Clinical Characteristics and Oncological Outcomes of Surgically Treated Early-Onset Gastric Adenocarcinoma - a Retrospective Cohort Study

Prognostic Relevance of the Proximal Resection Margin Distance in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The risk for recurrence in patients with distal gastric cancer can be reduced by surgical radicality. However, dispute exists about the value of the proposed minimum proximal margin distance (PMD). Here, we assess the prognostic value of the safety distance between the proximal resection margin and the tumor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a single-center cohort study of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (2001-2021). Cohorts were defined by adequacy of the PMD according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines (≥ 5 cm for intestinal and ≥ 8 cm for diffuse Laurén's subtypes). Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were assessed by log-rank and multivariable Cox-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 176 patients, 70 (39.8%) had a sufficient PMD. An adequate PMD was associated with cancer of the intestinal subtype (67% vs. 45%, p = 0.010). Estimated 5-year survival was 63% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51-78] and 62% (95% CI 53-73) for adequate and inadequate PMD, respectively. Overall, an adequate PMD was not prognostic for OS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.38) in the multivariable analysis. However, in patients with diffuse subtype, an adequate PMD was associated with improved oncological outcomes (median OS not reached versus 131 months, p = 0.038, median TTP not reached versus 88.0 months, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with diffuse gastric cancer are at greater risk to undergo resection with an inadequate PMD, which in those patients is associated with worse oncological outcomes. For the intestinal subtype, there was no prognostic association with PMD, indicating that a distal gastrectomy with partial preservation of the gastric function may also be feasible in the setting where an extensive PMD is not achievable.

Distinct characteristics of distant metastasis in early-onset gastric cancer patients compared to late-onset patients: An observational study

Presently, there is limited understanding of the features of distant metastasis in early-onset gastric cancer (GC). To explore these disparities, a retrospective study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was undertaken. The SEER database was utilized to extract patient data, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors associated with distant metastasis and liver metastasis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the occurrence of liver metastasis among patients based on their age at diagnosis. The study included 2684 early-onset GC patients and 33,289 late-onset GC patients. Preliminary data analysis indicated that early-onset GC patients exhibited more aggressive characteristics such as poor cell differentiation, advanced T stage, and a higher incidence of distant metastasis, excluding liver metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified younger age as an independent risk factor for distant metastasis, along with T stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and tumor size (>3 cm). Another regression analysis revealed that younger age, diffuse type, and female gender were protective factors against liver metastasis. Through PSM, 3276 early-onset GC patients were matched with an equal number of late-onset GC patients, revealing that patients with early-onset GC had fewer instances of liver metastasis but a higher prevalence of distant metastasis. Our findings suggest that early-onset serves as a protective factor against liver metastasis in GC, while it poses a risk for distant metastasis, likely influenced by the increased prevalence of diffuse-type GC in early-onset patients.

Anatomical and Biological Considerations to Determine Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains associated with poor outcomes with a 5-year survival of 12% across all stages of the disease. These poor outcomes are driven by a delay in diagnosis and an early propensity for systemic dissemination of the disease. Recently, aggressive surgical approaches involving complex vascular resections and reconstructions have become more common, thus allowing more locally advanced tumors to be resected. Unfortunately, however, even after the completion of surgery and systemic therapy, approximately 40% of patients experience early recurrence of disease. To determine resectability, many institutions utilize anatomical staging systems based on the presence and extent of vascular involvement of major abdominal vessels around the pancreas. However, these classification systems are based on anatomical considerations only and do not factor in the burden of systemic disease. By integrating the biological criteria, we possibly could avoid futile resections often associated with significant morbidity. Especially patients with anatomically resectable disease who have a heavy burden of radiologically undetected systemic disease most likely do not derive a survival benefit from resection. On the contrary, we could offer complex resections to those who have locally advanced or oligometastatic disease but have favorable systemic biology and are most likely to benefit from resection. This review summarizes the current literature on defining anatomical and biological resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Age-dependent benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: a multicenter retrospective observational study of young versus old patients

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to provide evidence for age-dependent use of neoadjuvant treatment by clinical comparisons of young (lower quartile, <56.6 years) versus old (upper quartile, >71.3 years) patients with esophageal and esophagogastric-junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment is the standard of care for locally advanced and node-positive EAC. However, the effect of age on oncological outcomes is disputable as they are underrepresented in treatment defining randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Patients with EAC undergoing esophagectomy between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from three centers. Patients having distant metastases or clinical UICC-stage I were excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify the variables associated with survival benefit.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 185/248 (74.2%) young and 151 out of 248 (60.9%) elderly patients ( P =0.001). Young age was associated with a significant overall survival (OS) benefit (median OS: 85.6 vs. 29.9 months, hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.92) after neoadjuvant treatment versus surgery alone. In contrast, elderly patients did only experience a survival benefit equaling the length of neoadjuvant treatment itself (median OS: neoadjuvant 32.8 vs. surgery alone 29.3 months, hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI: 0.63-1.27). Despite the clear difference in median OS benefit, histopathological regression was similar ((Mandard-TRG-1/2: young 30.7 vs. old 36.4%, P= 0.286). More elderly patients had a dose reduction or termination of neoadjuvant treatment (12.4 vs. 40.4%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Old patients benefit less from neoadjuvant treatment compared to younger patients in terms of gain in OS. Since they also experience more side effects requiring dose reduction, upfront surgery should be considered as the primary treatment option in elderly patients.