Improvement of upper extremity lymphedema after delayed breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap

Usefulness of Harmonic ACE+7 Scalpel in Breast Reconstruction with Extended Latissimus Dorsi Flap: An Open-label Single Institution Pilot Study

The extended latissimus dorsi (ELD) flap is a safe and aesthetically acceptable method to reconstruct small to medium-sized breasts. However, the long time required for flap elevation and intraoperative bleeding contributes to various postoperative complications. We investigated the use of alternative devices, such as the Harmonic ACE+7, which has a long arm that can help simultaneously detach and seal tissues to prevent such complications.

Methods

We compared 27 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with the ELD flap using the Harmonic ACE +7 scalpel, and 28 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using an electrocautery scalpel, between May 2019 and March 2022. Data on patient demographics, surgery, and postoperative complications were collected. Surgical outcomes were compared between electrocautery (EC) and Harmonic ACE+7 (HA) groups.

Results

The median age of the patients was 50.2 years. The patient demographics between the groups did not show significant differences. Flap necrosis and hematomas did not occur, and seroma was the major postoperative complication (65.7% in the EC group and 70% in the HA group). The time required for flap elevation was significantly shorter in the HA group than in the EC group (286.0 minutes and 179.0 minutes, respectively). Blood loss reduced significantly in the HA and EC groups (138.5 mL and 78.2 mL, respectively). Moreover, decreased drainage was observed for the breast area. There were no significant differences in other end points.

Conclusion

In breast reconstruction with ELD flaps, using the Harmonic ACE+7 can help reduce the rate of seroma, operative time, and intraoperative bleeding without further disadvantages.

Association of the breast reconstruction modality with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema: A long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Whether the breast reconstruction modality could influence the long-term development of post-mastectomy lymphedema has been little investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential association of the breast reconstruction method with the incidence of lymphedema over an extended follow-up period.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate reconstruction from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. They were categorized into three groups according to the reconstruction method: tissue expander/implant, abdominal flaps, and latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flaps. Differences in the cumulative incidence of lymphedema by the reconstruction method were analyzed, as well as their independent influence on the outcome. Further analyses were conducted with propensity-score matching for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 664 cases were analyzed with a median follow-up of 83 months (402 prostheses, 180 abdominal flaps, and 82 LD flaps). The rate of axillary lymph node dissection was significantly higher in the LD flap group than in the other two groups. The 5-year cumulative incidences of lymphedema in the LD flap, abdominal flap, and prosthesis groups were 3.7%, 10.6%, and 10.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, compared to the use of the LD flap, that of tissue expander/implant and that of abdominal flaps were associated with increased risks of lymphedema. A similar association was observed in the propensity-score matching analysis. The use of abdominal flaps or prostheses was not associated with the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the method of immediate breast reconstruction might be associated with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema.

Donor-site morbidity following breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap - A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Despite a trend toward the use of perforator-based flaps for autologous breast reconstruction, the m. latissimus dorsi (LD) flap remains a popular alternative. Several studies have sought to uncover the shoulder-related donor-site morbidity, but the results are inconclusive. This study aims at evaluating what impact breast reconstruction with an LD flap has on shoulder strength, range of motion (ROM), lymphedema, sensory disturbances, and patients' ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective observational study, we examined 20 female patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction with an LD flap. The primary outcome was a change in shoulder strength, measured with the Biodex System4 Pro-dynamometer. ROM was assessed using two-dimensional photogrammetry. Furthermore, the patients' self-reported pain, lymphedema, sensory disturbances, and ability to perform ADL were assessed using a questionnaire. Measurements were performed pre-operatively at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Of the 20 included patients, 17 completed the follow-up. At the 12 months follow-up, a significant loss of isometric shoulder strength of 17% was observed in shoulder adduction (P<0.001) and 21% in extension (P<0.001). Isometric strength and ability to perform ADL and ROM were unchanged. There was a decrease in the number of patients reporting problems with lymphedema (10 to 7) and an increase in the incidence of sensory disturbances (10 to 13).

CONCLUSION

A loss of shoulder strength was observed following the transfer of the LD flap; however, the procedure did not hinder the post-operative performance of ADLs for the patients. LD reconstruction seems to be a safe procedure.

Patient-specific surgical options for breast cancer-related lymphedema: technical tips

In order to provide a physiological solution for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), the surgeon must understand where and how the pathology of lymphedema occurred. Based on each patient's pathology, the treatment plan should be carefully decided and individualized. At the authors' institution, the treatment plan is made individually based on each patient's symptoms and relative factors. Most early-stage patients first undergo decongestive therapy and then, depending on the efficacy of the treatment, a surgical approach is suggested. If the patient is indicated for surgery, all the points of lymphatic flow obstruction are carefully examined. Thus a BCRL patient can be considered for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), a lymph node flap, scar resection, or a combination thereof. LVA targets ectatic superficial collecting lymphatics, which are located within the deep fat layer, and preoperative mapping using ultrasonography is critical. If there is contracture on the axilla, axillary scar removal is indicated to relieve the vein pressure and allow better drainage. Furthermore, removing the scars and reconstructing the fat layer will allow a better chance for the lymphatics to regenerate. After complete removal of scar tissue, a regional fat flap or a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap with lymph node transfer is performed. By deciding the surgical planning for BCRL based on each patient's pathophysiology, optimal outcomes can be achieved. Depending on each patient's pathophysiology, LVA, scar removal, vascularized lymph node transfer with a sufficient adipocutaneous flap, and simultaneous breast reconstruction should be planned.

Pedicled local flaps: a reliable reconstructive tool for partial breast defects

Background

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy has gained great popularity in the treatment of breast cancer over the past years. However, radiation therapy can lead to many unfavourable aesthetic outcomes including significant volume/skin deficiency, nipple areola complex distortion and skin contraction. We present our experience in using pedicled perforator flaps to tackle the resultant partial breast defects or deformities.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis study on Thirty patients with post breast conserving surgery (BCS) partial breast defects who were managed with pedicled per-forator flaps including muscle sparing latissimus dorsi muscle flap (MSLD), thoraco-dorsal artery perforator flap (TDAP) and intercostal artery perforator flap (ICAP) in the period between December 2008 and December 2018.

Results

Defects were in all quadrants apart from the upper inner quadrant. The reconstructive techniques included TDAP flap 6/30 (20%), MSLD flap 20/30 (66.7%), AICAP flap 4/30 (13.3%). Age ranges 22-35 (mean 29). All flaps showed complete survival, one nipple areola complex superficial epidermolysis was experienced, and one patient presented with fat necrosis. No resultant donor site morbidity apart from scar revision for excess skin at the axillary fold in one patient. The overall satisfaction reached 94% with only 8 patients who required lipofilling to maximize the cosmetic outcome.

Conclusions

The availability of a range of reliable techniques including thoracodorsal/intercostal artery perforator flap (TAP/ICAP) and muscle sparing lattissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) allow optimum results to be achieved in the treatment of partial breast defects following breast conserving surgery.

Outcomes of Lymphedema Microsurgery for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema With or Without Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the outcome of lymphedema microsurgery with or without microsurgical breast reconstruction for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

BACKGROUND

Complete decongestive therapy, lymphovenous anastomosis, and vascularized lymph node flap transfer are the 3 major treatment modalities for BCRL. Releasing axillary contracture and transferring a free flap may potentially improve the BCRL.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2015, 124 patients with BCRL who underwent 3 treatment modalities without or with microsurgical breast reconstruction were included in this study as groups I and II, respectively. Patients were offered the lymphedema microsurgery depending on the availability of patent lymphatic ducts on indocyanine green lymphography if they failed to complete decongestive therapy. The circumferential difference, reduction rate, and episodes of cellulitis were used to evaluate the outcome of treatments.

RESULTS

Improvements in the circumferential difference (12.8 ± 4.2% vs 11.5 ± 5.3%), the reduction rate (20.4 ± 5.1% vs 14.7 ± 6%), and episodes of cellulitis (1.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.1 ± 2.4 times/yr) did not significantly differ between groups I and II (P = 0.06, 0.07, and 0.06, respectively). In both groups, vascularized lymph node flap transfer was significantly superior to lymphovenous anastomosis or complete decongestive therapy in terms of improvements in the circumferential difference, reduction rate and episodes of cellulitis (P = 0.04, 0.04, and 0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical breast reconstruction did not improve the outcome of BCRL. Improvements in BCRL were better for lymphatic microsurgery than complete decongestive therapy. Moreover, vascularized lymph node flap transfer provided greater improvements in the BCRL than lymphovenous anastomosis.

Latissimus dorsi flap with vascularized lymph node transfer for lymphedema treatment: Technique, outcomes, indications and review of literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

One of the surgical treatment options for lymphedema is vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). We present our experience with latissimus dorsi (LD) flap based VLNT for lymphedema treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed 14 consecutive patients treated with pedicled or free LD VLNT between 2014 and 2016 for recalcitrant upper or lower extremity lymphedema. Seven patients underwent lymphovenous bypass in addition to LD VLNT. Limb volume and quality of life scores using the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS) were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative assessment.

RESULTS

Mean duration of lymphedema was 69 months (range 24-124 months). Follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.7 month). Major complications included one free flap loss and one reoperation for thrombosis. Mean preoperative volume differential between normal and affected limb was 35% (range 3-87%). Volume differential reduction was 48%, 28%, and 46% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The LLIS score improved from mean of 46.8 before surgery to a mean of 38.6 at 12 month, demonstrating improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The LD VLNT provides a viable option for treatment of UE and LE lymphedema in selected patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:72-77. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Intratissue lymphovenous communications in the mechanism of action of vascularized lymph node transfer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) as a surgical treatment for cancer-related lymphedema has shown beneficial effects. The mechanism of action of this procedure involves lymphangiogenesis and lymphovenous communications (LVC) within the lymph nodes. We propose intratissue LVC as an additional element responsible for drainage of lymph to blood in the flap and examine this hypothesis in the current study.

METHODS

This prospective study determined the passage of lymph to the venous system via intratissue LVC in 26 free flaps used for breast reconstruction. We evaluated whether fluorescence was positive in the pedicle vein after increasing time intervals following intradermal injection of indocyanine green (ICG) dye into the flaps using near infra-red fluorescence lymphography.

RESULTS

We studied 26 free flaps, 22 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (84.6%), and 4 superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps (15.4%). Fluorescence in the pedicle vein was positive in 22 of the 26 flaps (P = 0.000). The median time for fluorescence evaluation in the pedicle vein was 120 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence in the pedicle vein after ICG intradermal injection indicates functional intratissue LVC in free flaps. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:27-31. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Method of breast reconstruction and the development of lymphoedema

Background

Several studies have demonstrated an association between immediate autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction and a reduced incidence of lymphoedema. However, few of these have ocused specifically on whether the reconstruction method affects the development of lymphoedema. The study evaluated the potential impact of breast reconstruction modality on the incidence of lymphoedema.

Methods

Outcomes of women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using an autologous flap or a tissue expander/implant between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed. Arm or hand swelling with pertinent clinical signs of lymphoedema and excess volume compared with those of the contralateral side was diagnosed as lymphoedema. The cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Clinicopathological factors associated with the development of lymphoedema were investigated by Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 429 reconstructions (214 autologous and 215 tissue expander/implant) were analysed; the mean follow-up of patients was 45·3 months. The two groups had similar characteristics, except that women in the autologous group were older, had a higher BMI, and more often had preoperative radiotherapy than women in the tissue expander/implant group. Overall, the 2-year cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was 6·8 per cent (autologous 4·2 per cent, tissue expander/implant 9·3 per cent). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that autologous reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphoedema compared with that for tissue expander/implant reconstruction. Axillary dissection, a greater number of dissected lymph nodes and postoperative chemotherapy were also independent risk factors for lymphoedema.

Conclusion

The method of breast reconstruction may affect subsequent development of lymphoedema.

Surgical options for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment

Surgical options for treating lymphedema have expanded in recent years. For many years the only treatment options were conservative nonsurgical therapies and excisional surgeries. Advances in microsurgery have made it possible to reconstruct lymphatic function. Reconstructive surgical options include lymphaticovenular bypass, lymphaticolymphatic bypass, and vascularized lymph node transfer. Currently, there is no consensus on how or when to surgically treat lymphedema, and more studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and risks of each of these techniques.

Complicated breast cancer-related lymphedema: evaluating health care resource utilization and associated costs of management

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema can become a disabling condition necessitating inpatient care. This study aimed to estimate complicated lymphedema incidence after breast cancer surgery and calculate associated hospital resource utilization.

METHODS

We identified adult women undergoing lumpectomy and/or mastectomy with axillary lymph node surgery between 2006 and 2012 using 5-state inpatient databases. Patients were grouped according to the development of complicated lymphedema. The primary outcomes were all-cause hospitalizations and health care charges within 2 years of surgery. Multivariate regression models were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 56,075 women included, 2.3% had at least 1 hospital admission for complicated lymphedema within 2 years of surgery. Despite confounder adjustment, women with complicated lymphedema experienced 5 fold more all-cause (incidence rate ratio = 5.02, 95% confidence interval: 4.76 to 5.29) admissions compared with women without lymphedema. This resulted in substantially higher health care charges ($58,088 vs $31,819 per patient, P < .001). Although axillary dissection and certain comorbidities were associated with complicated lymphedema, breast reconstruction appeared unrelated.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated lymphedema develops in a quantifiable number of patients. The health care burden of lymphedema underscored here mandates further investigation into targeted, anticipatory management strategies for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

The link between lymphedema, breast reconstruction and microsurgery

SUMMARY 

This management perspective will explore the relationship between lymphedema and breast reconstruction surgery. Little data exist, but early reports suggest breast reconstruction may be associated with a lower risk of lymphedema. Theories surrounding this relationship, as well as available data on lymphatic repair theories, will be discussed. In addition, the emerging role of lymphatic surgery to prevent or reverse lymphedema will be discussed. The refinement of advanced microsurgical techniques has resulted in a renewed interest in lymphatic surgery to cure lymphedema. However, efficacy, validation of surgical results, and surgery's ability to eliminate from patients the need for daily compression garments and therapy need further study.

[In search of the ideal surgical treatment for lymphedema. Report of 2nd European Conference on supermicrosurgery (Barcelona - March 2012)]

Since more than 50 years, many surgeons all around the world try to find the perfect surgical technique to treat limb lymphedemas. Decongestive physiotherapy associated with the use of a compressive garment has been the primary choice for lymphedema treatment. Many different surgical techniques have been developed, however, to date, there is no consensus on surgical procedure. Most surgical experts of lymphedema met in the second European Conference on supermicrosurgery, organized on March 1st and 2nd 2012, in San Pau Hospital, Barcelona. Together they tried to clarify these different options and ideally a strategy for using these techniques.