1
|
Goldaracena N, Vargas PA, McCormack L. Pre-operative assessment of living liver donors' liver anatomy and volumes. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01806-6. [PMID: 38526699 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01806-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Decades of experience supports LDLT as a favorable strategy to reduce waitlist mortality. The multiple regenerative pathways of hepatocytes and other hepatic cells justify the rationale behind it. Nonetheless, living liver donation is still underused and its broader implementation is challenging, mostly due to variability in practices leading to concerns related to donor safety. A non-systematic literature search was conducted for peer-reviewed original articles related to pre-operative evaluation of living liver donor candidates. Eligible studies were synthesized upon consensus for discussion in this up-to-date review. Review of the literature demonstrate that the importance of preoperative assessment of vascular, biliary and liver volume to ensure donor safety and adequate surgical planning for graft procurement is widely recognized. Moreover, data indicates that anatomic variants in vascular and biliary systems in healthy donors are common, present in up to 50% of the population. Therefore, comprehensive mapping and visualizations of each component is needed. Different imaging modalities are reported across practices and are discussed in detail. Lastly, assessment of liver volume must take into account several technical and donor factors that increase the chances of errors in volume estimation, which occurs in up to 10% of the cases. Experience suggests that maximizing donor safety and lessening their risks is a result of integrated experience between hepatobiliary and transplant surgery, along with multidisciplinary efforts in performing a comprehensive pre-operative donor assessment. Although technical advances have increased the accuracy of volume estimation, over- or under-estimation remains a challenge that needs further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Goldaracena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA.
| | - Paola A Vargas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA
| | - Lucas McCormack
- Transplant Unit, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy MS, Kasahara M, Ikegami T, Lee KW. An international survey of venous thromboembolic events and current practices of peri-operative VTE prophylaxis after living donor hepatectomy. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15209. [PMID: 38064308 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolic complications are an uncommon but significant cause of morbidity & mortality after live donor hepatectomy . The precise incidence of these events and the current practices of centers performing living donor liver transplantation worldwide are unknown. METHODS An online survey was shared amongst living donor liver transplantation centers containing questions regarding center activity, center protocols for donor screening, peri-operative thromboembolic prophylaxis and an audit of -perioperative venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy in the previous five years (2016-2020). RESULTS Fifty-one centers from twenty countries completed the survey. These centers had cumulatively performed 11500 living donor liver transplants between 2016-2020. All centers included pre-operative l assessment for thromboembolic risk amongst potential liver donors in their protocols. Testing for inherited prothrombotic conditions was performed by 58% of centers. Dual-mode prophylaxis was the most common practice (65%), while eight and four centers used single mode or no routine prophylaxis respectively. Twenty (39%) and 15 (29%) centers reported atleast one perioperative deep venous thrmobosis or pulmonary embolism event respectively. There was one donor mortality directly related to post-operative pulmonary embolism. Overall incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism events was 3.65 and 1.74 per 1000 live donor hepatectomies respectively. Significant variations in center practices and incidence of thromboembolic events was identified in the survey primarily divided along world regions. 75% of participating centers agreed on the need for clear international guidelines. CONCLUSION Venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy are an uncommon but important cause of donor morbidity. There is significant variation in practice among centers. Evidence-based guidelines regarding risk assessment, and peri-operative prophylaxis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mettu Srinivas Reddy
- Department of Liver Transplantation & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gleneagles Global Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Mureo Kasahara
- Center for Organ Transplantation, National Center for Child Health & Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Department of Surgery & Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anouti A, Patel MS, VanWagner LB, Lee WM, Fung JJ, Cholankeril G, Hwang CS, Mufti AR, Tujios S, Kerr T, Rich NE, Louissaint J, Desai DM, Vagefi PA, Hanish S, Shah J, Singal AG, Cotter TG. Biliary atresia and liver transplantation in the United States: A contemporary analysis. Liver Int 2023; 43:2198-2209. [PMID: 37548078 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary atresia (BA) remains the number one indication for paediatric liver transplantation (LT) worldwide but is an uncommon indication for older LT recipients. The impact of recent donor allocation changes, pervasive organ shortage and evolving LT practices on the BA LT population is unknown. METHODS We identified patients who underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2021 using the UNOS database. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with BA and those with non-BA cholestatic liver disease. Groups were stratified by age, <12 years (allocated via PELD system) and ≥12 years (allocated via MELD system). Waitlist outcomes were compared using competing-risk regression analysis, graft survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling provided adjusted estimates. RESULTS There were 2754 BA LT waitlist additions and 2206 BA LTs (1937 <12 years [younger], 269 ≥12 years [older]). There were no differences in waitlist mortality between BA and non-BA cholestatic patients. Among BA LT recipients, there were 441 (20.0%) living-donor liver transplantations (LDLT) and 611 (27.7%) split deceased-donor LTs. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher among BA versus non-BA cholestatic patients in the older group (88.3% vs. 79.5%, p < .01) but not younger group (89.3% vs. 89.5%). Among BA LT recipients, improved graft outcomes were associated with LDLT (vs. split LT: HR: 2, 95% CI: 1.03-3.91) and higher transplant volume (volume >100 vs. <40 BA LTs: HR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.87-6.2). CONCLUSION Liver transplant outcomes among BA patients are excellent, with LDLT and higher transplant centre volume associated with optimal graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Anouti
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lisa B VanWagner
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - William M Lee
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - John J Fung
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine Transplant Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - George Cholankeril
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christine S Hwang
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Arjmand R Mufti
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Shannan Tujios
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas Kerr
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole E Rich
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jeremy Louissaint
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dev M Desai
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Parsia A Vagefi
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steven Hanish
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jigesh Shah
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas G Cotter
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vargas PA, Goldaracena N. Right vs Left Hepatectomy for LDLT, Safety and Regional Preference. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00386-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|