Is there a Role for Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Dental Procedures in Patients with Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature

[Arthroplasty and oral health-an overview]

Despite limited evidence for a preoperative dental screening examination and needs-based focal rehabilitation, as well as the need for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to invasive dental procedures, oral health is and remains a relevant topic in arthroplasty. The aspect of oral health should not be neglected in the future in connection with periprosthetic infections and should continue to be the subject of intensive research. The frequency of conspicuous dental findings in middle and old age underlines the importance of this problem. A dental examination prior to arthroplasty implantation can generally contribute to minimizing the risk of arthroplasty infection. It would be desirable for further studies to provide evidence on this topic in order to make recommendations for action. Independently of this, the development of an interdisciplinary guideline (arthroplasty and dentistry) on this topic should be encouraged. This could help to ensure that standardized treatment procedures are integrated into everyday clinical practice across the board.

Use of Hinged Implants for Multi-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Severe Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Remission Rate and Outcomes After a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years

BACKGROUND

In severe periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), multi-stage procedures are indicated for ongoing signs of infection after implant removal during the spacer interval of an intended two-stage exchange. In these cases, several additional debridement and spacer exchange surgeries may be necessary. Herein, we analyzed the complications, remission rate, and functional outcome after multi-stage revision arthroplasty using hinged TKAs.

METHODS

Patients (n = 79) treated with multi-stage revision arthroplasty after chronic PJI of the knee were included (2010 to 2018). During the prosthesis-free interval, a static spacer containing antibiotic-loaded bone cement was implanted. The mean number of surgeries, including implant removal and revision arthroplasty, was 3.8 (range, 3 to 8). The mean duration from implant removal to revision arthroplasty was 83 days (range, 49 to 318). Complications, remission, and mortality were analyzed after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Outcomes were assessed based on the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

RESULTS

During follow-up, 24 (30.4%) patients underwent revision surgery, with a mean time to surgical revision of 99 weeks (range, 1 to 261). After follow-up, the infection-free remission rate and overall mortality were 87.3 and 11.4%, respectively. The mean KSS was 74.3 (range, 24 to 99); the KSS Function Score was 60.8 (range, 5 to 100); and the WOMAC, 30.2 (range, 5 to 83).

CONCLUSION

In difficult-to-treat cases, multi-stage revision arthroplasty showed high remission rates and low mortality after a follow-up of 5 years. The overall revision rate was comparably high, accounting for early and late reinfections most of the time. In cases of implant survival, functional outcomes comparable to those of revision hinge TKA reported in the literature can be achieved. Therefore, multi-stage procedures with additional debridement steps should be performed in cases of ongoing infections in intended two-stage procedures.

Incidence, functional outcomes and cure rate of hematogenous infection in a 2,498 Total Knee Arthroplasties cohort

PURPOSE

The primary aim of the present study is to report the late acute hematogenous (LAH) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cure rate following Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated by means of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in a long-term follow-up. The secondary purpose is to report the functional outcomes at that follow-up and to compare them with a non-infected group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study cohort consists of 2,498 TKA performed from September 2005 to April 2010 that had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The diagnosis of PJI and classification into LAH was done in accordance with the Zimmerli criteria. The primary outcome was the failure rate, defined as death before the end of antibiotic treatment, a further surgical intervention for treatment of infection, life-long antibiotic suppressive treatment or chronic infection. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten patients were diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI during the study period (0.4%). All of them were managed with DAIR, which was performed by a knee surgeon and/or PJI surgeon. The failure rate was 0% at the 8.5-year (SD, 2.4) follow-up mark. The KSS score was 82.1 vs. 84.1 (p n.s.) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although the literature suggests that TKA DAIR for LAH periprosthetic joint infection is associated with high rates of failure, the results presented here suggest a high cure rate with good functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Oral Health Screening for Risk Reduction for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Hip and Knee Endoprostheses-Results of a Prospective Cohort Study

This prospective observational study had two aims: (I) to assess whether a preoperative dental screening before endoprosthesis (EP) implantation with need-based dental intervention would decrease the prevalence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and (II) to evaluate whether instructed orthopedic surgeons would achieve similar results in oral screening as dentists. The preoperative oral health statuses of the patients, prior to EP insertion, were either evaluated by the patients' general dentists (Ia) or, if the patient had not visited a general dentist, by an instructed orthopedic surgeon (Ib). Both the dentist and orthopedic surgeon used standardized risk estimation (low risk, moderate risk, and high risk) for an oral-health-related infectious complication after EP insertion, including a recommendation for further management of the patient. If required, a need-based dental rehabilitation was performed. In addition, retrospective data evaluation of a comparison group (II) was performed, which had not been screened orally preoperatively. A total of 777 patients (screening group (I): n = 402, of which 229 were screened by a dentist (Ia), 173 were screened by an orthopedic surgeon (Ib); comparison group (II): n = 375) were included. No general association between early infection rate and preoperative oral screening in general was found (1% PJI in screening group (I), 1.6% PJI in comparison group (II); p = 0.455). However, screening performance (dentist vs. orthopedic surgeon) had a significant impact on the prevalence of developed PJIs (p = 0.021). Thereby, 100% of observed infections in the screening group (I) occurred in the group with previous oral screening by an orthopedic surgeon (Ib). Furthermore, the C-reactive protein (CRP) value at discharge was significantly lower when general preoperative oral screening had been performed (group I vs. group II, p = 0.03). Only preoperative oral screening by a dentist had the potential to reduce oral-focus-associated EP infections; therefore, increased attention should be paid to the further promotion of interdisciplinary work between dentists and orthopedic surgeons. Dental screenings, using objectifiable criteria, as applied in this study, seem reasonable but require further validation in larger cohorts.

Routine Preoperative Dental Clearance for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Is There a Benefit?

Background Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) place significant psychological and financial burdens on patients and healthcare systems. One measure to reduce the risk of PJIs is preoperative dental screening, for which there is no current consensus recommendation. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in the rate of PJI and microorganism profile in patients who did and did not obtain preoperative dental clearance. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted among patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty from 2017 to 2021. A cohort of 8,654 patients who underwent routine dental clearance was matched with a cohort of patients who did not. Surgeons who changed their dental clearance protocol were also identified, and the rates of PJIs were compared before and after. Results No statistically significant difference was seen in the rate of PJIs between patients who did and did not undergo routine preoperative dental clearance. No statistically significant difference was seen in the rate of PJIs before and after for surgeons who changed their dental clearance protocol. The microorganism profile between the groups was also found to be without differences. Conclusions Eliminating dental clearance from routine preoperative clearance does not appear to increase the rates of acute PJIs following elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) or to change the organism profile of the infections that did occur. It may be reasonable to not require routine preoperative dental clearance or to practice selective dental clearance in patients undergoing elective TJA, especially given the increased financial cost and delay in care experienced by patients.

Coprescription Trends in Western Medicine, Chinese Herbal Medicine and Dental Medicine among Older Adults in Taiwan from 1997 to 2013

BACKGROUND

Coprescription is a potential medical problem for older adults that could induce polypharmacy and subsequent complications. In Taiwan, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is popular among the older adults. Investigating the coprescription trends in Western medicine, CHM and dental medicine is important to avoid possible polypharmacy.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID 2000) in Taiwan. Patients ≥ 60 years old who received coprescription of Western medicine, CHM and drugs for dental care from 1997 to 2013 were included. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by a logistic regression model for evaluating the correlation between baseline characteristics and coprescription.

RESULTS

A total of 266,034 patients were included for the analysis. Most patients receiving coprescriptions lived in the northern Taiwan and with a monthly income lower than 20,000 new Taiwan dollars. The trends in older adults using Western medicine alone or CHM alone decreased over time, but the cohort using dental medicine alone had the opposite result. Decreased trends in coprescription with age were noted. The trends in the proportion of coprescription and the number of days of coprescription increased with the calendar year. Increased trends in the proportion of patients with coprescription were also found, except for the cohort of patients who used both Western medicine and CHM. Patients who were female, and aged 70-79 years were prone to receive coprescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Coprescription in older patients is not uncommon in Taiwan. Healthcare providers and policymakers should be aware of the complex coprescription pattern in the older adults.

Viewpoint: Periprosthetic joint infection and dental antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines

The purpose of this viewpoint is to provide a framework that is used within the Mayo Clinic to align recommendations from infectious disease experts, dental specialists, and orthopedic surgeons with regards to need for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to invasive dental procedures.

Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection: From Traditional Approaches towards Quality Improvement and Data Mining

A projected increased use of total joint arthroplasties will naturally result in a related increase in the number of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Suppression of the local peri-implant immune response counters efforts to eradicate bacteria, allowing the formation of biofilms and compromising preventive measures taken in the operating room. For these reasons, the prevention of PJI should focus concurrently on the following targets: (i) identifying at-risk patients; (ii) reducing “bacterial load” perioperatively; (iii) creating an antibacterial/antibiofilm environment at the site of surgery; and (iv) stimulating the local immune response. Despite considerable recent progress made in experimental and clinical research, a large discrepancy persists between proposed and clinically implemented preventative strategies. The ultimate anti-infective strategy lies in an optimal combination of all preventative approaches into a single “clinical pack”, applied rigorously in all settings involving prosthetic joint implantation. In addition, “anti-infective” implants might be a choice in patients who have an increased risk for PJI. However, further progress in the prevention of PJI is not imaginable without a close commitment to using quality improvement tools in combination with continual data mining, reflecting the efficacy of the preventative strategy in a particular clinical setting.