One-year follow-up of treatment with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant

Efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the most important treatment for end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapies can prevent acute rejection for kidney transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is usually administered to prevent graft rejection after transplantation. Previous studies have indicated that once-daily tacrolimus may improve medication adherence. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes between once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, and Embase until July 2022. Those randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo renal transplantation were included. A summary risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, nine RCTs were included. There were no differences in biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates between patients with once-daily and those with twice-daily tacrolimus (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.13) in 12 months. Regarding renal function, there was no significant difference between the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups (SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.07). In addition, the risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups.

CONCLUSION

Our major findings suggest that de novo renal transplantation recipients receiving once-daily tacrolimus immediately after transplantation have comparable efficacy and safety with those recipients who received twice-daily tacrolimus. Therefore, once-daily tacrolimus medication can be an alternative for de novo renal transplantation recipients.

Treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A retrospective cohort study of 37 transplants

AIM

Data on the treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) are scarce, and therapeutical strategies for CA-TCMR have not been established. We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes and effects of treatment on pathological and clinical findings in patients with CA-TCMR.

METHODS

This study comprised 37 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institute who were diagnosed with CA-TCMR between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were followed until October 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of the 37 patients were treated. During the observation period, two patients died (5%), and five patients developed allograft loss (13%). A univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that indication biopsy, higher spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR), and Banff ci/ct scores were risk factors for allograft loss. Of the treated patients, 23 underwent follow-up biopsies. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant improvement in the Baff scores for "ti", "i-IFTA", "t", and "t-IFTA" after treatment. On pathology, 13 (57%) of the patients who underwent follow-up biopsy improved to "no evidence of rejection" or "borderline change". Assuming that improvement in pathology to "borderline change" or "no evidence of rejection" on follow-up biopsy indicates response to treatment, multivariate logistic analysis showed that lower UPCR was a predictive factor for response to treatment. No specific effect of treatment type was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that treatment could improve the pathological findings in CA-TCMR. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A Comparative Analysis of Once-daily and Twice-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Objectives:

We aimed to compare the once-daily and twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus concerning the efficiency and effects on graft function in de novo kidney transplant patients.

Methods:

Twenty once-daily (TAC-OD) and twenty twice-daily (TAC-BID) tacrolimus administrated de novo kidney recipients who had received initial immunosuppressive therapy according to protocols at our institution (0.2 mg/kg of tacrolimus combined with 1000 milligrams of steroid taper plus 720 mg of mycophenolate and with 2.5mg/kg anti-thymocyte globulin) assessed concerning demographics, drug doses and blood concentration, and graft function.

Results:

The mean tacrolimus blood concentration measurements were higher in the TAC-OD group in the first sixty days after transplantation, and the TAC-OD group showed more blood concentration overshoots/fluctuations in the first 30 days of the treatment. The initial drug dose was significantly higher in the TAC-OD group than the TAC-BID group (p=0.04). There was no meaningful difference among groups according to graft function (creatinine measurements) (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

Between de novo kidney recipients, the new TAC-OD formulation presents a similar short-term efficacy profile as TAC-BID. However, a higher daily dosage of TAC-OD is needed to achieve similar blood concentrations in the early postoperative period.

One-year Outcome of Everolimus With Standard-dose Tacrolimus Immunosuppression in De Novo ABO-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single-center, Propensity Score Matching Comparison With Mycophenolate in 42 Transplants

Background.

Despite improvement in immunosuppressive therapy, long-term kidney allograft survival remains a major challenge. The outcomes of therapy with everolimus (EVR) and standard-dose tacrolimus (Tac) have not been compared with those of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and standard-dose Tac in recipients of de novo ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT).

Methods.

This retrospective, observational, single-center, propensity score matching (PSM) study compared the outcomes of EVR and standard-dose Tac with those of MMF and standard-dose Tac following de novo ABOi LDKT. In total, 153 recipients of ABOi LDKT between January 2008 and March 2018 were screened for inclusion in the study. The variables considered for PSM were: recipient age/sex, duration of dialysis, cytomegalovirus mismatch (seronegative recipient and seropositive donor), cause of kidney disease, donor age/sex, and numbers of mismatches (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR). After PSM, there were 21 patients in each group (n = 42 overall).

Results.

Four patients in the EVR group and 1 patient in the MMF group were withdrawn because of adverse effects. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 1-year outcomes regarding patient death, graft loss, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection, infection requiring hospital admission, or estimated glomerular filtration rate. The 1-year protocol biopsy showed that the severity of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was significantly milder in the EVR group than in the MMF group.

Conclusions.

The findings suggest that the renal efficacy and safety of EVR and standard-dose Tac in recipients of de novo ABOi LDKT are comparable with those of MMF and standard-dose Tac.

Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, Convertibility, and Tacrolimus Trough Levels of Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Once-Daily Tacrolimus (Advagraf) Among Standard-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute

BACKGROUND

Recently, a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) was released in the Philippines. Studies have shown that these 2 formulations are bioequivalent at a 1:1 conversion. This study aims to determine the efficacy, safety, convertibility, and tacrolimus trough level of once-daily tacrolimus at the end of 6 months post transplant.

METHODS

This is a randomized study among standard-risk primary kidney transplant patients performed at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Philippines. A total of 40 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Patients in Group A who failed to meet the criteria for conversion to once-daily tacrolimus were considered to have reached the end of the study, while patients who satisfied the conversion criteria will be followed up for an additional 6 months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The area under the curve, maximum concentration, time to achieve the maximum concentration, and the coefficient of variation were similar. The twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) group patients had significantly higher mean tacrolimus trough levels than the Group B once-daily tacrolimus patients. An increase of a once-daily tacrolimus mean dose of 8% was required to achieve a therapeutic drug level post conversion. The graft and patient survival were 100%. There was no biopsy-proven acute rejection noted either both group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant in both de novo and converted patients after KT is safe, ensuring greater stability of drug blood concentrations than the standard form. The results also suggest an 8% increase when converting stable KT patients from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus.

Pharmacogenetic-based strategy using de novo tacrolimus once daily after kidney transplantation: prospective pilot study

Aim: The once daily tacrolimus formulation (Tac-OD) has been associated with better patient adherence and low variability in exposure. Patients carrying the CYP3A5*1 allele show accelerated clearance of Tac. Authors prospectively evaluate a simplified strategy for Tac-OD administration. Patients & methods: After grafting, 151 patients were divided into four groups and received a daily dose calculated according to CYP3A5 genotypes and unchanged for the first 3 days: CYP3A5*3/*3: 0.20 mg/kg/day, CYP3A5*3/*3: 0.25 mg/kg/day, CYP3A5*1/*3: 0.30 mg/kg/day and CYP3A5*1/*1: 0.35 mg/kg/day. The dose was adaptated on day 4 and remained unchanged a further three days and so on. Results: On day 3, median Cmin fell within the therapeutic range in all study groups. CYP3A5 expressors require significantly higher Tac-OD throughout the follow-up period to achieve a comparable Cmin. Conclusion: This simplified strategy does not hamper treatment efficacy.

Update on the clinical utility of once-daily tacrolimus in the management of transplantation

Adherence to immunosuppression and minimizing variability in drug exposure are important considerations in preventing rejection and maximizing overall transplant outcomes. The availability of once-daily tacrolimus may confer potential benefit by simplifying immunosuppressive regimens, thereby improving medication adherence among transplant recipients. Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy normal volunteers and stable transplant recipients suggest that once-daily tacrolimus is bioequivalent to twice-daily tacrolimus. Efficacy studies suggest that once-daily tacrolimus is noninferior to twice-daily tacrolimus with a concentration-dependent rejection risk. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival are more or less comparable between the two tacrolimus formulations. Once-daily tacrolimus has also been reported to have favorable effects on blood pressure, lipid profile, and glucose tolerance. Once-daily tacrolimus may be a viable option to consider for de novo immunosuppression or for conversion from conventional tacrolimus.

Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation

Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.