14.1 months in the UFS cohort. Compared to the AJCC staging method, the NATCP staging system performed better and was verified in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the use of NAT, NATCP staging demonstrated greater predictive abilities than the existing AJCC staging approach for resected PDAC and may facilitate clinical decision-making based on accurate prediction of patients' OS.

Comparative Analyses of the Clinicopathologic Features of Short-Term and Long-Term Survivors of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients with PDAC often show heterogenous responses to NAT with variable clinical outcomes, and the clinicopathologic parameters associated with these variable outcomes remain unclear. In this study, we systematically examined the clinicopathologic characteristics of 60 short-term survivors (overall survival < 15 months) and 149 long-term survivors (overall survival > 60 months) and compared them to 352 intermediate-term survivors (overall survival: 15-60 months) of PDAC who received NAT and pancreatoduodenectomy. We found that the short-term survivor group was associated with male gender (p = 0.03), tumor resectability prior to NAT (p = 0.04), poorly differentiated tumor histology (p = 0.006), more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.04), higher ypN stage (p = 0.002), and higher positive lymph node ratio (p = 0.03). The long-term survivor group had smaller tumor size (p = 0.001), lower ypT stage (p = 0.001), fewer positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001), lower ypN stage (p < 0.001), lower positive lymph node ratio (p < 0.001), lower rate of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001) and perineural invasion (p < 0.001), better tumor response grading (p < 0.001), and less frequent recurrence/metastasis (p < 0.001). The ypN stage is an independent predictor of both short-term and long-term survivors by multivariate logistic regression analyses. In addition, tumor differentiation was also an independent predictor for short-term survivors, and tumor response grading and perineural invasion were independent predictors for long-term survivors. Our results may help to plan and select post-operative adjuvant therapy for patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreatoduodenectomy based on the pathologic data.

Hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 inhibits the development and progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Ras plays an essential role in the development of acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, mutant Kras is an inefficient driver for PDAC development. The mechanisms of the switching from low Ras activity to high Ras activity that are required for development and progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) are unclear. In this study, we found that hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 (HPK1) was upregulated during pancreatic injury and ADM. HPK1 interacted with the SH3 domain and phosphorylated Ras GTPase-activating protein (RasGAP) and upregulated RasGAP activity. Using transgenic mouse models of HPK1 or M46, a kinase-dead mutant of HPK1, we showed that HPK1 inhibited Ras activity and its downstream signaling and regulated acinar cell plasticity. M46 promoted the development of ADM and PanINs. Expression of M46 in KrasG12D Bac mice promoted the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and macrophages, inhibited the infiltration of T cells, and accelerated the progression of PanINs to invasive and metastatic PDAC, while HPK1 attenuated mutant Kras-driven PanIN progression. Our results showed that HPK1 plays an important role in ADM and the progression of PanINs by regulating Ras signaling. Loss of HPK1 kinase activity promotes an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and accelerates the progression of PanINs to PDAC.

Prognosticators for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Therapy and Pancreatectomy

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) therapies are increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, limited data are available on their clinicopathologic prognosticators. We examined the clinicopathologic factors and survival of 213 PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX with 71 patients who received GemNP. The FOLFIRINOX group was younger (p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of radiation (p = 0.049), higher rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease (p < 0.001), higher rate of Group 1 response (p = 0.045) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.03) than the GemNP group. Within FOLFIRINOX group, radiation was associated with decreased lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.01). The tumor response group, ypT, ypN, LVI and PNI, correlated significantly with both DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Patients with the ypT0/T1a/T1b tumor had better DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.03) than those with ypT1c tumor. In multivariate analysis, the tumor response group and ypN were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX group was younger and had a better pathologic response than the GemNP group and that the tumor response group, ypN, ypT, LVI and PNI, are significant prognostic factors for survival in these patients. Our results also suggest that the tumor size of 1.0 cm is a better cut off for ypT2. Our study highlights the importance of systemic pathologic examination and the reporting of post-treatment pancreatectomies.

Integrated Pathologic Score Effectively Stratifies Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pathologic parameters of treated PDAC, including tumor (ypT) and lymph node (ypN) stage, and tumor response grading (TRG) are important prognostic factors in this group of patients. To our knowledge, a multifactorial prognostic score combining pathologic features including ypT, ypN, and TRG in treated PDAC patients has not been reported. Our cohort consisted of 398 PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. All pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens were grossly and microscopically evaluated using a standard protocol. The integrated pathologic score (IPS) was calculated as the sum of the scores for ypT, ypN, and TRG according to either the MD Anderson grading system (IPSMDA) or the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading system (IPSCAP). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and patient survival. Using either IPSMDA or IPSCAP, PDAC patients were stratified into 3 distinct prognostic groups for both disease-free survival (DFS) ( P <0.001) and overall survival (OS) ( P <0.001). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP correlated with tumor differentiation, margin status, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and tumor recurrence ( P <0.05). In multivariate analysis, IPSMDA, IPSCAP, margin status, and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic factors for both DFS ( P <0.05) and OS ( P <0.05). However, patients with AJCC stage IB, IIA, or IIB disease had no significant difference in either DFS or OS ( P >0.05). The IPS appears to provide improved prognostic information compared with AJCC staging for preoperatively treated patients with PDAC.

Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Pathology and Predictive Biomarkers

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an extremely poor prognosis due to the lack of methods or biomarkers for early diagnosis and its resistance to conventional treatment modalities, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. PDACs are a heterogenous group of malignant epithelial neoplasms with various histomorphological patterns and complex, heterogenous genetic/molecular landscapes. The newly proposed molecular classifications of PDAC based on extensive genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and epigenetic data have provided significant insights into the molecular heterogeneity and aggressive biology of this deadly disease. Recent studies characterizing the tumor microenvironment (TME) have shed light on the dynamic interplays between the tumor cells and the immunosuppressive TME of PDAC, which is essential to disease progression, as well as its resistance to chemotherapy, newly developed targeted therapy and immunotherapy. There is a critical need for the development of predictive markers that can be clinically utilized to select effective personalized therapies for PDAC patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the histological and molecular heterogeneity and subtypes of PDAC, as well as its precursor lesions, immunosuppressive TME, and currently available predictive molecular markers for patients.

The Histopathology of Neoadjuvant-Treated (NAT) Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Examination of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after NAT with the intent of diagnosis and outcome prediction remains a challenging task. The lack of a uniform approach to macroscopically assess these cases along with variations in sampling adds to the complexity. Several TRG systems have been proposed to correlate with an overall survival. In clinical practice, most of these TRG schemes have shown low level of interobserver agreement arguing for a need of larger studies and more innovative ways to assess outcome in this population.

Critical issues in pathologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resected after neoadjuvant treatment: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Because NAT often induces heterogeneous tumor response and extensive fibrosis both in tumor and adjacent pancreatic tissue, pathologic assessment of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens is challenging. A limited number of studies examined the optimal grossing and sampling methods, tumor response grading (TRG), and the prognostic value of posttherapy tumor (ypT) and lymph node (ypN) stages of treated PDAC patients. In this review, we will provide an overview of the current status and critical issues in pathologic evaluation of PDAC resected after NAT.

METHODS

In PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science, we reviewed existing English literature (published up to December 2021) highlighting the most recent ones using electronic databases and authors' experience to outline the challenging aspects and new perspectives on pathologic assessment of the treated PDAC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

The recent recommendations from the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) provide the much-needed guidelines for systematic and standardized pathologic evaluation and reporting of treated PDAC for optimal patient care. For treated PDAC, tumor size measured by gross and radiology is not reliable. Histologic validation of tumor size on consecutive mapping sections is recommended for accurate ypT stage. A tumor size of 1.0 cm seems to be a better cutoff for ypT2 for treated PDACs. The published data suggested that the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) TRG system is easy to use, has a better interobserver agreement and better correlation with patient prognosis compared to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Evans grading systems and may be used as an alternative TRG system for the CAP cancer protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic and standardized grossing and sampling are essential for accurate pathologic evaluation and reporting for optimal care of PDAC patients who received NAT. Future studies on optimal sampling and integration of histopathology with artificial intelligence (AI), molecular and immunohistochemical markers are needed for better and personalized care of treated PDAC patients.

Pathologic Examination of Pancreatic Specimens Resected for Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recommendations From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society

Currently, there are no internationally accepted consensus guidelines for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The Neoadjuvant Therapy Working Group of Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society was formed in 2018 to review grossing protocols, literature, and major issues and to develop recommendations for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The working group generated the following recommendations: (1) Systematic and standardized grossing and sampling protocols should be adopted for pancreatectomy specimens for treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (2) Consecutive mapping sections along the largest gross tumor dimension are recommended to validate tumor size by histology as required by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocol. (3) Tumor size of treated PDACs should be measured microscopically as the largest dimension of tumor outer limits that is bound by viable tumor cells, including intervening stroma. (4) The MD Anderson grading system for tumor response has a better correlation with prognosis and better interobserver concordance among pathologists than does the CAP system. (5) A case should not be classified as a complete response unless the entire pancreas, peripancreatic tissues, ampulla of Vater, common bile duct, and duodenum adjacent to the pancreas are submitted for microscopic examination. (6) Future studies on tumor response of lymph node metastases, molecular and/or immunohistochemical markers, as well as application of artificial intelligence in grading tumor response of treated PDAC are needed. In summary, systematic, standardized pathologic evaluation, accurate tumor size measurement, and reproducible tumor response grading to neoadjuvant therapy are needed for optimal patient care. The criteria and discussions provided here may provide guidance towards these goals.

Morphologic changes associated with neoadjuvant-treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and comparison of two tumor regression grading systems

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is aggressive, with an overall five-year survival rate of 9%, and few patients are candidates for pancreatectomy at presentation. The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is evolving, especially for high-risk potentially resectable tumors. Owing to the increasing number of NAT resection specimens, we aim to characterize the histologic changes associated with NAT and to compare two tumor regression grading schemes. One hundred eighteen resections for PDAC were selected from the cases between 2011 and 2018, 59 not treated and 59 treated with NAT. All H&E stained tumor slides were reviewed for histologic changes and graded using the four-tier modified Ryan score (recommended by College of American Pathologists) and the three-tier MD Anderson (MDA) score. The histologic changes evaluated included blue/grey fibrosis, islet cell hyperplasia, dystrophic calcification, amyloid deposition, cholesterol clefts, nerve hypertrophy, elastotic stromal/vascular change, abscess formation, and eosinophilic tumor cell changes. There were statistically significant differences for dystrophic calcification, eosinophilic tumor cell changes, elastotic stromal/vascular change, islet cell hyperplasia, and nerve hypertrophy between the two groups, with these features seen more frequently in NAT cases. Blue/grey stromal fibrosis was present in all cases regardless of NAT, except few complete regression cases and one treated case with intraneural invasion only. Blue/grey fibrosis is a useful histologic visual clue to suggest the possibility of adjacent tumor in the majority of PDAC cases regardless of NAT. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, neither grading scheme correlated with overall survival in our cohort. However, the MDA score was significantly correlated with both time to primary tumor recurrence (p = 0.002) and time to distant recurrence (p = 0.04), whereas the modified Ryan score was not.

Current and future cancer staging after neoadjuvant treatment for solid tumors

Until recently, cancer registries have only collected cancer clinical stage at diagnosis, before any therapy, and pathological stage after surgical resection, provided no treatment has been given before the surgery, but they have not collected stage data after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Because NAT is increasingly being used to treat a variety of tumors, it has become important to make the distinction between both the clinical and the pathological assessment without NAT and the assessment after NAT to avoid any misunderstanding of the significance of the clinical and pathological findings. It also is important that cancer registries collect data after NAT to assess response and effectiveness of this treatment approach on a population basis. The prefix y is used to denote stage after NAT. Currently, cancer registries of the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer only partially collect y stage data, and data on the clinical response to NAT (yc or posttherapy clinical information) are not collected or recorded in a standardized fashion. In addition to NAT, nonoperative management after radiation and chemotherapy is being used with increasing frequency in rectal cancer and may be expanded to other treatment sites. Using examples from breast, rectal, and esophageal cancers, the pathological and imaging changes seen after NAT are reviewed to demonstrate appropriate staging.

Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Tumor size measurement is critical for accurate tumor staging in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, accurate tumor size measurement is challenging in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before resection, due to treatment-induced fibrosis and tumor invasion beyond the grossly identified tumor area. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between the tumor size and tumor volume measured on post-therapy computed tomography (CT) scans and the pathological measurement. Also, we investigated the correlation between these measurements and clinicopathological parameters and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, we evaluated 343 patients with PDAC who received neoadjuvant therapy, followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy and had pre-operative pancreatic protocol CT imaging. We measured the longest tumor diameter (RadL) and the radiological tumor volume (RadV) on the post-therapy CT scan, then we categorized RadL into four radiologic tumor stages (RTS) based on the current AJCC staging (8th edition) protocol and RadV based on the median. Pearson correlation or Spearman's coefficient (δ), T-test and ANOVA was used to test the correlation between the radiological and pathological measurement. Chi-square analysis was used to test the correlation with the tumor pathological response, lymph-node metastasis and margin status and Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard for survival analysis. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

As a continuous variable, RadL showed a positive linear correlation with the post-therapy pathologic tumor size in the overall patient population (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.72, P < 0.001) and RadV (δ: 0.63, p < 0.0001). However, there was no correlation between RadL and pathologic tumor size in patients with ypT0 and those with pathologic tumor size of ≤1.0 cm. Post-therapy RTS and RadV group correlated with ypT stage, tumor response grades using either CAP or MDA grading system, distance of superior mesenteric artery margin and tumor recurrence/metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Although RadL tends to understage ypT in PDAC patients who had no radiologically detectable tumor or small tumors (RTS0 or RTS1), radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size may be used as a marker for the pathologic tumor staging and tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy.