Eszopiclone versus zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia

Effect of graduated drug therapy for moderate-to-severe chronic insomnia on the severity of disease: an observational study in Germany

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Severe chronic insomnia is a common sleep disorder that is mostly persistent and needs to be treated. Pharmacologic treatment options and guidelines are sparse, particularly for long-term treatment. Our study aimed to investigate a graduated therapy scheme for moderate-to-severe chronic insomnia in practice, considering the effects on self-reported sleep quality and quality of life.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic insomnia were given appropriate medication according to a graduated therapy scheme, ranging from l-tryptophan (as the first choice, least potent) to Z-drugs and combination therapies (as the last option, most potent). Each step of the graduated therapy scheme was tested for at least 4 weeks. Data related to sleep and quality of life were collected in questionnaire form (Insomnia Severity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Beck Depression Inventory, second edition, and Short Form 36 Health Survey) at baseline and during the course of the treatment after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 86 eligible patients, 60.5% started treatment with l-tryptophan and 8.1% with melatonin. After 3 months, 12.5% were still taking l-tryptophan and 12.5% were taking melatonin. There was a significant decrease in mean Insomnia Severity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Beck Depression Inventory, second edition, and Short Form 36 Health Survey scores after 3 months of treatment for all patients in the study (n = 64). After 6 months, 22.2% were still taking l-tryptophan, melatonin, or agomelatine, and the remainder had switched to more potent drugs such as antidepressants, hypnotics, daridorexant, or combination therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients already responded favorably to mild sleep medications, whereas others demonstrated a need for more potent treatments. Ongoing monitoring will evaluate the long-term effectiveness of both approaches.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: German Clinical Trials Register; Name: Schlafqualität und Lebensqualität mit einer medikamentösen Langzeittherapie bei moderater bis schwerer Insomnie; URL: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033175; Identifier: DRKS00033175.

CITATION

Boer J, Toncar T, Stange A, Rosenblum L, Fietze I. Effect of graduated drug therapy for moderate-to-severe chronic insomnia on the severity of disease: an observational study in Germany. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(1):33-45.

The role of the GABAergic system on insomnia

Sleep is an essential activity for the survival of mammals. Good sleep quality helps promote the performance of daily functions. In contrast, insufficient sleep reduces the efficiency of daily activities, causes various chronic diseases like Alzheimer's disease, and increases the risk of having accidents. The GABAergic system is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter system in the central nervous system. It transits the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmitter via GABAA and GABAB receptors to counterbalance excitatory neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, noradrenaline, serotonin, acetylcholine, orexin, and dopamine, which release and increase arousal activities during sleep. Several studies emphasized that dysfunction of the GABAergic system is related to insomnia, the most prevalent sleep-related disorder. The GABAergic system comprises the GABA neurotransmitter, GABA receptors, GABA synthesis, and degradation. Many studies have demonstrated that GABA levels correlate with sleep quality, suggesting that modulating the GABAergic system may be a promising therapeutic approach for insomnia. In this article, we highlight the significance of sleep, the classification and pathology of insomnia, and the impact of the GABAergic system changes on sleep. In addition, we also review the medications that target the GABAergic systems for insomnia, including benzodiazepines (BZDs), non-BZDs, barbiturates, GABA supplements, and Chinese herbal medicines.

2023 Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Insomnia in Adults - Brazilian Sleep Association

Chronic insomnia disorder (simplified in this document as insomnia) is an increasingly common clinical condition in society and a frequent complaint at the offices of different areas of health practice (particularly Medicine and Psychology). This scenario has been accompanied by a significant evolution in treatment, as well as challenges in approaching patients in an appropriately way. This clinical guideline, coordinated by the Brazilian Sleep Association and the Brazilian Association of Sleep Medicine and counting on the active participation of various specialists in the area, encompasses an update on the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia in adults. To this end, it followed a structured methodology. Topics of interest related to diagnosis were written based on theoretical framework, evidence in the literature, and professional experience. As for the topics related to the treatment of insomnia, a series of questions were developed based on the PICO acronym (P - Patient, problem, or population; I - Intervention; C - Comparison, control, or comparator; O - Outcome). The work groups defined the eligible options within each of these parameters. Regarding pharmacological interventions, only the ones currently available in Brazil or possibly becoming available in the upcoming years were considered eligible. Systematic reviews were conducted to help prepare the texts and define the level of evidence for each intervention. The final result is an objective and practical document providing recommendations with the best scientific support available to professionals involved in the management of insomnia.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Insomnia Drugs: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 153 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatment is common in practice and widely used for the management of insomnia. However, evidence comparing the relative effectiveness, safety, and certainty of evidence among drug classes and individual drugs for insomnia are still lacking. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of drugs for insomnia.

METHODS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to January 10, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insomnia drugs with placebo or an active comparator in adults with insomnia. We conducted random-effects frequentist network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty, categorize interventionsand present the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 148 articles met our eligibility criteria; these included 153 trials which enrolled 46,412 participants and assessed 36 individual drugs from eight drug classes. Compared with placebo, both subjectively and objectively measured total sleep time were significantly improved with non-benzodiazepine (subjective: mean difference [MD] 25.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.49-34.64, low certainty; objective: MD 22.34, 95% CI 7.64-37.05, high certainty), antidepressants (subjective: MD 54.40, 95% CI 34.96-75.83, low certainty; objective: MD 35.64, 95% CI 13.05-58.24, high certainty), and orexin receptor antagonists (subjective: MD 21.62, 95% CI 0.84-42.40, high certainty; objective: MD 31.81, 95% CI 2.66-60.95, high certainty); of which doxepin, almorexant, suvorexant, and lemborexant were among the relatively effective drugs with relatively good tolerability and lower risks of any adverse events (AEs). Both subjectively and objectively measured sleep onset latency were significantly shortened with non-benzodiazepines (subjective: MD - 10.12, 95% CI - 13.84 to - 6.40, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 12.11, 95% CI - 19.31 to - 4.90, moderate certainty) and melatonin receptor agonists (subjective: MD - 7.73, 95% CI - 15.21 to - 0.26, high certainty; objective: MD - 7.04, 95% CI - 12.12 to - 1.95, moderate certainty); in particular, zopiclone was among the most effective drugs with a lower risk of any AEs but worse tolerability. Non-benzodiazepines could significantly decrease both subjective and objective measured wake time after sleep onset (subjective: MD - 16.67, 95% CI - 21.79 to - 11.56, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 13.92, 95% CI - 22.71 to - 5.14, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-benzodiazepines probably improve total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake time after sleep onset. Other insomnia drug classes and individual drugs also showed potential benefits in improving insomnia symptoms. However, the choice of insomnia drugs should be based on the phenotype of insomnia presented, as well as each drug's safety and tolerability. Protocol registration PROSPERO (CRD42019138790).

Efficacy, Safety, and Drug–Drug Interactions for Insomnia Therapy in COVID-19 Patients

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a systemic viral infection. COVID-19 patients show diverse clinical presentations ranging from asymptomatic, mild symptoms to severe symptoms characterized by severe respiratory distress. Sleep disorders or insomnia is one of the psychiatric problems that arise during the COVID-19 pandemic. The term used to define this particular insomnia is coronasomnia or COVID-19 insomnia. Data show that the prevalence of this problem is increasing, especially in the confirmed COVID-19 patient group. Anti-insomnia drugs such as hypnotics, sedatives, and anxiolytics are the easiest option. As with drugs generally, anti-insomnia drugs are associated with various safety issues, especially in people with COVID-19. Therefore, their use may be hazardous. The literature review aims to make health practitioners aware of the anti-insomnia drugs that have the best efficacy and safety issues that are clinically relevant from the use of anti-insomnia drugs and the interactions of anti-insomnia drugs with various drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19. The articles were explored on PubMed and Cochrane Library, whereas the drug–drug interactions between the anti-insomnia and COVID-19 drugs were searched on Drugs.com Interaction Checker and Lexiomp-interact. Overall anti-insomnia drugs have efficacy in improving sleep parameters. Orexin receptor antagonist drugs have good efficacy in increasing WASO, LPS, and SE with an acceptable safety profile. Meanwhile, the combination of zolpidem, lorazepam, and diphenhydramine improved TST parameters better than other drugs. Side effects such as drowsiness and dizziness were among the most commonly reported effects. Therefore, attention and monitoring of the use of anti-insomnia drugs in COVID-19 patients need to be carried out by considering the side effects and interactions that are very risky.

Umbilical acupuncture for insomnia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is characterized by high incidence, easy recurrence, and difficulty in curing. Serious insomnia not only seriously affects the body organ function but also causes great damage psychological.Umbilical acupuncture (UA) has fewer side effects and is increasingly used to treat insomnia. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of UA in the treatment of insomnia.

METHODS

Literature on UA for insomnia in PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Wan Fang Database were searched from the creation of these databases to October 3, 2021. In addition, the reference lists of studies meeting the inclusion criteria will also be searched to achieve a comprehensive retrieval of the maximum. All randomized controlled trials of UA for treating insomnia were included. Two reviewers will conduct literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation respectively. The main outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the secondary outcomes included clinical efficacy, and safety. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for mate analysis.

RESULTS

This study aimed to evaluate the current status of UA treatment for insomnia, with the aim of illustrating the effectiveness and safety of UA.

CONCLUSION

This study will provides a high-quality evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UA in treating insomnia.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021283036.

Efficacy and safety of abdominal acupuncture for insomnia: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is characterized by high incidence, easy recurrence, and difficulty in curing. Serious insomnia not only seriously affects the body organ function, but psychological patients also cause great damage. Abdominal acupuncture (AA) has fewer side effects and is increasingly used to treat insomnia. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of abdominal acupuncture in the treatment of insomnia.

METHODS

Literature on abdominal acupuncture for insomnia in the PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database(Embase), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Wan Fang databases were searched from the creation of these databases to October 3, 2021. In addition, the reference lists of studies meeting the inclusion criteria will also be searched to achieve a comprehensive retrieval of the maximum. All randomized controlled trials of AA for treating insomnia were included. Two reviewers will conduct literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation respectively. The main outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the secondary outcomes included clinical efficacy and safety. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for mate analysis.

RESULTS

This study aimed to evaluate the current status of AA treatment for insomnia, with the aim of illustrating the effectiveness and safety of abdominal acupuncture.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide high-quality evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AA in treating insomnia.Registration: INPLASY2021100088.

Zopiclone to treat insomnia in older adults: A systematic review

Considering the global increase in use of Z-drugs to treat insomnia, the study objective was to conduct a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of zopiclone to treat sleep disorders in older adults compared to other sedative-hypnotics, to placebo or to non-pharmacological interventions. The literature search for original reports - clinical trials, cohort studies and cross-sectional, observational investigations - was done in eleven databases and web search engines followed PRISMA guidelines, and methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. The search resulted in 12 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials along with 2 open studies and 2 observational reports. Overall, the studies suggest that zopiclone is effective to treat insomnia by reducing sleep latency, nocturnal awakenings and wake time after sleep onset while increasing total sleep time, with probable effects on sleep architecture. Zopiclone was found to be fairly tolerated, to induce a low rate of adverse events with non-severe impact on psychomotor or cognitive performance and to produce no major harm to the overall well-being and daily living abilities. However, the quality of most studies was classified as low or unclear. Though the studies available support benefits from zopiclone use, there is still a need for further evidence on long-term effects, tolerability and safety in the treatment of older adults by means of high-quality trials.

Comparative efficacy of lemborexant and other insomnia treatments: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a common disorder associated with a substantial burden of illness, particularly in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of lemborexant with specified other insomnia treatments through a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Medline and Embase were systematically searched from inception to February 2019 and updated with a targeted search of PubMed for pivotal trials in March 2021. Randomized controlled trials in adults with primary insomnia were included if they reported results following at least 1 week of treatment. Interventions of interest were specified as lemborexant, suvorexant, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (also called Z-drugs [zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, zopiclone]), trazodone, and ramelteon. Efficacy outcomes included wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), latency to persistent sleep (LPS)/sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Bayesian NMA were performed at predetermined time intervals approximating 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs), and specified AEs (dizziness, somnolence, and falls). Subgroup analysis was conducted in the older population. RESULTS: 45 studies were included in the NMA. At 4 weeks, lemborexant had the highest probability of being the best treatment for 3 of the 4 outcomes measured objectively by polysomnography-TST, LPS, and SE-and was ranked second to suvorexant on WASO. Eszopiclone was highly ranked for subjectively measured SOL and ISI at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Lemborexant was rated more highly than suvorexant in subjective measures of WASO, TST, and SOL at 4 weeks (the differences were not statistically significant). No statistically significant interactions between treatment effect and older subpopulations were found, indicating that the treatment effect was similar in older and adult populations. The safety profile of lemborexant was broadly similar to the other treatments for SAEs and withdrawals due to AEs. A limitation is the age of some of the included studies (3 were published in 1990 or earlier). A further limitation is the lack of stratification of recommended doses. If the doses used in the study publications do not reflect doses used in clinical practice, this could potentially bias the results. CONCLUSIONS: Lemborexant was ranked highest of the treatments studied on 3 out of the 4 objectively measured insomnia efficacy outcomes, with a safety profile broadly similar to other insomnia treatments. DISCLOSURES: This work was funded by Eisai Inc., which was involved with all stages of the study and analysis. McElroy, O'Leary, and Adena are consultants with Datalytics Pty Ltd., which was paid by Eisai Inc. for conducting the literature review and analysis. They were not financially compensated for collaborative efforts on publication-related activities. Campbell, Tahami Monfared, and Meier are employed by Eisai Inc. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP Nexus Virtual, October 20-23, 2020 and at the AGS Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting 2021, May 13-15, 2021.

Benzodiazepines use in Morocco: A nation wide consumption database study between 2004 and 2017

Although information exists regarding the rate of benzodiazepines (BZDs) use in different countries, little information is available concerning the BZDs consumption in Morocco. To describe prescription rate in Morocco, a retrospective descriptive analysis of BZDs and their agonists use with the instituteIQIVIA database was performed during the period 2004-2017. The obtained data provide a dynamic approach to total BZDs consumption using an annual collection of sales data in Morocco and were expressed in terms of daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day. Data analysis showed that the major BZDs sold in Morocco were Alprazolam, Bromazepam, Nordazepam, Lorazepam, Parazepam, Diazepam and two benzodiazepine agonists, Zolpidem and Zopiclone. The Bromazepam was the molecule the most consumed during 2004-2016. In 2017, Alprazolam was the most consumed followed by Bromazepam, Nordazepam, Zolpidem, Lorazepam, Parazepam, Diazepam, Dipotassium clorazepate, Dipotassium Clorazypate and Zopiclone with 0.94, 0.91, 0.6, 0.55, 0.45, 0.32, 0.18, 0.18, 0.07 and 0.05 daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day respectively. The total amount consumed each year for all BZDs and their agonists in Morocco was 2.69, 2.77, 3, 3.17, 3.32, 3.54, 3.61, 3.81, 4.06, 4.30, 4.06, 3.94, 3.78 and 3.66 daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day, respectively during 2004-2017. To our knowledge, this is the first study that describes the consumption of BZDs and their agonists (Zolpidem, Zopiclone) in Morocco. This data may help the analytical toxicology laboratory and health organizations operating in the field of analytical biochemistry to develop specific BZDs quantification and detection methods needed for the Moroccan population.

The stereoisomerism of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides: a way to improve this class of molecules to meet the requirements of society?

Second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGAR) are generally highly efficient for rodent management even towards warfarin-resistant rodents. Nevertheless, because of their long tissue-persistence, they are very associated with non-target exposure of wildlife and have been identified as 'Candidates for Substitution' by the European Union's competent authority. A promising way to reduce ecotoxicity issues associated to SGAR could be the improvement of SGAR based on their stereoisomery, and due to this improvement, positioning about SGAR might be reconsidered. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Eszopiclone for insomnia

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is a major public health issue affecting between 6% to 10% of the adult population in Western countries. Eszopiclone is a hypnotic drug belonging to a newer group of hypnotic agents, known as new generation hypnotics, which was marketed as being just as effective as benzodiazepines for this condition, while being safer and having a lower risk for abuse and dependence. It is the aim of the review to integrate evidence from randomised controlled trials and to draw conclusions on eszopiclone's efficacy and safety profile, while taking methodological features and bias risks into consideration.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone for the treatment of insomnia compared to placebo or active control.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX and registry databases (WHO trials portal, ClinicalTrials.gov) with results incorporated from searches to 10 February 2016. To identify trials not registered in electronic databases, we contacted key informants and searched reference lists of identified studies. We ran an update search (21 February 2018) and have placed studies of interest in awaiting classification/ongoing studies. These will be incorporated into the next version of the review, as appropriate.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing eszopiclone with either placebo or active control were included in the review. Participants were adults with insomnia, as diagnosed with a standardised diagnostic system, including primary insomnia and comorbid insomnia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted outcome data; one reviewer assessed trial quality and the second author cross-checked it.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 14 RCTs, with 4732 participants, were included in this review covering short-term (≤ 4 weeks; 6 studies), medium-term (> 4 weeks ≤ 6 months; 6 studies) and long-term treatment (> 6 months; 2 studies) with eszopiclone. Most RCTs included in the review included participants aged between 18 and 64 years, three RCTs only included elderly participants (64 to 85 years) and one RCT included participants with a broader age range (35 to 85 years). Seven studies considered primary insomnia; the remaining studies considered secondary insomnia comorbid with depression (2), generalised anxiety (1), back pain (1), Parkinson's disease (1), rheumatoid arthritis (1) and menopausal transition (1).Meta-analytic integrations of participant-reported data on sleep efficacy outcomes demonstrated better results for eszopiclone compared to placebo: a 12-minute decrease of sleep onset latency (mean difference (MD) -11.94 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.03 to -7.86; 9 studies, 2890 participants, moderate quality evidence), a 17-minute decrease of wake time after sleep onset (MD -17.02 min, 95% CI -24.89 to -9.15; 8 studies, 2295 participants, moderate quality evidence) and a 28-minute increase of total sleep time (MD 27.70 min, 95% CI 20.30 to 35.09; 10 studies, 2965 participants, moderate quality evidence). There were no significant changes from baseline to the first three nights after drug discontinuation for sleep onset latency (MD 17.00 min, 95% CI -4.29 to 38.29; 1 study, 291 participants, low quality evidence) and wake time after sleep onset (MD -6.71 min, 95% CI -21.25 to 7.83; 1 study, 291 participants, low quality evidence). Adverse events during treatment that were documented more frequently under eszopiclone compared to placebo included unpleasant taste (risk difference (RD) 0.18, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.21; 9 studies, 3787 participants), dry mouth (RD 0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.06; 6 studies, 2802 participants), somnolence (RD 0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.06; 8 studies, 3532 participants) and dizziness (RD 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.05; 7 studies, 2933 participants). According to the GRADE criteria, evidence was rated as being of moderate quality for sleep efficacy outcomes and adverse events and of low quality for rebound effects and next-day functioning.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Eszopiclone appears to be an efficient drug with moderate effects on sleep onset and maintenance. There was no or little evidence of harm if taken as recommended. However, as certain patient subgroups were underrepresented in RCTs included in the review, findings might not have displayed the entire spectrum of possible adverse events. Further, increased caution is required in elderly individuals with cognitive and motor impairments and individuals who are at increased risk of using eszopiclone in a non-recommended way.

Psychopharmakotherapie bei Ein- und Durchschlafstörungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter: Eine Übersicht

Zusammenfassung. Ein- und Durchschlafstörungen sind mit einer Prävalenz von etwa 20 % eine relevante Symptomatik im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Aufgrund des mit Insomnien oftmals verbundenen verminderten psychosozialen Funktionsniveaus und des sich einstellenden Leidensdrucks ist eine suffiziente Behandlung notwendig. Zeigen sich Maßnahmen wie eine angemessene Schlafhygiene und andere nichtmedikamentöse Therapieansätze als nicht ausreichend, wird oftmals eine pharmakotherapeutische Behandlung in Betracht gezogen. Die vorliegende Arbeit bietet eine Literaturübersicht zum Einsatz verschiedener Substanzklassen in hypnotischer Indikation. Der Einsatz von Melatonin bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Autismus-Spektrum-Störungen ist zwischenzeitlich gut untersucht und ist mit einem positiven Effekt auf den Schlaf bei dieser Patientengruppe assoziiert. Hinsichtlich der Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit anderer Wirkstoffe bei primären Insomnien bzw. Schlafstörungen im Kontext anderer psychiatrischer Erkrankungen bei Minderjährigen besteht bislang eine geringe Evidenz. Daher sind zunächst nichtmedikamentöse Behandlungsstrategien vorzuziehen und eine Pharmakotherapie erst sekundär und nach kritischer Abwägung zu erwägen.

An Update on Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Their Potential Role in Insomnia Therapeutics

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Current pharmacological options for the treatment of insomnia insufficiently meet the needs of all insomnia patients. Approved treatments are not consistently effective in improving sleep onset and sleep maintenance, while also having complicated safety profiles. These limitations highlight the unmet need for additional medications and treatment strategies. Initial research suggests that the dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) may offer an additional pharmaceutical option to treat insomnia in some patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the existing literature on dual orexin receptor antagonists in PubMed databases using the search terms "orexin receptor antagonist," "almorexant" "filorexant," "lembroexant" and "suvorexant"; searches were limited to English language primary research articles, clinical trials, and reviews.

RESULTS

Targeting the orexin receptor system for treatment of insomnia offers an additional and alternative pharmacological approach to more common gamma aminobutyric acid agonist sedative hypnotic treatment. Effectiveness is not well established in the current literature; however, the literature does suggest efficacy. Preclinical reports also suggest the potential for treatment in individuals with comorbid Alzheimer disease and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

DORAs offer an additional treatment option for insomnia. More clinical trials are needed to robustly evaluate their safety and effectiveness in several subclasses of individuals with insomnia. Given the published literature, head-to-head comparisons to existing treatment for insomnia are warranted.