Triaging Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in the Emergency Department: Room for Improvement

Review article: Strategies to improve emergency department care for adults living with disability: A systematic review

Equitable access means that timely, sensitive and respectful treatment is offered to all people. Adults with disability access ED care more frequently than the general population. However, in Australia and internationally, people with disability experience poorer healthcare access and outcomes than the general population. There is acknowledgement that ED environments and processes of care could be better designed to promote equitable access, so as not to further disadvantage, disable and create vulnerability. This systematic review aimed to locate and describe evaluated strategies implemented to improve care for people with disability (aged 18-65 years) in the ED. Four databases were searched from inception to June 2024. 1936 peer-reviewed papers were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers. Four studies met our inclusion criteria, demonstrating the limited peer-reviewed literature reporting on evaluated strategies to improve ED care for adults aged 18-65 years. Three studies focused on the needs of people with intellectual disability, and one created a specific treatment pathway for people experiencing status epilepticus. No studies evaluated across patient experience, patient outcomes, system performance and staff experience, with limited evaluation of patient outcomes and system performance measures. We have referenced helpful resources published elsewhere and drawn from our previous reviews of ED care to provide guidance for the development and evaluation of targeted initiatives.

Patterns of multiple sclerosis presentation to the emergency department

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are no strangers to the emergency department (ED) due to the relapsing and progressive nature of the disease and the associated complications. This study aimed to identify patterns of ED visits among patients diagnosed with MS, the underlying causes of these visits, and the factors associated with these visits.

Methods

This was a single center retrospective cohort study which utilized a non-probability consecutive sampling technique to include all patients diagnosed with MS (471 patients) from March 2016 to October 2021 in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. ED visits were categorized as directly related to MS, indirectly related to MS, or unrelated to MS.

Results

One in four people with MS visited the ED at least once with a total of 280 ED visits. Most ED visits were ones directly related to MS 43.6%, closely followed by unrelated to MS 41.1%, and then indirectly-related MS visits 15.4%. The most common presenting symptoms in directly-related MS visits were weakness 56.6% and numbness/tingling 56.6% followed by gait impairment 29.5%. Indirectly related to MS or unrelated to MS ED visits were commonly due to neurological 17.7% and gastrointestinal 17.1% causes. Using disease modifying therapy (DMT) was significantly associated with no ED visits (p < 0.001). The use of high-efficacy DMTs was significantly associated with no ED visits than using moderate efficacy DMT (p < 0.001). The use of B-cell depleting therapy (ocrelizumab and rituximab) was significantly associated with no visits to the ED than using any other DMT (p < 0.001). Evidence of brain atrophy on imaging was significantly associated with patients who presented to the ED ≥3 times (p = 0.006, UOR = 3.92).

Conclusion

Due to the nature of the disease, many MS patients find themselves visiting the ED due to MS related and unrelated issues. These patients are not only required to be treated by neurologists but also by multiple disciplines. The use of high-efficacy DMTs and B-cell depleting therapy may reduce the total frequency of ED visits. Special attention should be paid to patients who have evidence of brain atrophy on imaging.

Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.

Characterization of potentially avoidable neurological emergency department visits at a large urban public hospital

This study characterized potentially avoidable neurological emergency department (ED) visits at a large urban public hospital. This was a retrospective review of Parkland Health (Dallas, TX) data from May 15, 2021, to July 15, 2021. The study population included encounters discharged home from the ED with any of the following: a primary neurological ED diagnosis, a neurological consultation in the ED, or a neurology clinic referral placed during the ED encounter. Neurovascular, strokelike, acute trauma, and nonneurological cases were excluded. The primary outcome was the number of ED visits by diagnosis category. A total of 965 ED discharge encounters met study criteria as potentially avoidable neurological ED visits, far higher than total neurology-related admissions over the same 2-month period. Headache (66%) and seizure/epilepsy (18%) syndromes were the most common. Thirty-five percent of all cases had neurology involvement in either the ED or the outpatient setting. This was lowest for headache (19%). The revisit rate within 3 months of the index ED visit was 29%, and it was highest for seizures/epilepsy (48%). Potentially avoidable nonvascular neurological ED visits occur frequently, especially for headache and seizure disorders. This study highlights the need for quality improvement and delivery innovation initiatives to optimize the site of care for patients with chronic neurological conditions.

Prevalence of Neurological and Non-neurological Complaints Among Patients Visiting the Emergency Department with Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Study in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) visit Emergency Departments (ED) due to both neurological and non-neurological symptoms. Objectives: Our main aim was to study some epidemiologic features of the ED visits of MS cases in a referral hospital. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted during 22 September 2018 - 21 September 2019 in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Admission causes were divided into two categories: patients admitted because of neurological complaints (MS true attacks and pseudo attacks) and patients admitted due to non-neurological reasons that may or may not be related to the disease. To compare the differences between the two categories, t and χ2 tests were used. Results: A total of 375 visits by 346 MS patients were reviewed. We observed that 239 (63.7%) visits were due to neurologic complaints, of which 213 (89.1%) were diagnosed with true MS relapses. Moreover, 136 visits were because of non-neurologic complaints, with urinary tract infection (UTI) being the most common complaint. The patients with MS visiting the ED were mostly female, though there was no significant difference between men and women diagnosed with true relapses (P = 0.154). Patients with neurologic symptoms were significantly younger than those with non-neurologic symptoms (P = 0.007). Our findings showed that 90% of patients with neurological symptoms underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the yield of MRI was about 50%. Furthermore, the duration of admission was significantly higher in patients with neurological symptoms (P < 0.001) Conclusions: MS relapse was the most frequent cause of ED visits by individuals with MS. There were also many ED visits by MS patients due to non-neurological causes, and the UTI was the most prevalent chief complaint.

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Emergency department use by persons with MS: A population-based descriptive study with a focus on infection-related visits

We described emergency department (ED) visits (all visits and infection-related) by persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) in British Columbia, Canada (1 April 2012 to 31 December 2017). We identified 15,350 MS cases using health administrative data; 73.4% were women, averaging 51.4 years at study entry. Over 4.9 years of follow-up (mean), 56.0% of MS cases visited an ED (mean = 0.6 visits/person/year; total = 37,072 visits). A diagnosis was documented for 25,698 (69.3%) ED visits, and 18.4% (4725/25,698) were infection-related. Inpatient admissions were reported for 20.4% (5238/25,698) of all and 29.2% (1380/4725) of infection-related ED visits. Findings suggest that the ED plays a substantial role in MS healthcare and infection management.

Multiple Sclerosis Wellness Shared Medical Appointment Model: A Pilot Study

Background

Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are group medical visits combining medical care and patient education. We examined the impact of a wellness-focused pilot SMA in a large multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic.

Methods

We reviewed data on all patients who participated in the SMA from January 2016 through June 2019. The following data were collected 12 months pre/post SMA visits: demographics, body mass index, patient-reported outcomes, and health care utilization. Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

Fifty adult patients (mean ± SD age, 50.1 ± 12.3 years) attended at least one MS wellness SMA. Most patients had private insurance (50%), and 26% had Medicaid coverage. The most common comorbidity was depression/anxiety (44%). Pre/post SMA outcomes showed a small but significant reduction in body mass index (30.2 ± 7.3 vs 28.8 ± 7.1, P = .03), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores decreased from 7.3 ± 5.5 to 5.1 ± 5.6 (P = .001). The number of emergency department visits decreased from 13 to two (P = .0005), whereas follow-up visits increased with an attendees' primary care provider from 19 to 41 (P < .001), physical therapist from 15 to 27 (P = .004), and psychologist from six to 19 (P = .003).

Conclusions

This pilot MS wellness SMA was associated with improved physical and psychological outcomes. There was increased, lower-cost health care utilization with reduced acute, high-cost health care utilization, suggesting that SMAs may be a cost-effective and beneficial method in caring for patients with MS.

Factors associated with oral fingolimod use over injectable disease- modifying agent use in multiple sclerosis

Background

Fingolimod is the first approved oral disease-modifying agent (DMA) in 2010 to treat Multiple Sclerosis (MS). There is limited real-world evidence regarding the determinants associated with fingolimod use in the early years.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine the factors associated with fingolimod prescribing in the initial years after the market approval.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted involving adults (≥18 years) with MS from the 2010–2012 IBM MarketScan. Individuals with MS were selected based on ICD-9-CM: 340 and a newly initiated DMA prescription. Based on the index/first DMA prescription, patients were classified as fingolimod or injectable users. All covariates were measured during the six months baseline period prior to the index date. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors, conceptualized as per the Andersen Behavioral Model (ABM), associated with prescribing of fingolimod versus injectable DMA for MS.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 3118 MS patients receiving DMA treatment. Of which, 14.4% of patients with MS initiated treatment with fingolimod within two years after the market entry, while the remaining 85.6% initiated with injectable DMAs. Multivariable regression revealed that the likelihood of prescribing oral DMA increased by 2–3 fold during 2011 and 2012 compared to 2010. Patients with ophthalmic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-2.60), heart (aOR-2.21) and urinary diseases (aOR-1.37) were more likely to receive fingolimod. Patients with other neurological disorders (aOR-0.50) were less likely to receive fingolimod than those without neurological disorders. Use of symptomatic medication (for impaired walking (aOR-2.60), bladder dysfunction (aOR-1.54), antispasmodics (aOR-1.48), and neurologist consultation (aOR-1.81) were associated with higher odds of receiving fingolimod. However, patients with non-MS associated emergency visits (aOR-0.64) had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without emergency visits.

Conclusions

During the initial years after market approval, patients with highly active MS were more likely to receive oral fingolimod than injectable DMAs. More research is needed to understand the determinants of newer oral DMAs.

•

During 2010–2012, nearly one in seven MS patients were prescribed oral fingolimod

•

Several patient and clinical factors were associated with fingolimod prescribing

•

Patients with heart, eye, and urinary disease were more likely to receive fingolimod than those without those disorders

•

Patients with other neurological disorders had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without neurological disorders

•

Patients using MS symptomatic medication were more likely to receive fingolimod than their counterparts

Multiple Sclerosis Clinic Utilization is Associated with Fewer Emergency Department Visits

OBJECTIVE

Alberta is a Canadian province with a high prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this ecological study, we examined group differences in health care utilization among persons with MS (pwMS) living within different regions of the province.

METHODS

pwMS were identified from provincial administrative databases spanning 2002-2011. Utilization of health care services was determined for a 2-year period (April 2010-March 2012). Residential postal codes placed patients into their provincial health care zones. As data were provided to the investigators in an aggregated form, tests of statistical significance and confounding were not performed.

RESULTS

In total, 11,721 pwMS were identified. During the 2-year observation period, 96.2% of pwMS accessed a family physician and 57.1% accessed a neurologist. Nearly all (99.0%) pwMS who received neurologist care in Calgary visited an MS clinic, in contrast to Edmonton where a larger proportion (34.8%) received solely community neurologist care. More pwMS living in Edmonton accessed the ED (41.1%) compared to Calgary (35.7%), and the rate of visits per pwMS was higher in Edmonton (1.07/pwMS) than in Calgary (0.81/pwMS). The frequency of inpatient admissions was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 2 years, most pwMS accessed primary care and over half saw a neurologist. Despite a similar frequency of inpatient admissions, the frequency of ED visits by pwMS was higher in Edmonton compared to Calgary, where more patients received MS clinic care. Although this exploratory study is subject to several limitations, our findings suggest that specialized MS clinics may reduce costly ED visits.

Evaluation of Urinary Tract Infection following Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Exacerbation

The first treatment for multiple sclerosis exacerbation is usually short-term intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), with or without a regimen of oral prednisone taper (OPT). This study aims to evaluate the effects of IVMP and OPT in comparison with IVMP alone in raising the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and posttreatment improvement of urinary tract symptoms in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 56 people with multiple sclerosis relapse who had undergone methylprednisolone for 5 days. Patients were randomly split into two groups: oral prednisolone and placebo (tapering for 20 days). Demographic data, duration of multiple sclerosis, urinary tract symptoms, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and urine data were analyzed. The incidence of UTI in the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly ( $p=560$ ). However, the improvement of urinary tract symptoms in the intervention group was significantly more favorable than in the control group ( $p\le 0.001$ ). Furthermore, administering OPT after IVMP did not increase the risk of UTI occurrence in patients with multiple sclerosis exacerbation. The urine analysis results did not show any differences at baseline and after the corticosteroid tapering regimen. Due to the risk of infection by corticosteroids, it is no longer necessary to do further urinary screening in this group of patients.

The pressing questions in multiple sclerosis Care in the era of COVID-19

•

MS patients should continue their disease modifying therapy during the pandemic.

•

Newly diagnosed patients should start disease modifying therapy without delay.

•

The effect on COVID-19 infection and future vaccination should be considered.

•

Agents that cause prolonged non-selective lymphopenia are not preferred.

•

Only severe relapses should be treated preferably with oral steroids at home.

Illuminating an Invisible Epidemic: A Systemic Review of the Clinical and Economic Benefits of Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Inflammatory Disease and Related Syndromes

Healthcare expenditures in the United States are growing at an alarming level with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) projecting that they will reach $5.7 trillion per year by 2026. Inflammatory diseases and related syndromes are growing in prevalence among Western societies. This growing population that affects close to 60 million people in the U.S. places a significant burden on the healthcare system. Characterized by relatively slow development, these diseases and syndromes prove challenging to diagnose, leading to delayed treatment against the backdrop of inevitable disability progression. Patients require healthcare attention but are initially hidden from clinician's view by the seemingly generalized, non-specific symptoms. It is imperative to identify and manage these underlying conditions to slow disease progression and reduce the likelihood that costly comorbidities will develop. Enhanced diagnostic criteria coupled with additional technological innovation to identify inflammatory conditions earlier is necessary and in the best interest of all healthcare stakeholders. The current total cost to the U.S. healthcare system is at least $90B dollars annually. Through unique analysis of financial cost drivers, this review identifies opportunities to improve clinical outcomes and help control these disease-related costs by 20% or more.