A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial: Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin versus 5-Fluorouracil plus Cisplatin in Patients with Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin/5-flourouracil or carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with resectable cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction - comparison of postoperative mortality and complications, toxicity, and pathological tumor response

PURPOSE

In 2012, the CROSS trial implemented a new neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy protocol for patients with locally advanced, resectable cancer of the esophagus prior to scheduled surgery. There are only limited studies comparing the CROSS protocol with a PF-based (cisplatin/5-fluorouracil) nRCT protocol.

METHODS

In this retrospective, monocentric analysis, 134 patients suffering from esophageal cancer were included. Those patients received either PF-based nRCT (PF group) or nRCT according to the CROSS protocol (CROSS group) prior to elective en bloc esophagectomy. Perioperative mortality and morbidity, nRCT-related toxicity, and complete pathological regression were compared between both groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify independent factors for pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Thirty-day/hospital mortality showed no significant differences between both groups. Postoperative complications ≥ grade 3 according to Clavien-Dindo classification were experienced in 58.8% (PF group) and 47.6% (CROSS group) (p = 0.2) respectively. nRCT-associated toxicity ≥ grade 3 was 30.8% (PF group) and 37.2% (CROSS group) (p = 0.6). There was no significant difference regarding the pCR rate between both groups (23.5% vs. 30.5%; p = 0.6). In multivariate analysis, SCC (OR 7.7; p < 0.01) and an initial grading of G1/G2 (OR 2.8; p = 0.03) were shown to be independent risk factors for higher rates of pCR.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that both nRCT protocols are effective and safe. There were no significant differences regarding toxicity, pathological tumor response, and postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and favorable preoperative tumor grading (G1 and G2) are independent predictors for higher pCR rate in multivariate analysis.

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up results of a phase II randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Definitive radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy has been a standard treatment for esophagus patients who are unfit to undergo surgery. However, there are a variety of concurrent chemotherapy regimens with varying efficacy. In this phase II prospective study, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of DP (docetaxel and cisplatin) and PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) regimens with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and analyzed the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). We also summarized the salvage treatments and late toxicities.

METHODS

We enrolled 86 patients with clinical stage II-IVA from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The patients were divided into two groups: PF group (41) and DP group (45). Statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates were 62.9% ± 7.6% in PF group, and 52.7% ± 7.5% in DP group (P = 0.131), respectively. The 5-year PFS rates were 43.9% ± 7.8% for PF group, and 40.0% ± 7.3% for DP group (P = 0.398), respectively. Sixteen patients in the DP group and thirteen in the PF group received salvage treatment. For those patients with local residual or local recurrent disease, the median survival time after salvage treatment was 13.5 months and the 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates were 79.0%, 50.3%, and 43.1%, respectively. For all patients, thirteen (15.1%) had Grade 2 late cardiac toxicities. One patient had Grade 2 pleural effusion and required diuretic. Most patients with pneumonia are mild, and only one patient in PF group had Grade 2 pneumonia. One patient in the DP group developed tracheoesophageal fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year follow-up confirmed that definitive CCRT with the DP regimen did not improve the treatment response, OS, or PFS in patients with ESCC compared to the PF regimen. The PF regimen remains the standard regimen for definitive CCRT for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Long-term follow-up also suggested that appropriate and active salvage treatment has a survival benefit for some patients, and late cardiopulmonary toxicities should be noticed during follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02969473, October 2010).

Phase I study of cisplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel combined with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This phase I study aimed to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary effect of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who were ineligible or refused surgery were enrolled. Nab-paclitaxel (60 mg/m2 , 75 mg/m2 , and 90 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 ) were administered intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 on the basis of the 3 + 3 dose escalation method. The total dose of radiation was 50-64 Gy. The primary endpoint was the safety of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 12 patients across three dose levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. One patient in the 60 mg/m2 dose level occurred dose-limiting Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. No DLT was found in the 90 mg/m2 dose level thus the MTD was not reached. The phase II study's recommended dose was 75 mg/m2 based on the available preclinical and clinical data including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity. The frequent hematologic toxicities were leukocytopenia (Grade 1-2 of 66.7% and Grade 3-4 of 33.3%), neutropenia (Grade 1-2 of 91.7% and Grade 3-4 of 8.3%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. Overall response rate (ORR) of all patients achieved 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly schedule of cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent radiotherapy showed manageable toxicities and promising antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel for further studies is 75 mg/m2 .

Moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy combined with S-1 in inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm phase II study (GASTO-1045)

Purpose

We launched this prospective phase II single-arm trial on the combination of moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and S-1, to explore the safety and efficacy of the new potent regimen in inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma (LA-ESCC) patients.

Methods

Patients with unresectable stage II-IVB LA-ESCC (UICC 2002, IVB only with metastatic celiac or supraclavicular lymph nodes) were included. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (60Gy in 24 fractions) concurrent with S-1 was delivered. Meanwhile, gastrostomy tube placement by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was performed to provide nutritional support. Nutritional supplements were prescribed to meet requirements. The study outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), failure pattern, toxicities, nutritional status and treatment compliance. Endoscopy was routinely performed during post-treatment follow-up.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 24.4 months. The median age was 63 years (range 49-83 years) and 42 patients (72.4%) had stage III or IV diseases. The ORR was 91.3% and the CR rate was 60.3%. The estimated 2-year PFS rate and 2-year OS rate was 44.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 31.3-57.1%) and 71.4% (95% CI, 59.4-83.4%), respectively. Radiation-induced esophagitis was the most common non-hematologic toxicity and 5 patients (8.6%) developed grade≥3 esophagitis. While, with PEG nutrition support, the nutrition-related indicators presented a clear trend toward a gradual improvement. Treatment-related death was not observed.

Conclusions

The moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy combined with S-1 showed promising loco-regional disease control and survival benefit in inoperable LA-ESCC patients. Meanwhile, favorable nutritional status and low incidence of severe radiation-induced esophagitis were observed with PEG nutritional support. Moreover, endoscopy examination contributed to the early detection of recurrent esophageal lesions and timely salvage treatment. The efficacy and toxicity of the combined regimen deserved further evaluation.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03660449.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cancer

Objective

To compare effects and adverse events of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and CRT alone as the initial treatment in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed locally advanced ESCC patients who received Anti-PD-1+CRT as initial treatment at 3 institutions. Primary outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) including immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Results

At data cutoff, 81 patients were included (30 Anti-PD-1+CRT, 51 CRT). Median follow-up was 31.4 months. Anti-PD-1+CRT resulted in significant improvements in PFS (median, 18.6 vs. 11.8 months, HR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.29-0.80], P = 0.008), and OS (median, 27.7 vs. 17.4 months, HR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.22-0.63], P = 0.002), compared with CRT in ESCC. The ORR and DCR of patients treated with Anti-PD-1+CRT were also significantly higher than those treated with CRT (80.0% vs. 56.9%, P = 0.034), (100% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.023), respectively. Anti-PD-1+CRT had better durable response compared with CRT, with DoR (median,17.3 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.022). Treatment-related adverse event incidence was similar between the two groups (any Grade, 93.3% vs. 92.2%; ≥Grade 3, 50.0% vs. 33.3%).

Conclusion

Anti-PD-1 plus chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity and was well tolerated in locally advanced ESCC.

Factors affecting the completion of concurrent chemotherapy and impact of non-completion on survival in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether completion of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and to identify predictors of non-completion of CCT.

METHODS

Data of ESCC patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. CCT completion was defined as receiving recommended cycles with at most 25% dose reduction. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to adjust unbalanced covariates between groups. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors affecting CCT completion.

RESULTS

Of the 487 patients in the study, 194 patients (39.8%) had completed CCT. The majority (90.7%) had stage III-IV disease. Three-year OS rate was significantly higher in the completion group than non-completion group (35.4% vs. 30.3%; p = 0.025). Multivariate Cox analysis showed CCT completion was independently associated with longer OS (p = 0.005). The independent risk factors for CCT non-completion were weekly CCT regimen [odds ratio (OR) = 4.35, 95% CI 2.26-8.37; p < 0.001], clinical target volume (CTV)-elective nodal irradiation (ENI) (OR = 3.86, 95% CI 2.41-6.18; p < 0.001), planning target volume (PTV)/50 cm³ (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16; p = 0.017), age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.011), and tumor in middle/lower esophagus (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.43, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

CCT completion can provide superior OS for ESCC patients treated with definitive CCRT. Weekly CCT regimen, CTV-ENI, PTV, older age, and tumor location are independent predictors of non-completion of CCT.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Taxanes Plus Platinum and Fluorouracil Plus Platinum in the First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) and taxanes plus platinum (TP) are standard treatments for esophageal cancer (EC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the difference in the therapeutic effect and toxicity of FP and TP regimens in EC patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were fully searched and analyzed to find relevant articles on EC patients treated with FP and TP regimens up to 22 March 2022. Thirty-one studies, with a total of 3432 participants, were included in this review. The primary outcomes showed that the prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of TP groups were better than those of FP groups for the EC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy treatment (3-year OS: RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08−1.44, p = 0.003; 3-year PFS: RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17−1.75, p = 0.0006; ORR: RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06−1.29, p = 0.001). However, TP therapy was significantly correlated with a higher incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.05). In the preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group, these two groups had a similar survival time (p > 0.05). The FP regimen corresponded to a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, while the TP regimen was associated with an increased incidence of febrile leukopenia (p < 0.05). Therefore, TP regimens could generate both superior clinical response and survival benefits when compared with FP regimens in EC patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Consolidation Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (I-CCRT), induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (I-CCRT-C), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCRT-C) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC).

Patients and Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel from February 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan–Meier curve was used to estimate survival. Efficacy was assessed using RECIST, version 1.0. Prognosis factors were identified with Cox regression analysis.

Results

Patients were treated with CCRT-C (n = 59), I-CCRT (n = 20), and I-CCRT-C (n = 48). The median follow-up duration was 73.9 months for the entire cohort. The ORR of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 89.8%, 70.0%, and 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.078). The median PFS in the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 32.5, 16.1, and 27.1 months, respectively (p = 0.464). The median OS of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 45.9, 35.5, and 54.0 months, respectively (p = 0.788). Cox regression analysis indicated that I-CCRT-C and I-CCRT did not significantly prolong PFS and OS compared with CCRT-C (p &gt; 0.05). Neutropenia grade ≥3 in CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 47.5%, 15%, and 33.3% of patients, respectively (p = 0.027).

Conclusions

I-CCRT and I-CCRT-C using cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel regimen are not superior to CCRT-C in survival but seem to have less severe neutropenia than CCRT-C. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Progression-free survival at 3 years is a reliable surrogate for 5-year overall survival for patients suffering from locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Despite 3‐year survival being used as a primary endpoint in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs), limited evidence supports the use of intermediate endpoints to evaluate the effect of new therapies in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to systematically evaluate progression‐free survival at 3 years (3‐year PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with ESCC.

Methods

We identified 528 patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC who received definitive radiotherapy. OS was compared with an age‐ and sex‐matched general Chinese population using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Regression analysis was used to validate the correlation between PFS and OS using published data.

Results

The annual risk of progression decreased to 11.5% after 3 years. Patients who did not achieve 3‐year PFS had a median postprogression survival (PPS) of 7.3 months, with a 5‐year OS rate of 9.6% and a SMR of 15.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9–17.5). Conversely, the SMR for patients who achieved 3‐year PFS was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6–1.3). We observed a significant correlation between log hazard ratio (HR) (PFS) and log HR (OS) at the trial level (r = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88–0.90). The strongest correlation was observed between 3‐year PFS and 5‐year OS in RCTs and retrospective studies.

Conclusions

Patients exhibiting progression within 3 years experienced poor survival, whereas patients achieving 3‐year PFS had excellent outcomes. Our study supports 3‐year PFS as a reliable primary endpoint for study design and risk stratification in locally advanced ESCC.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275).

Conclusion

CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01821-6.

Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

As patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are heterogeneous, we aimed to identify prognostic factors and failure patterns after dCRT. From 2006 to 2015, 327 patients who received dCRT for ESCC were reviewed. Treatment response to dCRT was evaluated based on EORTC-PET criteria with endoscopy and CT results. After dCRT, 296 patients (90.5%) achieved disease stabilisation, with 132 cases of complete response (CR) (40.4%), 158 of partial response (PR) (48.3%) and 6 of stable disease (SD) (1.8%); 31 patients (9.5%) had progressive disease (PD). Median overall survival (OS) from response evaluation was 24.0 months in the overall population. Post-treatment clinical response was the most significant prognostic factor for OS in the multivariate analysis (median OS, 65.0 months for CR, 17.3 months for PR, 4.4 months for SD and 4.0 months for PD; p < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) in 296 patients who achieved disease stabilisation was 13.1 months, and only clinical response was a significant factor in the multivariate analysis. The median PFS of CR, PR and SD patients were 36.9, 9.2 and 2.8 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). The clinical response was also significantly associated with the predominant failure pattern (locoregional failure [81.6%] in the initial non-PD group vs. distant metastasis [87.1%] in the initial PD group [p < 0.0001]). In conclusion, definitive chemoradiotherapy-treated ESCC patients showed highly different prognoses after treatment especially according to the clinical response to chemoradiotherapy.

A comparison between raltitrexed plus cisplatin and docetaxel plus cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiation for non-surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered as a standard treatment for unresectable and inoperable esophageal cancer (EC) patients. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal synchronous chemotherapy regimen and the best combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of raltitrexed plus cisplatin and docetaxel plus cisplatin to find a safe and effective concurrent chemotherapy schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our retrospective study included 151 EC patients treated with raltitrexed and cisplatin (RP) (n=90) or docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) (n=61) from 2011 till 2018. Survival outcomes and treatment related toxicity were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

PFS and OS were 18 and 34 months in the RP group, while 13 and 20 months in the DP group (P=0.118 and P=0.270). The 1-, 2-, 3-year survival rates of the RP group were 71.1, 55.4 and 46.4%. For the DP group, these were 63.9, 44.3 and 37.6%, respectively. Compared with DP group, RP group received a superior CR rate (68.9% versus 52.5%, P=0.041). There was a trend that the total number of toxic reactions in RP group was lower than that in DP group (P=0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Even RP and DP groups have the similar survival outcomes and toxicity, raltitrexed/cisplatin get a higher complete response rate. Our study suggests that raltitrexed combined with cisplatin is a safe and effective concurrent chemotherapy regimen and it might be used as an alternative for cisplatin/5-FU and cisplatin/docetaxel in CCRT for EC patients.

Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for nonsurgical esophageal cancer (EC). However, esophageal cancer patients receiving CCRT alone are still unsatisfactory in terms of local control and overall survival (OS) benefit. Clinicians generally add consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT. It remains controversial whether CCT following CCRT is beneficial for esophageal cancer. We, therefore, undertook a meta-analysis to assess the need for CCT in inoperable esophageal cancer.

Materials and Methods

We combed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for relevant published articles up to July 2020 that compared CCRT plus CCT to CCRT alone for patients with nonsurgical EC. Our primary endpoint was OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was treatment toxicity. We analyzed the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the time-to-event data and the odds ratio (OR) to compare the treatment-related effect. To assess heterogeneity, we performed the I² test and examined publication bias using funnel plots analysis.

Results

The 11 retrospective studies involved 2008 patients. Of these 2008 patients, 1018 received CCRT plus CCT, and 990 received CCRT. Compared to CCRT alone, CCT after CCRT did not improve disease control rate (DCR) (OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.53–5.15, p=0.384) and objective response rate (ORR) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.62–3.35, p=0.393). However, OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.86, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.84, p=0.003) did increase. Our results show that CCT plus CCRT had a clear survival advantage over CCRT alone. The risk of treatment toxicity did not increase for EC patients who received CCT.

Conclusion

CCT after CCRT significantly increases OS and PFS in patients with nonsurgical EC and could provide them remarkable survival benefits. The results provide an evidence-based framework for the use of CCT after CCRT.

Sequential chemotherapy after definitive radiotherapy in markedly elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for advanced esophageal cancer, but it may be more invasive in the elderly and definitive radiotherapy (RT) alone may be selected. This study assessed the significance of sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) in elderly esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

We reviewed 87 patients aged 75 years and older, who were treated using definitive radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. A total dose ranging from 50.4 to 63 Gy (median, 58.8) was delivered to the primary lesion and the involved lymph nodes. This study compared patients who received SCRT with those who received RT alone among 40 patients with stage III or IVA cancer. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and the generalized Wilcoxon test.

Results

The total progression-free survival (TPFS), progression-free survival outside the irradiation field, and overall survival were significantly longer after SCRT (n = 15) than after definitive RT alone (n = 25; P = 0.0041 and 0.0098), whereas the progression-free survival in the irradiation field was not significantly different between the two groups. The TPFS was significantly shorter in patients who received RT alone than in those who received SCRT (P = 0.0372). There were no grade 4 or higher adverse events in the patients who received SCRT.

Conclusion

SCRT was associated with a reduced relapse rate, suggesting that it should be considered for markedly elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Docetaxel and nedaplatin twice a week with concurrent definitive radiotherapy in inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase I trial (GASTO-1021)

PURPOSE

This phase I trial aimed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of incorporating a twice-weekly docetaxel and nedaplatin regimen into definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as radiosensitizers in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

The CCRT regimen included docetaxel (5 mg/m², 10 mg/m², or 15 mg/m²) and nedaplatin (5 mg/m², 10 mg/m², or 15 mg/m²) twice-weekly based on the traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy, and radiotherapy (64 Gy in 32 fractions). The primary goals were to determine the MTD of concurrent chemotherapy and the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). In-field objective response rate (ORR) was investigated.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients had been recruited and analyzed. DLT involving persistent grade 3 esophagitis over 1 week was observed in all three patients (3/3) at dose level 3 (15 mg/m²), and two patients (2/6) experienced DLTs in the dose level 2 (10 mg/m²) due to esophageal fistula and persistent grade 3 esophagitis over 1 week, while one patient (1/6) treated at dose level 1 (5 mg/m²) exhibited DLT owing to Grade 3 increased liver enzymes, suggesting a MTD of 5 mg/m². The in-filed ORR was both 100% in all patients and those receiving MTD. The 1-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival rate was 83.3%, 83.3% and 66.7% in dose level 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of twice-weekly docetaxel and nedaplatin regimen was 5 mg/m² in inoperable ESCC patients treated with definitive CCRT. Low dose concurrent docetaxel and nedaplatin showed promising radiosensitizing effect on in-filed disease control and good tolerability.

The PET-Derived Tumor-to-Liver Standard Uptake Ratio (SUV TLR ) Is Superior to Tumor SUVmax in Predicting Tumor Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Background: The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) derived from ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) have some well-known shortcomings in predicting treatment response and prognosis in oncology. The standardized SUVmax with an appropriate reference background may overcome this problem in some instances. This study explored the prognostic value of the tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (SUV_TLR) and the tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUV_TBR) in predicting the objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who were treated with CCRT. The SUVmax of primary tumor, SUV_TLR, SUV_TBR and clinicopathologic features data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the predictors of tumor response. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SUV_TLR was superior to SUVmax and SUV_TBR in predicting treatment response. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that advanced tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.67; 95% CI: 1.15-81.28; P = 0.037) and high SUV_TLR (HR = 21.92; 95% CI: 2.26-212.96; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of poor treatment response. Cox regression analysis showed that good clinical tumor response (p < 0.014, HR =0.501; 95% CI: 0.288–0.871) was a favorable independent predictive factor for OS, while an advanced tumor stage (p = 0.018, HR = 1.796; 95% CI: 1.107-2.915) and a high SUV_TLR (p < 0.002, HR = 2.660; 95% CI: 1.425–4.967) were prognostic factors for poor OS. The median OS of patients in the low SUV_TLR and high SUV_TLR groups was 13.47 vs. 19.30 months, respectively.

Conclusions: PET-derived SUV_TLR is superior to tumor SUVmax and SUV_TBR in predicting treatment response and overall survival in patients with ESCC undergoing CCRT. High SUV_TLR was an independent predictor of poor treatment response and shorter overall survival.

A predictive model for treatment response in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: based on SUVmean and NLR

Background

We conducted this study to combine the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to establish a strong predictive model for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 163 newly diagnosed ESCC patients treated with CCRT. Eighty patients (training set) were randomly selected to generate cut-off SUVmean and NLR values by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and to establish a predictive model by using the independent predictors of treatment outcomes. Then, we evaluated the performance of the prediction model regarding treatment outcomes in the testing set (n = 83) and in all sets.

Results

A high SUVmean (> 5.81) and high NLR (> 2.42) at diagnosis were associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes in patients with ESCC. The prediction model had a better performance than the simple parameters (p < 0.05). With a cut-off value of 0.77, the prediction model significantly improved the specificity and positive predictive value for treatment response (88.9 and 92.1% in the training set, 95.8 and 97.1% in the testing set, and 92.2 and 91.8% in all sets, respectively).

Conclusions

The pretreatment SUVmean and NLR were independent predictors of treatment response in ESCC patients treated with CCRT. The predictive model was constructed based on these two parameters and provides a highly accurate tool for predicting patient outcomes.

A study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with T4 and/or M1 lymph node metastasis or locoregional recurrence

Background

The improvement of survival outcomes and the reduction of toxicities for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are still needed. We conducted a pilot study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin for the treatment of esophageal SCC with T4 and/or M1 lymph node metastasis (LNM) or locoregional recurrence.

Methods

Fifty-four patients with advanced thoracic esophageal SCC having a stage T4 tumor or M1 LNM and/or locoregional recurrence were enrolled. Docetaxel and cisplatin were both administered weekly at a dose of 25 mg/m² 5–6 times in total concurrently with a specific dose of radiation. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control and treatment-related toxicities.

Results

From October 2015 to December 2016, concurrent treatment with full-cycle docetaxel and cisplatin and radiotherapy was administered to 41 of 54 patients (75.9%). A total of 51 patients (94.4%) completed the radiation schedules. Twenty-one patients (44.4%) achieved a complete response, and 21 (44.4%) achieved a partial response after chemoradiotherapy. The median survival time was 18.2 months, and the median PFS time was 11.5 months. The 1-year and 3-year OS, locoregional control and PFS rates were 70.4, 80.6, 50.0 and 36.4%, 64.3, 31.5%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (13.0%), anemia (3.7%), thrombocytopenia (1.9%), fatigue (20.4%), anorexia (13.0%), esophagitis (11.1%), and pneumonitis (5.6%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 16.7% of patients. Four patients (7.4%) died from grade 5 toxicities. There were no significant differences in both survival and grade 3 and higher toxicities between the newly diagnosed group and recurrent group.

Conclusions

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin is a well-tolerated and effective treatment regimen for esophageal SCC with T4 or M1 LNM and/or locoregional recurrence. Clinical trials with larger sample size and comparisons with conventional fluorouracil and cisplatin regimens are needed.

Comparison of a Concurrent Fluorouracil-Based Regimen and a Taxane-Based Regimen Combined with Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma may benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with a concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)–based regimen and a taxane-based regimen combined with radiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 46 patients with ESCC aged older than 65 years were included in this study. The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: 24 patients who received CCRT with a 5-Fu–based regimen were allocated to the PF group, and 22 patients who received CCRT with a taxane-based regimen were allocated to the DP group. The median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, and treatment-related toxicity were assessed. For patients in the PF group, the median OS time was 27.8 ± 9.1 months, and the median PFS time was 12.5 ± 2.7 months. Patients in the DP group had comparable survival outcomes, with a median OS time of 34.4 ± 6.4 months and a median PFS time of 21.1 ± 6.4 months (P = .296 and P = .115, respectively). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 anemia occurred in 63.6% and 59.1% of patients in the DP group, respectively, and in 25.0% and 16.7% of patients in the PF group, respectively. Our results suggest that CCRT with a taxane-based regimen results in a higher incidence of treatment-related toxicity than CCRT with a 5-Fu–based regimen but comparable survival outcomes.

Comprehensive Analysis of Competitive Endogenous RNAs Network, Being Associated With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Emerging Role in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy with poor prognosis and survival rate. To identify meaningful long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and messenger RNA (mRNA) modules related to the ESCC prognosis, The Cancer Genome Atlas-ESCC was downloaded and processed, and then, a weighted gene co-expression network analysis was applied to construct lncRNA co-expression networks, miRNA co-expression networks, and mRNA co-expression networks. Twenty-one hub lncRNAs, seven hub miRNAs, and eight hub mRNAs were clarified. Additionally, a competitive endogenous RNAs network was constructed, and the emerging role of the network involved in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was also analyzed using several webtools. The expression levels of eight hub genes (TBC1D2, ATP6V0E1, SPI1, RNASE6, C1QB, C1QC, CSF1R, and C1QA) were different between normal esophageal tissues and HNSCC tissues. The expression levels of TBC1D2 and ATP6V0E1 were related to the survival time of HNSCC. The competitive endogenous RNAs network might provide common mechanisms involving in ESCC and HNSCC. More importantly, useful clues were provided for clinical treatments of both diseases based on novel molecular advances.

Identification of hub genes and therapeutic drugs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on integrated bioinformatics strategy

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of leading malignant cancers of gastrointestinal tract worldwide. Until now, the involved mechanisms during the development of ESCC are largely unknown. This study aims to explore the driven-genes and biological pathways in ESCC.

Methods

mRNA expression datasets of GSE29001, GSE20347, GSE100942, and GSE38129, containing 63 pairs of ESCC and non-tumor tissues data, were integrated and deeply analyzed. The bioinformatics approaches include identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and hub genes, gene ontology (GO) terms analysis and biological pathway enrichment analysis, construction and analysis of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and miRNA-gene network construction. Subsequently, GEPIA2 database and qPCR assay were utilized to validate the expression of hub genes. DGIdb database was performed to search the candidate drugs for ESCC.

Results

Finally, 120 upregulated and 26 downregulated DEGs were identified. The functional enrichment of DEGs in ESCC were mainly correlated with cell cycle, DNA replication, deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) mediated attractive signaling pathway, and Netrin-1 signaling pathway. The PPI network was constructed using STRING software with 146 nodes and 2392 edges. The most significant three modules in PPI were filtered and analyzed. Totally ten genes were selected and considered as the hub genes and nuclear division cycle 80 (NDC80) was closely related to the survival of ESCC patients. DGIdb database predicted 33 small molecules as the possible drugs for treating ESCC.

Conclusions

In summary, the data may provide new insights into ESCC pathogenesis and treatments. The candidate drugs may improve the efficiency of personalized therapy in future.

Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a single agent or double agents vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers

The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer (OC) is increasing as the population ages. Until now, the treatment strategy in these patients has been unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with radiotherapy alone (RT alone), single‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐1), or double‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐2) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with OC. A total of 271 patients with OC aged 65 years or older were included in this study. The median overall survival (OS), median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment‐related toxicities were assessed. The median OS time for all patients was 23.6 ± 2.3 months, with 2‐year survival rates of 48.0 ± 3.0%. The median PFS time was 13.6 ± 1.3 months with the 2‐year PFS rate was 33.0 ± 4.0%. Among patients who received CCRT‐1, better OS, and PFS were found in patients who received docetaxel than in patients received fluorouracil and platinum. In a subgroup analysis, 118 patients who underwent RT alone had a median OS time of 15.6 ± 1.9 months and median PFS time of 10.4 ± 0.9 months. The median OS time of patients who received CCRT‐1 was 28.8 ± 10.1 months compared with 27.8 ± 2.5 months for the patients treated with CCRT‐2 (P = 0.537). The similar results were observed for median PFS, with 16.5 ± 3.2 months in the CCRT‐1 group and 17.0 ± 2.0 months in the CCRT‐2 group (P = 0.321). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 weight loss during treatment occurred in 40.6% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, in the CCRT‐2 group, which was higher than that observed in the CCRT‐1 group. Our results suggested that CCRT could be considered as an acceptable treatment for elderly patients with OC. The CCRT‐1 group presented with a lower incidence of treatment toxicities but comparable survival outcomes, compared to the CCRT‐2 group. Docetaxel was superior to fluorouracil and platinum in terms of OS.

The current status of multimodality treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

A multimodality approach plays a key role in the treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Currently, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin with radiotherapy is the standard treatment in this population. dCRT regimens using 5-FU plus leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and carboplatin plus paclitaxel have been investigated in prospective clinical trials. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has been evaluated in combination with dCRT; however, this combination has not revealed any additive benefits. Induction chemotherapy using docetaxel plus 5-FU plus cisplatin has also been under investigation. Although long-term survival and cure have been observed in some patients by dCRT, most patients experience local failure or distant metastasis and eventually die from the disease. Salvage surgery is an important option if the residual or recurrent tumors after dCRT can be resectable, but is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. Introduction of radiotherapy using a new technique with dose escalation is expected to improve efficacy without increasing radiation-related toxicities. Immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy has also gathered attention. For the establishment of new and effective treatments in the field of unresectable locally advanced ESCC, a collaboration between clinical researchers and basic researchers is warranted.