Multicentric Type 3 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors

Multimodal management of foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms

The foregut, which includes the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, represents one of the most common sites for neuroendocrine neoplasms. These are highly heterogenous with different risk of progression depending on location, cell-type of origin, size, grade and other factors. Various endoscopic and imaging modalities exist to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may be in the form of surgical or endoscopic resection and medical therapy depending on the extent of the disease after diagnostic evaluation. This narrative review aims to explore the literature on the multimodal management of such foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Endoscopic Management of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: An Overview of Proposed Resection and Ablation Techniques

A literature search of MEDLINE/PUBMED was conducted with the aim to highlight current endoscopic management of localised gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. Relevant articles were identified through a manual search, and reference lists were reviewed for additional articles. The results of the research have been displayed in a narrative fashion to illustrate the actual state-of-the-art of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of NETs. Localised NETs of the stomach, duodenum and rectum can benefit from advanced endoscopic resection techniques (e.g., modified endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full thickness resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection) according to centre expertise. Radiofrequency thermal ablation can be proposed as an alternative to surgery in selected patients with localised pancreatic NETs.

A 15-year experience with gastric neuroendocrine tumors: Does type make a difference?

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) are rare and classified into three types by disease etiology and typical behavior.

METHODS

The aim was to describe outcomes after GNET resection at a single institution from 2000 to 2014, stratified by tumor type. Given the small patient number, P-values were not assigned.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients, 12 patients (55%) had Type 1, none (0%) had Type 2, and 10 (45%) had Type 3 tumors. Compared to Type 3, Type 1 patients were younger (mean age: 52 vs. 59 years) with similar rates of endoscopic resection (25% vs. 20%). Type 1 GNETs often had multiple tumors (60% vs. 10%) and were not poorly differentiated (0% vs. 11%). Only 33% of Type 1 had nodal metastases compared to 71% of Type 3. Type 1 GNETs presented with metastatic disease less often (17% vs. 40%). Three year recurrence-free survival was 33% for Type 1 compared to 86% for Type 3. Disease-specific survival at 3-years was 100% and 75% for Types 1 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Type 1 GNETs are often indolent and multifocal without nodal involvement, but have high recurrence risk. Type 3 is more aggressive with increased nodal involvement; nodal evaluation should be routinely performed. Determination of GNET type is paramount to treating patients with this rare disease. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:576-580. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinicopathological features of primary gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A single-center analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and therapeutic modalities for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) among the Chinese population in a single institution.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients with histologically confirmed GNENs, who were diagnosed between 1995 and 2015 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical, imaging and histopathologic characteristics as well as the treatments of GNENs were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with GNENs mostly presented with non-specific symptoms. Gastric body was the most common site of involvement. The choice of imaging modality, such as endoscopy and computed tomography depended on the tumor subtype. Chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin were indispensable immunohistochemical markers for diagnosis. Significant inter-group differences in the positivity rate of CD56 were observed among the three grades (G1, G2 and G3). Therapeutic modalities included endoscopic intervention, surgical resection and pharmacotherapy, which were largely guided by the tumor subtype and the presence or absence of distant metastasis or tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine endoscopic examination is recommended for the early diagnosis of GNENs. Histopathological examination can make the definite diagnosis of GNENs and clarify the nature of gastric polyps. A multidisciplinary approach is important in the management of patients with GNENs.