The Reliability of the Transconjunctival Approach for Orbital Exposure: Measurement of Positional Changes in the Lower Eyelid

Enhancing aesthetic outcomes: The role of biomechanics in periorbital and eyelid cosmetic surgery

Cosmetic periorbital and eyelid surgery is a commonly performed procedure in facial plastic surgery. Understanding the biomechanics of periorbital anatomy and its role in aesthetic surgery is essential for achieving optimal outcomes. This review explores the biomechanical processes involved in periorbital age changes and analyzes the impact of cosmetic surgery approaches on these processes. By maintaining the initial mechanical equilibrium of the brows, eyelids, septal fat, and blepharoplasty folds, periorbital and eyelid cosmetic surgery can effectively rejuvenate the appearance. Disruption of this equilibrium can lead to the migration of anatomic components, resulting in signs of aging. Surgeons, by applying biomechanical concepts, can tailor the forces exerted upon the different structures to manifest the patient's aesthetic aspirations. The key to success in periorbital and eyelid cosmetic surgery lies in re-establishing a dynamic mechanical equilibrium within the periorbital framework.

An Overview of Surgical Approaches for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty

Age-related changes in the lower eyelid are noticed by patients as bags or circles under the eye, a tired look, and a flattened face. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty, in which the excess skin and/or orbital fat is excised and repositioned, is mainly performed for aesthetic reasons rather than the correction of functional abnormalities. Favorable outcomes for the combination of these approaches have been reported, but the most suitable surgical technique is still debated. This systematic narrative review deals with the indications, preoperative considerations, operative techniques, and complications of several different surgical approaches to lower eyelid blepharoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Changes in Lower Eyelid Position and Shape After Inferior Orbital Wall Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To use morphological measurements to analyze changes in the position and shape of the lower eyelid after inferior orbital wall reconstruction.

METHODS

This study included 47 eyes from 47 patients with blowout fractures. Digital photographs were taken in primary gaze immediately before and after surgery; the degree of enophthalmos was recorded. Several eyelid parameters were measured, including marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1), MRD2, lower eyelid length (LEL), lower medial palpebral fissure area, lower central palpebral fissure area (LCA), and lower lateral palpebral fissure area.

RESULTS

The exophthalmometry values (P < 0.001), MRD2 (P < 0.001), LEL (P < 0.001), LCA (P = 0.022), and lower lateral palpebral fissure area (P = 0.038) on the injured side before surgery were significantly smaller than those on the contralateral, uninjured side. Following surgery, the MRD2 increased from 5.01 ± 0.65 mm to 5.60 ± 0.78 mm (P < 0.001), LEL from 25.62 ± 2.11 mm to 26.64 ± 2.29 mm (P < 0.001), lower medial palpebral fissure area from 7.10 ± 3.97 mm to 10.37 ± 3.40 mm (P < 0.001), and LCA from 20.28 ± 4.79 mm to 21.25 ± 5.14 mm (P = 0.008). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that changes in the MRD2 (P = 0.019) and LCA (P = 0.048) were associated with enophthalmos improvement.

CONCLUSION

The central and medial portions of the lower eyelid are retracted after inferior orbital reconstruction in patients with blowout fractures. The amount of central retraction on the lower eyelid is associated with the amount of enophthalmos improvement.

Clinical outcome after orbital floor fracture reduction with special regard to patient's satisfaction

PURPOSE

Primary reconstruction via transconjunctival approach is a standardized treatment option for orbital floor fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the findings of specific ophthalmologic assessment with the patient's complaints after fracture reduction.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart analysis was performed on patients who had undergone transconjunctival orbital floor fracture reduction for fracture therapy with resorbable foil (ethisorb sheet or polydioxanone foil). A follow-up assessment including ophthalmological evaluation regarding visual acuity (eye chart projector), binocular visual field screening (Bagolini striated glasses test) and diplopia (cover test, Hess screen test) was conducted. Additionally, a questionnaire was performed to assess patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with a mean follow-up of 23 months (ranging from 11 to 72) after surgical therapy were included. Diplopia was present preoperatively in 23 (43.4%) and reduced in follow-up examination (n = 12, 22.6%). Limitations in ocular motility reduced from 37.7% to 7.5%. The questionnaire about the patient's satisfaction revealed excellent outcomes in relation to the functional and esthetical parameters.

CONCLUSION

Transconjunctival approach is a safe approach for orbital fracture therapy. Postoperative diplopia is nearly never perceptible for the individual and differs to pathologic findings in the ophthalmic assessment.