1
|
Forte M, Cecere SC, Di Napoli M, Ventriglia J, Tambaro R, Rossetti S, Passarelli A, Casartelli C, Rauso M, Alberico G, Mignogna C, Fiore F, Setola SV, Troiani T, Pignata S, Pisano C. Endometrial cancer in the elderly: characteristics, prognostic and risk factors, and treatment options. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024:104533. [PMID: 39442900 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer incidence and related mortality are on the rise due to aging demographics. This population often presents with unfavorable features, such as myometrial invasion, non-endometrioid histology, high-grade tumors, worse prognosis, etc. The role of age as an independent prognostic factor is still debated, and screening tools addressing frailty emerge as pivotal in guiding treatment decisions; however, they are still underutilized. Treatment disparities are evident in the case of older patients with endometrial cancer, who frequently receive suboptimal care, hindering their survival. Radiotherapy and minimally invasive surgical approaches could be performed in older patients. Data on chemotherapy and immunotherapy are scarce, but their potential remains promising and data are being gathered by recent trials, contingent on optimal patient selection through geriatric assessments. Overall, we recommend personalized, screening tool-guided approaches, adherence to guideline-recommended treatments, and inclusion of older people in clinical trials to help identify the best course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Forte
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
| | - Sabrina Chiara Cecere
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Marilena Di Napoli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Jole Ventriglia
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Rosa Tambaro
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Sabrina Rossetti
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Anna Passarelli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Chiara Casartelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.
| | - Martina Rauso
- Department of Oncology, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Gennaro Alberico
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy; Medical Oncology, Hospital San Luca, Vallo della Lucania, Salerno, Italy.
| | - Chiara Mignogna
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G Pascale IRCCS, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Francesco Fiore
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Carmela Pisano
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Theodorakis N, Nikolaou M, Hitas C, Anagnostou D, Kreouzi M, Kalantzi S, Spyridaki A, Triantafylli G, Metheniti P, Papaconstantinou I. Comprehensive Peri-Operative Risk Assessment and Management of Geriatric Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:2153. [PMID: 39410557 PMCID: PMC11475767 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: As the population ages, the prevalence of surgical interventions in individuals aged 65+ continues to increase. This poses unique challenges due to the higher incidence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty in the elderly population, which result in high peri-operative risks. Traditional preoperative risk assessment tools often fail to accurately predict post-operative outcomes in the elderly, overlooking the complex interplay of factors that contribute to risk in the elderly. Methods: A literature review was conducted, focusing on the predictive value of CGA for postoperative prognosis and the implementation of perioperative interventions. Results: Evidence shows that CGA is a superior predictive tool compared to traditional models, as it more accurately identifies elderly patients at higher risk of complications such as postoperative delirium, infections, and prolonged hospital stays. CGA includes assessments of frailty, sarcopenia, nutritional status, cognitive function, mental health, and functional status, which are crucial in predicting post-operative outcomes. Studies demonstrate that CGA can also guide personalized perioperative care, including nutritional support, physical training, and mental health interventions, leading to improved surgical outcomes and reduced functional decline. Conclusions: The CGA provides a more holistic approach to perioperative risk assessment in elderly patients, addressing the limitations of traditional tools. CGA can help guide surgical decisions (e.g., curative or palliative) and select the profiles of patients that will benefit from perioperative interventions to improve their prognosis and prevent functional decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Theodorakis
- School of Medicine, National, and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece;
- Department of Cardiology, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (C.H.); (D.A.)
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Maria Nikolaou
- Department of Cardiology, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (C.H.); (D.A.)
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Christos Hitas
- Department of Cardiology, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (C.H.); (D.A.)
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Dimitrios Anagnostou
- Department of Cardiology, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (C.H.); (D.A.)
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Magdalini Kreouzi
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece
| | - Sofia Kalantzi
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Spyridaki
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece
| | - Gesthimani Triantafylli
- Geriatric Outpatient Clinic, Sismanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital, 14 25is Martiou Str., 15127 Melissia, Greece; (M.K.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Panagiota Metheniti
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76 Vasilissis Sofias Ave., 11528 Athens, Greece; (P.M.); (I.P.)
| | - Ioannis Papaconstantinou
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76 Vasilissis Sofias Ave., 11528 Athens, Greece; (P.M.); (I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartog M, Beishuizen SJE, Togo R, van Bruchem-Visser RL, van Eijck CHJ, Mattace-Raso FUS, Pek CJ, de Wilde RF, Groot Koerkamp B, Polinder-Bos HA. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes in Older Patients Eligible for Pancreatic Surgery. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 39290062 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Periampullary cancer has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a potentially curative but high-risk treatment. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can inform treatment decisions, but has not yet been evaluated in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery. METHODS This prospective observational study included patients ≥ 70 years of age eligible for pancreatic surgery. Frailty was defined as impairment in at least two of five domains: somatic, psychological, functional, nutritional, and social. Outcomes included postoperative complications, functional decline, and mortality. RESULTS Of the 88 patients included, 87 had a complete CGA. Sixty-five patients (75%) were frail and 22 (25%) were non-frail. Frail patients were more likely to receive nonsurgical treatment (43.1% vs. 9.1% p = 0.004). Fifty-seven patients underwent surgery, of which 52 (59%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The incidence of postoperative delirium was three times higher in frail patients (29.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). The risk of mortality was three times higher in frail patients (HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.43-7.89, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Frailty is common in older patients eligible for pancreatic surgery and is associated with treatment decision, a higher incidence of delirium and a three times higher risk of all-cause mortality. CGA can contribute to shared decision-making and optimize perioperative care in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marij Hartog
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Reon Togo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco U S Mattace-Raso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chulja J Pek
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harmke A Polinder-Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berian JR, Schwarze ML, Werner NE, Mahoney JE, Shah MN. Using Systems Engineering and Implementation Science to Design an Implementation Package for Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Among Older Adults Having Major Abdominal Surgery: Protocol for a 3-Phase Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e59428. [PMID: 39250779 PMCID: PMC11420609 DOI: 10.2196/59428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older Americans, a growing segment of the population, have an increasing need for surgical services, and they experience a disproportionate burden of postoperative complications compared to their younger counterparts. A preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (pCGA) is recommended to reduce risk and improve surgical care delivery for this population, which has been identified as vulnerable. The pCGA optimizes multiple chronic conditions and factors commonly overlooked in routine preoperative planning, including physical function, polypharmacy, nutrition, cognition, mental health, and social and environmental support. The pCGA has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in a variety of surgical specialties. Although national guidelines recommend the use of the pCGA, a paucity of strategic guidance for implementation limits its uptake to a few academic medical centers. By applying implementation science and human factors engineering methods, this study will provide the necessary evidence to optimize the implementation of the pCGA in a variety of health care settings. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to describe the study protocol to design an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package for use among older adults before major abdominal surgery. METHODS This protocol uses systems engineering methods to develop, tailor, and pilot-test a user-centered pCGA implementation package, which can be adapted to community-based hospitals in preparation for a multisite implementation trial. The protocol is based upon the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development and aligns with the goal to develop behavioral interventions with an eye to real-world implementation. In phase 1, we will use observation and interviews to map the pCGA process and identify system-based barriers and facilitators to its use among older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. In phase 2, we will apply user-centered design methods, engaging health care providers, patients, and caregivers to co-design a pCGA implementation package. This package will be applicable to a diverse population of older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a large academic hospital and an affiliate community site. In phase 3, we will pilot-test and refine the pCGA implementation package in preparation for a future randomized controlled implementation-effectiveness trial. We anticipate that this study will take approximately 60 months (April 2023-March 2028). RESULTS This study protocol will generate (1) a detailed process map of the pCGA; (2) an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package ready for feasibility testing in a pilot trial; and (3) preliminary pilot data on the implementation and effectiveness of the package. We anticipate that these data will serve as the basis for future multisite hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trials of the pCGA in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONS The expected results of this study will contribute to improving perioperative care processes for older adults before major abdominal surgery. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/59428.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia R Berian
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Margaret L Schwarze
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Nicole E Werner
- Department of Health and Wellness Design, School of Public Health, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Jane E Mahoney
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Manish N Shah
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Husinat L, Azzam S, Sharie SA, Al Hseinat L, Araydah M, Al Modanat Z, Balawi AR, Haroun A, Alsharei A, Gharaibeh S, Alzoubi A, De Rosa S, Battaglini D. Impact of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification on hip fracture surgery outcomes: insights from a retrospective analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:271. [PMID: 39103787 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02660-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification is the most used system to assess patient health status before surgery, ranging from I to V levels. This study aims to explore the impact of different ASA risk classes (ASA II [mild risk] and ASA III [severe risk]) on clinical outcomes following hip fracture surgery, including all-cause mortality and postoperative complications. METHODS A retrospective analysis from 2019 to 2021 across three Jordanian centers was conducted. The study included patients aged 65 and above who underwent hip fracture repair surgeries. Preoperative measures, intraoperative management protocols, and postoperative care were collected. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, including demographics, fracture type, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS The analysis included 1033 patients, with 501 (48.5%) in the mild anesthetic risk group (ASA I-II) and 532 (51.5%) in the severe anesthetic risk group (ASA III-V). The mean age was 73 years, with a higher prevalence of males in the severe risk group. Patients in the severe risk group had more comorbidities, higher ICU admissions (15.23% vs. 6.18%), longer hospital stays (median 7 vs. 6 days), and higher rates of postoperative thromboembolic complications (3.39% vs. 1.39%) compared to the mild risk group. Additionally, the severe risk group showed higher mortality rates both in-hospital mortality (3.38% vs. 1.39%) and all-cause mortality (16.92% vs. 10.36%). Multivariate analysis identified higher ASA score as independent risk factors for increased all-cause mortality (HR = 1.64 95%CI 1.51-2.34) and thromboembolic complications (OR = 2.85 95%CI 1.16-7). Length of hospital stay was significantly associated with higher ASA score (OR = 1.04 95%CI 0.96-1.11). CONCLUSION The study underscores the significant impact of anesthetic risk on the outcomes of hip fracture surgeries. Patients with higher ASA scores associated with severe systemic diseases may have at increased risk of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lou'i Al-Husinat
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
| | - Saif Azzam
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan
| | - Sarah Al Sharie
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan
| | - Laith Al Hseinat
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Medical Services, Amman, 11855, Jordan
| | - Mohammad Araydah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Istishari Hospital, Amman, 11942, Jordan
| | - Zaid Al Modanat
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan
| | | | - Ahmed Haroun
- Anesthesia Department, Albashir Hospitals, Ministry of Health, Amman, 11151, Jordan
| | - Adel Alsharei
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan
| | - Saif Gharaibeh
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, 19117, Jordan
| | - Ahmed Alzoubi
- Emergency Department, Rosary Hospital, Irbid, 21163, Jordan
| | - Silvia De Rosa
- Centre for Medical Sciences - CISMed, University of Trento, 38122, Trento, Italy
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, 38122, APSS Trento, Italy
| | - Denise Battaglini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Skorus-Zadęcka U, Miążek A, Zmysłowska N, Kupniewski K, Kenig J. Comorbidity assessment methods and their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer - A scoping review. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 91:102597. [PMID: 38865796 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The scoping review was performed to identify methods of comorbidity assessment and to evaluate their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and European Trials Register were searched for eligible studies investigating the impact of comorbidity on various postoperative outcomes of patients aged ≥65. Findings were narratively reported. RESULTS The review identified 40 studies with a total population of 59,612 patients, using eight different methods of comorbidity assessment. The most used was Charlson Comorbidity Index (60 % of studies) and presence of specific comorbid conditions (38 %). No study provided rationale for the choice of specific comorbidity measure. Most of the included studies reported short-term results (75 %), such as postoperative complications (43 %) and mortality (18 %) as main clinical endpoint. The results were inconsistent across the studies. DISCUSSION There is still no consensus regarding the choice of comorbidity measures and their role in postoperative outcome prediction. Further efforts are needed to develop new, well-designed, more effective comorbidity assessments tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urszula Skorus-Zadęcka
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowski Street, Cracow 30-688, Poland.
| | - Apolonia Miążek
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowski Street, Cracow 30-688, Poland
| | - Natalia Zmysłowska
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowski Street, Cracow 30-688, Poland
| | - Kuba Kupniewski
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowski Street, Cracow 30-688, Poland
| | - Jakub Kenig
- First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowski Street, Cracow 30-688, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scoccianti G, Innocenti M, Scanferla R, Scolari F, Muratori F, Ungar A, Rostagno C, Campanacci DA. Survival and Results after Resection and Reconstruction with Megaprosthesis at the Hip in Octogenarians. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7740. [PMID: 38137808 PMCID: PMC10743573 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Few data are available about results after procedures of resection and megaprosthesis at the hip in very elderly patients. The aim of our study was to ascertain survival and complications in patients aged 80 or older undergoing these major orthopedic procedures. A consecutive series of 27 procedures in 26 patients aged 80-93 years was evaluated. In total, 15 procedures were performed due to oncological diseases, 6 were performed following joint arthroplasty failures or periprosthetic fractures, and 6 were performed after trauma or trauma sequelae. Survival of the patients ranged from 0 to 122 months. Overall survival was 56% at 3 years, 24% at 5 years, and 16% at 8 years. An early postoperative death during the first 3 months occurred in five patients (18.5%). The only preoperative parameter negatively affecting survival was preoperative hemoglobin lower than 11 g/dL. Local complications were similar to reported rates in all-age patients' series. In our experience, resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction can also be a valid choice in very elderly patients, with 56% of patients living more than two years from surgery and 24% more than five. Nevertheless, early postoperative deaths are frequent. A multidisciplinary evaluation of frailty of the patient must be accomplished, and patients and relatives must be informed about the risks of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Scoccianti
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (R.S.); (F.M.); (D.A.C.)
| | - Matteo Innocenti
- Orthopaedic Clinic, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Roberto Scanferla
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (R.S.); (F.M.); (D.A.C.)
| | - Federico Scolari
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy;
| | - Francesco Muratori
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (R.S.); (F.M.); (D.A.C.)
| | - Andrea Ungar
- Department of Internal and Geriatric Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Carlo Rostagno
- Department of Internal and Postoperative Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Domenico Andrea Campanacci
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (R.S.); (F.M.); (D.A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu X, Ma Y, Jiang X, Tang W, Xia Y, Song P. Neurosurgical perioperative management of frail elderly patients. Biosci Trends 2023; 17:271-282. [PMID: 37635083 DOI: 10.5582/bst.2023.01208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
With the rapid increase in global aging, the prevalence of frailty is increasing and frailty has emerged as an emerging public health burden. Frail elderly patients suffer from reduced homeostatic reserve capacity, which is associated with a disproportionate decline in physical status after exposure to stress and an increased risk of adverse events. Frailty is closely associated with changes in the volume of the white and gray matter of the brain. Sarcopenia has been suggested to be an important component of frailty, and reductions in muscle strength and muscle mass lead to reductions in physical function and independence, which are critical factors contributing to poor prognosis. Approximately 10-32% of patients undergoing neurological surgery are frail, and the risk of frailty increases with age, which is significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse postoperative events (major complications, total duration of hospitalization, and need for discharge to a nursing facility). The postoperative mortality rate in severely frail patients is 9-11 times higher than that in non-frail individuals. Therefore, due attention must be paid to neurosurgical frailty and muscle assessment in elderly patients. Specialized interventions in the perioperative period of neurosurgery in frail elderly patients may improve their postoperative prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiqi Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Haikou, China
- Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yanan Ma
- Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Xuemei Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Wei Tang
- International Health Care Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ying Xia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Haikou, China
| | - Peipei Song
- Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tian BWCA, Stahel PF, Picetti E, Campanelli G, Di Saverio S, Moore E, Bensard D, Sakakushev B, Galante J, Fraga GP, Koike K, Di Carlo I, Tebala GD, Leppaniemi A, Tan E, Damaskos D, De'Angelis N, Hecker A, Pisano M, Maier RV, De Simone B, Amico F, Ceresoli M, Pikoulis M, Weber DG, Biffl W, Beka SG, Abu-Zidan FM, Valentino M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, Sartelli M, Agnoletti V, Chirica M, Bravi F, Sall I, Catena F. Assessing and managing frailty in emergency laparotomy: a WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:38. [PMID: 37355698 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00506-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Many countries are facing an aging population. As people live longer, surgeons face the prospect of operating on increasingly older patients. Traditional teaching is that with older age, these patients face an increased risk of mortality and morbidity, even to a level deemed too prohibitive for surgery. However, this is not always true. An active 90-year-old patient can be much fitter than an overweight, sedentary 65-year-old patient with comorbidities. Recent literature shows that frailty-an age-related cumulative decline in multiple physiological systems, is therefore a better predictor of mortality and morbidity than chronological age alone. Despite recognition of frailty as an important tool in identifying vulnerable surgical patients, many surgeons still shun objective tools. The aim of this position paper was to perform a review of the existing literature and to provide recommendations on emergency laparotomy and in frail patients. This position paper was reviewed by an international expert panel composed of 37 experts who were asked to critically revise the manuscript and position statements. The position paper was conducted according to the WSES methodology. We shall present the derived statements upon which a consensus was reached, specifying the quality of the supporting evidence and suggesting future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Philip F Stahel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Ernest Moore
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Denis Bensard
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- Research Institute of Medical University Plovdiv/University Hospital St George Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Joseph Galante
- Trauma Department, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Unicamp Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Kaoru Koike
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Cannizzaro Hospital, Via Messina 829, 95126, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni D Tebala
- Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, HeadingtonOxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- General Surgery Department, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- General and Emergency Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris Est, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique, Créteil, France
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ron V Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Francesco Amico
- John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General Surgery, Monza University Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Dieter G Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Walt Biffl
- Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Solomon Gurmu Beka
- School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE
| | | | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- Department of General Surgery, Military Teaching Hospital, Hôpital Principal Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Korc-Grodzicki B. It is not "If" but "How" Preoperative Frailty Assessment Should be Provided. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1935-1937. [PMID: 36585535 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13008-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
11
|
Cuadra A, Tin AL, Moffat GT, Alexander K, Downey RJ, Korc-Grodzicki B, Vickers AJ, Shahrokni A. The association between perioperative frailty and ability to complete a web-based geriatric assessment among older adults with cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:662-666. [PMID: 36404252 PMCID: PMC9974608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to assess the degree to which patient frailty is associated with both need for assistance and time required to complete the eRFA, a web-based GA tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified patients who underwent surgery for cancer from 2015 to 2020, had a hospital length of stay ≥1 day, and completed the eRFA before surgery. Frailty was assessed using two methods: the MSK-FI (score 0-11) and the AGD (score 0-13). Time to complete the eRFA was automatically recorded by a web-based tool; assistance with eRFA completion was self-reported by the patient. RESULTS In total, 3456 patients were included (median age, 78 years). Overall, 58% of surveys were completed without assistance, 30% were completed with assistance, and 12% were completed by someone other than the patient. Younger age (median age: without assistance, 77 years; with assistance, 80 years; completed by someone else, 80 years) and lower frailty score (median AGD: 4, 6, and 8, respectively; median MSK-FI: 2, 3, and 3, respectively) were associated with independency (all p < 0.001). Higher frailty score was associated with longer time to complete the eRFA (all nonlinear association p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Frail patients are more likely to benefit from completion of GA to determine appropriate treatment. Given that not all cancer patients have a caregiver who can assist completing a digital questionnaire, innovative solutions are needed to help frail patients complete the eRFA without assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cuadra
- Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Koshy Alexander
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maurer LR, Chetlur P, Zhuo D, El Hechi M, Velmahos GC, Dunn J, Bertsimas D, Kaafarani HMA. Validation of the Al-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator in Patients 65 Years and Older. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e8-e15. [PMID: 33378309 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the performance of the Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) tool in elderly emergency surgery (ES) patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The POTTER tool was derived using a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI)-methodology called optimal classification trees and validated for prediction of ES outcomes. POTTER outperforms all existent risk-prediction models and is available as an interactive smartphone application. Predicting outcomes in elderly patients has been historically challenging and POTTER has not yet been tested in this population. METHODS All patients ≥65 years who underwent ES in the ACS-NSQIP 2017 database were included. POTTER's performance for 30-day mortality and 18 postoperative complications (eg, respiratory or renal failure) was assessed using c-statistic methodology, with planned sub-analyses for patients 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ years. RESULTS A total of 29,366 patients were included, with mean age 77, 55.8% females, and 62% who underwent emergency general surgery. POTTER predicted mortality accurately in all patients over 65 (c-statistic 0.80). Its best performance was in patients 65 to 74 years (c-statistic 0.84), and its worst in patients ≥85 years (c-statistic 0.71). POTTER had the best discrimination for predicting septic shock (c-statistic 0.90), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours (c-statistic 0.86), and acute renal failure (c-statistic 0.85). CONCLUSIONS POTTER is a novel, interpretable, and highly accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality in elderly ES patients up to age 85 years. POTTER could prove useful for bedside counseling and for benchmarking of ES care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia R Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prahan Chetlur
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Majed El Hechi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George C Velmahos
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jack Dunn
- Interpretable AI, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dimitris Bertsimas
- Interpretable AI, Boston, Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Haytham M A Kaafarani
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kong C, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang P, Li X, Wang W, Wang Y, Shen J, Ren X, Wang T, Zhao G, Lu S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older orthopedic patients and analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:644. [PMID: 35927629 PMCID: PMC9354431 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03328-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been proposed as a supplementary tool to reduce perioperative complications of geriatric patients, however there is no universally accepted standardization of CGA for orthopedic surgery. In this study, a novel CGA strategy was applied to evaluate the conditions of older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery from a broad view and to identify potential risk factors for postoperative complications. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted from March 2019 to December 2020.The study enrolled patients (age > 75 years) for elective or confined orthopedic surgery. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary team. A structured CGA was conducted to identify high-risk older patients and to facilitate coordinated multidisciplinary team care by a geriatric team. The basic patient characteristics, CGA results, postoperative complication and mortality rates were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications. Results A total of 214 patients with an age of 81.07 ± 4.78 (range, 75–100) years were prospectively enrolled in this study. In total, 66 (30.8%) complications were registered, including one death from myocardial infarction (mortality rate, 0.5%). Poor Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) were accompanied by frailty, worse perioperative risk, pain, and nutritional status. Poor ADL was also associated with higher risks of falling, polypharmacy, and cardiac and respiration complications. Poor IADL was associated with a higher risk of cardiac and respiration complications. Higher stroke risk was accompanied by higher risks of cardiac complications, delirium, and hemorrhage. Worse American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was associated with worse ADL, IADL, frailty, and higher delirium risk. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that spinal fusion (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.83; p = 0.0214), blood loss(OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.01; p = 0.0168), ADL (severe dysfunction or worse) (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.81; p = 0.0413), IADL (serious dependence) (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.63; p = 0.0436), renal function (chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥ stage 3a) (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.55; p = 0.0133), and malnutrition(OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.74 to 2.56; p = 0.0101) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Conclusion The CGA process reduces patient mortality and increases safety in older orthopedic surgery patients. Spinal fusion, blood loss, ADL (severe dysfunction or worse), IADL (serious dependence), renal function (CKD ≥ stage 3a) and nutrition mini nutritional assessment (MNA) (malnourished) were independent risk factors of postoperative complications following orthopaedic surgery in older patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03328-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanhong Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Chaodong Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangyu Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianghua Shen
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyi Ren
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianlong Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
| | - Guoguang Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
| | - Shibao Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,National Geriatric Disease Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. .,Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chuang MH, Chen JY, Tsai WW, Lee CW, Lee MC, Tseng WH, Hung KC. Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on the risk of adverse events in the older patients receiving anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6625706. [PMID: 35776674 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND to assess the efficacy of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for preventing treatment-related toxicity in older people undergoing non-surgical cancer therapies. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were searched from inception till January 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the incidence of toxicity measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (primary outcome) and that of therapeutic modifications, early treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, overall survival and hospitalisation (secondary outcomes). RESULTS analysis of six RCTs published from 2016 to 2021 recruiting 2,126 participants (median age: 71-77) who received chemotherapy as the major therapeutic approach revealed 51.7% and 64.7% of Grade 3+ toxicity in the CGA and control (i.e. standard care) groups, respectively (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7-0.94, P = 0.005, I2 = 65%, certainty of evidence [COE]: moderate). There were no significant differences in the incidence of early treatment discontinuation (RR = 0.88, P = 0.47; I2 = 63%,1,408 participants, COE: low), initial reduction in treatment intensity (RR = 0.99, P = 0.94; I2 = 83%, 2055 participants, COE: low), treatment delay (RR = 1.06, P = 0.77, I2 = 0%, 309 participants, COE: moderate), hospitalisation (RR = 0.86, P = 0.39, I2 = 41%, 914 participants, COE: moderate), progression-free and overall survival with or without CGA. However, there was an association between CGA and a lower incidence of dose reduction during treatment (RR = 0.73, P < 0.00001, 956 participants, COE: moderate). CONCLUSIONS our results demonstrated that comprehensive geriatric assessment may be associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related toxicity and dose reduction compared to standard care in older people receiving non-surgical cancer treatments. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min-Hsiang Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Yi Chen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Wen Tsai
- Department of Education, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Wei Lee
- Department of Neurology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Chuan Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tseng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saur NM, Davis BR, Montroni I, Shahrokni A, Rostoft S, Russell MM, Mohile SG, Suwanabol PA, Lightner AL, Poylin V, Paquette IM, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Evaluation and Management of Frailty Among Older Adults Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:473-488. [PMID: 35001046 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Saur
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bradley R Davis
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Isacco Montroni
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, Italy
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Department of Medicine/Geriatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marcia M Russell
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Surgery, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Pasithorn A Suwanabol
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vitaliy Poylin
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gajra A, Jeune-Smith Y, Fortier S, Feinberg B, Phillips E, Balanean A, Klepin HD. The Use and Knowledge of Validated Geriatric Assessment Instruments Among US Community Oncologists. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1081-e1090. [PMID: 35263162 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of a standardized geriatric assessment (GA) to inform treatment decisions in older adults with cancer improves quality of life, reduces treatment-related toxicity, and is guideline-recommended. This study aimed to assess community oncologists' knowledge and utilization of GAs. METHODS Between September 2019 and February 2020, practicing US-based oncologists were invited to attend live meetings and complete web-based surveys designed to collect information on treatment decision making and various practice-based challenges in oncology care. RESULTS Among the 349 oncologists surveyed, 74% practiced in a community setting. Sixty percent did not use a formal GA to inform treatment decisions for any of their older patients; the most common reasons for not using a GA were "Too cumbersome to incorporate into routine practice" (44%) and "Adds no value beyond the comprehensive history and physical exam" (36%). Validated GA instruments used in routine clinical practice included: Mini-Mental State Exam (54%), Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (23%), Cancer and Aging Research Group toxicity tool (12%), and Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients tool (9%). Nineteen percent of oncologists were not aware of any validated GA instruments. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and comorbidities were the most frequently used assessment factors to inform treatment decisions (88% and 73%, respectively). CONCLUSION Many oncologists have not incorporated GA tools because of perceptions that GAs are difficult to implement or do not add any value. Increasing education of the benefits of GA-directed therapy could help to increase GA utilization among community oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajeet Gajra
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Dublin, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Letica-Kriegel AS, Tin AL, Nash GM, Benfante NE, McNeil N, Vickers AJ, Bochner B, Donat SM, Goh A, Dalbagni G, Donahue T, Cha EK, Pietzak E, Herr H, Korc-Grodzicki B, Shahrokni A. Feasibility of a geriatric comanagement (GERICO) pilot program for patients 75 and older undergoing radical cystectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1427-1432. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
18
|
Raab G, Restifo D, McBride SM, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Shahrokni A, Zakeri K. Outcomes following head and neck cancer surgery among older adults as determined by an electronic geriatric assessment. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:228-233. [PMID: 34756495 PMCID: PMC8882127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older adults with head and neck cancer have increased postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of mortality. Geriatric assessment (GA) provides a measure of overall health status and is preferable to using age alone for assessing fitness for surgery. We sought to determine whether a patient's frailty as determined by a novel electronic GA is associated with outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 159 patients aged 75 and older referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for pre-operative evaluation prior to undergoing HNC surgery. All patients completed the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA) within 60 days prior to surgery. The accumulated geriatric deficit (AGD) score includes twelve domains from the eRFA with a point assigned for each domain in which there is a deficit and a final point related to comorbidities. Three other metrics were individually assessed: age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and number of comorbidities. We utilized multivariable linear regression and t-tests to determine whether frailty is associated with longer length of hospital stay, 30-day intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS Patients with a higher AGD score spent more time in the hospital post-operatively (1.0 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI: 0.21-1.9; p = 0.015). Lower KPS was also associated with statistically significant longer length of stay (-2.70 day change per increasing index KPS; 95% CI: -4.30 - -1.00; days; p = 0.002), while age and comorbidity were not found to be statistically associated with length of stay. Higher AGD score remained significantly associated with longer length of stay on multivariable analysis (0.93 day increase per unit increase in AGD; 95% CI 0.15-1.71; p = 0.019). AGD was the only metric associated with increased risk of ICU admission (6.6 vs 5.0 geriatric deficits for those admitted vs not admitted to ICU; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS Frailty is associated with increased length of hospital stay and ICU admission in older adults with HNC undergoing surgery. GA can be used to counsel patients on the expected postoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comparison of preoperative assessment tools in older patients undergoing cancer surgery: A prospective study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:420-425. [PMID: 34998721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery in older adults with cancer is complex due to multiple age related confounding factors. There are many scoring systems available for preoperative risk stratifications of older patients. Currently very few prospective studies comparing the various commonly used scales are available. This is the first study which compares the established preoperative risk assessment tools of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Scale (ASA) with frailty scores of Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a prospective observational study of older patients with cancer who underwent oncosurgery in a tertiary cancer centre during the one-year study period. Patients were scored on the CFS, MFI, ASA and ECOG scales. All patients were followed up for 30 days immediately following surgery and their post operative complications were documented. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done and a p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of the 820 patients studied, 15.6% had prolonged hospital stay, 9.1% had 30-day morbidity, 0.7% had readmission, and mortality was 1.1%. High-risk scores on the ASA and CFS were significantly associated with prolonged postoperative stay, readmission, morbidity, and mortality (p < 0.05). High-risk scores on the ECOG was significantly associated with prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.027), 30-day morbidity (p = 0.003), and mortality (p = 0.001), but not with readmission. There was no significant association between MFI score and the postoperative variables studied (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, morbidity was significantly associated only with male gender (p = 0.015), higher cancer stage (p = 0.005), higher ASA score (p = 0.029), and prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.001). Mortality was significantly associated only with emergency surgery (p = 0.012) and prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.004), and prolonged hospital stay was significantly associated with advanced cancer stage (p = 0.001) and emergency surgery (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In older patients undergoing cancer surgery, ASA and CFS are predictors of prolonged postoperative stay, morbidity, mortality, and readmission. A high-risk ECOG score is predictive of prolonged post operative stay, 30-day morbidity, and mortality, but not of readmission. Score on MFI is not a predictor of postoperative outcomes. Newer predictive tools which include cancer- specific factors are required for better management of these patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Quero G, Pecorelli N, Paiella S, Fiorillo C, Petrone MC, Capretti G, Laterza V, De Sio D, Menghi R, Kauffmann E, Nobile S, Butturini G, Ferrari G, Rosa F, Coratti A, Casadei R, Mazzaferro V, Boggi U, Zerbi A, Salvia R, Falconi M, Alfieri S. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: The importance of "biological age" on clinical outcomes. Surg Oncol 2021; 40:101688. [PMID: 34844071 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the prolongation of life expectancy, an increasing number of elderly patients are evaluated for pancreatic surgery. However, the influence of increasing age on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still unclear, especially in octogenarians. Aim of this study is to evaluate the perioperative characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians undergoing PD. METHODS Data for 812 patients undergoing PD between 2019 and 2020 in 10 referral centers in Italy were reviewed. Patients aged 80 years or older were matched based on nearest neighbor propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio to patients younger than 80 years. Propensity scores were calculated using 7 perioperative variables including gender, ASA score, neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), biliary stent positioning, type of surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted), associated vascular resections, type of lesion. Perioperative characteristics and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared before and after matching. RESULTS Overall, 81 (10%) patients had 80 years or more. Before matching, octogenarians had a higher rate of ASA score≥ 3 (n = 35, 43.2% vs. n = 207, 28.3%; p = 0.005) and less frequently underwent NAT (n = 11, 13.6% vs. n = 213, 29.1%; p = 0.003). Matching was successfully performed for 70 octogenarians. After matching, no differences in preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were found. Postoperatively, ICU admission was more frequent in octogenarians (50% vs 30%; p = 0.01). Although in-hospital mortality was higher in octogenarians before matching (7.4% vs 2.9% in the younger cohort; p = 0.03), no difference was noted between the matched cohorts (p = 0.36). Postoperative morbidity was comparable between groups in the whole and selected populations. At the multivariate analysis, chronological age was not recognized as a prognostic factor for cumulative major complications, while ASA ≥3 was the only confirmed influencing feature (OR 2.98; 95%CI: 1.6-6.8; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIO In high-volume centers, PD in octogenarians shows similar outcomes than younger patients. Age itself should not be considered an exclusion criterion for PD, but a focused preoperative assessment is essential for adequate patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Quero
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Vito Laterza
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Menghi
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Chirurgia Generale Universitaria dell'Ospedale di Cisanello, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Nobile
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Casa di Cura Pederzoli, Via Monte Baldo 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Division of Minimally-invasive Surgical Oncology, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Rosa
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Chirurgia Generale Universitaria dell'Ospedale di Cisanello, Via Paradisa, 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:904-919. [PMID: 34491303 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system celebrates its 80th anniversary in 2021. Its simplicity represents its greatest strength as well as a limitation in a world of comprehensive multisystem tools. It was developed for statistical purposes and not as a surgical risk predictor. However, since it correlates well with multiple outcomes, it is widely used-appropriately or not-for risk prediction and many other purposes. It is timely to review the history and development of the system. The authors describe the controversies surrounding the ASA Physical Status classification, including the problems of interrater reliability and its limitations as a risk predictor. Last, the authors reflect on the current status and potential future of the ASA Physical Status system.
Collapse
|
22
|
McMillan S, Kim SJ, Tin AL, Downey RJ, Vickers AJ, Korc-Grodzicki B, Shahrokni A. Association of frailty with 90-day postoperative mortality & geriatric comanagement among older adults with cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:903-908. [PMID: 34756761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Geriatric medical comanagement of older surgical patients with cancer is associated with lower 90-day postoperative mortality. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that this association varies on the basis of the degree of a patient's frailty. METHODS Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index. Our hypothesis was evaluated using two approaches, both adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, preoperative albumin, operating room duration, and estimated blood loss. A logistic regression was performed with 90-day mortality as the outcome and geriatric comanagement, continuous Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index, and an interaction term between these two variables as the primary predictors. We then categorized frailty into four levels and, within each level, performed logistic regression with geriatric comanagement as the primary predictor and 90-day mortality as the outcome. Finally, we extracted the effect size and used a meta-analytic approach to test for heterogeneity. RESULTS Of 1687 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent elective cancer surgery with a length of stay of ≥1 day, 931 (55%) received comanagement; 31 patients (3.3%) who received comanagement died within 90 days, compared with 72 (9.5%) who did not. Ninety-day mortality was not statistically significantly different by degree of frailty in either analysis (interaction P = 0.4; test of heterogeneity P = 0.8). CONCLUSION Geriatric comanagement is valuable for all older surgical patients, not just the frail, and should be provided to as large a portion of the older surgical population as possible. Further research should examine predictors of response to geriatric comanagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sincere McMillan
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Soo Jung Kim
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sweeny L, Curry JM, Crawley MB, DiLeo M, Bonaventure CA, Luginbuhl AJ, Guice KM, Taghizadeh F, McCreary E, Buncke M, Petrisor D, Wax MK. Age and Comorbidities Impact Medical Complications and Mortality Following Free Flap Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:772-780. [PMID: 34415067 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine if age correlated with surgical or medical complications following head and neck free flap reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected databases. METHODS Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction at three tertiary care institutions were included (n = 1972). Cohorts were based on age (<65, 65-75, 75-85, and >85). Outcomes reviewed operative duration, length of stay, surgical complications (free flap failure, fistula, hematoma, dehiscence, and infection), and medical complications (thromboembolism, stroke, cardiac, and pulmonary). RESULTS Anatomic site (P < .0001) and donor site varied by age (P < .0001). There was no difference in operative duration (P = .3) or length of hospitalization (P = .8) by age. The incidence of medical complications increased with increasing age. Pulmonary complication rates: <65 (3.9%), 65 to 75 (4.8%), 75 to 85 (7.1%), and >85 (11%) (P = .02). Cardiac complication rates: <65 (2.0%), 65 to 75 (7.3%), 75 to 85 (6.1%), and >85 (16.4%) (P < .0001). Mortality increased with age: <65 (0.4%), 65 to 75 (0.8%), 75 to 85 (1.1%), and >85 (4.1%) (P < .003). Medical complications correlated with mortality rates: pulmonary (3.5% vs. 0.6%; OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.0; P = .004); cardiac (3.3% vs. 0.6%; OR: 6.0; 95% CI: 1.6-21.8; P = .002); thromboembolism (4.6% vs. 0.7%; OR: 7.3; 95% CI: 1.6-33.6; P = .003); stroke (42% vs. 0.5%; OR: 149; 95% CI: 40-558; P < .0001); and sepsis (5% vs. 0.7%; OR 7.5; 95% CI: 1.0-60.5; P = .03). Age did not correlate with free flap success (P = .5), surgical complications (hematoma, P = .33; fistula, P = .23; infection, P = .07; and dehiscence, P = .37), or thirty-day readmission (P = .3). CONCLUSION Following free flap reconstruction, patient age did not correlate with development of a surgical complication. Patient age did correlate with development of a medical complication. Postoperative medical complications were found to correlate with perioperative mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Sweeny
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Joseph M Curry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Meghan B Crawley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Michael DiLeo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Caroline A Bonaventure
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Adam J Luginbuhl
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Kelsie M Guice
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Farshid Taghizadeh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Eleanor McCreary
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Michelle Buncke
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Daniel Petrisor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Montroni I, Saur NM, Shahrokni A, Suwanabol PA, Chesney TR. Surgical Considerations for Older Adults With Cancer: A Multidimensional, Multiphase Pathway to Improve Care. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2090-2101. [PMID: 34043436 PMCID: PMC10476754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Montroni
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ospedale “per gli Infermi”, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy
| | - Nicole M. Saur
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Pasithorn A. Suwanabol
- Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tyler R. Chesney
- Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The Impact of Patient Age ≥80 Years on Postoperative Outcomes and Treatment Costs Following Pancreatic Surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040696. [PMID: 33578965 PMCID: PMC7916670 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As life expectancy is increasing, elderly patients are evaluated more frequently for resection of benign or malignant pancreatic lesions. However, the impact of age on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs in octogenarian patients (≥80 years) undergoing major pancreatic surgery needs further investigation. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2015 and March 2019 in a major hepatopancreatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs of octogenarians and younger patients were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. During the study period, 346 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, and other procedures were performed in 54%, 20%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The major postoperative morbidity rate and postoperative mortality rate were 25% and 3.5%, respectively. A total of 39 patients (11%) were ≥80 years old, and 307 patients were <80 years old. The majority of octogenarians suffered from ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas among younger patients, other indications for a pancreatic resection were predominant (ductal adenocarcinoma 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.006). Age ≥80 was associated with more frequent postoperative medical (pulmonary, cardiovascular) and surgical (high-grade pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage) complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.4% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). This finding may be explained by the higher rate of type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 5%), resulting more frequently in postoperative hemorrhage (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.002) among patients ≥80 years old. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age ≥80 years predicted postoperative mortality independently of the tumor entity and surgical technique (p = 0.013, OR 6.71, 95% CI [1.5–30.3]). Increased major postoperative morbidity was responsible for lower cost recovery in octogenarians (94% vs. 102%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, patient age ≥80 years is associated with increased postoperative medical and surgical morbidity after major pancreatic surgery leading to lower cost recovery and a lower chance for successful resuscitation in patients requiring revisional surgery for postoperative hemorrhage and/or pancreatic fistula. In octogenarian patients suffering from pancreatic tumors, careful selection, and thorough prehabilitation is crucial to achieve the best postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
|
26
|
Comparison of the prognostic value of MUST, ECOG-PS, mGPS and CT derived body composition analysis in patients with advanced lung cancer. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020; 40:349-356. [PMID: 33183562 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of malnutrition, performance status and systemic inflammation are routine aspects of clinical assessment in patients with advanced cancer. There is increasing evidence that body composition measurements from routine staging CT also have prognostic value. To date the relative prognostic value of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), modified Glasgow Prognostic score (mGPS) and CT derived body composition analysis in patients with advanced lung cancer has not been examined. The aim of the present study was to examine this relationship. METHODS Clinicopathological characteristics including MUST, ECOG-PS, mGPS and body composition data were collected pre-radiotherapy from a prospectively maintained database of patients with advanced lung cancer (n = 643). Using the MUST score, patients were classified into low (MUST = 0, n = 189), medium (MUST = 1, n = 341) and high (MUST ≥ 2, n = 113) malnutrition risk and their relationship to systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and body composition with clinical outcomes were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Primary outcome of the study was overall survival. RESULTS Compared with the patients at low nutrition risk (MUST = 0), patients at moderate to high risk (MUST 1-≥2) had poorer ECOG-PS > 1 (p < 0.01), elevated modified frailty index (mFI) (p < 0.001), elevated mGPS (p < 0.001), lower skeletal muscle index (SMI, p < 0.01) but not lower skeletal muscle density (SMD, p = 0.115). MUST was an important prognostic marker of 12 months overall survival (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, higher MUST (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, p < 0.05), ECOG-PS > 1 (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.39, p < 0.001), elevated mGPS (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.33, p < 0.001) were independently associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION A large proportion of patients (71%) with advanced lung cancer were at moderate to high nutrition risk. Higher malnutrition risk and elevated inflammatory status were independently associated with poor overall survival. MUST, ECOG-PS and mGPS all had independent prognostic value and may form an important prognostic framework in treatment decision making and resource utilization.
Collapse
|
27
|
Chesnut GT, Tin AL, Sjoberg DD, Jang B, Benfante N, Sarraf S, Herr H, Donat SM, Dalbagni G, Bochner B, Shahrokni A, Goh AC. Electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment Identifies Factors Associated with Adverse Early Postoperative Outcomes following Radical Cystectomy. J Urol 2020; 205:400-406. [PMID: 32897772 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes following radical cystectomy. Prospective tools to identify factors affecting outcomes are needed. We describe a novel electronic rapid fitness assessment to evaluate geriatric patients undergoing radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Before undergoing radical cystectomy between February 2015 and February 2018, 80 patients older than age 75 years completed the electronic rapid fitness assessment and were perioperatively comanaged by the Geriatrics Service. Physical function and cognitive function over 12 domains were evaluated and an accumulated geriatric deficit score was compiled. Hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, urgent care visits, readmissions, complications and deaths were assessed. RESULTS A total of 65 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer without concomitant procedures completed the assessment. Median age was 80 (77, 84) years and 52 (80%) were male. A higher proportion of patients with intensive care unit admission, urgent care visit and major complications had impairments identified within electronic rapid fitness assessment domains, including Timed Up and Go. Readmission rates were similar between patients with or without deficits identified. Higher accumulated geriatric deficit score was significantly associated with intensive care unit admission (p=0.035), death within 90 days (p=0.037) and discharge to other than home (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the feasibility of assessing fitness in patients older than 75 years undergoing radical cystectomy using a novel electronic fitness tool. Physical limitations and overall impairment corresponded to higher intensive care unit admission rates and adverse postoperative outcomes. Larger studies in less resourced environments are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory T Chesnut
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Brian Jang
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Saman Sarraf
- Geriatric Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - S Machele Donat
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard Bochner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatric Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alvin C Goh
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic nutritional index (PNI), independent of frailty is associated with six-month postoperative mortality. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:880-884. [PMID: 32253157 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is associated with disease and overall survival in patients with cancer. We aimed to assess the relationship between PNI, frailty, and six-month postoperative survival in older patients with cancer. METHODS In this retrospective study, patients with cancer aged ≥75 who underwent geriatric preoperative evaluation and then proceeded with elective surgery with hospital length of stay of ≥1 day and had six-month follow-up were included. PNI is measured by preoperative [10 × albumin(gr/dl)] + [0.005 × absolute lymphocyte count (per mm3)]. Higher PNI is suggestive of better nutritional status. Frailty was assessed by geriatric assessment. PNI among patients with and without each age-related impairment was evaluated. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the number of age-related impairments and PNI. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between six-month mortality and PNI. RESULTS PNI ranged from 19 to 49 (average 40) among 1025 patients (average age 80). Patients with impairment in Karnofsky Performance Status, falls in the past year, prolonged timed up and go test, limited social activity, significant weight loss, polypharmacy, polycomorbid conditions, depression, and dependent for basic and instrumental activities of daily living had lower PNI than fit patients. The correlation coefficient between PNI and number of aging impairments was -0.28 (p < .001). Each unit increase in PNI was associated with 10% reduction in 6-month mortality (OR = 0.90, p < .001). CONCLUSION PNI independent of frailty, age, American Society of Anesthesiologist Performance Scale (ASA-PS), and metastatic disease is associated with six-month postoperative mortality. Future studies should assess the interventions aimed at improving PNI and its impact on surgical outcomes.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lichtman SM. Geriatricizing clinical trials: The legacy of Arti Hurria, MD. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:149-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
30
|
Benito V, Lubrano A, Andújar M, Mori M, Federico M. Management of endometrial cancer in patients aged 80 years and older: Identifying patients who may benefit from a curative treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 242:36-42. [PMID: 31550627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to evaluate the demographic characteristics, pathology, treatment, prognostic factors and survival rates in elderly patients with endometrial cancer, and to compare their results with those of younger ones, in order to define the specific characteristics of this malignancy in this population. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of all endometrial cancer patients managed at the University Hospital of the Canary Islands (Spain) between 1990 and 2016. Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of different variables on cancer-specific survival. Statistical significance was considered for p < 0.05. RESULTS The study included 1799 endometrial cancer patients; 170 of them (9.4%) were 80 years old or older. Elderly patients received less surgery (68.2% vs. 92.4%), lymphadenectomy (10.3% vs. 26.2%) and adjuvant treatment (37.1% vs. 51.2%) than younger ones, and presented higher probability of receiving palliative treatment (27.6% vs. 4%). Endometrioid tumors were more frequently diagnosed in younger patients (78.8% vs. 62.9%), while type 2-endometrial cancer was more frequently diagnosed in elderly ones (37.1% vs. 21.2%). Cancer-specific survival in older patients was significantly poorer than in younger ones, with a mean of 61.4 months (95%CI 51.7-71.1) versus 226 months (95%CI 218.9-233.1), respectively. In a multivariate analysis: age, FIGO stage, histology, tumor differentiation and adjuvant treatment were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSION Although endometrial cancer is more aggressive in older patients, they are less likely to receive optimal treatment, which negatively affects their survival. Specific guidelines for the management of this population, including a comprehensive geriatric assessment, should be developed to improve their prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Benito
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35016, Spain.
| | - Amina Lubrano
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35016, Spain
| | - Miguel Andújar
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35016, Spain
| | - Marta Mori
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35016, Spain
| | - Mario Federico
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35016, Spain
| |
Collapse
|