Laboratory Detection and Initial Diagnosis of Monoclonal Gammopathies

Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Shenzhen, China

BACKGROUND

Data on the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in China are very limited. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of MGUS in a large Chinese population.

METHODS

This study included 49,220 healthy people who received serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) and serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) tests. Serum free light chain ratio, immunoglobulin quantification, and other clinically correlates of MGUS were performed for all patients with M-protein.

RESULTS

A total of 576 MGUS patients were identified by sIFE, with a median age of 58 years and an overall prevalence of 1.17% (95% CI, 1.08-1.27). Among those aged 50 years and older, the prevalence of MGUS was 2.26% (95% CI, 2.04-2.50). The prevalence of MGUS was significantly higher in males than in females (P < 0.05). The median concentration of M-protein was 3.1 g/L, ranging from 0.5 g/L to 25.1 g/L. The M-protein type was IgG in 55.4% of MGUS patients, followed by IgA (31.1%), IgM (9.5%), IgD (0.5%), biclonal (2.3%), and light chain (1.2%). Abnormalities in SPE, FLC ratios, and immunoglobulin levels were observed in 78.3%, 31.1%, and 38.4% of MGUS patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MGUS is substantially lower in southern China than in whites and blacks.

Artificial intelligence in serum protein electrophoresis: history, state of the art, and perspective

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is a valuable laboratory test that separates proteins from the blood based on their electrical charge and size. The test can detect and analyze various protein abnormalities, and the interpretation of graphic SPEP features plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and monitoring of conditions, such as myeloma. Furthermore, the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents an opportunity to enhance the organization and optimization of analytical procedures by streamlining the process and reducing the potential for human error in SPEP analysis, thereby making the process more efficient and reliable. For instance, AI can assist in the identification of protein peaks, the calculation of their relative proportions, and the detection of abnormalities or inconsistencies. This review explores the characteristics and limitations of AI in SPEP, and the role of standardization in improving its clinical utility. It also offers guidance on the rational ordering and interpreting of SPEP results in conjunction with AI. Such integration can effectively reduce the time and resources required for manual analysis while improving the accuracy and consistency of the results.

A Qualitative Method to Detect Paraproteins from Serum Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Mass spectrometry-based techniques are increasingly reported in the literature for identifying paraproteins due to their improved specificity and sensitivity. The present study demonstrates the capability of ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the qualitative analysis of paraproteins.

METHODS

Paraproteins from patient serum (n = 40) were immunopurified using agarose beads coated with camelid antibodies that are specific for various subtypes of immunoglobulins (Igs; G, A, M, and light chains κ, λ). The extracted Igs are reduced to separate light chains from heavy chains in solution. The reduced sample was subjected to UPLC and mass measured using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. The mass spectral peaks at specific retention times were deconvoluted after clean-up to obtain the mass of light chains. The interpretation of liquid chromatography peaks and LC-MS data was validated by comparing them with immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) results.

RESULTS

The interpretation from the chromatographic pattern had a 92.5% (37/40) agreement when compared with mass information. The correlation of mass spectrometry data to IFE was 90% (36/40). The high mass of light chains (>25 kDa) was suggestive of glycosylation. Patient sera positive for IgGκ on IFE (n = 15) were analyzed for the interference of tAbs. The mass of Daratumumab observed in a sample was confirmed by the treating physician. A biclonal of same isotype (IgGκ) was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of using liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the identification of the subtype of paraproteins has been demonstrated. The method's applicability to screen for interference from tAbs and identification of biclonals of the same isotype has been highlighted.

A review of clinical guidelines, laboratory recommendations and external quality assurance programs for monoclonal gammopathy testing

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is a spectrum of diseases ranging from the benign asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to the malignant multiple myeloma. Clinical guidelines and laboratory recommendations have been developed to inform best practices in the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of MG. In this review, the pathophysiology, relevant laboratory testing recommended in clinical practice guidelines and laboratory recommendations related to MG testing and reporting are examined. The clinical guidelines recommend serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation and serum free light chain measurement as initial screening. The laboratory recommendations omit serum immunofixation as it offers limited additional diagnostic value. The laboratory recommendations offer guidance on reporting findings beyond monoclonal protein, which was not required by the clinical guidelines. The clinical guidelines suggested monitoring total IgA concentration by turbidimetry or nephelometry method if the monoclonal protein migrates in the non-gamma region, whereas the laboratory recommendations make allowance for involved IgM and IgG. Additionally, several external quality assurance programs for MG protein electrophoresis and free light chain testing are also appraised. The external quality assurance programs show varied assessment criteria for protein electrophoresis reporting and unit of measurement. There is also significant disparity in reported monoclonal protein concentrations with wide inter-method analytical variation noted for both monoclonal protein quantification and serum free light chain measurement, however this variation appears smaller when the same method was used. Greater harmonization among laboratory recommendations and reporting format may improve clinical interpretation of MG testing.

Urine Immunofixation Electrophoresis for Diagnosis of Monoclonal Gammopathy: Evaluation of Methods for Urine Concentration

BACKGROUND

Examination of urine by immunofixation electrophoresis (UIFE) is one of the tests recommended for screening and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies, especially multiple myeloma. Unlike the serum free light chain measurement, a positive result on urine immunofixation is diagnostic for monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. Urine is usually concentrated, generally by membrane filtration, prior to electrophoresis.

METHODS

Alternative methods to membrane filtration for urine concentration were examined. Residual urine specimens submitted for urine protein electrophoresis were concentrated by precipitation of the proteins by ammonium sulfate salt precipitation, precipitation with ethanol and acetonitrile, and by desiccation. The concentrated specimens were subjected to immunofixation electrophoresis using antisera to free light chains (FLC). The results were compared with those from conventional immunofixation electrophoresis using specimens concentrated by membrane filtration.

RESULTS

Ammonium sulfate, ethanol, and acetonitrile precipitation results were less than satisfactory. Concentration by desiccation provided results comparable, if not better than, those by membrane filtration and conventional UIFE. The cost of desiccation is minimal compared to more than $5.00/specimen cost of concentration by membrane filtration. The differences in the results with conventional UIFE and the method described here are likely due to (a) variability in the reactivity of different antisera to free monoclonal light chains, and (b) obscuration of monoclonal free light chains by co-migration with intact immunoglobulin monoclonal proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrating urine by desiccation for immunofixation electrophoresis is technically simple, inexpensive, and provides results comparable to concentrating by membrane filtration. Using FLC provides a more sensitive assay than using conventional antisera.

Defect in Automated Antigen Excess Detection Discovered after Reviewing Serum Free Light Chain Results in Context with Clinical Findings

Serum κ and λ free light chains can be markedly elevated in monoclonal gammopathies; consequently, serum free light chain (sFLC) immunoassays are susceptible to inaccuracies caused by antigen excess. As a result, diagnostics manufacturers have attempted to automate antigen excess detection. A 75-year-old African-American woman had laboratory findings consistent with severe anemia, acute kidney injury, and moderate hypercalcemia. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and sFLC testing were ordered. The sFLC results initially showed mildly elevated free λ light chains and normal free κ. The pathologist noted that sFLC results were discrepant with the bone marrow biopsy, electrophoresis, and immunofixation results. After manual dilution of the serum, repeat sFLC testing revealed significantly higher λ sFLC results. Antigen excess causing falsely low sFLC quantitation may not be detected by immunoassay instruments as intended. Correlation with clinical history, serum and urine protein electrophoresis results, and other laboratory findings is essential when interpreting sFLC results.

Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part I: Update on laboratory tests for the study of monoclonal gammopathies

Monoclonal gammopathies (MG) are characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells that produce identical abnormal immunoglobulins (intact or some of their subunits). This abnormal immunoglobulin component is called monoclonal protein (M-protein), and is considered a biomarker of proliferative activity. The identification, characterization and measurement of M-protein is essential for the management of MG. We conducted a systematic review of the different tests and measurement methods used in the clinical laboratory for the study of M-protein in serum and urine, the biochemistry and hematology tests necessary for clinical evaluation, and studies in bone marrow, peripheral blood and other tissues. This review included literature published between 2009 and 2022. The paper discusses the main methodological characteristics and limitations, as well as the purpose and clinical value of the different tests used in the diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and assessment of treatment response in MG. Included are methods for the study of M-protein, namely electrophoresis, measurement of immunoglobulin levels, serum free light chains, immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pairs, and mass spectrometry, and for the bone marrow examination, morphological analysis, cytogenetics, molecular techniques, and multiparameter flow cytometry.

Quantification of Free Immunoglobulin Light Chains in Urine

BACKGROUND

The serum-free immunoglobulin light chain assay has been recommended as a screening test for monoclonal gammopathy. We evaluated the usefulness of urine free immunoglobulin light concentration for selection of specimens for immunofixation electrophoresis.

METHODS

Using kits from The Binding Site for Freelite ®, we validated examination of urine for measuring free κ and λ light chains. The results of urine free light chain concentrations were evaluated to ascertain if the results could be used to reduce the number of specimens requiring urine protein immunofixation electrophoresis.

RESULTS

In the 515 specimens examined, there was no evidence of monoclonal gammopathy or history of monoclonal gammopathy in 331. Monoclonal κ or λ light chains were detectable in 42 and 30 specimens, respectively. There was history of κ or λ chain associated monoclonal gammopathy in 62 and 50 patients, respectively. In the 38 monoclonal κ positive urine specimens, with light chain data, κ/λ ratio was >5.83 in all specimens. In 27 specimens positive for monoclonal λ light chains, with light chain data, the urine λ/κ ratio was > 0.17 in 24 of 27 specimens and > 0.041 in all specimens. In patients without monoclonal gammopathy all specimens had a κ/λ ratio of >5.83 or λ/κ ratio >0.17.

CONCLUSIONS

The Freelite ® assay from The Binding Site is suitable for quantification of free light chains in urine. In patients with known history of monoclonal gammopathy, urine immunofixation electrophoresis may be omitted in specimens with κ/λ ratio of <5.83 for κ associated lesions and λ/κ ratio of <0.041 for λ associated lesions. However, the results do not support using this test for first-time urine testing for monoclonal light chains as it is not predictive of positive result, nor does it exclude a monoclonal light chain in urine.

Screening for and diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy

Monoclonal gammopathy is a spectrum of disorders characterised by clonal proliferation of plasma cells or lymphocytes, which produce abnormal immunoglobulin or its components (monoclonal proteins). Monoclonal gammopathies are often categorised as low-tumour-burden diseases (eg, amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis), premalignant disorders (such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma), and malignancies (eg, multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia). Such diversity of concentration and structure makes monoclonal protein a challenging clonal marker. This article provides an overview on initial laboratory testing of monoclonal gammopathy to guide clinicians and laboratory professionals in the selection and interpretation of appropriate investigations.

Urine Protein Immunofixation Electrophoresis: Free Light Chain Urine Immunofixation Electrophoresis Is More Sensitive than Conventional Assays for Detecting Monoclonal Light Chains and Could Serve as a Marker of Minimal Residual Disease

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin monoclonal light chains (MLCs) in serum and urine are markers for monoclonal gammopathy and could serve as markers of minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM). Excretion of MLCs in urine is known to result in renal damage and shorter survival in patients with LC-predominant MM.

METHODS

Retrospective review of urine immunofixation in 1738 specimens at 3 medical centers was conducted to assess the utility of urinalysis for diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathy. We tested 228 stored urine specimens via the modified urine immunofixation method, using antisera to assay free LCs (FLCs).

RESULTS

Our review of urine immunofixation results and medical records validated the theory that the only meaningful value-added finding was detection of monoclonal free light chains. Examination of 228 urine specimens using our novel method revealed 18.4% additional positive results. The rate of incremental findings for lambda LCs was nearly 3-fold higher than for kappa LCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The new method of urine immunofixation is significantly more sensitive and more efficient than the conventional method for detecting MLCs in urine. The new assay appears to be sensitive enough to prove that MLCs serve as a marker of MRD in MM.

Kappa Free Light Chain Drift Prompts the Need for a New Upper Limit of Normal Free Light Chain Ratio to Avoid an Epidemic of Kappa Light Chain Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undermined Significance

BACKGROUND

Multiple laboratory tests are employed for detection of monoclonal proteins in patients and include serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation electrophoresis, free light chain (FLC) immunoassay, and mass spectrometry (Mass-Fix). Recently, reports on a drift in FLC quantitation results have been brought to light.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 16 887 patients whose sera were tested for a monoclonal protein by a FLC assay, serum protein electrophoresis, and Mass-Fix. This is a retrospective study designed to assess the impact of a drift on the performance of FLC ratio (rFLC) in groups of patients with and without detectable plasma cell disorders (PCDs).

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that 63% of patients with monoclonal protein equal or higher than 2 g/L (by SPEP) had an abnormal rFLC (reference range 0.26-1.65). Conversely, 16% of patients with undetectable monoclonal protein by other methods (i.e., SPEP and Mass-Fix) who also had no record of treated PCD had an abnormal rFLC. In these cases, there was an imbalance in the number of kappa high rFLCs to lambda low rFLCs of 201 to 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest decreased specificity of rFLC for a monoclonal kappa FLC in the 1.65 to 3.0 range.

Retrospective Analysis of Serum Free Light Chain Reference Intervals and Risk for Monoclonal Gammopathy Suggests Different Limits Than Those in International Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Recent reference interval studies of the serum free light chain (FLC) test using contemporary instruments display divergence with the diagnostic range generally adopted as the international standard. In this study, we perform a retrospective reference interval analysis with risk predictions for monoclonal gammopathy.

METHODS

Retrospective laboratory and clinical data for 8,986 patients were included in the study. Reference intervals were generated against a set of inclusion/exclusion criteria for two time periods representing the use of different instruments. The presence of monoclonal gammopathy was established from diagnostic test interpretations and EHR diagnosis codes in the patient problem lists and medical history.

RESULTS

The 95% FLC ratio reference intervals were 0.76-2.38 for SPAPLUS®, and 0.68-1.82 for Optilite® instruments. These intervals varied considerably from the current diagnostic range of 0.26-1.65 and mapped approximately to the FLC ratios beyond which risk of monoclonal gammopathy substantially increased.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings corroborate recent reference interval studies and support recommendations for independent re-evaluation of intervals by institutions as well as an update of international guidelines.

Utilizing Mass Spectrometry to Detect and Isotype Monoclonal Proteins in Urine: Comparison to Electrophoretic Methods

BACKGROUND

Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry coupled to immune enrichment (MASS-FIX) as an alternative to serum immunofixation electrophoresis has demonstrated increased sensitivity in monoclonal protein (MP) detection with improved laboratory workflow. This study explored similar replacement of urine immunofixation electrophoresis (u-IFE) with urine MASS-FIX (u-MASS-FIX) by method comparison.

METHODS

Residual urine (n = 1008) from Mayo Clinic patients with a known plasma cell disease were assayed neat by u-MASS-FIX analysis. Each sample was paired with the following: u-IFE, urine total protein, urine protein electrophoresis, serum κ/λ free light chain (LC) ratio (rFLC), and serum MASS-FIX (s-MASS-FIX). Analytical sensitivities were measured in pooled urine spiked with daratumumab.

RESULTS

u-IFE and u-MASS-FIX had 91% agreement in determining the presence/absence of MPs (Cohen kappa = 0.8200). In discrepant cases, serum rFLC statistically aligned more closely with positive u-MASS-FIX cases than u-IFE. Patients positive by both s-MASS-FIX and u-MASS-FIX had matching MP masses (±20 daltons) in 94% of cases. The u-MASS-FIX spectra further identified κ/λ LC fragments and glycosylated LCs not appreciated on u-IFE. The unconcentrated u-MASS-FIX limit of detection of 0.156 mg/mL was determined equivalent to 100× concentrated u-IFE.

CONCLUSION

u-MASS-FIX is a reliable alternative to u-IFE with the added benefits of LC glycosylation detection and MP mass tracking between serum and urine. Furthermore, u-MASS-FIX is performed using neat urine. Eliminating the need to concentrate urine for u-IFE has potential to increase productivity by decreasing labor minutes per test.

A Single Reference Interval for Interpreting Serum Free Light Chains across Patients with Varying Renal Function

BACKGROUND

Serum free light chain (sFLC) assays are interpreted using a sFLC-ratio-based reference interval (manufacturer's interval) that was defined using a cohort of healthy patients. However, renal impairment elevates the sFLC-ratio, leading to a high false positive rate when using the manufacturer's interval. Prior studies have developed renal-specific reference intervals; however, this approach has not been widely adopted due to practical limitations. Thus, there remains a critical need for a renally robust sFLC interpretation method.

METHODS

Retrospective data mining was used to define patient cohorts that reflect the spectrum of renal function seen in clinical practice. Two new reference intervals, one based on the sFLC-ratio and one based on a novel principal component analysis (PCA)-based metric, were developed for the FREELITE assay (Binding Site) on the Roche Cobas c501 instrument (Roche).

RESULTS

Compared to the manufacturer's reference interval, both new methods exhibited significantly lower false positive rates and greater robustness to renal function while maintaining equivalent sensitivity for monoclonal gammopathy (MG) diagnosis. While not significantly different, the point estimate for sensitivity was highest for the PCA-based approach.

CONCLUSION

Renally robust sFLC interpretation using a single reference interval is possible given a reference cohort that reflects the variation in renal function observed in practice. Further studies are needed to achieve sufficient power and determine if the novel PCA-based metric offers superior sensitivity for MG diagnosis. These new methods offer the practical advantages of not requiring an estimated glomerular filtration rate result or multiple reference intervals, thereby lowering practical barriers to implementation.

Use of Clinical Decision Support to Improve the Laboratory Evaluation of Monoclonal Gammopathies

OBJECTIVES

There is considerable variation in ordering practices for the initial laboratory evaluation of monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) despite clear society guidelines to include serum free light chain (sFLC) testing. We assessed the ability of a clinical decision support (CDS) alert to improve guideline compliance and analyzed its clinical impact.

METHODS

We designed and deployed a targeted CDS alert to educate and prompt providers to order an sFLC assay when ordering serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) testing.

RESULTS

The alert was highly effective at increasing the co-ordering of SPEP and sFLC testing. Preimplementation, 62.8% of all SPEP evaluations included sFLC testing, while nearly 90% of evaluations included an sFLC assay postimplementation. In patients with no prior sFLC testing, analysis of sFLC orders prompted by the alert led to the determination that 28.9% (800/2,769) of these patients had an abnormal κ/λ ratio. In 452 of these patients, the sFLC assay provided the only laboratory evidence of a monoclonal protein. Moreover, within this population, there were numerous instances of new diagnoses of multiple myeloma and other MGs.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDS alert increased compliance with society guidelines and improved the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected MGs.

Accuracy of determination of free light chains (Kappa and Lambda) in plasma and serum by Swedish laboratories as monitored by external quality assessment

BACKGROUND

Free light chain (FLC) measurements are important in diagnosing monoclonal gammopathies. As FLC are heterogeneous, different reagents and instruments for measuring FLC concentrations may give diverging results that affect assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Here we investigated agreement between different FLC methods using data from the Swedish external quality assurance (EQA) programme.

METHODS

The two main FLC assays, N Latex FLC (Siemens) and Serum Freelite (The Binding Site), using four nephelometric or turbidimetric instrument platforms, were compared. Results from 27 EQA rounds distributed to 11-16 Swedish hospital laboratories during 2015-2020 were investigated.

RESULTS

The kappa (κ) FLC measurements deviated significantly over time, but when only nephelometry was used, deviation from the mean was lower (median ranges: -5% to 13 %). The CV was significantly higher for the Freelite assay (mean CV = 8.7) than for the N latex assay (mean CV = 5.7) (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of determination between all combinations of reagents and instrument platforms used was generally good (r² = 0.76-0.87), and the correlation slope acceptable (0.81-1.2). For lambda (λ) FLC measurements, no concordance between combinations of instruments and reagents is apparent, deviating between -40 % to + 48 % from the mean. The CV was significantly higher for the combination with nephelometry and the Freelite assay (CV mean = 13.9 %) than nephelometry and the N latex assay (CV mean = 9.9 %) (p <0.001). The coefficient of determination varied between combinations of reagents and instrument platforms (r² = 0.59-0.89) and the slope ranged between 0.48 and 1.5. Significant differences between the two reagents used were sometimes noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Imprecision in λFLC affects the κFLC/λFLC ratio. This may be important in clinical assessment of patients, especially differentiating between monoclonal and polyclonal gammopathies.