1
|
Salluh JIF, Póvoa P, Beane A, Kalil A, Sendagire C, Sweeney DA, Pilcher D, Polverino E, Tacconelli E, Estenssoro E, Frat JP, Ramirez J, Reyes LF, Roca O, Nseir S, Nobre V, Lisboa T, Martin-Loeches I. Challenges for a broad international implementation of the current severe community-acquired pneumonia guidelines. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:526-538. [PMID: 38546855 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains one of the leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit, thus consuming a large share of resources and is associated with high mortality rates worldwide. The evidence generated by clinical studies in the last decade was translated into recommendations according to the first published guidelines focusing on severe community-acquired pneumonia. Despite the advances proposed by the present guidelines, several challenges preclude the prompt implementation of these diagnostic and therapeutic measures. The present article discusses the challenges for the broad implementation of the sCAP guidelines and proposes solutions when applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge I F Salluh
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
- Postgraduate Program of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Póvoa
- NOVA Medical School, CHRC, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Abi Beane
- Pandemic Science Hub and Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- NICS-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Andre Kalil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Cornelius Sendagire
- Anesthesia and Critical Care, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Daniel A Sweeney
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - David Pilcher
- Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Commercial Road3004, Prahran, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell, Australia
| | - Eva Polverino
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Estenssoro
- Hospital Interzonal de Agudos General San Martín, Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean-Pierre Frat
- CHU de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France
- INSERM, CIC-1402, IS-ALIVE, Faculté de Médecine Et de Pharmacie de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Julio Ramirez
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY, USA
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Luis Felipe Reyes
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oriol Roca
- Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut de Recerca Part Taulí - I3PT, Parc del Taulí 1, 08028, Sabadell, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Saad Nseir
- Centre de Réanimation, CHU de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
- Team Fungal Associated Invasive and Inflammatory Diseases, Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Université de Lille, INSERM U995, Lille, France
| | - Vandack Nobre
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Thiago Lisboa
- Critical Care Department, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciencias Pneumologicas, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization, St. James's University Hospital, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bahlis LF, Diogo LP, Fuchs SC. Charlson Comorbidity Index and other predictors of in-hospital mortality among adults with community-acquired pneumonia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 47:e20200257. [PMID: 33656092 PMCID: PMC8332672 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To compare the performance of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with those of the mental Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, and age = 65 years (CURB-65) score and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) as predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: This was a cohort study involving hospitalized patients with CAP between April of 2014 and March of 2015. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were obtained in the ER, and the scores of CCI, CURB-65, and PSI were calculated. The performance of the models was compared using ROC curves and AUCs (95% CI). Results: Of the 459 patients evaluated, 304 met the eligibility criteria. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate was 15.5%, and 89 (29.3%) of the patients were admitted to the ICU. The AUC for the CCI was significantly greater than those for CURB-65 and PSI (0.83 vs. 0.73 and 0.75, respectively). Conclusions: In this sample of hospitalized patients with CAP, CCI was a better predictor of all-cause in-hospital mortality than were the PSI and CURB-65.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fuchs Bahlis
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS - São Leopoldo (RS) Brasil.,. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.,. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - Luciano Passamani Diogo
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS - São Leopoldo (RS) Brasil.,. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - Sandra Costa Fuchs
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bahlis LF, Diogo LP, Kuchenbecker RDS, Fuchs SC. Clinical, epidemiological, and etiological profile of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia in a public hospital in the interior of Brazil. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 44:261-266. [PMID: 30328925 PMCID: PMC6326715 DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37562017000000434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To describe the patient profile, mortality rates, the accuracy of prognostic scores, and mortality-associated factors in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a general hospital in Brazil. Methods: This was a cohort study involving patients with a clinical and laboratory diagnosis of CAP and requiring admission to a public hospital in the interior of Brazil between March 2014 and April 2015. We performed multivariate analysis using a Poisson regression model with robust variance to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: We included 304 patients. Approximately 70% of the patients were classified as severely ill on the basis of the severity criteria used. The mortality rate was 15.5%, and the ICU admission rate was 29.3%. After multivariate analysis, the factors associated with in-hospital mortality were need for mechanical ventilation (OR: 3.60; 95% CI: 1.85-7.47); a Charlson Comorbidity Index score > 3 (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.18-1.43); and a mental Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, and age > 65 years (CURB-65) score > 2 (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.09-1.98). The mean time from patient arrival at the emergency room to initiation of antibiotic therapy was 10 h. Conclusions: The in-hospital mortality rate of 15.5% and the need for ICU admission in almost one third of the patients reflect the major impact of CAP on patients and the health care system. Individuals with a high burden of comorbidities, a high CURB-65 score, and a need for mechanical ventilation had a worse prognosis. Measures to reduce the time to initiation of antibiotic therapy may result in better outcomes in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fuchs Bahlis
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Campus São Leopoldo, São Leopoldo (RS) Brasil.,. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.,. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | | | | | - Sandra Costa Fuchs
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC). Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:1764-1780. [PMID: 28936698 PMCID: PMC5717127 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4920-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Much of the common practice in paediatric mechanical ventilation is based on personal experiences and what paediatric critical care practitioners have adopted from adult and neonatal experience. This presents a barrier to planning and interpretation of clinical trials on the use of specific and targeted interventions. We aim to establish a European consensus guideline on mechanical ventilation of critically children. Methods The European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care initiated a consensus conference of international European experts in paediatric mechanical ventilation to provide recommendations using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness method. An electronic literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words related to mechanical ventilation and disease-specific terms. Results The Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC) consisted of a panel of 15 experts who developed and voted on 152 recommendations related to the following topics: (1) general recommendations, (2) monitoring, (3) targets of oxygenation and ventilation, (4) supportive measures, (5) weaning and extubation readiness, (6) normal lungs, (7) obstructive diseases, (8) restrictive diseases, (9) mixed diseases, (10) chronically ventilated patients, (11) cardiac patients and (12) lung hypoplasia syndromes. There were 142 (93.4%) recommendations with “strong agreement”. The final iteration of the recommendations had none with equipoise or disagreement. Conclusions These recommendations should help to harmonise the approach to paediatric mechanical ventilation and can be proposed as a standard-of-care applicable in daily clinical practice and clinical research. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4920-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|