Sedation and analgesia in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates: continue standard of care or experiment?

Time to first passage of meconium and defecation frequency preceding necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a case-control study

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Early recognition and treatment of NEC are critical to improving outcomes. Enteric nervous system (ENS) immaturity has been proposed as a key factor in NEC pathophysiology. Gastrointestinal dysmotility is associated with ENS immaturity and may serve as a predictive factor for the development of NEC. In this case-control study, preterm infants (gestational age (GA) < 30 weeks) were included in two level-IV neonatal intensive care units. Infants with NEC in the first month of life were 1:3 matched to controls based on GA (± 3 days). Odds ratios for NEC development were analyzed by logistic regression for time to first passage of meconium (TFPM), duration of meconial stool, and mean daily defecation frequency over the 72 h preceding clinical NEC onset (DF < T0). A total of 39 NEC cases and 117 matched controls (median GA 27 + 4 weeks) were included. Median TFPM was comparable in cases and controls (36 h [IQR 13-65] vs. 30 h [IQR 9-66], p = 0.83). In 21% of both cases and controls, TFPM was ≥ 72 h (p = 0.87). Duration of meconial stool and DF < T0 were comparable in the NEC and control group (median 4 and 3, resp. in both groups). Odds of NEC were not significantly associated with TFPM, duration of meconial stools, and DF < T0 (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.00 [0.99-1.03], 1.16 [0.86-1.55] and 0.97 [0.72-1.31], resp.).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, no association was found between TFPM, duration of meconium stool, and DF < T0 and the development of NEC.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening acute intestinal inflammatory disease of the young preterm infant. Early clinical risk factors for NEC have been investigated in order to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment. • Signs of disrupted gastrointestinal mobility, such as gastric retention and paralytic ileus, have been established to support the diagnosis of NEC. Nevertheless, defecation patterns have insufficiently been studied in relation to the disease.

WHAT IS NEW

• Defecation patterns in the three days preceding NEC did not differ from gestational age-matched controls of corresponding postnatal age. Additionally, the first passage of meconium and the duration of meconium passage were comparable between cases and controls. Currently, defecation patterns are not useful as early warning signs for NEC. It remains to be elucidated whether these parameters are different based on the location of intestinal necrosis.

Impact of dexmedetomidine in conjunction with a weaning protocol on post-surgical opioid use in a neonatal intensive care unit

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the impact of protocol-driven dexmedetomidine (and clonidine) use on opioid exposure in post-surgical neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A Level III, surgical NICU.

PATIENTS

Surgical neonates who received clonidine or dexmedetomidine concomitantly with an opioid for sedation and/or analgesia post-operatively.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of a standardized sedation/analgesia weaning protocol.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were clinically, although not statistically, significant reductions in opioid wean duration (240 vs. 227 h, p = 0.82), total opioid duration (604 vs. 435 h, p = 0.23), and total opioid exposure (91 vs. 51 mg ME/kg, p = 0.13), and limited impact on NICU outcomes or pain/withdrawal scores with use of the protocol. Increases in use of medications in alignment with the protocol (e.g., scheduled acetaminophen and opioids weaned first) were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

We have been unable to demonstrate a reduction in opioid exposure with use of alpha-2 agonists alone; addition of a weaning protocol showed a reduction in opioid duration and exposure (although not statistically significant). At this point, dexmedetomidine and clonidine should not be introduced outside standardized protocols with scheduled acetaminophen post-operatively.

Missed nursing care and its influencing factors among neonatal intensive care unit nurses in South Korea: a descriptive study

Purpose

Preventing missed care is important in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) due to neonates’ vulnerabilities. This study examined missed care and its influencing factors among NICU nurses.

Methods

Missed care among 120 Korean NICU nurses was measured using a cross-culturally adapted online questionnaire. The frequency of missed care for 32 nursing activities and the significance of 23 reasons for missed care were collected.

Results

All participants had missed at least 1 activity, missing on average 19.35 activities during a typical work-day. The most common missed item was “provide developmental care for the baby”. The most common reason for missed care was “emergency within the unit or deterioration of one of the assigned patients”. The final regression model explained 9.6% of variance in missed care. The average daily number of assigned patients receiving inotropes or sedation over the last month influenced the total number of missed care items.

Conclusion

Missed care was affected by nurses’ workload related to the number of patients taking medication. Frequently missed activities, especially those related to developmental care, require patience and time, conflicting with safety prioritization and inadequate working conditions. NICU nurses’ working conditions should be improved to ensure adequate time for nursing activities.

Cardiopulmonary effects and recovery characteristics associated with 2 sedative protocols for assisted ventilation in healthy neonatal foals

Neonatal foals may require prolonged sedation to permit ventilatory support in the first few days of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the cardiopulmonary effects and clinical recovery characteristics of 2 sedative/analgesia protocols in healthy foals receiving assisted ventilation. Foals were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine, butorphanol, and propofol (DBP) or midazolam, butorphanol, and propofol (MBP) during a 24-hour period. Infusion rates of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol were adjusted and propofol boluses administered according to set protocols to maintain optimal sedation and muscle relaxation. Ventilatory support variables were adjusted to preset targets. Physiologic variables were recorded, cardiac output (CO) measured (thermodilution), and arterial and mixed venous blood collected for gas analysis at intervals up to 24 hours. Foals in group DBP received dexmedetomidine [2.4 ± 0.5 μg/kg body weight (BW) per hour], butorphanol (13 μg/kg BW per hour), and propofol (6.97 ± 0.86 mg/kg BW per hour), whereas foals in group MBP received midazolam (0.14 ± 0.04 mg/kg BW per hour), butorphanol (13 μg/kg BW per hour), and propofol (5.98 ± 1.33 mg/kg BW per hour). Foals in the DBP group received significantly more propofol boluses (9.0 ± 3.0) than those in the MBP group (4.0 ± 2.0). Although physiologic variables remained within acceptable limits, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac index (CI) were lower in foals in the DBP group than in the MBP group. Times to sternal recumbency, standing, and nursing were significantly shorter in the DBP than MBP group. We found that MBP and DBP protocols are suitable to assist ventilatory support in neonatal foals, although MBP results in a prolonged recovery compared to DBP.

Early Enteral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Narrative Review of the Nutritional, Metabolic, and Developmental Benefits

Enteral feeding is the preferred method of nutrient provision for preterm infants. Though parenteral nutrition remains an alternative to provide critical nutrition after preterm delivery, the literature suggests that enteral feeding still confers significant nutritional and non-nutritional benefits. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to summarize health and clinical benefits of early enteral feeding within the first month of life in preterm infants. Likewise, this review also proposes methods to improve enteral delivery in clinical care, including a proposal for decision-making of initiation and advancement of enteral feeding. An extensive literature review assessed enteral studies in preterm infants with subsequent outcomes. The findings support the early initiation and advancement of enteral feeding impact preterm infant health by enhancing micronutrient delivery, promoting intestinal development and maturation, stimulating microbiome development, reducing inflammation, and enhancing brain growth and neurodevelopment. Clinicians must consider these short- and long-term implications when caring for preterm infants.

To Sedate or Not to Sedate for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: An Ethical Approach

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is an effective, minimally invasive technique of administering surfactant to infants with respiratory distress syndrome. While termed less invasive, LISA still requires airway instrumentation with direct laryngoscopy, thus may be considered painful. However, the issue of whether or not to routinely sedate infants for LISA remains contentious, with significant variation in practice between centres. Proponents for giving pharmacological analgesia and/or sedation predominantly focus on patient comfort during the procedure. However, those who favour non-pharmacological measures of pain management focus on the potential for procedural success without the risk of adverse events, such as respiratory depression and potentially the need for escalation to intubation, which may occur with pharmacological agents. The neonatal population who may benefit from LISA is varied. Due to this variety in presentation type, gestational age, and unit experience, there is a need to provide an individualized, tailored approach to sedation and analgesia for these infants. Using a blanket approach to sedation will lead to infants being exposed to sedative medications on the assumption of potential distress, rather than in response to signs of actual distress. This places the infant at risk of the adverse reactions, potentially without them ever having needed the beneficial effect of the medications. This seems an unnecessary risk. This article explores the ethical arguments pertaining to analgesia and sedation during the LISA technique, concluding that a standardized approach to the usage of pharmacological sedation is undesirable. Moreover, we maintain that procedural analgesia and sedation should be based on individualized, infant-centred assessment, rather than on a rigid, standardized approach.

Clinical and Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Midazolam on Morphine Therapy for Pain Relief in Critically Ill Ventilated Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The impact of midazolam on the overall performance of morphine therapy for pain in ventilated neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has never been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study is a clinical and economic analysis of morphine monotherapy versus morphine plus midazolam in ventilated infants with RDS.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model from the hospital perspective was developed to follow the consequences of the use of the study drugs. Clinical and resource utilization data were extracted based on a retrospective cohort study of 104 neonates with RDS receiving morphine alone versus in combination with midazolam at the main neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Qatar, from 2014 to 2019. Primary outcome measures were the analgesia success rate, via the Premature Infant Pain Profile scale, and overall costs of therapies. Multivariate statistical analyses confirmed no significant variations in baseline characteristics between study groups.

RESULTS

With 0.05 significance and 80% power, morphine had a higher rate of successful analgesia (65.4 vs. 34.6%; risk ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.28; p = 0.019). Overall costs were also in favor of morphine compared with its combination with midazolam, with cost savings of 40,959 Qatari Riyal ($US11,222), year 2019/20 values. The Monte Carlo analyses confirmed the economic advantage of morphine alone in 100% of cases and demonstrated that it is not sensitive to uncertainties in study model inputs.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphine monotherapy enabled enhanced pain relief over its combination with midazolam in the NICU, at a reduced overall cost. Morphine alone, therefore, seems to be a dominant analgesia strategy.

An assessment of the impact of dexmedetomidine on opioid use in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine on opioid use in neonates.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of neonates that received dexmedetomidine compared to matched historical controls in a surgical tertiary NICU. The primary endpoint was overall opioid exposure. Secondary endpoints included the duration of regular opioid use, duration of opioid wean, duration of mechanical ventilation, and time to achieve full enteral feeds.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in opioid exposure (60.3 vs 42.6 mcg ME/kg, p = .25), duration (583 vs 340 h, p = .07), or wean duration (261 vs 147 h, p = .12) between the two cohorts. In fact, these parameters showed clinically, if not statistically, significant increases in the dexmedetomidine cohort. Opioid exposure per day, length of NICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and days to full enteral feeds did not differ between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective cohort study did not show reduced opioid exposure in surgical neonates receiving dexmedetomidine, which is in contrast to other literature. It highlights the limitations of using a medication without appropriate guidance and assessment tools to support its use.

Clonidine for pain in non-ventilated infants

BACKGROUND

Critically ill newborn infants undergo a variety of painful procedures or experience a variety of painful conditions during their early life in the neonatal unit. In the critically ill paediatric and neonatal population, clonidine is prescribed as an adjunct to opioids or benzodiazepines aiming to reduce the doses of these drugs that are required for analgesia or sedation, or to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. It has been shown that clonidine premedication might have a positive effect on postoperative pain in children.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and harms of clonidine for the prevention or treatment of procedural pain; postoperative pain; or pain associated with clinical conditions in non-ventilated neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the CENTRAL, MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to December 2018. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. We ran an updated search from 1 January 2018 to 11 March 2020 in CENTRAL via CRS Web, MEDLINE via Ovid, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, and cluster trials comparing clonidine to placebo or no treatment, opioids, paracetamol, dexmedetomidine, or non-pharmacological pain-reducing interventions for the management of procedural pain, postoperative pain, and pain associated with clinical conditions in preterm and term newborns.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently planned to extract data (e.g. number of participants, birth weight, gestational age, modality of administration, and dose of clonidine) and assess the risk of bias (e.g. adequacy of randomisation, blinding, completeness of follow-up). The primary outcome considered was pain: for procedural pain, the mean values of each analgesia scale assessed during the procedure and at one to two hours after the procedure; for postoperative pain and for pain associated with clinical conditions, the mean values of each analgesia scale assessed at 30 minutes, three hours, and 12 hours after the administration of the intervention. We planned to use the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 3383 references. Two review authors independently assessed all references for inclusion. We did not find any completed studies for inclusion. We excluded three trials where clonidine was administered for spinal anaesthesia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any studies that met our inclusion criteria and hence there is no evidence to recommend or refute the use of clonidine for the prevention or treatment of procedural or postoperative pain, or pain associated with clinical conditions in neonates.

Dexmedetomidine for the Management of Postoperative Pain and Sedation in Newborns

BACKGROUND

Opioids and benzodiazepines have been the mainstay of neonatal analgesia and sedation. However, based on evidence in neonatal animals, these drugs may be deleterious for the developing brain. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a central alpha-2 agonist, has sedative and analgesic effects and has been shown to be neuroprotective in animal models. Despite increasing use of DEX in newborns, there is a paucity of data regarding its safety and efficacy in this population.

OBJECTIVES

The impact of using DEX in postsurgical neonates, either alone or with opioid infusions, for sedation/analgesia was evaluated. The cumulative dose of opioids among patients who did or did not receive DEX was calculated to examine the hypothesis that the addition of DEX can reduce the patient exposure to opioids without significantly increasing side effects and providing adequate sedation and pain control.

METHODOLOGY

This was a retrospective cohort study in which patients were matched by postnatal age and surgical procedure into 2 groups. One group received DEX in the regimen for treatment of pain or sedation after a surgical procedure, and the other group received no DEX. Episodes of bradycardia, respiratory depression and hypotension, and the cumulative dose of opioids and number of supplemental doses administered in both groups were documented.

RESULTS

Although there was no difference in gestational age or weight at birth between the DEX and no-DEX groups, the DEX group's median postconceptional date was older at the time of surgery (39.6 vs 37.4 weeks; p = 0.003). Patients in the DEX group experienced more episodes of bradycardia (12.8% vs 5.1%; p = 0.01). There was no difference between groups in episodes of hypotension or respiratory depression. The cumulative dose of opioids was significantly lower in the DEX group compared with the no-DEX group (1155 mcg/kg vs 1841 mcg/kg; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the number of supplemental doses of opioids given between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of DEX to opioid infusions resulted in a significant decrease in the cumulative dose of opioids but was associated with more episodes of bradycardia than opioids alone.

Dexmedetomidine Use in a Tertiary Care NICU: A Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine are increasingly used for sedation in critically ill pediatric patients. Emerging data suggest potential benefits when used for sedation in neonates, including reduced sedative requirements and earlier enteral feeds.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use, adverse effects, and signs of withdrawal in a cohort of neonates receiving dexmedetomidine, the majority of whom were receiving concomitant opioids.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive review of 38 neonates receiving dexmedetomidine in a medical surgical neonatal intensive care unit, including data on duration of use, dose, adverse effects, weaning, and signs of withdrawal.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine was used for a median of 183 hours, at a median maximum dose of 0.5 µg/kg/h. Premature infants were started on dexmedetomidine at a later chronological age than term infants (41 vs 9 days, P = 0.004). Of 18 patients receiving an opioid infusion at the time of dexmedetomidine initiation, 67% had a dose reduction in opioids by 24 hours. The majority (89%) of neonates had at least 1 potentially related adverse effect during the dexmedetomidine infusion, though no discontinuations were needed as a result. In all, 80% of patients had their dexmedetomidine gradually weaned off, and 71% had at least 1 sign of withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort, dexmedetomidine was often used in a postsurgical setting, with concomitant opioids, over prolonged periods. These factors appear to affect and likely confound the rates of adverse effects and withdrawal signs from dexmedetomidine. Clinicians considering the use of dexmedetomidine in a similar population can draw guidance from our data.

Trends in narcotics and sedative use during mechanical ventilation of preterm infants in Canadian neonatal intensive care units

OBJECTIVE

Mechanical ventilation (MV) in preterm infants (PTI) causes discomfort. Whether it causes pain is controversial. Meta analysis reviews of published work on PTI during MV have shown no clinically significant impact of opioids on pain scales, and hence not recommended for routine use in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Similarly regular use of sedative midazolam is also not recommended. Therefore we hypothesized a downward trend in narcotics and sedatives used in MV of PTI in NICUs. This study aimed to assess trends of sedatives and narcotics use during MV of PTI in Canadian NICUs during 2004-2009.

METHODS

PTI born at gestational age (GA) of <35 weeks requiring invasive MV for >24 hours were identified retrospectively from the Canadian Neonatal Network database for 2004-2009. PTI were excluded if moribund on admission, had major congenital anomalies, surgery (except laser eye surgery), necrotizing enterocolitis, chest tube or history of maternal narcotic abuse. PTI were classified according to whether they received any narcotics (morphine, fentanyl, methadone, sufentanyl, meperidine, alfentynl and codiene) or sedatives (chloral hydrate, midazolam, lorazepam, phenobarbital, pentobarbital, ketamine and propofol) for >24 consecutive hours during MV. Trends of narcotics and sedatives were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage Trend test separately for PTI born at <29 and 29-34 weeks of GA.

RESULTS

Among 5 638 study subjects, 2 169 (38.5%) received narcotics and 897 (15.9%) received sedatives. The most common narcotics were morphine (62.2%) and fentanyl (63.8%) and sedatives were phenobarbital (44.9%) and chloral hydrate (44.2%). A significant decreasing trend (P<0.01) in the use of any sedatives during MV was observed in PTI <29 and 29-34 weeks of GA. However, the use of any narcotics during MV increased significantly (P=0.03) among PTI <29 weeks of GA, and no change in trend was detected for PTI born at 29-34 weeks of GA.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of sedatives during MV in PTI born at <35 weeks of GA was positively affected, however the narcotics use during MV remained constant for PTI born at 29-34 weeks, and increased in extremely low GA group (less than 29 weeks) suggesting evidence based practice change was not observed during the study period.

Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine against hyperoxia-induced injury in the developing rat brain

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective agonist of α2-receptors with sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine have been reported in various brain injury models. In the present study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on hippocampal neurogenesis, specifically the proliferation capacity and maturation of neurons and neuronal plasticity following the induction of hyperoxia in neonatal rats. Six-day old sex-matched Wistar rats were exposed to 80% oxygen or room air for 24 h and treated with 1, 5 or 10 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine or normal saline. A single pretreatment with DEX attenuated the hyperoxia-induced injury in terms of neurogenesis and plasticity. In detail, both the proliferation capacity (PCNA+ cells) as well as the expression of neuronal markers (Nestin+, PSA-NCAM+, NeuN+ cells) and transcription factors (SOX2, Tbr1/2, Prox1) were significantly reduced under hyperoxia compared to control. Furthermore, regulators of neuronal plasticity (Nrp1, Nrg1, Syp, and Sema3a/f) were also drastically decreased. A single administration of dexmedetomidine prior to oxygen exposure resulted in a significant up-regulation of expression-profiles compared to hyperoxia. Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine may have neuroprotective effects in an acute hyperoxic model of the neonatal rat.

Alveolar formation is dysregulated by restricted nutrition but not excess sedation in preterm lambs managed by noninvasive support

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth and respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation frequently leads to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). A hallmark feature of BPD is alveolar simplification. For our preterm lamb model of BPD, invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with postnatal feeding intolerance (reduced nutrition) and sedation. In contrast, preterm lambs managed by noninvasive support (NIS) have normal alveolar formation, appropriate postnatal nutrition, and require little sedation. We used the latter, positive-outcome group to discriminate the contribution of reduced nutrition vs. sedation on alveolar simplification. We hypothesized that, restricted nutrition, but not sedation with pentobarbital, contributes to impaired indices of alveolar formation in preterm lambs managed by NIS.

METHODS

Preterm lambs managed by NIS for 21d were randomized into three groups: NIS control, NIS plus restricted nutrition, and NIS plus excess sedation with pentobarbital. We quantified morphological and biochemical indices of alveolar formation, as well as mesenchymal cell apoptosis and proliferation.

RESULTS

Restricted nutrition impaired morphological and biochemical indices of alveolar formation, and reduced mesenchymal cell apoptosis and proliferation. Excess sedation with pentobarbital did not alter these indices, although mesenchymal cell apoptosis was less.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that restricted nutrition, but not excess sedation, contributes to impaired alveolar formation during the evolution of BPD in chronically ventilated preterm lambs.

Less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a new, less invasive surfactant administration technique for beractant replacement using a specifically designed cannula in preterm infants born at <32 weeks of gestation and to compare short- and long-term outcomes between this approach and standard treatment, consisting of intubation, administration of surfactant and early extubation to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

METHOD

This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, non-randomized, controlled pilot study with an experimental cohort of 30 patients treated with less invasive surfactant administration and a retrospective control group comprising the 30 patients most recently treated with the standard approach. Beractant (4 ml/kg) was administered as an exogenous surfactant in both groups if patients on nasal continuous positive airway pressure during the first three days of life were in need of more than 30% FiO2. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02611284.

RESULTS

In the group with less invasive surfactant administration, beractant was successfully administered in all patients. Thirteen patients (43.3%) in the group with less invasive surfactant administration required invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 1 hour during the first 3 days of life, compared with 22 (73%) in the control group (p<0.036). The rate of requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours was similar between the infants in the two groups (46% vs. 40%, respectively). There were no differences in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The administration of beractant (4 ml/kg) using a less invasive surfactant administration technique with a specifically designed cannula for administration is feasible. Moreover, early invasive mechanical ventilation exposure is significantly reduced by this method compared with the strategy involving intubation, surfactant administration and early extubation.

Neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine on hyperoxia-induced toxicity in the neonatal rat brain

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective agonist of α2-receptors with sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, and anesthetic properties. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine have been reported in various brain injury models. In the present study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine on neurodegeneration, oxidative stress markers, and inflammation following the induction of hyperoxia in neonatal rats. Six-day-old Wistar rats received different concentrations of dexmedetomidine (1, 5, or 10 µg/kg bodyweight) and were exposed to 80% oxygen for 24 h. Sex-matched littermates kept in room air and injected with normal saline or dexmedetomidine served as controls. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment significantly reduced hyperoxia-induced neurodegeneration in different brain regions of the neonatal rat. In addition, dexmedetomidine restored the reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio and attenuated the levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of lipid peroxidation, after exposure to high oxygen concentration. Moreover, administration of dexmedetomidine induced downregulation of IL-1β on mRNA and protein level in the developing rat brain. Dexmedetomidine provides protections against toxic oxygen induced neonatal brain injury which is likely associated with oxidative stress signaling and inflammatory cytokines. Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine may have a therapeutic potential since oxygen administration to neonates is sometimes inevitable.

The neurodevelopmental impact of neonatal morphine administration

Medical management of newborn infants often necessitates recurrent painful procedures, which may alter nociceptive pathways during a critical developmental period and adversely effect neuropsychological outcomes. To mitigate the effects of repeated painful stimuli, opioid administration for peri-procedural analgesia and ICU (intensive care unit) sedation is common in the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit). A growing body of basic and animal evidence suggests potential long-term harm associated with neonatal opioid therapy. Morphine increases apoptosis in human microglial cells, and animal studies demonstrate long-term changes in behavior, brain function, and spatial recognition memory following morphine exposure. This comprehensive review examines existing preclinical and clinical evidence on the long-term impacts of neonatal pain and opioid therapy.