Use of Rotational Thromboelastometry in Liver Transplantation Is Associated With Reduced Transfusion Requirements

Implementation of a Bleeding Management Algorithm in Liver Transplantation: A Pilot Study

Objectives

The aims of the study were to compare the consumption of blood products before and after the implementation of a bleeding management algorithm in patients undergoing liver transplantation and to determine the feasibility of a multicentre, randomized study.

Background

Liver transplantation remains the only curative therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, but it carries a high risk of surgical bleeding.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective study of patients treated before (group 1) and after (group 2) implementation of a haemostatic algorithm guided by viscoelastic testing, including use of lyophilized coagulation factor concentrates (prothrombin complex and fibrinogen concentrates). Primary outcome was the number of units of blood products transfused in 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, mortality, and cost.

Results

Data from 30 consecutive patients was analysed; 14 in group 1 and 16 in group 2. Baseline data were similar between groups. Median total blood product consumption 24 h after surgery was 33 U (IQR: 11-57) in group 1 and 1.5 (0-23.5) in group 2 (p = 0.028). Significantly fewer units of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate were transfused in group 2 versus group 1. There was no significant difference in complications, hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality between groups. The cost of haemostatic therapy was non-significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (7,400 vs. 15,500 USD; p = 0.454).

Conclusion

The haemostatic management algorithm was associated with a significant reduction in blood product use during 24 h after liver transplantation. This study demonstrated the feasibility and provided a sample size calculation for a larger, randomized study.

An overview of unresolved issues in the perioperative management of liver transplant patients

Over the past decade, the field of solid organ transplantation has undergone significant changes, with some of the most notable advancements occurring in liver transplantation. Recent years have seen substantial progress in preoperative patient optimization protocols, anesthesia monitoring, coagulation management, and fluid management, among other areas. These improvements have led to excellent perioperative outcomes for all surgical patients, including those undergoing liver transplantation. In the last few decades, there have been numerous publications in the field of liver transplantation, but controversies related to perioperative management of liver transplant recipients persist. In this review article, we address the unresolved issues surrounding the anesthetic management of patients scheduled for liver transplantation.

Preoperative fibrinogen level and blood transfusions in liver transplantation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a major surgery often associated with significant bleeding. We conducted a systematic review to explore the association between preoperative fibrinogen level and intraoperative blood products transfusion, blood loss and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing OLT.

METHODS

We included observational studies conducted in patients undergoing an OLT mostly for end-stage liver disease that reported an association between the preoperative fibrinogen level and our outcomes of interest. Our primary outcome was the intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements. Our secondary outcomes were intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion of any blood product, postoperative RBC transfusion, postoperative thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications, and mortality. We used a standardized search strategy. We reported our results mostly descriptively but conducted meta-analyses using random-effect models when judged feasible.

RESULTS

We selected 24 cohort studies reporting at least one of our outcomes. We found that a high preoperative fibrinogen level was associated with fewer intraoperative RBC and other blood products transfusions, and lower blood loss. We also found a lower overall survival in patients with a higher fibrinogen level (pooled hazard ratio [95% CI] of 1.50 [1.23 to 1.84]; 5 studies, n = 1012, I2 = 48%). Only one study formally explored a fibrinogen level threshold effect. Overall, reporting was heterogeneous, and risk of bias was variable mostly because of uncontrolled confounding.

CONCLUSION

A higher preoperative fibrinogen level was associated with fewer intraoperative RBC and other blood products transfusions, lower blood loss, and higher mortality. Further studies may help clarify observed associations and inform guidelines.

Multicenter evaluation of the Quantra with the QStat Cartridge in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation

Blood loss and transfusion of blood products are key concerns during liver transplantation. Whole-blood viscoelastic testing devices have been used to monitor hemostatic function and guide the transfusion of blood products in this patient population. The Quantra System with the QStat Cartridge is a new point-of-care, closed-system viscoelastic testing device that measures changes in clot stiffness during coagulation and fibrinolysis using ultrasound detection of resonance. The aim of this multicenter prospective observational study was to evaluate the Quantra System against the ROTEM delta device in monitoring coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation. One hundred twenty-five (125) adult subjects (above 18 y old) were enrolled across 5 medical centers in the US. Blood samples were collected at a minimum of 3-time points: preincision (baseline), during the anhepatic phase, and after the start of reperfusion. Performance was assessed as the correlation of equivalent measurements from the QStat Cartridge and ROTEM delta INTEM, EXTEM, and FIBTEM assays. In addition, a clinical concordance analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the 2 devices related to the detection of fibrinolysis. The correlation between the 2 viscoelastic testing devices was strong, with r -values ranging between 0.88 and 0.95, and the overall agreement with respect to detecting fibrinolysis was 90.3% (CI, 86.9%-93.2%). The results indicate that the Quantra with the QStat Cartridge provides comparable information as the ROTEM delta in the assessment of hemostatic function during a liver transplant. Quantra's simplicity of use and availability of rapid results may provide clinicians with a faster, more convenient means to assess coagulation and fibrinolysis status in the operating room and critical care setting.

Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe some components of the perioperative practice in liver transplantation as reported by clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional clinical practice survey using an online instrument containing questions on selected themes related to the perioperative care of liver transplant recipients. We sent email invitations to Canadian anesthesiologists, Canadian surgeons, and French anesthesiologists specialized in liver transplantation. We used five-point Likert-type scales (from "never" to "always") and numerical or categorical answers. Results are presented as medians or proportions.

RESULTS

We obtained answers from 130 participants (estimated response rate of 71% in Canada and 26% in France). Respondents reported rarely using transesophageal echocardiography routinely but often using it for hemodynamic instability, often using an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management strategy, and never using a phlebotomy (medians from ordinal scales). Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported using a restrictive fluid management strategy to manage hemodynamic instability during the dissection phase. Forty-two percent and 15% of respondents reported using viscoelastic tests to guide intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, respectively. Fifty-four percent of respondents reported not pre-emptively treating preoperative coagulations disturbances, and 91% reported treating them intraoperatively only when bleeding was significant. Most respondents (48-64%) did not have an opinion on the maximal graft ischemic times. Forty-seven percent of respondents reported that a piggyback technique was the preferred vena cava anastomosis approach.

CONCLUSION

Different interventions were reported to be used regarding most components of perioperative care in liver transplantation. Our results suggest that significant equipoise exists on the optimal perioperative management of this population.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Viscoelastic versus conventional coagulation tests to reduce blood product transfusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests viscoelastic test (VET)-guided transfusion management could be associated with reduced blood product administration in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of coagulation management guided by VETs compared with conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) in reducing blood product transfusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised (RCTs) and nonrandomised clinical trials performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was previously published (PROSPERO: CRD42021230213).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Central Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Transfusion Evidence Library were searched up to 30 th January 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Setting: operating room. Patients: liver transplantation recipients. Intervention: use of VETs versus CCTs. Main outcome measures: the primary outcome was the mean number of transfused units for each blood product including red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets (PLTs) and cryoprecipitate. Secondary outcomes included mortality rate, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies ( n  = 5345 patients), 15 observational and two RCTs, were included in this review. There was a mean difference reduction in RBCs [mean difference: -1.40, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), -1.87 to -0.92; P  < 0.001, I2  = 61%) and FFP units (mean difference: -2.98, 95% CI, -4.61 to -1.35; P  =  < 0.001; I2  = 98%) transfused in the VETs group compared with the CCTs one. A greater amount of cryoprecipitate was administered in the VETs group (mean difference: 2.71, 95% CI, 0.84 to 4.58; P  = 0.005; I2  = 91%). There was no significant difference in the mean number of PLT units, mortality, hospital and ICU-LOS.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that VETs implementation was associated with reduced RBC and FFP consumption in liver transplantation patients without effects on mortality and hospital and ICU-LOS. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Further well conducted RCTs are needed to improve the certainty of evidence.

Intraoperative transfusion management, antifibrinolytic therapy, coagulation monitoring and the impact on short-term outcomes after liver transplantation-A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is frequently complicated by coagulopathy associated with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), that is, often multifactorial.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to identify evidence based intraoperative transfusion and coagulation management strategies that improve immediate and short-term outcomes after LT.

METHODS

PRISMA-guidelines and GRADE-approach were followed. Three subquestions were formulated. (Q); Q1: transfusion management; Q2: antifibrinolytic therapy; and Q3: coagulation monitoring.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included for Q1, six for Q2, and 10 for Q3. Q1: PRBC and platelet transfusions were associated with higher mortality. The use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fibrinogen concentrate (FC) were not associated with reductions in intraoperative transfusion or increased thrombotic events. The use of cell salvage was not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence or mortality. Cell salvage and transfusion education significantly decreased blood product transfusions. Q2: Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TXA) were not associated with decreased blood product transfusion, improvements in patient or graft survival, or increases in thrombotic events. Q3: Viscoelastic testing (VET) was associated with decreased allogeneic blood product transfusion compared to conventional coagulation tests (CCT) and is likely to be cost-effective. Coagulation management guided by VET may be associated with increases in FC and PCC use.

CONCLUSION

Q1: A specific blood product transfusion practice is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Cell salvage and educational interventions are recommended (QOE: low | Grade of Recommendation: moderate). Q2: The routine use of antifibrinolytics is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Q3: The use of VET is recommended (QOE; low-moderate | Recommendation; strong).

Role of Viscoelastic and Conventional Coagulation Tests for Management of Blood Product Replacement in the Bleeding Patient

An important aim of viscoelastic testing (VET) is to implement transfusion algorithms based on coagulation test results to help reduce transfusion rates and improve patient outcomes. Establishing a rapid diagnosis and providing timely treatment of coagulopathy is the cornerstone of management of severely bleeding patients in trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, and major surgery. As the nature of acute bleeding and trauma leads to an unstable and tenuous physiologic state, conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) are too slow to diagnose, manage, and also course correct any hemostatic abnormalities that accompany an acute critical illness. Viscoelastic point-of-care tests strongly correlate with results from standard laboratory tests but are designed to enable clinicians to make timely, informed bleeding management decisions when time to intervene is critical. These assays provide an individualized and goal-oriented approach to patient blood management and are increasingly becoming involved in transfusion algorithms. The scope of this review aims to evaluate the current literature on VETs and their impact on actionable outputs in clinical decision making and their relationship to CCT.

ROTEM in the setting of liver transplant surgery reduces frozen plasma transfusion

BACKGROUND

INR is traditionally used as a marker of clinical coagulopathy, but is suboptimal in liver disease patients due to rebalanced hemostasis and its ineffectiveness to predict bleeding. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) testing evaluates whole blood hemostasis, which may provide more accurate assessments with the EXTEM CT parameter than INR. Thus, in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients, we hypothesized that elevated INRs are associated with normal EXTEM CT values.

METHODS

A retrospective study assessing adult (>18) patients with ESLD and elevated INRs undergoing liver transplantation, was performed to assess correlations between INR and EXTEM CT. This included patients post-ROTEM implementation where all had pre-operative ROTEM testing; and patients up to one year pre-ROTEM implementation to compare transfusion utilization. Data abstracted also included patient demographics, coagulation testing results, liver disease etiology, and MELD score.

RESULTS

The study included 138 patients in the post-ROTEM group and 59 patients in the pre-ROTEM group. Normal EXTEM CT was observed in 95.3 % and 93 % of patients with INR of 1.3-1.8 and up to 3 respectively. There was no correlation between INR of 1.3-1.8 and EXTEM CT (⍴ = 0.239), and only moderate correlation was observed with higher INRs (⍴ = 0.617 with INRs >1.8). ROTEM-guided transfusion in liver transplant surgeries was associated with reduced plasma transfusion (OR 0.27, 95 % CI 0.12-0.58, p = 0.001) after adjusting for red cell utilization and coagulation testing.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests ROTEM may be advantageous for evaluating coagulopathy in patients with liver disease and ROTEM-guided transfusion reduces plasma transfusion.

Thromboelastography does not reduce transfusion requirements in liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare total blood product requirements in liver transplantation (LT) assisted by thromboelastography (TEG) or conventional coagulation tests (CCTs).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A tertiary care referral center for LT.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing LT from deceased donor.

INTERVENTION

Hemostasis was monitored by TEG or CCTs and corresponding transfusion algorithms were adopted.

MEASUREMENTS

Number and types of blood products (red blood cells, RBC; fresh-frozen plasma, FFP; platelets, PLT) transfused from the beginning of surgery until the admission to the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We compared data retrospectively collected in 226 LTs, grouped according to the type of hemostasis monitoring (90 with TEG and 136 with CCTs, respectively). Confounding variables affecting transfusion needs (recipient age, sex, previous hepatocellular carcinoma surgery, Model for End Stage Liver Disease - MELD, baseline hemoglobin, fibrinogen, creatinine, veno-venous by pass, and trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) were managed by propensity score match (PSM).

MAIN RESULTS

The preliminary analysis showed that patients in the TEG group received fewer total blood products (RBC + FFP + PLT; p = 0.001, FFP (p = 0.001), and RBC (p = 0.001). After PSM, 89 CCT patients were selected and matched to the 90 TEG patients. CCT and TEG matched patients received similar amount of total blood products. In a subgroup of 39 patients in the top MELD quartile (MELD ≥25), the TEG use resulted in lower consumption of FFP units and total blood products. Nevertheless, due to the low number of patients, any meaningful conclusion could be achieved in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, TEG-guided transfusion in LT does not reduce the intraoperative blood product consumption. Further studies are warranted to assess an advantage for TEG in either the entire LT population or the high-MELD subgroup of patients.

Current perspective on fibrinogen concentrate in critical bleeding

INTRODUCTION

. Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates.

AREAS COVERED

. We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events.

EXPERT OPINION

. Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.

Assessment of hemostatic profile in patients with mild to advanced liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis of patients suffering from liver cirrhosis is challenging due to both, pro- and anticoagulatory disorders leading to hemostatic alterations with distinct abnormalities of coagulation. Pathological changes in conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count are common manifestations of decreased liver synthesis of coagulation factors and reduced platelet count in these patients. However, conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count do not reflect in-vivo coagulation status or platelet function. The purpose of this present observational study was therefore to assess the haemostatic profile including plasmatic coagulation using thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry for platelet function in patients suffering from liver cirrhosis.

AIM

To assess the hemostatic profile of cirrhotic patients according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.

METHODS

Our study included both in- and outpatients suffering from liver cirrhosis attending the out- and inpatient care of the department of hepatology. Demographic and biochemical data as well as medical history including cause of liver cirrhosis, end stage kidney failure and medication with anticoagulants were recorded. To assess the hemostatic profile, platelet function was analyzed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using Multiplate^® (ADP-, ASPI- and TRAP-test) and thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM). Data were compared using Mann-Whitney U- or χ²-test. Spearman correlation was performed to analyze the association between MELD Score and results of thrombelastometry and MEA.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients attending the out- and inpatient care suffering from liver cirrhosis were screened. Of these, 50 patients were included and assigned to groups according to MELD score 6 to 11 (n = 25) or ≥ 17 (n = 25). Baseline patient characteristics revealed significant differences for MELD score (8 vs 22, P < 0.0001) and underlying laboratory parameters (international normalized ratio, bilirubine, creatinine) as well as fibrinogen level (275 mg/dL vs 209 mg/dL, P = 0.006) and aPTT (30 s vs 35 s, P = 0.047). MEA showed a moderately impaired platelet function (medians: AUC_ADP = 43U, AUC_ASPI = 71U, AUC_TRAP = 92U) but no significant differences between both groups. Thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM) revealed values within normal range in both groups. No significant correlation was observed between MELD score and results of MEA/thrombelastometry.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate a partially impaired hemostatic profile in liver cirrhosis patients unrelated to MELD score. An individual assessment of a potential coagulopathy should therefore be considered.