Practical Updates and Diagnostic Challenges in Endometrial Carcinoma

A Review of the Risk Factors Associated with Endometrial Hyperplasia During Perimenopause

Background

Endometrial hyperplasia, characterized by excessive growth leading to endometrial thickening, is commonly observed in the premenopausal period. Its prevalence in postmenopausal women is approximately 15%, peaking between ages 50 and 60. This condition often manifests as abnormal uterine bleeding and can progress to malignancy, with varying risks depending on the type of hyperplasia.

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the factors influencing endometrial thickness during the perimenopausal period and raise awareness among healthcare professionals about the importance of evaluating and caring for individuals with endometrial hyperplasia.

Methods

Studies examining the association between various factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, age, estrogen replacement therapy, anovulatory disorders, smoking, medications, genetic factors, and endocrine-related proteins and the development of endometrial hyperplasia were reviewed. The literature search encompassed relevant databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Results

Research findings indicate significant associations between changes in gene expression of several factors and the development of endometrial hyperplasia. Notably, the risk of progression to cancer varies between non-atypical and atypical hyperplasia cases. Factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, age, estrogen replacement therapy, anovulatory disorders, smoking, medications, Lynch syndrome, tamoxifen use, and alterations in gene expression of TNF-α, EGF, IGF-1, IGF-1R, and PTEN have been implicated in the pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia.

Conclusion

This study underscores the importance of understanding the factors influencing endometrial thickness during the perimenopausal period. It emphasizes the pivotal role of healthcare professionals in evaluating and caring for individuals with this condition.

Case report: A rare case of malacoplakia resembling a malignant tumor of the cervix: a case report and review of the literature

Malacoplakia is a rare chronic granulomatous disease that mostly affects the gastrointestinal tract and urinary tract of immunocompromised patients; malacoplakia rarely effects the female reproductive tract. Here, we report a 56-year-old patient who underwent thymectomy for thymoma and myasthenia gravis prior to developing cervical and vaginal malacoplakia. The patient presented with recurrent vaginal bleeding. We discovered that there were alterations in the cervical cauliflower pattern during colposcopy, which is suggestive of cervical cancer. Pathological examination of the lesion tissue showed that a large number of macrophages aggregated, and M-G bodies with concentric circles and refractive properties were observed between cells. Immunostaining for CD68 and CD163 was positive, and special staining for D-PAS and PAS was positive. The discovery of Escherichia coli in bacterial culture can aid in the diagnosis of malacoplakia. Following surgery, we performed vaginal lavage with antibiotics in addition to resection of local cervical and vaginal lesions. This study provides a fresh perspective on the management of genital malacoplakia.

HER-2 overexpression in female genital tract clear cell carcinomas: Evaluation of different scoring guidelines, clinicopathological features and prognostic impact

BACKGROUND

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare high-grade adenocarcinoma associated with poor response to platinum-based chemotherapy agents in the female genital tract. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is routinely used as a biomarker for targeted therapy in breast and gastric carcinomas, but its role in CCC remains unclear.

METHODS

In this study, HER2 overexpression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 scoring guidelines for breast and endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) on tissue microarray blocks. In equivocal and positive cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed. IHC score 3, and all amplified cases on FISH test were considered positive.

RESULTS

Thirty-six cases of ovarian (OCCC), 36 endometrial (ECCC), and 2 cervical CCC were included. According to ESC and breast scoring guidelines, 20 % and 15.1 % of ECCC and 14.7 % and 6 % of OCCC were HER2 positive, respectively. Both cases of cervical CCC were negative. Scoring based on breast carcinoma guideline showed higher concordance (100 %) with gene amplification results, in comparison with ESC guideline (82.7 %). On multivariate survival analysis, HER2 positive ECCC and OCCC (based on ESC scoring methods) had significantly lower overall and disease-free survivals (OS, DFS) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HER2 immunoscoring based on ESC guideline can yield a higher sensitivity with relevant clinical and prognostic features in OCCC and ECCC. HER2 can be considered a potential biomarker for targeted therapy and future clinical trials.