Detection of Plasma EGFR Mutations in NSCLC Patients with a Validated ddPCR Lung cfDNA Assay

An ultrasensitive DNA-enhanced amplification method for detecting cfDNA drug-resistant mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with selective FEN-assisted degradation of dominant somatic fragments

OBJECTIVES

Blood cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be a new reliable tool for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the currently reported cfDNA assays have a limited role in detecting drug-resistant mutations due to their deficiencies in sensitivity, stability, or mutation detection rate.

METHODS

We developed an Archaeoglobus fulgidus-derived flap endonuclease (Afu FEN)-based DNA-enhanced amplification system of mutated cfDNA by designing a pair of hairpin probes to anneal with wild-type cfDNA to form two 5'-flaps, allowing for the specific cleavage of wild-type cfDNA by Afu FEN. When the dominant wild-type somatic cfDNA fragments were cleaved by structure-recognition-specific Afu FEN, the proportion of mutated cfDNA in the reaction system was greatly enriched. As the amount of mutated cfDNA in the system was further increased by PCR amplification, the mutation status could be easily detected through first-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

In a mixture of synthetic wild-type and T790M EGFR DNA fragments, our new assay still could detect T790M mutation at the fg level with remarkably high sensitivity. We also tested its performance in detecting low variant allele frequency (VAF) mutations in clinical samples from NSCLC patients. The plasma cfDNA samples with low VAF (0.1 and 0.5 %) could be easily detected by DNA-enhanced amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

This system with enhanced amplification of mutated cfDNA is an effective tool used for the early screening and individualized targeted therapy of NSCLC by providing a rapid, sensitive, and economical way for the detection of drug-resistant mutations in tumors.

Optimising primary molecular profiling in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Molecular profiling of NSCLC is essential for optimising treatment decisions, but often incomplete. We assessed the efficacy of protocolised molecular profiling in the current standard-of-care (SoC) in a prospective observational study in the Netherlands and measured the effect of providing standardised diagnostic procedures. We also explored the potential of plasma-based molecular profiling in the primary diagnostic setting.

METHODS

This multi-centre prospective study was designed to explore the performance of current clinical practice during the run-in phase using local SoC tissue profiling procedures. The subsequent phase was designed to investigate the extent to which comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) can be maximized by protocolising tumour profiling. Successful molecular profiling was defined as completion of at least EGFR and ALK testing. Additionally, PD-L1 tumour proportions scores were explored. Lastly, the additional value of centralised plasma-based testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations using droplet digital PCR was evaluated.

RESULTS

Total accrual was 878 patients, 22.0% had squamous cell carcinoma and 78.0% had non-squamous NSCLC. Stage I-III was seen in 54.0%, stage IV in 46.0%. Profiling of EGFR and ALK was performed in 69.9% of 136 patients included in the run-in phase, significantly more than real-world data estimates of 55% (p<0.001). Protocolised molecular profiling increased the rate to 77.0% (p = 0.049). EGFR and ALK profiling rates increased from 77.9% to 82.1% in non-squamous NSCLC and from 43.8% to 57.5% in squamous NSCLC. Plasma-based testing was feasible in 98.4% and identified oncogenic driver mutations in 7.1% of patients for whom tissue profiling was unfeasible.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high success rate of tissue-based molecular profiling that was significantly improved by a protocolised approach. Tissue-based profiling remains unfeasible for a substantial proportion of patients. Combined analysis of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA is a promising approach to allow adequate molecular profiling of more patients.

Efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC with different T790M statuses tested via digital droplet polymerase chain reaction ddPCR and next-generation sequencing

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesize that digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) would optimize the treatment strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) relapsed patients. In this study, we compared the efficacy of third-generation TKIs with various T790M statuses via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

NGS was performed on blood samples of patients progressed from previous EGFR-TKIs for resistance mechanism. T790M-negative patients received further liquid biopsy using ddPCR for T790M detection.

RESULTS

A cohort of 40 patients were enrolled, with 30.0% (12/40) T790M-positive via NGS (Group A). In another 28 T790M-negative patients by NGS, 11 (39.3%) were T790M-positive (Group B) and 17 (60.7%) were T790M-negative (Group C) via ddPCR. A relatively longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in group A (NR) and group B (10.0 months, 95% CI 7.040-12.889) than in group C (7.0 months, 95% CI 0.000-15.219), with no significant difference across all three groups (p = 0.196), or between group B and C (p = 0.412). EGFR-sensitive mutation correlated with inferior PFS (p = 0.041) and ORR (p = 0.326), and a significantly lower DCR (p = 0.033) in T790M-negative patients via NGS (n = 28).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that ddPCR may contribute as a supplement to NGS in liquid biopsies for T790M detection in EGFR-TKIs relapsed patients and help to optimize the treatment strategies, especially for those without coexistence of EGFR-sensitive mutation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05458726.

Comparative analysis of QS3D versus droplet digital PCR for quantitative measures of EGFR T790M mutation from identical plasma

Objectives

The capacity of QuantStudio™ 3D (QS3D) and droplet digital PCR (dPCR) for the detection of plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations have been widely reported. Few comparative studies on the quantitative test of the identical DNA material, however, are carried out. Here we compared the performance of the two methods in detecting EGFR T790M mutation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the same lung cancer patients.

Methods

We recruited 72 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who initially respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment but subsequently developed resistance. Two tubes of 10mL anticoagulant blood were collected and cfDNA was isolated from plasma. Identical cfDNA samples were analyzed for T790M mutation using QS3D and droplet dPCR in parallel.

Results

T790M mutation was detected in 15 and 21 cfDNA samples by QS3D and droplet digital PCR, respectively. The 6 discordant samples showed low mutation abundance (∼0.1%) and the discrepancy is caused by the stricter threshold settings for QS3D dPCR. The overall agreement between the two methods was 91.7% (66/72). The median allele frequencies for QS3D dPCR and droplet dPCR to detect T790M mutation was 2.01% and 2.62%, respectively. There was no significance in mutation abundance detected by both methods. Both methods are highly correlated with allele frequencies and copy numbers in T790M wild type and mutant, with R² of 0.98, 0.92 and 0.95, respectively.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that QS3D dPCR are highly consistent with droplet PCR for quantitative determination of EGFR T790M mutation in plasma cfDNA.

Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Tumour DNA in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-An Update

Despite efforts to improve earlier diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients present with advanced stage disease, which is often associated with poor survival outcomes with only 15% surviving for 5 years from their diagnosis. Tumour tissue biopsy is the current mainstream for cancer diagnosis and prognosis in many parts of the world. However, due to tumour heterogeneity and accessibility issues, liquid biopsy is emerging as a game changer for both cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Liquid biopsy is the analysis of tumour-derived biomarkers in body fluids, which has remarkable advantages over the use of traditional tumour biopsy. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) are two main derivatives of liquid biopsy. CTC enumeration and molecular analysis enable monitoring of cancer progression, recurrence, and treatment response earlier than traditional biopsy through a minimally invasive liquid biopsy approach. CTC-derived ex-vivo cultures are essential to understanding CTC biology and their role in metastasis, provide a means for personalized drug testing, and guide treatment selection. Just like CTCs, ctDNA provides opportunity for screening, monitoring, treatment evaluation, and disease surveillance. We present an updated review highlighting the prognostic and therapeutic significance of CTCs and ctDNA in NSCLC.

PEAC: An Ultrasensitive and Cost-Effective MRD Detection System in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Plasma Specimen

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a tumor-derived fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), has emerged as a promising marker in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in postsurgical patients. However, ctDNA level in early-stage cancers and postsurgical patients is very low, which posed many technical challenges to improve the detection rate and sensitivity, especially in the clinical practice of MRD detection. These challenges usually include insufficient DNA input amount, limit of detection (LOD), and high experimental costs. To resolve these challenges, we developed an ultrasensitive ctDNA MRD detection system in this study, namely PErsonalized Analysis of Cancer (PEAC), to simultaneously detect up to 37 mutations, which account for 70–80% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driver mutations from low plasma sample volume and enables LOD of 0.01% at a single-site level. We demonstrated the high performance achieved by PEAC on both cfDNA reference standards and clinical plasma samples from three NSCLC patient cohorts. For cfDNA reference standards, PEAC achieved a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 87% for the mutations at 0.01% allele fraction. In the second cohort, PEAC showed 100% concordance rate between ddPCR and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) among 29 samples. In the third cohort, 22 of 59 patients received EGFR TKI treatment. Among them, three in four patients identified low level actionable gene mutations only by PEAC had partial responses after targeted therapy, demonstrating high ctDNA detection ability of PEAC. Overall, the developed PEAC system can detect the majority of NSCLC driver mutations using 8–10 ml plasma samples, and has the advantages of high detection sensitivity and lower costs compared with the existing technologies such as ddPCR and NGS. These advantages make the PEAC system quite appropriate for ctDNA and MRD detection in early-stage NSCLC and postsurgical recurrence monitoring.

Validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in cell-free circulating tumor DNA

Detection of EGFR mutations from blood plasma represents a gentle, non-invasive alternative to rebiopsy and can therefore be used for therapy monitoring of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this project was to investigate whether the Reveal ctDNA™ 28 NGS assay (ArcherDX, Boulder, CO), has a comparable sensitivity and specificity to droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, gold-standard) and is therefore suitable for therapy monitoring of progressing lung cancer patients. First, we validated the NGS assay with a commercially available reference material (SeraCare, Massachusetts, US). Using an input of 22 ng, a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100% could be achieved for variant allele frequencies (VAF) of 0.5%. For variants at a VAF of 0.1% the sensitivity was substantially reduced. Next, 28 plasma samples from 16 patients were analyzed and results were compared to existing ddPCR data. This comparative analysis of patient samples revealed a concordance of 91% between NGS and ddPCR. These results confirm that the Reveal ctDNA™ 28 NGS assay can be used for therapy monitoring of patients under TKI therapy. However, due to the slightly superior sensitivity of ddPCR, a combination of NGS (with broad coverage of a large number of genomic loci) and ddPCR (with targeted highly sensitive detection of specific mutations) might be the ideal approach.

A new sensitive and fast assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsies

BACKGROUND

A major perspective for the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the clinical setting of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is expected as predictive factor for resistance and response to EGFR TKI therapy and, especially, as a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsy. However, ctDNA is both highly fragmented and mostly low concentrated in plasma and serum. On this basis, it is important to use a platform characterized by high sensitivity and linear performance in the low concentration range. This motivated us to evaluate the newly developed and commercially available SensiScreen® EGFR Liquid assay platform (PentaBase) with regard to sensitivity, linearity, repeatability and accuracy and finally to compare it to our already implemented methods. The validation was made in three independent European laboratories using two cohorts on a total of 68 unique liquid biopsies.

RESULTS

Using artificial samples containing 1600 copies of WT DNA spiked with 50% - 0.1% of mutant copies across a seven-log dilution scale, we assessed the sensitivity, linearity, repeatability and accuracy for the p.T790M, p.L858R and exon 19 deletion assays of the SensiScreen® EGFR Liquid assay platform. The lowest value detectable ranged from 0.5% to 0.1% with R2≥0,97 indicating good linearity. High PCR efficiency was shown for all three assays. In 102 single PCRs each containing theoretical one copy of the mutant at initiating, assays showed repeatable positivity in 75.5% - 80.4% of reactions. At low ctDNA levels, as in plasma, the SensiScreen® EGFR Liquid assay platform showed better sensitivity than the Therascreen® EGFR platform (Qiagen) and equal performance to the ctEGFR Mutation Detection Kit (EntroGen) and the IOT® Oncomine cell-free nucleic acids assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 100% concordance at the sequence level.

CONCLUSION

For profiling clinical plasma samples, characterized by low ctDNA abundance, the SensiScreen® EGFR Liquid assay is able to identify down to 1 copy of mutant alleles and with its high sensitivity, linearity and accuracy it may be a competitive platform of choice.

Evaluation of the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay to detect EGFR mutations in plasma from patients with non-small cell lung cancers

The assessment of EGFR mutations is recommended for the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presence of EGFR mutation is associated with response or resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). Liquid biopsy is nowadays widely used for the detection of resistance to EGFR-TKI. We evaluated here the performance of the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma from patients with NSCLC. Previously characterized plasma samples from 38 patients with NSCLC were analysed using 2 different analytical conditions (C1 and C2). The limit of detection (LOD) was evaluated using 2 mL of healthy donor plasma spiked with commercial DNA controls. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were 92.1%, 86.7% and 95.7% for C1 condition respectively and 94.7%, 86.7% and 100% for C2 condition respectively. The T790M secondary resistance mutation was detected in two samples out of 3. The Idylla system was able to detect the exon 19 deletion from 6 copies/mL and up to 91 copies/mL for the G719S mutation. These results support that the Idylla ctEGFR mutation assay is a rapid option for the detection of EGFR hotspots mutations in plasma samples, however a particular attention is needed for its interpretation.

EGFR mutation testing on plasma and urine samples: A pilot study evaluating the value of liquid biopsy in lung cancer diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Cell free DNA (cfDNA) shed by cancer cells into blood and body fluids is a potential substrate for molecular testing. While plasma is approved for EGFR mutation testing in certain clinical settings, mutation testing on urine is not well explored in lung cancer. In this study, we assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of EGFR mutation analysis on plasma and urine samples.

METHODS

Matched plasma and urine were collected prospectively from TKI-naïve lung adenocarcinoma (ADCA) patients (Group A) with available tumor tissue. Only plasma was collected from TKI-treated, known EGFR mutant ADCA patients developing TKI resistance (Group B). qPCR (tumor tissue) or digital droplet-PCR (urine/plasma) was performed for exon 19 deletions, exon 21 L858R and exon 20 T790M.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (60 Group A, 21 Group B) were included. In Group A, EGFR mutations were detected in tissue in 34/60 (57%) patients. Mutations were detected in matched plasma in 24 (24/34, 70.5% sensitivity), and in matched urine in 15 (15/25, 60% sensitivity) of the 34 EGFR mutant cases, with no false positives (100% positive predictive value). Plasma and urine mutation results showed moderate agreement (70%) with a combined sensitivity of 88% (22/25). In Group B, new T790M mutations were detected in plasma in 61% (13/21) patients.

CONCLUSION

Liquid biopsies show moderate sensitivity (plasma > urine) with 100% positive predictive rates for EGFR mutations. Testing of more than one type of liquid biopsy sample increases sensitivity. In TKI-resistant settings, liquid biopsies can obviate need for invasive biopsies in >60% patients.

Detection and quantification of EGFR T790M mutation in liquid biopsies by droplet digital PCR

Background

Liquid biopsy allows the identification of targetable cancer mutations in a minimally invasive manner. In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is increasingly used to genotype the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). However, the sensitivity of this method is still under debate. The aim of this study was to implement and assess the performance of a ddPCR assay for detecting the EGFR T790M mutation in liquid biopsies.

Methods

A ddPCR assay was optimized to detect the EGFR T790M mutation in plasma samples from 77 patients with NSCLC in progression.

Results

Our ddPCR assay enabled the detection and quantification of the EGFR T790M mutation at cfDNA allele frequency as low as 0.5%. The mutation was detected in 40 plasma samples, corresponding to a positivity rate of 52%. The number of mutant molecules per mL of plasma ranged from 1 to 6,000. A re-biopsy was analyzed for 12 patients that had a negative plasma test and the mutation was detected in 2 cases. A second liquid biopsy was performed for 6 patients and the mutation was detected in 3 cases.

Conclusions

This study highlights the value of ddPCR to detect and quantify the EGFR T790M mutation in liquid biopsies in a real-world clinical setting. Our results suggest that repeated ddPCR tests in cfDNA may obviate tissue re-biopsy in patients unable to provide a tumor tissue sample suitable for molecular analysis.

dPCR application in liquid biopsies: divide and conquer

Introduction: Precision medicine is already a reality in oncology, since biomarker-driven therapies have clearly improved patient survival. Furthermore, a new, minimally invasive strategy termed 'liquid biopsy' (LB) has revolutionized the field by allowing comprehensive cancer genomic profiling through the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). However, its detection requires extremely sensitive and efficient technologies. A powerful molecular tool based on the principle of 'divide and conquer' has emerged to solve this problem. Thus, digital PCR (dPCR) allows absolute and accurate quantification of target molecules.Areas covered: In this review we will discuss the fundamentals of dPCR and the most common approaches used for partition of samples and quantification. The advantages and limitations of dPCR will be mentioned in the context of LB in oncology.Expert opinion: In our opinion, dPCR has proven to be one of the most sensitive methods available for LB analysis, albeit some aspects such as its capacity of multiplexing and protocol standardization still require further improvements. Furthermore, the increasing sensitivities and lower costs of next generation sequencing (NGS) methods position dPCR as a confirmatory and complementary technique for NGS results which will likely prove to be very useful for treatment monitoring and assessing minimal residual disease.

Molecular testing and targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Current status and perspectives

Molecular testing has become a mandatory component of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. The detection of EGFR, BRAF and MET mutations as well as the analysis of ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK translocations have already been incorporated in the NSCLC diagnostic standards, and the inhibitors of these kinases are in routine clinical use. There are emerging biomarkers, e.g., KRAS G12C substitutions and HER2 activating alterations, which are likely to enter NSCLC guidelines upon the approval of the corresponding drugs. In addition to genetic examination, NSCLCs are usually subjected to the analysis of PD-L1 protein expression in order to direct the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Comprehensive NSCLC testing for multiple predictive markers requires the analysis of distinct biological molecules (DNA, RNA, proteins) and, therefore, the involvement of different analytical platforms (PCR, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, FISH). There are ongoing efforts aimed at the integration of multiple NSCLC molecular assays into a single diagnostic pipeline.

Radiomic Detection of EGFR Mutations in NSCLC

Radiomics is defined as the use of automated or semi-automated post-processing and analysis of multiple features derived from imaging exams. Extracted features might generate models able to predict the molecular profile of solid tumors. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive algorithm to define the mutational status of EGFR in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CT scans from 109 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC (21 EGFR-mutant and 88 EGFR-wild type) underwent radiomics analysis to develop a machine learning model able to recognize EGFR-mutant from EGFR-WT patients via CT scans. A "test-retest" approach was used to identify stable radiomics features. The accuracy of the model was tested on an external validation set from another institution and on a dataset from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The machine learning model that considered both radiomic and clinical features (gender and smoking status) reached a diagnostic accuracy of 88.1% in our dataset with an AUC at the ROC curve of 0.85, whereas the accuracy values in the datasets from TCIA and the external institution were 76.6% and 83.3%, respectively. Furthermore, 17 distinct radiomics features detected at baseline CT scan were associated with subsequent development of T790M during treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. In conclusion, our machine learning model was able to identify EGFR-mutant patients in multiple validation sets with globally good accuracy, especially after data optimization. More comprehensive training sets might result in further improvement of radiomics-based algorithms. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate that data normalization and "test-retest" methods might improve the performance of machine learning models on radiomics images and increase their reliability when used on external validation datasets.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Droplet Digital PCR and Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in Cell-Free DNA of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from advanced lung cancer patients is an emerging clinical tool. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of two common PCR systems, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR), for detecting EGFR mutation in cfDNA.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was carried out based on PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane library. Data from eligible studies were extracted and pooled to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), using tissue biopsy results as the standard method. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding EGFR mutation type, tumor stage, and EGFR-TKI treatment.

Results: Twenty-five studies involving 4,881 cases were included. The plasma testing sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUROC, compared with the matched tumor tissues, were 72.1%, 95.6%, 38.5, 0.89 for ddPCR, and 65.3%, 98.2%, 52.8, 0.71 for ARMS-PCR, respectively, through indirect comparison, significant differences were found in sensitivity (P = 0.003) and specificity (P = 0.007). Furthermore, significant difference was found in sensitivity between tumor stage subgroups (IIIB–IV subgroup vs. IA–IV subgroup) in ARMS-PCR (73.7 vs. 64.2%, P = 0.008), but not in ddPCR (72.5 vs. 71.2%, P = 0.756).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ddPCR and ARMS-PCR have a high specificity with a practical sensitivity for detecting EGFR mutation in cfDNA, which supports their application as a supplement or a conditional-alternative to tissue biopsy in clinical practice for genotyping. It seems that ddPCR has a higher sensitivity than ARMS-PCR, especially in early stages.

A tetrahedral DNA nanostructure-decorated electrochemical platform for simple and ultrasensitive EGFR genotyping of plasma ctDNA

In this study, we propose an on-site electrochemical platform for sensitive simultaneous genotyping of the two major EGFR mutations (19del and L858R) through plasma ctDNA based on tetrahedral DNA nanostructure decorated screen-printed electrodes.