Safety, efficacy, and onset of a novel botulinum toxin type A (Nabota) for the treatment of glabellar frown lines: a single-arm, prospective, phase 4 clinical study

Efficacy, Safety, and Subject Satisfaction of PrabotulinumtoxinA for Moderate-to-Severe Crow's Feet: A Phase IV, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

PrabotulinumtoxinA has been identified as an effective agent against crow's feet. Our study, which included Korean patients with moderate to severe crow's feet, was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of PrabotulinumtoxinA and placebo treatments. Of the 90 study participants, 60 received prabotulinumtoxinA (24 U), whereas 30 received a placebo. The primary outcome assessment included facial wrinkle grading by investigators. At week 4, 69.64% of patients in the prabotulinumtoxinA group exhibited minimal crow's feet severity; in contrast, a 0% improvement was observed in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). At week 12, the improvement rates were 30.36% for prabotulinumtoxinA and 6.90% for the placebo, demonstrating a significant difference (p = 0.0152). Based on the independent review panel's assessment at week 4, the improvement rate was 39.29% in the prabotulinumtoxinA group and 3.45% in the placebo group during maximum smiling. Additionally, patient satisfaction was notably higher in the prabotulinumtoxinA group (32.14%) than in the placebo group (10.34%) at week 4 (p = 0.0289). Both treatments displayed comparable safety profiles, with only mild local reactions reported as ADRs for one patient from the prabotulinumtoxinA group. Thus, prabotulinumtoxinA demonstrates significant potential as a potent and safe remedy for crow's feet.

Clinical investigation of botulinum toxin (prabotulinumtoxin A) for bruxism related to masseter muscle hypertrophy: A prospective study

This study aims to confirm the effectiveness and safety of a prabotulinumtoxin type A (praBTX-A) injection in patients with bruxism and masseter hypertrophy. The study included patients who ground or clenched their teeth while sleeping and had computed tomography (CT) scans that showed a maximum thickness of the masseter muscle of 15 mm or more. The praBTX-A was administered bilaterally into the masseter muscles; 15 U/side for group 1, 25 U/side for group 2, and 35 U/side for group 3. CT scans and bruxism questionnaires were conducted before and eight weeks after the injection. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, but three dropped out due to loss of follow-up. After injection, masseter thickness decreased to 15.1 ± 2.0 mm for group 1, 14.3 ± 2.9 mm for group 2, and 13.4 ± 1.8 mm for group 3 (p = 0.043). Group 3 showed a statistically significant lower masseter thickness compared to group 1 (p = 0.039). Both subjective and objective frequencies of bruxism decreased for all groups, but there were no significant differences in either subjective (p = 0.396) or objective frequencies (p = 0.87) between the groups after the injection. The results of this study suggest that praBTX-A injection is a safe and effective treatment for bruxism and masseter hypertrophy. A dosage of 35 IU/side can effectively decrease masseter thickness and relieve bruxism symptoms. Even the minimum dosage of 15 IU/side can contribute to improvements in bruxism symptoms. This investigation provides valuable information for managing bruxism that is associated with hypertrophic masseter muscles.

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese Patients: A Pivotal, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-Label Phase Study

BACKGROUND

Various botulinumtoxinA formulations are approved for glabellar lines treatment worldwide, including abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport^®).

OBJECTIVES

Assess abobotulinumtoxinA superiority versus placebo and non-inferiority versus active comparator (onabotulinumtoxinA; Botox^®), for the treatment of Chinese patients with moderate/severe glabellar lines.

METHODS

Phase 3, randomized study (NCT02450526) comprising a double-blind (cycle 1) phase and an open-label (cycles 2-5) phase. Patients received abobotulinumtoxinA 50 units or matching placebo (5:1), active comparator (onabotulinumtoxinA 20 units) or matching placebo (5:1). In cycles 2-5, eligible patients were retreated with abobotulinumtoxinA only. Responders had glabellar lines of none/mild severity.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

responder rates at cycle 1, day 29 at maximum frown with abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (for superiority; by investigator's live assessment [ILA] and subject's self-assessment [SSA]), and versus active comparator (for non-inferiority; by ILA). Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 520 patients were randomized. Superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, were demonstrated for abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (ILA, SSA; both p < 0.0001) and abobotulinumtoxinA versus active comparator. AbobotulinumtoxinA efficacy was maintained over open-label cycles; median time to onset of efficacy was 2.0 days. After 6 months, 17% of patients treated with abobotulinumtoxinA remained responders. AbobotulinumtoxinA was well-tolerated. Safety results were in line with the known profile of abobotulinumtoxinA; adverse events rate decreased with repeated treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

After a single injection, abobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated superiority versus placebo and non-inferiority versus onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines in Chinese patients. Multiple injections of abobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar lines in Chinese patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Progressive Improvement in Static Glabellar Lines After Repeated Treatment With DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection

BACKGROUND

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin in development that has demonstrated efficacy on dynamic glabellar lines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of repeated DAXI treatment on static glabellar lines.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included adults with moderate or severe dynamic glabellar lines who were treated with 40U DAXI in the SAKURA clinical program. Glabellar line severity was evaluated through validated subject and investigator scales.

RESULTS

Overall, 568 subjects received 3 DAXI treatments. Most subjects were White (92.3%) and female (85.7%). At baseline, 9.0% and 27.3% of subjects had no static glabellar lines based on subject and investigator assessment, respectively. Four weeks after DAXI Treatment Cycle 1, the proportion of subjects with no static glabellar lines increased to 57.9% and 64.8% based on subject and investigator assessment, respectively. At Week 4 after DAXI Treatment Cycles 2 and 3, the proportion further increased to 68.7% and 71.5%, respectively, based on subject assessment and 75.0% and 77.6% based on investigator assessment.

CONCLUSION

Subjects who received repeated DAXI treatment showed progressive improvement in their static glabellar lines. The extended duration of therapeutic benefit with DAXI on dynamic glabellar lines likely provides a long period of muscle inactivity/hypoactivity, during which dermal remodeling can occur.

Efficacy and Safety of a New Botulinum Toxin (HU-014) Versus Existing Onabotulinumtoxin A in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

BACKGROUND

Recently, the safety of a new botulinum toxin (HU-014) was confirmed through animal experiments. The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this newly introduced botulinum toxin is required considering the risk of adverse events (AEs) and need for standardization before its universal use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, active-controlled phase III clinical trial was to investigate the noninferiority of HU-014 versus existing onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

METHODS

In total, 267 subjects were randomized to either the test (HU-014) or control (onabotulinumtoxin A) group. At the baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16, investigator's live assessment, independent photographic assessment, subjects' improvement assessment, subjects' satisfaction assessment, and safety assessment were performed.

RESULTS

At week 4, the response rate was 90.15% and 92.31% in the test and control groups, respectively, as per investigator's live assessment while frowning, without a significant difference. Both groups also showed no significant differences in response rates in the other assessments. In addition, no serious AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

HU-014 was noninferior to existing onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines at a 1:1 dose ratio, and both products were well tolerated.

Botulinum Toxin: An Update on Pharmacology and Newer Products in Development

Since its introduction as a treatment for strabismus, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has had a phenomenal journey and is now recommended as first-line treatment for focal dystonia, despite short-term clinical benefits and the risks of adverse effects. To cater for the high demand across various medical specialties, at least six US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved formulations of BoNT are currently available for diverse labelled indications. The toxo-pharmacological properties of these formulations are not uniform and thus should not be used interchangeably. Synthetic BoNTs and BoNTs from non-clostridial sources are not far from clinical use. Moreover, the study of mutations in naturally occurring toxins has led to modulation in the toxo-pharmacokinetic properties of BoNTs, including the duration and potency. We present an overview of the toxo-pharmacology of conventional and novel BoNT preparations, including those awaiting imminent translation from the laboratory to the clinic.

Neurotoxin Impurities: A Review of Threats to Efficacy

Recently launched esthetic botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) products include Nabota/Jeuveau, Meditoxin/Neuronox, and Botulax, which contain nontoxic accessory proteins and excipients. Clinical evidence supporting these formulations, including their purity and potential immunogenicity or their link to treatment failures, is limited. Any nonhuman protein, including nontoxin accessory proteins, can initiate immune reactions, especially if administered repeatedly, yet the issue of BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity is widely contested. However, there have been multiple reports of treatment failures and observations of BoNT/A-induced neutralizing antibodies. Compared with the purified formulation in Xeomin, these recently launched toxins contain higher total neurotoxin quantities, much of which is inactive and exposes patients to potentially immunogenic nontoxin proteins or inactive neurotoxins that increase their risk of developing treatment failure. Well-established products [especially abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and Xeomin] are accompanied by comprehensive and long-ranging clinical evidence on safety and efficacy in esthetic facial indications, which still remains undisclosed for many of the recently introduced toxins. Clinicians need this information as patients will require repeated BoNT treatments and may be unnecessarily but cumulatively exposed to potential immunogens. To underscore the need for caution and further evidence, we review some of the issues surrounding BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity and antibody-induced treatment failures and argue that using highly purified toxins that do not negatively impact patient outcomes is a prudent clinical decision.