1
|
Patel KR, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW, Schoots IG, Turkbey B, Citrin DE, Hall WA. Target Volume Optimization for Localized Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00148-6. [PMID: 39019208 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a comprehensive review of the means by which to optimize target volume definition for the purposes of treatment planning for patients with intact prostate cancer with a specific emphasis on focal boost volume definition. METHODS Here we conduct a narrative review of the available literature summarizing the current state of knowledge on optimizing target volume definition for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Historically, the treatment of prostate cancer included a uniform prescription dose administered to the entire prostate with or without coverage of all or part of the seminal vesicles. The development of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using prostate-specific radiotracers has ushered in an era in which radiation oncologists are able to localize and focally dose-escalate high-risk volumes in the prostate gland. Recent phase 3 data has demonstrated that incorporating focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes of the prostate improves biochemical control without significantly increasing toxicity. Still, several fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this technique. Given the remaining uncertainty, a knowledge of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the anatomic patterns of tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for the definition of clinical target volumes. CONCLUSION Advanced imaging has the ability to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in multiple ways, including by enabling focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes. However, many questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this practice, and key knowledge gaps remain. A detailed understanding of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the patterns of local tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for target volume definition given the current state of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William A Hall
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gauthaman DK, Luthra K, Lele V. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Initial Detection and Staging of Prostate Cancer. World J Nucl Med 2024; 23:79-87. [PMID: 38933063 PMCID: PMC11199037 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used for the evaluation of prostate cancer and is known to have better accuracy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Ga-68 PSMA) is a radiotracer that shows high localization in prostate cancer cells. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and utility of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in comparison with mpMRI as a noninvasive imaging technique for the initial diagnosis and locoregional staging of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy as gold standard. Materials and Methods This prospective observational study conducted from August 2017 to April 2020 evaluated 60 men ( n = 60) with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma. They underwent mpMRI and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scans within 14 days with TRUS biopsy being gold standard. T staging of disease, N staging of lymph nodes within the pelvis, and M staging of lesions in pelvic bones (within the imaging field of mpMRI) were compared using PSPP version 1.0.1 statistical software. Results All 60 men with a mean age of 69.9 ± 9.35 years showed Ga-68 PSMA avid disease, whereas 55 were detected by mpMRI. The sensitivity in detection of prostate lesions (with 95% confidence interval) was 99.08% for Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and 84.40% for mpMRI. Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT detected greater number of patients with regional lymph nodal involvement (19/60) as compared with mpMRI (12/60). Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT showed PSMA avid pelvic skeletal lesions in nine patients, whereas mpMRI detected pelvic lesions in six patients. In addition, four other patients showed extrapelvic skeletal lesions on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. Conclusion Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has superior sensitivity in detection of primary prostate tumor, as compared with mpMRI. Both modalities correlate well in detection of seminal vesicle involvement. Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT outperformed mpMRI in detection of lymph nodal and skeletal metastases. Hence, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT should be considered as first-line diagnostic modality for carcinoma prostate. Summary Statement : Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT shows superior diagnostic performance than mpMRI in the evaluation of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karuna Luthra
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikram Lele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Büttner T, Gärtner F, Essler M, Weiten R, Kristiansen G, Ellinger J, Ritter M, Krausewitz P. Key learnings from concordant systematic biopsies in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided prostate biopsies: Enhancing targeting accuracy. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38504659 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging have evolved with the advent of 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This study investigates the role of complementary systematic biopsies (SB) during PSMA-PET/CT-guided targeted prostate biopsies (PET-TB) for PCa detection, grading, and distribution. We address the uncertainty surrounding the necessity of SB in conjunction with PET-TB. METHODS We analyzed PCa grading and distribution in 30 men who underwent PET-TB and SB because of contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging or high clinical suspicion of PCa. Tumor distribution was assessed in relation to the PET-highlighted lesions. Standardized reporting schemes, encompassing SUVmax , PRIMARY score, and miTNM classification, were evaluated. RESULTS 80% of patients were diagnosed with PCa, with 70% classified as clinically significant (csPCa). SB detected more csPCa cases than PET-TB, but the differences were not statistically significant. Discordant results were observed in 25% of cases, where SB outperformed PET-TB. Spatial analysis revealed that tumor-bearing cores from SB were often located in close proximity to the PET-highlighted region. Reporting schemes showed potential for csPCa detection with significantly increased SUVmax in csPCA patients. Subsequent follow-up data underscored the importance of SB in precise PCa grading and staging. CONCLUSIONS While PET-TB can simplify prostate biopsy and reduce invasiveness by core number, SB cannot be omitted yet due to potential PET-TB targeting errors. Factors such as limited spatial resolution and fusion inaccuracies contribute to the need for SB. Standardization in reporting schemes currently cannot compensate for targeting errors highlighting the need for refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Büttner
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Florian Gärtner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Essler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Richard Weiten
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Ellinger
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhar A, Cendejas-Gomez JDJ, Castro Mendez L, Boldt G, McArthur E, Zamboglou C, Bauman G. Using multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography to detect and delineate the gross tumour volume of intraprostatic lesions - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 192:110070. [PMID: 38262815 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation therapy is used frequently for patients with prostate cancer. Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) has been shown to improve oncologic outcomes, without increasing toxicity. Both multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET can be used to identify IPLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted to determine the ability of mpMRI, PSMA PET and their combination to detect IPLs prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) as correlated with the histology. Trials included patients that had mpMRI, PSMA PET, or both, prior to RP. The quality of the histopathological-radiological co-registration was assessed as high or low for each study. Recorded outcomes include sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate model to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for each imaging modality. This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42023389092). RESULTS Altogether, 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 20 could be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (95 % CI), specificity (95 % CI) and AUROC for mpMRI (n = 13 studies) were 64.7 % (50.2 % - 76.9 %), 86.4 % (79.7 % - 91.1 %), and 0.852; the pooled outcomes for PSMA PET (n = 12) were 75.7 % (64.0 % - 84.5 %), 87.1 % (80.2 % - 91.9 %), and 0.889; for their combination (n = 5), the pooled outcomes were 70.3 % (64.1 % - 75.9 %), 81.9 % (71.9 % - 88.8 %), and 0.796. When reviewing studies with a high-quality histopathological-radiological co-registration, IPL delineation recommendations varied by study and the imaging modality used. CONCLUSION All of mpMRI, PSMA PET or their combination were found to have very good diagnostic outcomes for detecting IPLs. Recommendations for delineating IPLs varied based on the imaging modalities used and between research groups. Consensus guidelines for IPL delineation would help with creating consistency for focal boost radiation treatments in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneesh Dhar
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric McArthur
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Glenn Bauman
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arıkan MG, Soyluoğlu S, Korkmaz Ü, Taştekin E, Elboğa U, Arda E. Correlation between pre-radical prostatectomy standardized SUVmax ratios detected on 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and final histopathology outcomes: an in-depth analysis. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2024; 43:100-106. [PMID: 38331250 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the predictive potential of the maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax) value of intraprostatic tumors derived from preoperative 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT (SUVT), and its ratios to SUVmax in the liver (SUVTLR) and parotid gland (SUVTPR) with respect to histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC) at our clinic between 2017 and 2020 were assessed. Patients with a secondary malignancy, a history of transurethral prostate resection, prior treatment for PC, or who received salvage RP were excluded. Whole-body images obtained using the same device, as per the guidelines, were reviewed by two nuclear medicine specialists with more than a decade of experience to reach a consensus for each lesion. The relationships between age, PSA, Prostate Volume, clinical T stage, biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology grade (ISUP), D'amico risk group, intraprostatic tumor volume (HPTV) identified in the final histopathological specimen review, HP-ISUP grade, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), extracapsular invasion (ECI), positive surgical margine (PSM), SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR were analyzed. RESULTS The mean age of the 64 included patients was 64.1 ± 5.3. A statistically significant correlation was found between SUVT, SUVTLR, SUVTPR values, and histopathologic stage parameters, such as biopsy ISUP, D'amico Risk Classification, HP-ISUP, HPTV (p < 0.05). PSMATV, SUVT, and SUVTLR were statistically significant predictors of extracapsular invasion, while PSA, PSMATV, and SUVTLR were significant predictors of SVI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The standardized SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR values could be employed as noninvasive markers to assist in predicting postoperative histopathological findings, particularly ECI, SVI, and PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Arıkan
- Hatay Dörtyol State Hospital, Urology Clinic, Hatay, Turkey.
| | - S Soyluoğlu
- Trakya University School of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
| | - Ü Korkmaz
- Trakya University School of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
| | - E Taştekin
- Trakya University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Edirne, Turkey.
| | - U Elboğa
- Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.
| | - E Arda
- Trakya University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Edirne, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang H, Li G, Zhao J, Eiber M, Tian R. Current status of PSMA-targeted imaging and therapy. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1230251. [PMID: 38264741 PMCID: PMC10803481 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1230251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Currently, the incidence of prostate cancer is increasing, and it has become a great threat to men's health. The detection, staging, and follow-up of prostate cancer patients are inseparable from morphology or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these do not fully meet the needs of diagnosis and patient management. In particular, owing to the late diagnosis, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients usually have poor survival and few options for further effective treatment. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), because of its overexpression on prostate cancer cells, has gained interest due to its application in the imaging and theranostics field. Several PSMA radioligands have been developed for imaging and treating prostate cancer. Many clinical trials have assessed the efficacy and safety profiles of these radionuclide agents and show promise in patients who have exhausted other standard treatment options. To date, several small compounds for targeting PSMA have been developed, and 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for imaging of prostate cancer. 111In- or 99mTc-labeled PSMA-ligand can guide surgeons searching for radioactive metastatic lymph nodes, and 177Lu- or 225Ac-labeled PSMA-ligand can be used for internal radiotherapy. Moreover, some molecules for therapeutic application are undergoing different stages of clinical trials. In this review, we present current perspectives on the use of PSMA-targeted imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer. As PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutics are becoming the standard of care for prostate cancer patients, we emphasize the importance of integrating nuclear medicine physicians into multidisciplinary oncology teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - GuanNan Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanmenxia Central Hospital, Henan, China
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rong Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ren X, Nur Salihin Yusoff M, Hartini Mohd Taib N, Zhang L, Wang K. 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 170:111274. [PMID: 38147764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolu Ren
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China; School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | | | - Nur Hartini Mohd Taib
- Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Wuzhong, Wuzhong 751100, China
| | - Kehua Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adams ES, Deivasigamani S, Mottaghi M, Huang J, Gupta RT, Polascik TJ. Evaluation of Recurrent Disease after Radiation Therapy for Patients Considering Local Salvage Therapy: Past vs. Contemporary Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5883. [PMID: 38136427 PMCID: PMC10741753 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Adams
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Mahdi Mottaghi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Rajan T. Gupta
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas J. Polascik
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Poder J, Radvan S, Howie A, Kasraei F, Parker A, Bucci J, Haworth A. Viability of focal dose escalation to prostate cancer intraprostatic lesions using HDR prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:800-807. [PMID: 37748989 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the viability of focal dose escalation to prostate cancer intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) from multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) images using high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (pBT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective data from 20 patients treated with HDR pBT was utilized. The interobserver contouring variability of 5 observers was quantified using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Uncertainty in propagating IPL contours to trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) was quantified using a tissue equivalent prostate phantom. Feasibility of incorporating IPLs into HDR pBT planning was tested on retrospective patient data. RESULTS The average observer DSC was 0.65 (PSMA-PET) and 0.52 (mpMRI). The uncertainty in propagating IPL contours was 0.6 mm (PSMA-PET), and 0.4 mm (mpMRI). Uncertainties could be accounted for by expanding IPL contours by 2 mm to create IPL PTVs. The mean D98% achieved using HDR pBT was 166% and 135% for the IPL and IPL PTV contours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Focal dose escalation to IPLs identified on either PSMA-PET or mpMRI is viable using TRUS-based HDR pBT. Utilizing HDR pBT allows dose escalation of up to 166% of the prescribed dose to the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Poder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Samantha Radvan
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Howie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Farshad Kasraei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Annaleise Parker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Bucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao Y, Haworth A, Rowshanfarzad P, Ebert MA. Focal Boost in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Review of Planning Studies and Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4888. [PMID: 37835581 PMCID: PMC10572027 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal boost radiotherapy was developed to deliver elevated doses to functional sub-volumes within a target. Such a technique was hypothesized to improve treatment outcomes without increasing toxicity in prostate cancer treatment. PURPOSE To summarize and evaluate the efficacy and variability of focal boost radiotherapy by reviewing focal boost planning studies and clinical trials that have been published in the last ten years. METHODS Published reports of focal boost radiotherapy, that specifically incorporate dose escalation to intra-prostatic lesions (IPLs), were reviewed and summarized. Correlations between acute/late ≥G2 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical factors were determined by a meta-analysis. RESULTS By reviewing and summarizing 34 planning studies and 35 trials, a significant dose escalation to the GTV and thus higher tumor control of focal boost radiotherapy were reported consistently by all reviewed studies. Reviewed trials reported a not significant difference in toxicity between focal boost and conventional radiotherapy. Acute ≥G2 GU and late ≥G2 GI toxicities were reported the most and least prevalent, respectively, and a negative correlation was found between the rate of toxicity and proportion of low-risk or intermediate-risk patients in the cohort. CONCLUSION Focal boost prostate cancer radiotherapy has the potential to be a new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Zhao
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; (P.R.); (M.A.E.)
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia;
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; (P.R.); (M.A.E.)
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA 6000, Australia
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; (P.R.); (M.A.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
- 5D Clinics, Claremont, WA 6010, Australia
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ghezzo S, Neri I, Mapelli P, Savi A, Samanes Gajate AM, Brembilla G, Bezzi C, Maghini B, Villa T, Briganti A, Montorsi F, De Cobelli F, Freschi M, Chiti A, Picchio M, Scifo P. [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [ 68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI vs. Histopathological Images in Prostate Cancer: A New Workflow for Spatial Co-Registration. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:953. [PMID: 37627838 PMCID: PMC10451901 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This study proposed a new workflow for co-registering prostate PET images from a dual-tracer PET/MRI study with histopathological images of resected prostate specimens. The method aims to establish an accurate correspondence between PET/MRI findings and histology, facilitating a deeper understanding of PET tracer distribution and enabling advanced analyses like radiomics. To achieve this, images derived by three patients who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI before radical prostatectomy were selected. After surgery, in the resected fresh specimens, fiducial markers visible on both histology and MR images were inserted. An ex vivo MRI of the prostate served as an intermediate step for co-registration between histological specimens and in vivo MRI examinations. The co-registration workflow involved five steps, ensuring alignment between histopathological images and PET/MRI data. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated to assess the precision of the co-registration. Furthermore, the DICE score was computed between the dominant intraprostatic tumor lesions delineated by the pathologist and the nuclear medicine physician. The TRE for the co-registration of histopathology and in vivo images was 1.59 mm, while the DICE score related to the site of increased intraprostatic uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET images was 0.54 and 0.75, respectively. This work shows an accurate co-registration method for histopathological and in vivo PET/MRI prostate examinations that allows the quantitative assessment of dual-tracer PET/MRI diagnostic accuracy at a millimetric scale. This approach may unveil radiotracer uptake mechanisms and identify new PET/MRI biomarkers, thus establishing the basis for precision medicine and future analyses, such as radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Ghezzo
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Ilaria Neri
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Annarita Savi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Beatrice Maghini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Tommaso Villa
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Freschi
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (M.F.)
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (I.N.); (P.M.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (T.V.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (F.D.C.); (A.C.); (M.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| | - Paola Scifo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.S.); (A.M.S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang YF, Lo CY, Chen LY, Chang CW, Huang YT, Huang YY, Huang YH. Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e321-e331. [PMID: 37145456 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors. METHODS This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools. RESULTS Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chan TH, Haworth A, Wang A, Osanlouy M, Williams S, Mitchell C, Hofman MS, Hicks RJ, Murphy DG, Reynolds HM. Detecting localised prostate cancer using radiomic features in PSMA PET and multiparametric MRI for biologically targeted radiation therapy. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:34. [PMID: 37099047 PMCID: PMC10133419 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00984-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) are well-established modalities for identifying intra-prostatic lesions (IPLs) in localised prostate cancer. This study aimed to investigate the use of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for biologically targeted radiation therapy treatment planning by: (1) analysing the relationship between imaging parameters at a voxel-wise level and (2) assessing the performance of radiomic-based machine learning models to predict tumour location and grade. METHODS PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI data from 19 prostate cancer patients were co-registered with whole-mount histopathology using an established registration framework. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps were computed from DWI and semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters from DCE MRI. Voxel-wise correlation analysis was conducted between mpMRI parameters and PET Standardised Uptake Value (SUV) for all tumour voxels. Classification models were built using radiomic and clinical features to predict IPLs at a voxel level and then classified further into high-grade or low-grade voxels. RESULTS Perfusion parameters from DCE MRI were more highly correlated with PET SUV than ADC or T2w. IPLs were best detected with a Random Forest Classifier using radiomic features from PET and mpMRI rather than either modality alone (sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of 0.842, 0.804 and 0.890, respectively). The tumour grading model had an overall accuracy ranging from 0.671 to 0.992. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning classifiers using radiomic features from PSMA PET and mpMRI show promise for predicting IPLs and differentiating between high-grade and low-grade disease, which could be used to inform biologically targeted radiation therapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsz Him Chan
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alan Wang
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mahyar Osanlouy
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Scott Williams
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine Mitchell
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hayley M Reynolds
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:91-105. [PMID: 37101769 PMCID: PMC10123424 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported. Objective In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup. Evidence acquisition Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review. Evidence synthesis Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used. Conclusions This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa. Patient summary Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ren X, Jia L, Zhao Z, Qiang Y, Wu W, Han P, Zhao J, Sun J. Weakly supervised label propagation algorithm classifies lung cancer imaging subtypes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5167. [PMID: 36997586 PMCID: PMC10063585 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32301-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of long time, high cost, invasive sampling damage, and easy emergence of drug resistance in lung cancer gene detection, a reliable and non-invasive prognostic method is proposed. Under the guidance of weakly supervised learning, deep metric learning and graph clustering methods are used to learn higher-level abstract features in CT imaging features. The unlabeled data is dynamically updated through the k-nearest label update strategy, and the unlabeled data is transformed into weak label data and continue to update the process of strong label data to optimize the clustering results and establish a classification model for predicting new subtypes of lung cancer imaging. Five imaging subtypes are confirmed on the lung cancer dataset containing CT, clinical and genetic information downloaded from the TCIA lung cancer database. The successful establishment of the new model has a significant accuracy rate for subtype classification (ACC = 0.9793), and the use of CT sequence images, gene expression, DNA methylation and gene mutation data from the cooperative hospital in Shanxi Province proves the biomedical value of this method. The proposed method also can comprehensively evaluate intratumoral heterogeneity based on the correlation between the final lung CT imaging features and specific molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueting Ren
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Liye Jia
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Zijuan Zhao
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Yan Qiang
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Peng Han
- North Automatic Control Technology Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Juanjuan Zhao
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
| | - Jingyu Sun
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Management of Patients with Recurrent and Metachronous Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246194. [PMID: 36551678 PMCID: PMC9777467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) scans have higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph nodes or metastatic disease relative to conventional imaging in prostate cancer staging. Since its FDA approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, the use of PSMA PET has increased in patients undergoing initial staging, those with recurrence after initial definitive treatment, and patients with metastatic disease. Although the early detection of metastatic lesions is changing disease management, it is unclear whether this impact on management translates into clinical benefit. This review will summarize evidence pertaining to the change in patient management due to PSMA PET use and will discuss the implications of PSMA PET on treatment decisions in prostate cancer, particularly in the settings of biochemical recurrence and metachronous oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang YN, Lu ZG, Wang SD, Lu X, Zhu LL, Yang X, Fu LP, Zhao J, Wang HF, Xiang ZL. Gross tumor volume delineation in primary prostate cancer on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:36. [PMID: 35869521 PMCID: PMC9308314 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00475-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to assess the clinical value of 18F-PSMA-1007 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation of radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
Sixty-nine patients were retrospectively enrolled (57 in the 18F subgroup and 12 in the 68Ga subgroup). Three physicians delineated the GTV and tumor length by the visual method and threshold method with thresholds of 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% SUVmax. The volume correlation and differences in GTVs were assessed. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was applied to estimate the spatial overlap between GTVs. For 51 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the tumor length (Lpath) of the maximum area was measured, and compared with the longest tumor length obtained based on the images (LMRI, LPET/MRI, LPET, LPET30%, LPET40%, LPET50%, LPET60%) to determine the best delineation method.
Results
In the 18F subgroup, (1) GTV-PET/MRI (p < 0.001) was significantly different from the reference GTV-MRI. DSC between them was > 0.7. (2) GTV-MRI (R2 = 0.462, p < 0.05) was the influencing factor of DSC. In the 68Ga subgroup, (1) GTV-PET/MRI (p < 0.05) was significantly different from the reference GTV-MRI. DSC between them was > 0.7. (2) There was a significant correlation between GTV-MRI (r = 0.580, p < 0.05) and DSC. The longest tumor length measured by PET/MRI was in good agreement with that measured by histopathological analysis in both subgroups.
Conclusion
It is feasible to visually delineate GTV on PSMA PET/MRI in PCa radiotherapy, and we emphasize the utility of PET/MRI fusion images in GTV delineation. In addition, the overlap degree was the highest between GTV-MRI and GTV-PET/MRI, and it increased with increasing volume.
Collapse
|
18
|
A Comparative Study of Multiparametric MRI Sequences in Measuring Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume. J Belg Soc Radiol 2022; 106:105. [DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
19
|
A Preclinical Study of an 125I-Labeled PSMA Ligand for Prostate-Cancer Puncture. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15101252. [PMID: 36297363 PMCID: PMC9610460 DOI: 10.3390/ph15101252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) is characterized by high expression of prostate-specific 1membrane antigen (PSMA), a type II transmembrane protein. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has high sensitivity and specificity and can therefore be potentially used to detect PCa. Exploiting the advantages of PSMA PET imaging, in this study, we aim to develop a novel radiopharmaceutical to facilitate biopsy punching of PCa. Methods: We synthesized a high-affinity radiopharmaceutical of PSMA (125I-PSMA-7). We evaluated the properties of 125I-PSMA-7, including the purity, stability, affinity, partition coefficient, and toxicity. (PSMA+) 22Rv1 and (PSMA−) PC3 cell lines were used to evaluate 125I-PSMA-7 in vitro. BALB/c nude mice bearing 22Rv1 and PC3 xenografts were used for biodistribution and imaging. The uptake of the main organs was evaluated in vivo using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Results: 125I-PSMA-7 had a purity of 99.6% and remained stable for seven days and was therefore always safe to use. 125I-PSMA-7 had a Ki of 4.037 × 10−11 and a partition coefficient of −1.80. The results of in vitro cellular experiments showed a high uptake by 22Rv1 cells (ranging from 2.88 ± 0.14 IA%/106 at 5 min to 61.98 ± 3.43 IA%/106 at 24 h, where the internalization was 46.1% at 1 h and 88.06% at 24 h). However, the uptake of PC3 cells was very low (ranging from 0.34 ± 0.08 IA%/106 at 5 min to 1.60 ± 0.15 IA%/106 at 24 h). The tumors’ uptake of 125I-PSMA-7 ranged from 9.02 ± 0.30 ID%/g at 1 h to 4.11 ± 1.04 ID%/g at 7 d and the tumor/muscle ratios and tumor/blood ratios increased over time. In addition, we used γ-counter to measure cpm per milligram of tumor and muscle on days 4 and 7. The background on day 4 is 42 cpm and the tumor is 1739 cpm/mg and the muscle is 45 cpm/mg, and the background on day 7 is 74 cpm and the tumor is 1404cpm/mg and the muscle is 32 cpm/mg. At 1 h post-injection, the high uptake of 125I-PSMA-7 resulted in clear delineation of 22Rv1-derived tumors upon imaging. By comparison, 22Rv1-blocking mice took up less 125I-PSMA-7. Conclusions: These results show that 125I-PSMA-7 is a promising radiotracer that could be used to puncture the prostate. 125I-PSMA-7 could be applied to targeted biopsy, reducing the need for saturated biopsy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Parathithasan N, Perry E, Taubman K, Hegarty J, Talwar A, Wong L, Sutherland T. Combination of MRI prostate and 18F-DCFPyl PSMA PET/CT detects all clinically significant prostate cancers in treatment-naive patients: An international multicentre retrospective study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:927-935. [PMID: 35170858 PMCID: PMC9790525 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical and biochemical assessment and biopsies can miss clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa) in up to 20% of patients and diagnose clinically insignificant tumours leading to overtreatment. This retrospective study analyses the accuracy of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in detecting csPCa as a primary diagnostic tool and directly compares it with mpMRI prostate in treatment-naive patients. The two modalities are then correlated to determine whether they are better in combination, than either alone. METHODS This is a retrospective dual-institution study of patients who underwent contemporaneous MRI and PSMA-PET between January 2017 and March 2020 with histologic confirmation. The images were re-reviewed and concordance between modalities assessed. Results were compared with histopathology to determine the ability of MRI and PSMA-PET to detect csPCA. RESULTS MRI and PSMA-PET detected the same index lesion in 90.8% of cases with a kappa of 0.82. PET detected an additional 6.2% of index lesions which were MRI occult. MRI detected an additional 3.1% which were PET occult. No additional csPCa was identified on pathology which was not seen on imaging. The sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting csPCa is 96.7% and that of MRI is 93.4% with no statistically significant difference between the two (P = 0.232). Both modalities detected all four cases of non-csPCa with these being considered false positives. CONCLUSION Both mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA-PET/CT have high sensitivity for detecting csPCa with high agreement between modalities. There were no synchronous csPCa lesions detected on pathology that were not detected on imaging too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishanthinie Parathithasan
- St Vincent's Hospital Medical Imaging DepartmentMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisa Perry
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Pacific RadiologyCanterburyNew Zealand
| | - Kim Taubman
- St Vincent's Hospital Medical Imaging DepartmentMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Arpit Talwar
- St Vincent's Hospital Medical Imaging DepartmentMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Lih‐Ming Wong
- St Vincent's Hospital Medical Imaging DepartmentMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,St Vincent's Hospital Department of UrologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Department of SurgeryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- St Vincent's Hospital Medical Imaging DepartmentMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot. Cancer Lett 2022; 548:215883. [PMID: 36027998 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.
Collapse
|
22
|
Marinescu IM, Spohn SKB, Kiefer S, Bronsert P, Ceci L, Holzschuh J, Sigle A, Jilg CA, Rühle A, Sprave T, Nicolay NH, Winzer R, Rehm J, Kotzerke J, Hölscher T, Grosu AL, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Zamboglou C. Intraindividual Comparison Between [18F] PSMA-1007 PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Radiotherapy Planning in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:880042. [PMID: 35912219 PMCID: PMC9329567 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Accurate detection and segmentation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is pivotal for radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) since it influences focal therapy target volumes and the patients’ cT stage. The study aimed to compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging (mpMRI) with [18F] PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET) for intraprostatic GTV detection as well as delineation and to evaluate their respective influence on RT concepts. Materials and Methods In total, 93 patients from two German University Hospitals with [18F] PSMA-1007-PET/CT and MRI (Freiburg) or [18F] PSMA-1007-PET/MRI (Dresden) were retrospectively enrolled. Validated contouring techniques were applied for GTV-PET and -MRI segmentation. Absolute tumor volume and cT status were determined for each imaging method. The PCa distribution from histopathological reports based on biopsy cores and surgery specimen was used as reference in terms of laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral). Results In the Freiburg cohort (n = 84), mpMRI and PET detected in median 2 (range: 1–5) and 3 (range: 1–8) GTVs, respectively (p < 0.01). The median GTV-MRI was significantly smaller than the GTV-PET, measuring 2.05 vs. 3.65 ml (p = 0.0005). PET had a statistically significant higher concordance in laterality with surgery specimen compared to mpMRI (p = 0.04) and biopsy (p < 0.01), respectively. PSMA PET led to more cT2c and cT3b stages, whereas cT3a stage was more pronounced in mpMRI. Based on the cT stage derived from mpMRI and PET information, 21 and 23 as well as 59 and 60 patients, respectively, were intermediate- and high-risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) v1.2022 criteria. In the Dresden cohort (n = 9), similar results were observed. Conclusion Intraprostatic GTV segmentation based on [18F] PSMA-1007 PET results in more and larger GTVs compared to mpMRI. This influences focal RT target volumes and cT stage definition, but not the NCCN risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana M. Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- *Correspondence: Ioana M. Marinescu,
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Julius Holzschuh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Robert Winzer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jana Rehm
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- Tumorbank Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Ceci F, Baltzer PAT, Hacker M, Rasul S, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:390-400. [PMID: 35715320 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has gained acceptance as a staging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent reports suggest an association between PSMA PET and detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-targeted biopsy (PSMA-PET-TB) for csPCa detection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in December 2021 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of PSMA-PET-TB for csPCa detection. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA-PET-TB alone and in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TB for detecting csPCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, five prospective studies involving 497 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. For csPCa detection, PSMA-PET-TB had pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.93), 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.80), 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.50-0.93), respectively. Among the three studies assessing the PSMA-PET + MRI-TB strategy, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for csPCa detection were 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.64 (95% CI 0.40-0.82), 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-0.87), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), respectively. For lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.69, 0.73, 0.48, and 0.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET-TB appears to have favorable diagnostic accuracy for csPCa detection and combination with MRI seems to improve this. According to our meta-analysis, PSMA-PET has promising clinical application for detection of csPCa, namely in the case of PI-RADS 3 lesions. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the true clinical utility of a PSMA-PET-based diagnostic pathway. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is a promising imaging method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and seems to have additional value to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Feasibility of biology-guided radiotherapy using PSMA-PET to boost to dominant intraprostatic tumour. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:84-89. [PMID: 35662883 PMCID: PMC9156937 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Biology-guided radiation therapy (BGRT) uses PET imaging for online image guidance. PSMA PET uptake is abundant in the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). BgRT boost to PSMA-avid subvolume in the prostate region may be feasible. Suitable targets for BgRT were identified in the ProPSMA clinical trial.
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
25
|
Wu YY, Fan KH. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210670. [PMID: 34558308 PMCID: PMC8978248 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localized prostate cancer can be treated with several radiotherapeutic approaches. Proton therapy (PT) can precisely target tumors, thus sparing normal tissues and reducing side-effects without sacrificing cancer control. However, PT is a costly treatment compared with conventional photon radiotherapy, which may undermine its overall efficacy. In this review, we summarize current data on the dosimetric rationale, clinical benefits, and cost of PT for prostate cancer. METHODS An extensive literature review of PT for prostate cancer was performed with emphasis on studies investigating dosimetric advantage, clinical outcomes, cost-effective strategies, and novel technology trends. RESULTS PT is safe, and its efficacy is comparable to that of standard photon-based therapy or brachytherapy. Data on gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and sexual function toxicity profiles are conflicting; however, PT is associated with a low risk of second cancer and has no effects on testosterone levels. Regarding cost-effectiveness, PT is suboptimal, although evolving trends in radiation delivery and construction of PT centers may help reduce the cost. CONCLUSION PT has several advantages over conventional photon radiotherapy, and novel approaches may increase its efficacy and safety. Large prospective randomized trials comparing photon therapy with proton-based treatments are ongoing and may provide data on the differences in efficacy, toxicity profile, and quality of life between proton- and photon-based treatments for prostate cancer in the modern era. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE PT provides excellent physical advantages and has a superior dose profile compared with X-ray radiotherapy. Further evidence from clinical trials and research studies will clarify the role of PT in the treatment of prostate cancer, and facilitate the implementation of PT in a more accessible, affordable, efficient, and safe way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Yu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Axumin ( 18F-Fluciclovine) PET imaging in men exhibiting no clinically significant cancer on initial negative biopsy of PI-RADS 4 and 5 regions of interest. World J Urol 2022; 40:2765-2770. [PMID: 36197506 PMCID: PMC9532230 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04172-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of the study was to determine whether Axumin (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/MRI informs the decision to perform an early repeat biopsy of PI-RADS 4/5 region of interest (ROI) exhibiting no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on initial biopsy. METHODS This prospective study enrolled men with at least one PI-RADS 4/5 ROI on multi-parametric MRI and no csPCa on prior biopsy defined as Gleason grade group (GGG) > 1. All men underwent an Axumin PET/MRI and only-persistent PI-RADS > 2 ROI were advised to undergo a repeat biopsy. A PET cancer suspicion score (PETCSS) was internally developed to stratify PET avid lesions according to their suspicion of harboring csPCa. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PETCSS for predicting csPCa were assessed. Relative risk was calculated to analyze the association of baseline variables with csPCa on repeat biopsy. RESULTS Thirty-eight ROI on 36 enrolled men were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) were downgraded to PI-RADS 1/2 and were not subjected to repeat biopsy. Thirteen (92.9%) of these downgraded scans also exhibited low-risk PETCSS. Overall, 18/22 (81.2%) subjects underwent a repeat per protocol biopsy. Of the 20 ROI subjected to repeat biopsy, eight (40%) were found to harbour csPCa. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the PETCSS were 50, 50, 40, and 60%, respectively. No predictor of csPCa was found in the risk analysis. CONCLUSION Our pilot study showed that both MRI and PET sequences have limited performance for identifying those persistently suspicious PI-RADS 4/5 ROI that are found to harbor csPCa on repeat biopsy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Seifert R, Kersting D, Rischpler C, Opitz M, Kirchner J, Pabst KM, Mavroeidi IA, Laschinsky C, Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt B, Catalano OA, Herrmann K, Umutlu L. Clinical Use of PET/MR in Oncology: An Update. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 52:356-364. [PMID: 34980479 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The combination of PET and MRI is one of the recent advances of hybrid imaging. Yet to date, the adoption rate of PET/MRI systems has been rather slow. This seems to be partially caused by the high costs of PET/MRI systems and the need to verify an incremental benefit over PET/CT or sequential PET/CT and MRI. In analogy to PET/CT, the MRI part of PET/MRI was primarily used for anatomical imaging. Though this can be advantageous, for example in diseases where the superior soft tissue contrast of MRI is highly appreciated, the sole use of MRI for anatomical orientation lessens the potential of PET/MRI. Consequently, more recent studies focused on its multiparametric potential and employed diffusion weighted sequences and other functional imaging sequences in PET/MRI. This integration puts the focus on a more wholesome approach to PET/MR imaging, in terms of releasing its full potential for local primary staging based on multiparametric imaging and an included one-stop shop approach for whole-body staging. This approach as well as the implementation of computational analysis, in terms of radiomics analysis, has been shown valuable in several oncological diseases, as will be discussed in this review article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Opitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Julian Kirchner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Kim M Pabst
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumor Research), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christina Laschinsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Grueneisen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaarschmidt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA; Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ma L, Zhang WC, Hao YX. Current state of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT imaging-targeted biopsy techniques for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 66:776-780. [PMID: 34914195 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is the focus of clinical diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The current standard for diagnosing csPCa in men at risk relies on a transrectal (and in some instances transperineal) ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) that is blind to the location of cancer, leading to false-negative csPCa diagnoses. Over the past decade, PSMA PET/CT imaging-targeted prostate biopsy (PSMA PET/CT-TB), which obtains tissue samples from a defined suspicious area, has emerged as a promising solution for improving csPCa detection. Its feasibility and higher csPCa diagnostic value have been reported by a few case reports and studies. The current manuscript will review this latest targeted prostate puncture technology, summarize the existing applications of PSMA PET/CT-TB, including technical considerations, and discuss the advantages and challenges of each technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Wan-Chun Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ya-Xin Hao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zamboglou C, Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Kirste S, Sprave T, Gratzke C, Chen RC, Carl EG, Weber WA, Mix M, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Baltas D, Jenkner C, Grosu AL. PSMA-PET/MRI-Based Focal Dose Escalation in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (HypoFocal-SBRT): Study Protocol of a Randomized, Multicentric Phase III Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225795. [PMID: 34830950 PMCID: PMC8616152 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Technical advances in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery have substantially changed RT concepts for primary prostate cancer (PCa) by (i) enabling a reduction of treatment time, and by (ii) enabling safe delivery of high RT doses. Several studies proposed a dose-response relationship for patients with primary PCa and especially in patients with high-risk features, as dose escalation leads to improved tumor control. In parallel to the improvements in RT techniques, diagnostic imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific-membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) evolved and enable an accurate depiction of the intraprostatic tumor mass for the first time. The HypoFocal-SBRT study combines ultra-hypofractionated RT/stereotactic body RT, with focal RT dose escalation on intraprostatic tumor sides by applying state of the art diagnostic imaging and most modern RT concepts. This novel strategy will be compared with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHRT), one option for the curative primary treatment of PCa, which has been proven by several prospective trials and is recommended and carried out worldwide. We suspect an increase in relapse-free survival (RFS), and we will assess quality of life in order to detect potential changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol 4108, Cyprus
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Huber
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | | | - Wolfgang A. Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Carolin Jenkner
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
[Interdisciplinary expert consensus on innovations in imaging diagnostics and radionuclide-based therapies for advanced prostate cancer]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1579-1585. [PMID: 34406465 PMCID: PMC8654714 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01598-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Hintergrund Die zahlreichen diagnostischen und therapeutischen Innovationen beim fortgeschrittenen Prostatakarzinom, sowohl in der hormonsensitiven als auch in der kastrationsresistenten Situation, haben in den letzten Jahren zu einer Neuorientierung beim Management dieses Tumors geführt. Ungeachtet der bereits in Teilen in der S3-Leitlinie zu Früherkennung, Diagnose und Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms abgebildeten neuen diagnostischen und therapeutischen Methoden, gibt es in der klinischen Versorgung darüber hinaus gehende Fälle, in denen Patienten von diesen innovativen Verfahren potenziell profitieren könnten. Fragestellung Seit Juli 2018 trifft sich deshalb eine interdisziplinäre Expertengruppe aus Nuklearmedizinern, Radiologen, Radioonkologen und Urologen, um ein Konsensuspapier zu Innovationen der bildgebenden Diagnostik und radionuklidbasierten Therapien des fortgeschrittenen Prostatakarzinoms vor dem Hintergrund aktueller Studien und Erfahrungen im klinischen Alltag zu erarbeiten. Schlussfolgerung Der Arbeitskreis gibt Anregungen, um zu einer besseren Implementierung neuer bildgebender Techniken, wie multiparametrische Magnetresonanztomographie (mpMRT), PSMA-PET/CT (prostataspezifisches Membranantigen – Positronenemissionstomographie/Computertomographie) und innovativer therapeutischer Optionen (Radium-223-dichlorid, Lutetium-177-PSMA) bei den komplexen Therapieoptionen des fortgeschrittenen Prostatakarzinoms beizutragen.
Collapse
|
32
|
Draulans C, Pos F, Smeenk RJ, Kerkmeijer L, Vogel WV, Nagarajah J, Janssen M, Mai C, Heijmink S, van der Leest M, Zámecnik P, Oyen R, Isebaert S, Maes F, Joniau S, Kunze-Busch M, De Roover R, Defraene G, van der Heide UA, Goffin K, Haustermans K. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET, and MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Primary Prostate Cancer: Intermodality and Intertracer Variability. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:202-211. [PMID: 33941347 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the intermodality and intertracer variability of gallium-68 (68Ga)- or fluorine-18 (18F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-based gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for focal boosting in primary prostate cancer. METHODS Nineteen prospectively enrolled patients with prostate cancer underwent a PSMA PET/MRI scan, divided into a 1:1 ratio between 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007, before radical prostatectomy (IWT140193). Four delineation teams performed manual contouring of the GTV based on bpMRI and PSMA PET imaging, separately. Index lesion coverage (overlap%) and interobserver variability were assessed. Furthermore, the distribution of the voxelwise normalized standardized uptake values (SUV%) was determined for the majority-voted (>50%) GTV (GTVmajority) and whole prostate gland to investigate intertracer variability. The median patientwise SUV% contrast ratio (SUV%-CR, calculated as median GTVmajority SUV% / median prostate gland without GTVmajority SUV%) was calculated according to the tracer used. RESULTS A significant difference in overlap% favoring PSMA PET compared with bpMRI was found in the 18F subgroup (median, 63.0% vs 53.1%; P = .004) but was not present in the 68Ga subgroup (32.5% vs 50.6%; P = .100). Regarding interobserver variability, measured Sørensen-Dice coefficients (0.58 vs 0.72) and calculated mean distances to agreement (2.44 mm vs 1.22 mm) were statistically significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the 18F cohort compared with the 68Ga cohort. For the bpMRI-based delineations, the median Sørensen-Dice coefficient and mean distance to agreement were 0.63 and 1.76 mm, respectively. Median patientwise SUV%-CRs of 1.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-2.7) for 18F-PSMA and 3.3 (IQR, 2.7-5.9) for 68Ga-PSMA PET images were found. CONCLUSIONS Both MRI and PSMA PET provided consistent intraprostatic GTV lesion detection. However, the PSMA tracer seems to have a major influence on the contour characteristics, owing to an apparent difference in SUV% distribution in the prostate gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Nagarajah
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Janssen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy Mai
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn Heijmink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes van der Leest
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrik Zámecnik
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Oyen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frederik Maes
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pilot study comparing dominant intraprostatic lesion volume using Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-computed tomography and multiparametric MRI. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 41:1291-1298. [PMID: 32941400 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard imaging used for delineation of dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The use of biologic imaging such as Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) for this purpose is being explored in view of increased sensitivity of this modality and the associated ease of delineation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The primary objective of the study was to compare the autogenerated volumes of the DIL in Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT with the standard volume delineated in mpMRI. Twenty patients with biopsy-proven untreated prostatic adenocarcinoma were included. Multiple percentages of the maximum standardized uptake value (%SUVmax) were used to autogenerate DIL volumes in Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT and these volumes were numerically matched with the consensus DIL volume in mpMRI. PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) were also calculated for each lesion. RESULTS Median volume of DIL in mpMRI was 4 cm (interquartile range, IQR = 2.5-7.6 cm). The IQR for interobserver variability was 0.5-2.5 cm. Median SUVmax of the DIL was 14.1 (IQR = 10.2-22.3). Median %SUVmax corresponding to mpMRI volume was 41% of SUVmax (IQR = 34-55%). There was a strong negative correlation between MRI volume and %SUVmax (r = -0.829, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between TL-PSMA and prostate-specific antigen (r = 0.609, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The median DIL volume was 4 cm and median %SUVmax corresponding to MR volume of DIL was 41%. A strong inverse relationship is found between mpMRI-defined DIL volume and the %SUVmax which generates similar volume in Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT. TL-PSMA could be a quantitative biomarker for tumor load and prognosis.
Collapse
|
34
|
[ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14080713. [PMID: 34451810 PMCID: PMC8401928 DOI: 10.3390/ph14080713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
For the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate cancer, radiotracers targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are nowadays used in clinical practice. Almost 10 years after its discovery, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 has been approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the first 68Ga-radiopharmaceutical for the PET imaging of PSMA-positive prostate cancer in 2020. This radiopharmaceutical combines the peptidomimetic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC with the radionuclide 68Ga, enabling specific imaging of tumor cells expressing PSMA. Such a targeting approach may also be used for therapy planning as well as potentially for the evaluation of treatment response.
Collapse
|
35
|
Paterson F, Nottage M, Kitchener M, Jarvis M, Reid J, Oakden-Rayner L. Assessing the accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with MRI in the initial diagnosis of prostate malignancy: A cohort analysis of 114 consecutive patients. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 66:319-323. [PMID: 34250746 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer diagnosis is shifting towards a minimally invasive approach, maintaining accuracy and efficacy while reducing morbidity. We aimed to assess if PSMA-Ga68 PET/CT can accurately grade and localise prostatic malignancy using objective methods, compared with pathology and MRI. METHODS Retrospective analysis on 114 consecutive patients undergoing staging PSMA PET/CT scans over 12 months was carried out. The SUVmax and site of highest PSMA activity within the prostate gland were recorded. Pathology/biopsy review assessed maximum Gleason score (and location). MRI analysis assessed the highest PIRADS score and location. The grade, location and size of malignant tissue on biopsy, and PSA, were correlated with the SUVmax and the PIRADS score. RESULTS SUVmax was significantly elevated in cases with PSA ≥10 (P = 0.003) and Gleason score ≥8 (P = 0.0002). SUVmax demonstrated equivalent sensitivity to MRI-PIRADS in predicting Gleason ≥8 disease, with higher specificity when tested under a high-specificity regime (SUVmax ≥10, PIRADS = 5, P = 0.002). Furthermore, the region of highest SUVmax was superior to MRI-PIRADS for localising the highest grade tumour region, correctly identifying 71% of highest grade regions compared to 54% with MRI (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION PSMA PET/CT is as effective as MRI in identifying high-grade prostate malignancy. Our findings also support previous studies in showing a significant relationship between SUVmax and Gleason grade. These benefits, along with the known advantage in identifying distant metastases and the reduced cost, further support the argument that PSMA PET/CT should be offered as an initial investigation in the workup of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Paterson
- Dr Jones and Partners Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michelle Nottage
- Dr Jones and Partners Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Kitchener
- Dr Jones and Partners Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew Jarvis
- South Australian Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jessica Reid
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Oakden-Rayner
- Dr Jones and Partners Medical Imaging, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Strouthos I, Karagiannis E, Zamboglou N, Ferentinos K. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Rationale, current applications, and clinical outcome. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1450. [PMID: 34164950 PMCID: PMC8789612 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR BRT) has been enjoying rapid acceptance as a treatment modality offered to selected prostate cancer patients devoid of risk group, employed either in monotherapy setting or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and is currently one of the most active clinical research areas. Recent findings This review encompasses all the current evidence to support the use of HDR BRT in various clinical scenario and shines light to the HDR BRT rationale, as an ultimately conformal dose delivery method enabling safe dose escalation to the prostate. Conclusion Valid long‐term data, both in regard to the oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile, support the current clinical indication spectrum of HDR BRT. At the same time, this serves as solid, rigid ground for emerging therapeutic applications, allowing the technique to remain in the spotlight alongside stereotactic radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Nikolaos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Oerther B, Buren MV, Klein CM, Kirste S, Nicolay NH, Sprave T, Spohn S, Gunashekar DD, Hagele L, Bielak L, Bock M, Grosu AL, Bamberg F, Benndorf M, Zamboglou C. Predicting Biochemical Failure in Irradiated Patients With Prostate Cancer by Tumour Volume Measured by Multiparametric MRI. In Vivo 2021; 34:3473-3481. [PMID: 33144456 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We examined the prognostic value of intraprostatic gross tumour volume (GTV) as measured by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients with prostate cancer following (primary) external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS In a retrospective monocentric study, we analysed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after EBRT. GTV was delineated in pre-treatment mpMRI (GTV-MRI) using T2-weighted images. Cox-regression analyses were performed considering biochemical failure recurrence-free survival (BRFS) as outcome variable. RESULTS Among 131 patients, after a median follow-up of 57 months, biochemical failure occurred in 27 (21%). GTV-MRI was not correlated with % of positive biopsy cores, Gleason score and initial PSA (all r<0.2) and only moderately correlated with cT stage (r=0.32). In univariate analysis, cT stage, Gleason score and GTV-MRI were higher in subjects with shorter BRFS (p<0.05). GTV-MRI remained a significant predictor for BRFS in multivariate analyses, independent of Gleason score and cT stage. CONCLUSION GTV, defined using mpMRI, provides incremental prognostic value for BRFS, independent of established risk factors. This supports the implementation of imaging-based GTV for risk-stratification, although further validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedict Oerther
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz V Buren
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christina M Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Deepa Darshini Gunashekar
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Leonard Hagele
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lars Bielak
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Spohn SKB, Sachpazidis I, Wiehle R, Thomann B, Sigle A, Bronsert P, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Nicolay NH, Sprave T, Grosu AL, Baltas D, Zamboglou C. Influence of Urethra Sparing on Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Focal Dose Escalated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Planning Study Based on Histopathology Reference. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652678. [PMID: 34055621 PMCID: PMC8160377 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) are used to guide focal radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation concepts. Besides improvements of treatment effectiveness, maintenance of a good quality of life is essential. Therefore, this planning study investigates whether urethral sparing in moderately hypofractionated RT with focal RT dose escalation influences tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Patients and Methods 10 patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa), who underwent 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI followed by radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Intraprostatic tumour volumes (gross tumor volume, GTV) based on both imaging techniques (GTV-MRI and -PET) were contoured manually using validated contouring techniques and GTV-Union was created by summing both. For each patient three IMRT plans were generated with 60 Gy to the whole prostate and a simultaneous integrated boost up to 70 Gy to GTV-Union in 20 fractions by (Plan 1) not respecting and (Plan 2) respecting dose constraints for urethra as well as (Plan 3) respecting dose constraints for planning organ at risk volume for urethra (PRV = urethra + 2mm expansion). NTCP for urethra was calculated applying a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model. TCP-Histo was calculated based on PCa distribution in co-registered histology (GTV-Histo). Complication free tumour control probability (P+) was calculated. Furthermore, the intrafractional movement was considered. Results Median overlap of GTV-Union and PRV-Urethra was 1.6% (IQR 0-7%). Median minimum distance of GTV-Histo to urethra was 3.6 mm (IQR 2 - 7 mm) and of GTV-Union to urethra was 1.8 mm (IQR 0.0 - 5.0 mm). The respective prescription doses and dose constraints were reached in all plans. Urethra-sparing in Plans 2 and 3 reached significantly lower NTCP-Urethra (p = 0.002) without significantly affecting TCP-GTV-Histo (p = p > 0.28), NTCP-Bladder (p > 0.85) or NTCP-Rectum (p = 0.85), resulting in better P+ (p = 0.006). Simulation of intrafractional movement yielded even higher P+ values for Plans 2 and 3 compared to Plan 1. Conclusion Urethral sparing may increase the therapeutic ratio and should be implemented in focal RT dose escalation concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Matushita CS, da Silva AMM, Schuck PN, Bardisserotto M, Piant DB, Pereira JL, Cerci JJ, Coura-Filho GB, Esteves FP, Amorim BJ, Gomes GV, Brito AET, Bernardo WM, Mundstock E, Fanti S, Macedo B, Roman DH, Tem-Pass CS, Hochhegger B. 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:705-729. [PMID: 33566470 PMCID: PMC8321470 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina S Matushita
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Ana M Marques da Silva
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.,Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Phelipi N Schuck
- Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | - Diego B Piant
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | | | - George B Coura-Filho
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto do Câncer de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Barbara J Amorim
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | - Wanderley M Bernardo
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Mundstock
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine-DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruna Macedo
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Diego H Roman
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Cinthia Scatolin Tem-Pass
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Céspedes MS, Radtke JP, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and Prostate Cancer Staging: is our current conventional staging obsolete? Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:1243-1249. [PMID: 33861056 PMCID: PMC8486444 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Comparison of MRI, PSMA PET/CT, and Fusion PSMA PET/MRI for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2021; 45:210-217. [PMID: 33186177 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting intraprostatic lesions in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy; additionally, investigate the benefits of rostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-MR software fusion images to the diagnosis. METHODS Thirty patients, who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 2015 and April 2018, were included in the study. Subjects with gallium PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric prostate MRI performed according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 criteria in our clinic were included in the study. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT images were fused with MR sequences for analysis. RESULTS The mean age of cases was 63.2 years (ranged from 45 to 79 years). Index lesions of 29 cases were detected by MRI and 22 of them by PET CT. Both modalities were found to be less sensitive for detection of bilaterality and multifocality (42.85% and 20% for MRI, 28.57% and 20% for PET CT, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between modalities. It was observed that if a clinically significant tumor focus was not detected by MRI, it was small (6 mm or less) in diameter or had a low Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS Software fusion PSMA PET-MRI increased the sensitivity of the index lesion identification compared with PSMA PET-CT and also increased the sensitivity of real lesion size identification compared with multiparametric prostate MRI.
Collapse
|
42
|
Nestle U, Le Pechoux C, De Ruysscher D. Evolving target volume concepts in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1999-2010. [PMID: 34012809 PMCID: PMC8107754 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) target volume concepts for locally advanced lung cancer have been under discussion for years. Although they may be as important as treatment doses, many aspects of them are still based on conventions, which, due to the paucity of prospective data, rely on long-term practice or on clinical knowledge and experience (e.g., on patterns of spread or recurrence). However, in recent years, large improvements have been made in medical imaging and molecular imaging methods have been implemented, which are of great interest in RT. For lung cancer, in recent years, 18F-fluoro-desoxy-glucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown a superior diagnostic accuracy as compare to conventional imaging and has become an indispensable standard tool for diagnostic workup, staging and response assessment. This offers the chance to optimize target volume concepts in relation to modern imaging. While actual recommendations as the EORTC or ESTRO-ACROP guidelines already include imaging standards, the recently published PET-Plan trial prospectively investigated conventional versus imaging guided target volumes in relation to patient outcome. The results of this trial may help to further refine standards. The current review gives a practical overview on procedures for pre-treatment imaging and target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in synopsis of the procedures established by the PET-Plan trial with the actual EORTC and ACROP guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Medical Center Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Cecile Le Pechoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Villejuif, France
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Santhosh S, Jeeva G. Delayed 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Image-Guided Biopsy for Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:e190-e192. [PMID: 33234940 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Image-guided biopsy of prostate with multiparametric MRI is being adopted in the workup of prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-guided biopsy has also been shown to be equally sensitive in the evaluation of higher-grade tumors with increased PSMA expression. The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, however, reduces with lesser PSMA expression in low-grade PAC. Herein, we demonstrate a case where delayed 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging helped in detecting low-grade PAC in BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sampath Santhosh
- From the Division of PET/CT, Gemini Scans, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
The impact of the co-registration technique and analysis methodology in comparison studies between advanced imaging modalities and whole-mount-histology reference in primary prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5836. [PMID: 33712662 PMCID: PMC7954803 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85028-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparison studies using histopathology as standard of reference enable a validation of the diagnostic performance of imaging methods. This study analysed (1) the impact of different image-histopathology co-registration pathways, (2) the impact of the applied data analysis method and (3) intraindividually compared multiparametric magnet resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) by using the different approaches. Ten patients with primary PCa who underwent mpMRI and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT followed by prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. We demonstrate that the choice of the intermediate registration step [(1) via ex-vivo CT or (2) mpMRI] does not significantly affect the performance of the registration framework. Comparison of analysis methods revealed that methods using high spatial resolutions e.g. quadrant-based slice-by-slice analysis are beneficial for a differentiated analysis of performance, compared to methods with a lower resolution (segment-based analysis with 6 or 18 segments and lesions-based analysis). Furthermore, PSMA-PET outperformed mpMRI for intraprostatic PCa detection in terms of sensitivity (median %: 83-85 vs. 60-69, p < 0.04) with similar specificity (median %: 74-93.8 vs. 100) using both registration pathways. To conclude, the choice of an intermediate registration pathway does not significantly affect registration performance, analysis methods with high spatial resolution are preferable and PSMA-PET outperformed mpMRI in terms of sensitivity in our cohort.
Collapse
|
45
|
Moolan NJ, Somasundaram VH, Rajamma BM, Sundaram PS. Discrepancy between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 68Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography: A Simultaneous Acquired Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Case. Indian J Nucl Med 2021; 36:50-52. [PMID: 34040297 PMCID: PMC8130705 DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_115_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventionally, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) incorporating T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences is considered the standard for detection and staging of clinically important prostate cancer (PCa).[1] The 68gallium (68Ga)-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) tracer targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), 68Ga-PSMA PET, is a promising tool for detection, localization, and staging carcinoma prostate.[2] Here, we present a case of PCa, showing incongruence between 68Ga-PSMA PET and the corresponding mpMRI findings. Moreover, the final histopathology revealed a surprise, which exemplifies the complementary nature of combining 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI in the diagnosis and staging of carcinoma prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Jose Moolan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Vijay Harish Somasundaram
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hearn N, Blazak J, Vivian P, Vignarajah D, Cahill K, Atwell D, Lagopoulos J, Min M. Prostate cancer GTV delineation with biparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET: comparison of expert contours and semi-automated methods. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201174. [PMID: 33507812 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The optimal method for delineation of dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) for targeted radiotherapy dose escalation is unclear. This study evaluated interobserver and intermodality variability of delineations on biparametric MRI (bpMRI), consisting of T2 weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) sequences, and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT; and compared manually delineated GTV contours with semi-automated segmentations based on quantitative thresholding of intraprostatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardised uptake values (SUV). METHODS 16 patients who had bpMRI and PSMA-PET scanning performed prior to any treatment were eligible for inclusion. Four observers (two radiation oncologists, two radiologists) manually delineated the DIL on: (1) bpMRI (GTVMRI), (2) PSMA-PET (GTVPSMA) and (3) co-registered bpMRI/PSMA-PET (GTVFused) in separate sittings. Interobserver, intermodality and semi-automated comparisons were evaluated against consensus Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) volumes, created from the relevant manual delineations of all observers with equal weighting. Comparisons included the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA) and other metrics. RESULTS Interobserver agreement was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for GTVPSMA (DSC: 0.822, MDA: 1.12 mm) and GTVFused (DSC: 0.787, MDA: 1.34 mm) than for GTVMRI (DSC: 0.705, MDA 2.44 mm). Intermodality agreement between GTVMRI and GTVPSMA was low (DSC: 0.440, MDA: 4.64 mm). Agreement between semi-automated volumes and consensus GTV was low for MRI (DSC: 0.370, MDA: 8.16 mm) and significantly higher for PSMA-PET (0.571, MDA: 4.45 mm, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA-PET appears to improve interobserver consistency of DIL localisation vs bpMRI and may be more viable for simple quantitative delineation approaches; however, more sophisticated approaches to semi-automatic delineation factoring for patient- and disease-related heterogeneity are likely required. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first study to evaluate the interobserver variability of prostate GTV delineations with co-registered bpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hearn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.,ICON Cancer Centre, Maroochydore, Australia.,University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
| | - John Blazak
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
| | - Philip Vivian
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
| | - Dinesh Vignarajah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.,ICON Cancer Centre, Maroochydore, Australia
| | - Katelyn Cahill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
| | - Daisy Atwell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.,ICON Cancer Centre, Maroochydore, Australia.,University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
| | - Jim Lagopoulos
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.,Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience - Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Australia
| | - Myo Min
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.,ICON Cancer Centre, Maroochydore, Australia.,University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Matthias J, Engelhardt J, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Meyer PT, Haberkorn U, Eder M, Kopka K, Hell SW, Eder AC. Cytoplasmic Localization of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Inhibitors May Confer Advantages for Targeted Cancer Therapies. Cancer Res 2021; 81:2234-2245. [PMID: 33622696 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Targeted imaging and therapy approaches based on novel prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors have fundamentally changed the treatment regimen of prostate cancer. However, the exact mechanism of PSMA inhibitor internalization has not yet been studied, and the inhibitors' subcellular fate remains elusive. Here, we investigated the intracellular distribution of peptidomimetic PSMA inhibitors and of PSMA itself by stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy, applying a novel nonstandard live cell staining protocol. Imaging analysis confirmed PSMA cluster formation at the cell surface of prostate cancer cells and clathrin-dependent endocytosis of PSMA inhibitors. Following the endosomal pathway, PSMA inhibitors accumulated in prostate cancer cells at clinically relevant time points. In contrast with PSMA itself, PSMA inhibitors were found to eventually distribute homogeneously in the cytoplasm, a molecular condition that promises benefits for treatment as cytoplasmic and in particular perinuclear enrichment of the radionuclide carriers may better facilitate the radiation-mediated damage of cancerous cells. This study is the first to reveal the subcellular fate of PSMA/PSMA inhibitor complexes at the nanoscale and aims to inspire the development of new approaches in the field of prostate cancer research, diagnostics, and therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCE: This study uses STED fluorescence microscopy to reveal the subcellular fate of PSMA/PSMA inhibitor complexes near the molecular level, providing insights of great clinical interest and suggestive of advantageous targeted therapies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/8/2234/F1.large.jpg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Matthias
- Department of Optical Nanoscopy, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz International Graduate School, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johann Engelhardt
- Department of Optical Nanoscopy, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schäfer
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Bauder-Wüst
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Radiopharmaceutical Development, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Radiopharmaceutical Development, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan W Hell
- Department of Optical Nanoscopy, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of NanoBiophotonics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ann-Christin Eder
- Helmholtz International Graduate School, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Radiopharmaceutical Development, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jochumsen MR, Sörensen J, Tolbod LP, Pedersen BG, Frøkiær J, Borre M, Bouchelouche K. Potential synergy between PSMA uptake and tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:12. [PMID: 33559792 PMCID: PMC7873172 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00757-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake and tumour blood flow (TBF) correlate with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) and hence prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential synergistic benefit of combining the two physiologic parameters for separating significant PCa from insignificant findings. METHODS From previous studies of [82Rb]Rb positron emission tomography (PET) TBF in PCa, the 43 patients that underwent clinical [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were selected for this retrospective study. Tumours were delineated on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET or magnetic resonance imaging. ISUP GG was recorded from 52 lesions. RESULTS [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and [82Rb]Rb SUVmax correlated moderately with ISUP GG (rho = 0.59 and rho = 0.56, both p < 0.001) and with each other (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). A combined model of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [82Rb]Rb SUVmax separated ISUP GG > 2 from ISUP GG 1-2 and benign with an area-under-the-curve of 0.85, 96% sensitivity, 74% specificity, and 95% negative predictive value. The combined model performed significantly better than either tracer alone did (p < 0.001), primarily by reducing false negatives from five or six to one (p ≤ 0.025). CONCLUSION PSMA uptake and TBF provide complementary information about tumour aggressiveness. We suggest that a combined analysis of PSMA uptake and TBF could significantly improve the negative predictive value and allow non-invasive separation of significant from insignificant PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Ryø Jochumsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Jens Sörensen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lars Poulsen Tolbod
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Frøkiær
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Bouchelouche
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Corradini S, Niyazi M, Verellen D, Valentini V, Walsh S, Grosu AL, Lauber K, Giaccia A, Unger K, Debus J, Pieters BR, Guckenberger M, Senan S, Budach W, Rad R, Mayerle J, Belka C. X-change symposium: status and future of modern radiation oncology-from technology to biology. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:27. [PMID: 33541387 PMCID: PMC7863262 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01758-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Future radiation oncology encompasses a broad spectrum of topics ranging from modern clinical trial design to treatment and imaging technology and biology. In more detail, the application of hybrid MRI devices in modern image-guided radiotherapy; the emerging field of radiomics; the role of molecular imaging using positron emission tomography and its integration into clinical routine; radiation biology with its future perspectives, the role of molecular signatures in prognostic modelling; as well as special treatment modalities such as brachytherapy or proton beam therapy are areas of rapid development. More clinically, radiation oncology will certainly find an important role in the management of oligometastasis. The treatment spectrum will also be widened by the rational integration of modern systemic targeted or immune therapies into multimodal treatment strategies. All these developments will require a concise rethinking of clinical trial design. This article reviews the current status and the potential developments in the field of radiation oncology as discussed by a panel of European and international experts sharing their vision during the "X-Change" symposium, held in July 2019 in Munich (Germany).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Iridium Network, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Amato Giaccia
- Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Kristian Unger
- Integrative Biology Group, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roland Rad
- Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), TU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lesion-to-background ratio threshold value of SUVmax of simultaneous [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI imaging in patients with prostate cancer. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:137. [PMID: 33331959 PMCID: PMC7745090 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00926-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to calculate an applicable relative ratio threshold value instead of the absolute threshold value for simultaneous 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen/positron emission tomography ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).
Materials and methods Our study evaluated thirty-two patients and 170 focal prostate lesions. Lesions are classified into groups according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Standardized uptake values maximum (SUVmax), corresponding lesion-to-background ratios (LBRs) of SUVmax, and LBR distributions of each group were measured based on regions of interest (ROI). We examined LBR with receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine threshold values for differentiation between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-positive and mpMRI-negative lesions.
Results We analyzed a total of 170 focal prostate lesions. Lesions number of PI-RADS 2 to 5 was 70, 16, 46, and 38. LBR of SUVmax of each PI-RADS scores was 1.5 (0.9, 2.4), 2.5 (1.6, 3.4), 3.7 (2.6, 4.8), and 6.7 (3.5, 12.7). Based on an optimal threshold ratio of 2.5 to be exceeded, lesions could be classified into MRI-positive lesion on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET with a sensitivity of 85.2%, a specificity of 72.0%, with the corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83, p < 0.001. This value matches the imaging findings better. Conclusion The ratio threshold value of SUVmax, LBR, has improved clinical and research applicability compared with the absolute value of SUVmax. A higher threshold value than the background’s uptake can dovetail the imaging findings on MRI better. It reduces the bias from using absolute background uptake value as the threshold value.
Collapse
|