Establishment and prospective validation of an SUVmax cutoff value to discriminate clinically significant prostate cancer from benign prostate diseases in patients with suspected prostate cancer by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: a real-world study

The association of quantitative PSMA PET parameters with pathologic ISUP grade: an international multicenter analysis

PURPOSE

To assess if PSMA PET quantitative parameters are associated with pathologic ISUP grade group (GG) and upgrading/downgrading.

METHODS

PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection staged with preoperative PSMA PET at seven referral centres worldwide were evaluated. PSMA PET parameters which included SUVmax, PSMAvolume, and total PSMA accumulation (PSMAtotal) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between PSMA PET quantified parameters and surgical ISUP GG. Decision-tree analysis was performed to identify discriminative thresholds for all three parameters related to the five ISUP GGs The ROC-derived AUC was used to determine whether the inclusion of PSMA quantified parameters improved the ability of multivariable models to predict ISUP GG ≥ 4.

RESULTS

A total of 605 patients were included. Overall, 2%, 37%, 37%, 10% and 13% patients had pathologic ISUP GG1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. At multivariable analyses, all three parameters SUVmax, PSMAvolume and PSMAtotal were associated with GG ≥ 4 at surgical pathology after accounting for PSA and clinical T stage based on DRE, hospital and radioligand (all p < 0.05). Addition of all three parameters significantly improved the discrimination of clinical models in predicting GG ≥ 4 from 68% (95%CI 63 - 74) to 74% (95%CI 69 - 79) for SUVmax, 72% (95%CI 67 - 76) for PSMAvolume, 74% (70 - 79) for PSMAtotal and 75% (95%CI 71 - 80) when all parameters were included (all p < 0.05). Decision-tree analysis resulted in thresholds that discriminate between GG (SUVmax 0-6.5, 6.5-15, 15-28, > 28, PSMAvol 0-2, 2-9, 9-20 and > 20 and PSMAtotal 0-12, 12-98 and > 98). PSMAvolume was significantly associated with GG upgrading (OR 1.03 95%CI 1.01 - 1.05). In patients with biopsy GG1-3, PSMAvolume ≥ 2 was significantly associated with higher odds for upgrading to ISUP GG ≥ 4, compared to PSMAvolume < 2 (OR 6.36, 95%CI 1.47 - 27.6).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative PSMA PET parameters are associated with surgical ISUP GG and upgrading. We propose clinically relevant thresholds of these parameters which can improve in PCa risk stratification in daily clinical practice.

PRIMARY scoring in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: correlation with prostate cancer risk groups and its potential impact on active surveillance

OBJECTIVE

The PRIMARY scoring system is a scale designed to identify clinically significant intraprostatic malignancies on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images. Active surveillance is a management method for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of PRIMARY scoring in identifying appropriate candidates for active surveillance based on the distribution within prostate cancer risk groups.

METHODS

The data of 134 patients diagnosed with PCa by biopsy who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging for post-diagnostic staging purposes were retrospectively analyzed. Age, total PSA, ISUP grade, prostate lesion SUVmax values, PI-RADS scores, and PRIMARY scores were recorded. Patients were classified into low-risk and intermediate/high-risk groups.

RESULTS

In the intermediate/high-risk group, the PRIMARY score was 1-2 in 17.6% and 3-5 in 82.4% of patients. In the low-risk group, the PRIMARY score was 1-2 in 34.7% and 3-5 in 65.3% of patients. None of the patients in the low-risk group had a PRIMARY score of 5. The most frequent PRIMARY score in both groups was 4, and there was a significant difference between the average SUVmax values of the intermediate/high and low-risk groups with a PRIMARY score of 4 (p = 0.018). The sensitivity of PRIMARY scoring in detecting patients in the intermediate/high-risk group was 82.3%, the specificity was 34.6%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 68.6%. When a cut-off SUVmax value 5.0 was used for the PRIMARY score of 4, the sensitivity was 67.0%, the specificity was 65.3% and the PPV was 77.0%. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.727 for PRIMARY scoring, 0.662 for PI-RADS, and 0.744 for their combined mean.

CONCLUSION

The PRIMARY scoring system can complement PI-RADS scoring in mpMRI for selecting patients suitable for active surveillance. Revising the PRIMARY score 4 with an SUVmax cut-off value may increase the specificity.

Preliminary clinical practice of radical prostatectomy without preoperative biopsy

BACKGROUND

At present, biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP). However, with the development of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), it might be feasible to avoid biopsy before RP. Herein, we aimed to explore the feasibility of avoiding biopsy before RP in patients highly suspected of having PCa after assessment of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI.

METHODS

Between December 2017 and April 2022, 56 patients with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of ≥4 and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥4 lesions who received RP without preoperative biopsy were enrolled from two tertiary hospitals. The consistency between clinical and pathological diagnoses was evaluated. Preoperative characteristics were compared among patients with different pathological types, T stages, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades, and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (98%) patients were confirmed with PCa by pathology, including 49 (89%) with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as ISUP grade ≥2 malignancy). One patient was diagnosed with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). CsPCa patients, compared with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) and HGPIN patients, were associated with a higher level of prostate-specific antigen (22.9 ng/mL vs. 10.0 ng/mL, P = 0.032), a lower median prostate volume (32.2 mL vs. 65.0 mL, P = 0.001), and a higher median SUVmax (13.3 vs. 5.6, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It might be feasible to avoid biopsy before RP for patients with a high probability of PCa based on PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI. However, the diagnostic efficacy of csPCa with PI-RADS ≥4 and SUVmax of ≥4 is inadequate for performing a procedure such as RP. Further prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our perspectives and establish predictive models with PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI.

RHBDF1 modulates cisplatin sensitivity of small cell lung cancer through YAP1/Smad2 signaling pathway

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a fatal tumor type that is prone to drug resistance. In our previous study, we showed that human rhomboid-5 homolog-1 (RHBDF1) was differentially expressed in 5 intrinsic cisplatin-resistant SCLC tissues compared with 5 intrinsic cisplatin-sensitive SCLC tissues by RNA sequencing, which intrigued us. We performed gain- and loss-of-function experiments to investigate RHBDF1 function, bioinformatics analysis, qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunoprecipitation to elucidate the molecular mechanisms as well as detect RHBDF1 expression in SCLC by immunohistochemistry. We found that RHBDF1 knockdown promoted cell proliferation and cisplatin chemoresistance and inhibited apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. These effects could be reversed by overexpressing RHBDF1 in vitro. Mechanistically, RHBDF1 interacted with YAP1, which increased the phosphorylation of Smad2 and transported Smad2 to the nucleus. Among clinical specimens, the RHBDF1 was a low expression in SCLC and was associated with clinicopathological features and prognosis. We are the first to reveal that RHBDF1 inhibited cell proliferation and promoted cisplatin sensitivity in SCLC and elucidate a novel mechanism through RHBDF1/YAP1/Smad2 signaling pathway which played a crucial role in cisplatin chemosensitivity. Targeting this pathway can be a promising therapeutic strategy for chemotherapy resistance in SCLC.

The value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis (PPC) and no extracapsular invasion or distant metastasis.

METHODS

The PET/CT images and clinical data of 221 patients were retrospectively analyzed. These patients all had clear pathological results. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the main lesions was measured at the postprocessing workstation and was tested for correlation with the pathological score. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the best diagnostic threshold was calculated. The correlation between SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The pathological results of the 221 patients were 48 benign lesions and 173 malignant lesions, including 81 PPC. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers made up 21.97% (38/173), 54.33% (94/173), and 23.70% (41/173) of the malignant lesions, respectively. SUVmax and GG were positively correlated (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The best SUVmax thresholds for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the diagnosis of intracapsular PC and PPC were 7.95 and 13.94, respectively; the specificities were 0.83 and 0.85, the negative predictive values were 0.55 and 0.87, and the areas under the ROC curves were 0.88 and 0.88, respectively.

CONCLUSION

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has high specificity and NPV in the diagnosis of intracapsular PPC, but the sensitivity for the diagnosis of intracapsular low-risk PC is low, which may cause some cases to be undetected.

Evaluation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and neurotensin receptor 1 as potential biomarkers for accurate prostate cancer stratified diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Studies on single-target PET imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), or neurotensin receptor 1(NTR1) have been reported. However, the performance of these three targets in the progression of PCa remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the expression of GRPR, PSMA, and NTR1 in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostate cancer (PCa), and lymph node metastasis. We synthesized molecular probes targeting the markers to achieve a non-invasive precise detection of PCa patients with PET/CT imaging.

METHODS

In this study, the expression of GRPR, PSMA, and NTR1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 34 PIN, 171 PCa, and 22 lymph node metastasis tissues of patients. The correlation between their expression and the clinicopathological parameters of PCa patients was assessed. Sixteen PCa patients with different Gleason scores (GS) underwent dual-tracer (68Ga-NOTA-RM26 and 68Ga-NOTA-PSMA617) PET/CT.

RESULTS

In the PIN stage, the expression of GRPR was significantly higher than that of PSMA and NTR1 (P < 0.001), while NTR1 expression was significantly higher than PSMA and GRPR expression in primary PCa (P = 0.001). High PSMA expression in PCa patients was associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.037) and overall survival (P = 0.035). PCa patients with high GS had higher tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-PSMA617 than those with low GS (P = 0.001), while PCa patients with low GS had higher tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-RM26 than those with high GS (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents three novel biomarkers (PSMA, GRPR, and NTR1) as imaging agents for PET/CT, and may offer a promising approach for non-invasive precise detection and Gleason grade prediction of PCa patients.

Avoiding unnecessary biopsy: the combination of PRIMARY score with prostate-specific antigen density for prostate biopsy decision

BACKGROUND

Avoiding unnecessary biopsies for men with suspected prostate cancer remains a clinical priority. The recently proposed PRIMARY score improves diagnostic accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to determine the best strategy combining PRIMARY score or MRI reporting scores (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for prostate biopsy decision making.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 343 patients who underwent both 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI before prostate biopsy was performed. PSA was restricted to <20 ng/ml. Different biopsy strategies were developed and compared based on PRIMARY score or PI-RADS with PSAD thresholds. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was plotted to define the optimal biopsy strategy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of csPCa was 41.1% (141/343). According to DCA, the strategies of PRIMARY score +PSAD (strategy #1, strategy #2, strategy #6) had a higher net benefit than the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD at the risk threshold of 8-20%. The best diagnostic strategy was strategy #1 (PRIMARY score 4-5 or PSAD ≥ 0.20), which avoided 38.2% biopsy procedures while missed 9.2% of csPCa cases. From a clinical perspective, strategies with a lower risk of missing csPCa were strategy #2 (PRIMARY score ≥4 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 28.6% biopsies while missed 5.7% of csPCa cases, or strategy #6 (PRIMARY score≥3 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 20.7% biopsies while missed only 3.5% of csPCa cases. The limitations of the study were the retrospective single-center nature.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PRIMARY score +PSAD allows individualized decisions to avoid unnecessary biopsy, outperforming the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted surgery in prostate cancer: Accurate identification, real-time diagnosis, and precise resection

Radical prostatectomy (RP) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the first step in multimodal treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) without distant metastases. For a long time, the surgical resection range has been highly dependent on the surgeon's visualization and experience with preoperative imaging. With the rapid development of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (PSMA-PET and PSMA-SPECT), PSMA-targeted surgery has been introduced for a more accurate pathological diagnosis and complete resection of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and micro-lymph node metastases (LNMs). We reviewed PSMA-targeted surgeries, including PSMA-PET-guided prostatic biopsy (PSMA-TB), PSMA-targeted radio-guided surgery (PSMA-RGS), PSMA-targeted fluorescence-guided surgery (PSMA-FGS), and multi-modality/multi-targeted PSMA-targeted surgery. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA-targeted surgery, and propose that PSMA-targeted surgery could be a great addition to existing surgery protocols, thereby improving the accuracy and convenience of surgery for primary and recurrent PCa in the near future.

Strong Correlation Between SUVmax on PSMA PET/CT and Numeric Drop-In γ-Probe Signal for Intraoperative Identification of Prostate Cancer Lesions

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is used to select patients with recurrent prostate cancer for metastasis-directed therapy. A surgical approach can be achieved through radioguided surgery (RGS), using a Drop-In γ-probe that traces lesions that accumulate the radioactive signal. With the aim of guiding patient selection for salvage surgery, we studied the correlation between the SUVmax of lesions on preoperative PSMA PET/CT and their intraoperative counts/s measured using the Drop-In γ-probe. Methods: A secondary analysis based on the prospective, single-arm, and single-center feasibility study was conducted (NCT03857113). Patients (n = 29) with biochemical recurrence after previous curative-intent therapy and a maximum of 3 suggestive lesions within the pelvis on preoperative PSMA PET/CT were included. Patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy within 6 mo before surgery were excluded. All patients received an intravenous injection of 99mTc-PSMA-I&S 1 d before surgery. Radioguidance was achieved using a Drop-In γ-probe. Correlation was determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρs). Subgroup analysis was based on the median SUVmax Results: In total, 33 lesions were visible on the PSMA PET/CT images, with a median overall SUVmax of 6.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-9.7). RGS facilitated removal of 31 lesions. The median Drop-In counts/s were 134 (IQR, 81-220) in vivo and 109 (IQR, 72-219) ex vivo. The intensity of the values correlated with SUVmax (ρs = 0.728 and 0.763, respectively; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis based on median SUVmax in the group with an SUVmax of less than 6 showed no statistically significant correlation with the numeric signal in vivo (ρs = 0.382; P = 0.221) or the signal-to-background-ratio (ρs = 0.245; P = 0.442), whereas the group with an SUVmax of 6 or more showed respective statistically significant positive correlations (ρs = 0.774 [P < 0.001] and ρs = 0.647 [P = 0.007]). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that there is a direct relation between SUVmax on PSMA PET/CT and the readout recorded by the surgical Drop-In probe, thereby indicating that SUVmax can be used to select patients for PSMA RGS. For more definitive subgroup definitions for treatment recommendations, further studies are necessary to validate the present findings.

Diagnostic performance of 18F‑DCFPyL PET vs. 68Ga‑PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer: A systemic review and meta‑analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT was compared with that of 18F-DCFPyL PET for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Up to September 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for relevant papers. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected PCa were included in the present review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool was used to rate the diagnostic performance of each study. The diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PCa was examined by 13 studies included, comprising 1,178 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-DCFPyL PET were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.08-0.96), respectively. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), respectively. 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT both had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). In addition, the Fagan nomogram revealed that the post-test probabilities for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could rise to 69 and 77% when the pre-test probability was set at 50%. In conclusion, a comparable diagnostic performance for patients with suspected PCa was determined for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the findings of the present meta-analysis come from investigations with modest sample sizes. Therefore, more extensive research is required to obtain more solid data.

PSMA PET/CT Versus mpMRI for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An Updated Overview

In the last years, PSMA-PET imaging and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have improved the clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Currently, mpMRI is recommended by the EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines for the primary diagnosis of PCa, whereas PSMA-PET is reserved for disease staging, particularly in high risk localized or locally advanced disease, as well as for biochemical recurrence after surgery. Nevertheless, several studies have explored the added value of PSMA-PET in other clinical scenarios, including primary diagnosis and especially for the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa). In the present contribution, we will provide an overview and an update on the current literature on imaging detection of csPCa, with a particular focus on mpMRI, PSMA-PET and their comparison.

The PRIMARY Score: Diagnostic Performance and Added Value Compared With MRI in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Multiparametric MRI is the current standard for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, men with negative or equivocal MRI often undergo unnecessary biopsies due to concerns about false-negative results. The recently proposed 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based PRIMARY score exhibited good diagnostic performance for csPCa. This study aimed to externally validate the performance of the PRIMARY score and evaluate its added diagnostic value to MRI triage in detecting csPCa.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 431 men who underwent both 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI before biopsy. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the decision curve analysis. The PRIMARY score + MRI was considered positive for either PRIMARY score 3-5 or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4/5.

RESULTS

The prevalence of csPCa was 51.7% (223/431). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the 5-level PRIMARY score for csPCa was significantly higher than that of MRI (0.873 vs 0.786, P < 0.001). For the entire group, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PRIMARY score were 90.6%, 61.1%, 71.4%, and 85.8%, respectively, which outperformed 87.9%, 49.0%, 64.9%, and 79.1% of PI-RADS on MRI. The PRIAMRY score + MRI improved sensitivity (96.0% vs 87.9%, P < 0.001) and negative predictive value (91.5% vs 79.1%, P < 0.001) without compromising specificity and positive predictive value compared with MRI alone. This combined approach avoided 24.6% (106/431) of unnecessary biopsies, while missing 4.0% (9/223) of csPCa cases. The addition of the PRIMARY score in men with PI-RADS 1-3 showed a net benefit, but not in men with PI-RADS 4/5.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRIMARY score was superior to MRI in detecting csPCa, and its added diagnostic value was in men with negative or equivocal MRI results. The PRIMARY score + MRI improved negative predictive value and sensitivity for csPCa compared with MRI alone. Further prospective trials will validate whether men with clinical suspicion of csPCa but negative PRIMARY score + MRI can safely avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Robustness of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography radiomic features in prostate cancer: Impact on recurrence prediction after radiation therapy

Background and purpose

Radiomic features from MRI and PET are an emerging tool with potential to improve prostate cancer outcomes. However, feature robustness due to image segmentation variations is currently unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of radiomic features with segmentation variations and their impact on predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Materials and methods

Multi-scanner, pre-radiation therapy imaging from 142 patients with localised prostate cancer was used. Imaging included T2-weighted (T2), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) MRI, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET. The prostate gland and intraprostatic tumours were manually and automatically segmented, and differences were quantified using Dice Coefficient (DC). Radiomic features including shape, first-order, and texture features were extracted for each segmentation from original and filtered images. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Mean Absolute Percentage Difference (MAPD) were used to assess feature robustness. Random forest (RF) models were developed for each segmentation using robust features to predict BCR.

Results

Prostate gland segmentations were more consistent (mean DC = 0.78) than tumour segmentations (mean DC = 0.46). 112 (3.6 %) radiomic features demonstrated 'excellent' robustness (ICC > 0.9 and MAPD < 1 %), and 480 features (15.4 %) demonstrated 'good' robustness (ICC > 0.75 and MAPD < 5 %). PET imaging provided more features with excellent robustness than T2 and ADC. RF models showed strong predictive power for BCR with a mean area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.89 (range 0.85-0.93).

Conclusion

When using radiomic features for predictive modelling, segmentation variability should be considered. To develop BCR predictive models, radiomic features from the entire prostate gland are preferable over tumour segmentation-based features.

Prostate zones and tumor morphological parameters on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the tumor-stage diagnosis of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the morphological parameters of prostate zones and tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the tumor-stage (T-stage) of prostate cancer (PCa) and establish an optimal T-stage diagnosis protocol based on three-dimensional reconstruction and quantization after image segmentation.

METHODS

A dataset of the prostate MRI scans and clinical data of 175 patients who underwent biopsy and had pathologically proven PCa from January 2018 to November 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. The authors manually segmented and measured the volume, major axis, and cross-sectional area of the peripheral zone (PZ), transition zone, central zone (CZ), anterior fibromuscular stroma, and tumor. The differences were evaluated by the One-Way analysis of variance, Pearson's chi-squared test, or independent samples t-test. Spearman's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were also performed. The cut-off values of the T-stage diagnosis were generated using Youden's J index.

RESULTS

The prostate volume (PV), PZ volume (PZV), CZ volume, tumor's major axis (TA), tumor volume (TV), and volume ratio of the TV and PV were significantly different among stages T1 to T4. The cut-off values of the PV, PZV, CZV, TA, TV, and the ratio of TV/PV for the discrimination of the T1 and T2 stages were 53.63 cm3, 11.60 cm3, 1.97 cm3, 2.30 mm, 0.90 cm3, and 0.03 [area under the curves (AUCs): 0.628, 0.658, 0.610, 0.689, 0.724, and 0.764], respectively. The cut-off values of the TA, TV, and the ratio of TV/PV for the discrimination of the T2 and T3 stages were 2.80 mm, 8.29 cm3, and 0.12 (AUCs: 0.769, 0.702, and 0.688), respectively. The cut-off values of the TA, TV, and the ratio of TV/PV for the discrimination of the T3 and T4 stages were 4.17 mm, 18.71 cm3, and 0.22 (AUCs: 0.674, 0.709, and 0.729), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The morphological parameters of the prostate zones and tumors on the MRIs are simple and valuable diagnostic factors for predicting the T-stage of patients with PCa, which can help make accurate diagnoses and lateral treatment decisions.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 68Ga-P137 in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

P137 is a novel oxalyldiaminopropionic acid-urea-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting agent. This study compared the uptake patterns of 68Ga-P137 and the FDA-approved PET tracer 68Ga-PSMA-11 for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Sixteen patients suspected of PCa were scanned by 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-P137 PET/CT, respectively, followed by prospective analysis. The tumor-to-background ratio was calculated using normal prostate tissue, blood pool, muscle, and urine as backgrounds. Pathology or follow-up results were used to analyze uptake patterns of benign/malignant lesions and various organs. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with PCa and three with benign prostate diseases (BPD). The number and location of primary lesions, lymph node metastasis (LNM) (n = 25), bone metastasis (n = 30), and liver metastasis (n = 3) detected by the two tracers were identical. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor/normal prostate ratio, as well as semiquantitative miPSMA-ES and PRIMARY diagnostic scores (P all >0.05) showed similar uptake levels of primary lesions between 68Ga-P137 and 68Ga-PSMA-11. Compared to 68Ga-P137, the SUVmax of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was significantly higher for bone metastasis, LNM, and liver metastasis (14.9 ± 7.2 vs 9.1 ± 4.4, 14.4 ± 5.0 vs 7.5 ± 2.4, 13.9 ± 2.0 vs 8.8 ± 2.4, P all <0.05). One-hour postinjection, SUVmax of the duodenum (9.4 ± 2.1 vs 16.2 ± 6.1), kidney (19.4 ± 4.3 vs 45.6 ± 20.9), and urine (14.1 ± 7.1 vs 42.1 ± 25.9) were significantly lower for 68Ga-P137 than for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (P all <0.05), whereas the radioactivity accumulation of blood pool and muscle (3.9 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, 1.0 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, P all <0.05) of 68Ga-P137 was significantly higher than 68Ga-PSMA-11. The uptake level of 68Ga-P137 has no significant difference from that of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate primary lesions, and their imaging performances are visually equivalent for both primary and metastatic lesions, despite a higher blood pool and muscle background and a lower uptake in metastatic lesions. Due to the lower urine excretion of 68Ga-P137, primary prostate lesions near the urine can potentially be displayed clearer than 68Ga-PSMA-11.

PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to compare the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) traditional fixed threshold (FT) and newly established Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)-based segmented threshold (ST) for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 218 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSMA-PET examination for suspected prostate cancer (PCa) from January 2018 to November 2021. Lesions with Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 were diagnosed as csPCa. In PSMA-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the FT for all the lesions and STs for lesions with different PI-RADS score for diagnosing csPCa were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and compared with Z test. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Among the 218 patients, there were 113 csPCa and 105 non-csPCa. The PSMA-PET FT was SUVmax > 5.3 (area under the curve, AUC = 0.842) and STs for PI-RADS 3/4/5 were SUVmax > 4.2/5.7/6.0 (AUCs = 0.870/0.867/0.882), respectively. The AUC of PSMA-PET ST was higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.872 vs. 0.842), especially for PI-RADS 3 (0.870 vs. 0.653). Multimodality diagnostic criteria combining PSMA-PET ST and PI-RADS scores of mpMRI was established and its AUC was higher than that of PSMA-PET ST (0.893 vs. 0.872) and significantly higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.893 vs. 0.842) with an improvement in sensitivity (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.05) without significantly sacrificing specificity (86% vs. 91%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnosing csPCa, PI-RADS-based PSMA-PET segmented threshold achieved better performance than traditional fixed threshold, especially for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multimodality diagnostic criteria demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than segmented threshold and significantly better than PSMA-PET fixed threshold for detecting csPCa.

Meta-analysis of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in diagnostic efficacy of prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnostic value of prostate cancer.

METHOD

The Chinese and foreign databases, such as Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, etc., were systematically searched within the period from the establishment of the database to June 1, 2022. Clinical studies related to the diagnosis of prostate cancer by methods such as 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CTCT, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, were researched. Two (2) investigators independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias when these data were included in the studies with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Review Manager5.4, Stata 14.0, and Meta-disc 1.4 software were used for meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different methods in the diagnose of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (27) studies, including 2891 subjects were included in our study. Meta-analysis results showed that the pooled sensitivities of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.912 (95%CI: 0.883-0.936), 0.748 (95%CI: 0.698-0.795), and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.896-0.934), respectively; the pooled specification were 0.878 (0.844-0.907), 0.639 (95%CI: 0.589-0.687), and 0.734 (95%CI: 0.685-0.779), respectively; the positive likelihood ratios were 6.335 (95%CI: 4.288-9.357), 2.282 (95%CI: 1.497-3.477), and 3.593 (95%CI: 2.986-4.323), respectively; the negative likelihood ratios were 0.878 (95%CI: 0.844-0.907), 0.374 (95%CI: 0.280-0.499), and 0.110 (95%CI: 0.083-0.144), respectively; the diagnostic odds ratios were 65.125 (95%CI: 34.059-124.53), 7.094 (95%CI: 4.091-12.301), and 29.722 (95%CI: 20.141-43.863), respectively; the positive posterior probability was 64%, 38%, and 62%, respectively; the area under the SPOC curve was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97), 0.81 (95%CI: 0.78-0.84), and 0.96 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), respectively. The funnel plots indicated that there was no significant publication bias in the included literatures.

CONCLUSION

The current evidences showed that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had higher diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT, among which 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was slightly higher in the sensitivity of the diagnosis of prostate cancer, while 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT may have higher efficacy in specificity and confirmed positive rate. Due to the limitations of the quality of the included samples and literatures, the above conclusions should be further validated by expanding the sample size and improving the quality.

Standardised Uptake Value in Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in 68-Ga- Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan and its Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen Level and Gleason Score

Introduction

A positron emission tomography (PET) scan and a computed tomography (CT) scan are an integral part of oncological imaging and other modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, CT or bone scintigraphy have some limitations in staging the workup of prostate carcinoma. Combined with tissue-specific markers like prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), positron emitter-based functional imaging results have improved. Our study aimed to determine the Standardised Uptake Value (SUVmax) in prostate adenocarcinoma that is confined to the organ in Ga-68-PSMA PET-CT scans and how it correlates with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Gleason score (GS).

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, and includes subjects referred for a Ga68-PSMA PET-CT scan from September 2017 to January 2022. Histopathologic-proven adenocarcinoma prostate patients with organ-confined disease and PSA levels obtained within 6 weeks before the PSMA-PET-CT scan were included in the study. PET-CT images were semi-quantitatively analysed by measuring SUVmax and the result was interpreted using statistical software SPSS version 22.0.

Results

A total of 154 patients were analysed. The mean age of patients was 66.57 ± 8.86 years. The GS of all patients ranges from 6 to 10. The mean and median PSA levels were 32.33 ng/mL (range: 0.004-306.00) and 14.20 ng/mL, respectively. The mean SUVmax of all prostatic lesions was 14.67 ± 12.58 and the median value was 10.76. SUVmax was higher in patients with a PSA level of more than ten than those with a <10. The correlation of SUVmax with PSA and GS showed a significant correlation.

Conclusion

The SUVmax of organ-confined prostate cancer correlates well with PSA level and GS Median SUVmax and PSA directly relate to GS.

Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

It is not uncommon to incidentally discover prostate cancer during the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and necessitate a subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study aims to evaluate whether TURP have negative influence on subsequent RARP. Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, 10 studies with 683 patients who underwent RARP after previous TURP and 4039 patients who underwent RARP only were identified for the purposes of the meta-analysis. Compared to standard RARP, RARP after TURP was related to longer operative time (WMD: 29.1 min, 95% CI: 13.3-44.8, P < 0.001), more blood loss (WMD: 49.3 ml, 95% CI: 8.8-89.7, P = 0.02), longer time to catheter removal (WMD: 0.93 days, 95% CI: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001), higher rates of overall (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01) and major complications (RR: 3.67, 95% Cl: 1.63-8.24, P = 0.002), frequently demand for bladder neck reconstruction (RR: 5.46, 95% CI: 3.15-9.47, P < 0.001) and lower succeed in nerve sparing (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, P < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, there are worse recovery of urinary continence (RR of incontinence rate: RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) and potency (RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89, P < 0.001) at 1 year in RARP with previous TURP. In addition, the RARP with previous TURP had greater percentage positive margins (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03), while there is no difference in length of stay and biochemical recurrence rate at 1 year. RARP is feasible but challenging after TURP. It significantly increases the difficulty of operation and compromises surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. It is important for urologists and patients to be aware of the negative impact of TURP on subsequent RARP and establish treatment strategies to lessen the adverse effects.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using a novel 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric MRI-based model

Background

There are some limitations in the commonly used methods for the detection of prostate cancer. There is a lack of nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the prediction of prostate cancer. The study seeks to compare the performance of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, and design a novel predictive model capable of predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) before biopsy based on a combination of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, mpMRI, and patient clinical parameters.

Methods

From September 2020 to June 2021, we prospectively enrolled 112 consecutive patients with no prior history of prostate cancer who underwent both 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and mpMRI prior to biopsy at our clinical center. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of csPCa, with a predictive model and its nomogram incorporating 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, mpMRI, and the clinical predictors then being generated. The constructed model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, and further validated with the internal and external cohorts.

Results

The model incorporated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and it exhibited excellent predictive efficacy when applying to evaluate both training and validation cohorts [area under the curve (AUC): 0.936 and 0.940, respectively]. Compared with SUVmax alone, the model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance with improved specificity (0.910, 95% CI: 0.824-0.963) and positive predictive values (0.811, 95% CI: 0.648-0.920). Calibration curve and decision curve analysis further confirmed that the model exhibited a high degree of clinical net benefit and low error rate.

Conclusions

The constructed model in this study was capable of accurately predicting csPCa prior to biopsy with excellent discriminative ability. As such, this model has the potential to be an effective non-invasive approach for the diagnosis of csPCa.

Impact of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography on the Therapeutic Decision of Prostate Carcinoma Primary Staging: A Retrospective Analysis at the Brazilian National Public Health System

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in males and conventional imaging does not provide accurate primary staging. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) presents superior performance and strongly affects therapeutic choice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PSMA PET, compared with conventional imaging methods, on the therapeutic approach in primary staging scenarios in patients with PCa treated at the Brazilian National Public Health System.

METHODS

Overall, 35 patients diagnosed with PCa were evaluated using PSMA after conventional staging imaging with multiparametric magnetic resonance (MMR) and/or total abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan and bone scintigraphy (BS). The PCa extension identified by PET was compared with conventional imaging; staging changes and the management impact were then determined. PET comparison with conventional imaging, staging, and decision-making changes was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

PET revealed local disease (LD) in 15 (42.9%) patients, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in 5 (14.3%) patients, pelvic nodal impairment (PNI) in 7 (20%) patients, pelvic and distant nodes in 3 (8.6%) patients, pelvic nodes and bone metastasis in 4 (11.4%) patients, and pelvic and distant nodes and bone metastasis in 1 (2.8%) patient. Staging changes were observed in 60% of patients, with downstaging predominance (76.2%). Volume increase was identified in 11 (31.4%) patients (only 4 related to upstaging, 36.4%). The board changed management decisions for 60% of the patients. The main limitations of this study were the sample size and its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA findings changed the management decisions in more than half of the patients, which made the majority eligible for locoregional treatment and avoided unnecessary procedures in the systemic disease scenario.

The Impact of PSMA PET/CT on Modern Prostate Cancer Management and Decision Making-The Urological Perspective

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET use in prostate cancer treatment has recently become a routinely used imaging modality by urologists. New, established data regarding its performance in different stages of prostate cancer, as well as gaining clinical knowledge with new tracers, drives the need for urologists and other clinicians to improve the utilization of this tool. While the use of PSMA PET/CT is more common in metastatic disease, in which it outperforms classical imaging modalities and drives treatment decisions and adjustments, recently, it gained ground in localized prostate cancer as well, especially in high-risk disease. Still, PSMA PET/CT might reveal lesions within the prostate or possibly locoregional or metastatic disease, not always representing true cancer when utilized in earlier stages of the disease, potentially adding diagnostic burden and changing treatment decisions. As urological treatment options advance toward focal treatments in localized organ-confined prostate cancer, recent reports suggest the utilization of PSMA PET/CT in treatment planning and follow-up and even when choosing active surveillance. This review aims to reveal the current perspective of urologists regarding its daily use.

A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies

Context

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported.

Objective

In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup.

Evidence acquisition

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review.

Evidence synthesis

Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used.

Conclusions

This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa.

Patient summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer : A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty untreated primary PCa patients were enrolled. Each patient underwent 68 Ga-P16-093 and 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT within a week. In addition to visual analysis, SUV was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis.

RESULTS

68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT detected more positive tumors than 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (67 vs 56, P = 0.002), especially for intraprostatic lesions (29 vs 24, P = 0.025) and lymph node metastases (23 vs 17, P = 0.034). Further, 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited significantly higher SUV max of matched tumors (18.3 ± 14.4 vs 13.9 ± 11.8, P < 0.001). Besides, the SUV max of high-risk patients (based on D'Amico classification) on 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT was significantly higher than that of low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients (20.9 ± 9.9 vs 8.9 ± 9.1 vs 10.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.007). The SUV max of tumor measured by 68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT had a moderate association with biopsy Gleason score ( r = 0.462, P = 0.005) and prostate-specific antigen value ( r = 0.491, P = 0.002), and significantly correlated with PSMA expression ( r = 0.732, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited higher tumor uptake and potentially better tumor detection capability than 68 Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT, which suggested that 68 Ga-P16-093 may be more suitable in the diagnosis and staging of primary PCa patients.

The maximum standardized uptake value in patients with recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the association of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) prior to salvage radiotherapy (sRT) on biochemical recurrence free survival (BRFS) in a large multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA11-PET prior to sRT were enrolled in four high-volume centers in this retrospective multicenter study. Only patients with PET-positive local recurrence (LR) and/or nodal recurrence (NR) within the pelvis were included. Patients were treated with intensity-modulated-sRT to the prostatic fossa and elective lymphatics in case of nodal disease. Dose escalation was delivered to PET-positive LR and NR. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered at the discretion of the treating physician. LR and NR were manually delineated and SUVmax was extracted for LR and NR. Cox-regression was performed to analyze the impact of clinical parameters and the SUVmax-derived values on BRFS.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-five patients with a median follow-up (FU) of 24 months were included in the final cohort. Two-year and 4-year BRFS for all patients were 68% and 56%. The presence of LR was associated with favorable BRFS (p = 0.016). Presence of NR was associated with unfavorable BRFS (p = 0.007). While there was a trend for SUVmax values ≥ median (p = 0.071), SUVmax values ≥ 75% quartile in LR were significantly associated with unfavorable BRFS (p = 0.022, HR: 2.1, 95%CI 1.1-4.6). SUVmax value in NR was not significantly associated with BRFS. SUVmax in LR stayed significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.030). Sensitivity analysis with patients for who had a FU of > 12 months (n = 197) confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

The non-invasive biomarker SUVmax can prognosticate outcome in patients undergoing sRT and recurrence confined to the prostatic fossa in PSMA-PET. Its addition might contribute to improve risk stratification of patients with recurrent PCa and to guide personalized treatment decisions in terms of treatment intensification or de-intensification. This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology-Genitourinary.

Optimization of prostate cancer patient lymph node staging via the integration of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios, platelet-lymphocyte ratios, and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET-derived SUVmax values

BACKGROUND

At present, standardized parameters for quantitatively evaluating ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-PET/CT outcomes when diagnosing lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients are lacking. Inflammatory hematological biomarkers offer value as robust predictors of certain cancer-related outcomes. The present study was thus developed to explore approaches to improving the utility of ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for diagnosing lymph node metastasis through the combined evaluation of inflammatory hematological markers in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Pretreatment patient details including age, initial TPSA levels, hematological findings, biopsy pathology results (Gleason score and ISUP grouping), radical pathology results, and imaging details were collected. Optimal cutoff values for each predictor then being determined based upon Youden's index, with univariate and multivariate analyses were then used to identify independent predictors of lymph node metastasis and used to construct a nomogram.

RESULT

Independent predictors of lymph node metastasis in this patient cohort included SUVmax (odds ratio [OR]: 30.549, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.855-85.973, p < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (OR:8.221, 95%CI: 1.335-50.614, p = 0.023), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (OR:8.221, 95% CI: 1.335-50.614, p = 0.023), initial TPSA (OR:2.761, 95% CI: 1.132-6.733, p = 0.026), and clinical T-stage (T3 vs. T2, OR:11.332, 95% CI:3.929-32.681, p < 0.001; T4 vs. T2, OR:9.101, 95% CI:1.962-42.213, p = 0.005), with corresponding optimal cutoff values of 2.3 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.873, sensitivity: 0.736, specificity: 0.902), 1.72 (AUC: 0.558, sensitivity: 0.529, specificity: 0.643), 83.305 (AUC: 0.651, sensitivity: 0.299, specificity: 0.979), and 21.875 (AUC: 0.672, sensitivity: 0.736, specificity: 0.601). Subsequent nomogram construction was associated with good predictive ability, with a C-index of 0.887(95% CI: 0.793-0.981) and an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.882-0.965).

CONCLUSION

SUVmax, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, the platelet-lymphocyte ratio, initial TPSA, and clinical T-stage represent valuable independent predictors of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients, offering an opportunity to further optimize lymph node staging for these patients.

The Role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.

Comment on Rosenzweig et al. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 410

With interest, we read the article by Rosenzweig et al. [...].

18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Unmasked the Characteristics of Prostate Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Prostate lymphoma (PL) is rarely observed and may be concurrently presented with prostate adenocarcinoma. Moreover, the appearance of PL on conventional imaging is similar with prostate adenocarcinoma. Thus, most of PL is diagnosed through prostate biopsy, or accidentally found in the specimens of surgery. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has improved the management of prostate adenocarcinoma. While, the question regarding whether it benefits the discovery of the characteristics of PL is unknown. A 32-year-old man presented with worsening dysuria for 1 month, and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was normal. While the pelvic MRI showed a mass in the prostate and multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the bilateral inguinal area. Then, the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma was considered, but the serum PSA was normal and he was younger than most patients. So, 18F-PSMA PET/CT was then performed to further reveal the characteristics of the lesion and guide biopsy. However, there was no abnormal PSMA uptake in the lesion of the prostate and lymph nodes of the pelvic cavity and bilateral inguinal area. These lesions presented with increased glucose metabolism on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, and the prostate biopsy was then performed. PL was confirmed based on the results of the histopathologic examination, and the patient subsequently received systemic chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Fortunately, the symptoms and the lesions completely disappeared after radiotherapy. The clinical symptoms of PL are atypical, and PL and adenocarcinoma may be concurrently presented. Moreover, distinguishing PL from prostate adenocarcinoma based on the appearance of conventional imaging is difficult. As opposed to prostate adenocarcinoma, a high FDG-avidity and low PSMA uptake by lymphoma either in the prostate or metastases are seen. So, PSMA PET/CT combined with FDG PET/CT can non-invasively identify the characteristics and origin of PL.

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Performance on Risk Stratification Discrimination and Distant Metastases Prediction in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the prediction performance of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and clinicopathologic characteristics on prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification and distant metastatic prediction.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 101 consecutively patients with biopsy or radical prostatectomy proved PCa who underwent ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The semi-quantitative analysis provided minimum, maximum and mean standardized uptake (SUVmin, SUVmax and SUVmean) of PCa. Association between clinicopathologic characteristics (total prostate-specific antigen, tPSA and Gleason Score, GS) and PET/CT indexes were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of distant metastatic on PET/CT parameters, tPSA and GS was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. A path analysis was conducted to evaluate the mediating effect of tPSA level on the relation between semi-quantitative parameters of primary tumors and metastatic lesions.

Results

The PET/CT parameters were all higher in high risk stratification subgroups (tPSA>20 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8, and tPSA>20 ng/mL and/or GS ≥ 8, respectively) with high sensitivity (86.89%, 90.16% and 83.61%, respectively). The SUVmax, tPSA and GS could effectively predict distant metastatic with high sensitivity of SUVmax (90.50%) compared with tPSA (57.14%) and GS (55.61%). With a cutoff value of 29.01ng/mL for tPSA, the detection rate of distant metastasis between low and high prediction tPSA group had statistical differences (50.00% vs. 76.60%, respectively; P = 0.006) which was not found on guideline tPSA level (P>0.05). 6/15 (40%) patients tPSA between 20ng/mL to 29.01ng/mL without distant metastases may change the risk stratification. Finally, tPSA had a partial mediating effect on SUVmax of primary tumors and metastases lesions.

Conclusion

The ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT SUVmax has a higher sensitivity and can be an “imaging biomarker” for primary PCa risk stratification. The prediction tPSA level (29.01 ng/mL) is more conducive to the assessment of distant metastasis and avoid unnecessary biopsy.