1
|
Stoll S, Costello K, Newsome SD, Schmidt H, Sullivan AB, Hendin B. Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:21-37. [PMID: 38180727 PMCID: PMC10787702 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00573-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) between the patient and their healthcare provider (HCP) in developing treatment plans is increasingly recognized as central to improving treatment adherence and, ultimately, patient outcomes. In multiple sclerosis (MS), SDM is particularly crucial for optimizing treatment in a landscape that has grown more complex with the availability of newer, high-efficacy MS therapies. However, little direct evidence on the effectiveness of SDM is available to guide practice. Multiple factors, including patient age, ethnic background, perceptions, invisible MS symptoms, and psychological comorbidities can influence a patient's willingness and ability to participate in SDM. HCPs need to appreciate these factors and ask the right questions to break down obstacles to SDM. The HCP has a responsibility to help patients feel adequately informed and comfortable in having an active role in their care. This review identifies potential barriers to SDM and provides a strategy for HCPs to overcome these obstacles through patient (and caregiver) discussions to ensure optimal patient satisfaction with treatment and thus the best possible outcomes for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Scott D Newsome
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hollie Schmidt
- Accelerated Cure Project for Multiple Sclerosis, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Amy B Sullivan
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Barry Hendin
- Integrated Multiple Sclerosis Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keenan A, Le HH, Gandhi K, Adedokun L, Jones E, Unsworth M, Pike J, Trenholm E. Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Results of a Cross-Sectional, Real-World Survey in Europe and the United States. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:137-149. [PMID: 38249686 PMCID: PMC10799568 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s440410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive deterioration of cognitive and physical functioning, reducing activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL). Several treatments are available that modify the course of the disease and reduce the frequency of relapses. Although effective, all treatment options are accompanied by adverse events, and this study aimed to assess the extent to which patients were involved in the choice of treatment. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi Multiple Sclerosis Disease Specific Program (DSP)™, a cross-sectional survey of healthcare practitioners (HCP) and their patients with MS in real-world clinical settings in Europe and the United States (US) between December 2020 and July 2021. HCPs reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, current and previous treatment, and treatment outcomes. Patients voluntarily completed questionnaires reporting the physical and psychological impact of their MS and its treatment. Regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare treatment outcomes in patients actively involved in their current treatment choice with those who were not. Results Of a total of 692 patients, median age 40 years and 64% female, mostly diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, those who were involved in shared decision-making tended to choose oral therapies such as dimethyl fumarate more often than HCPs. MS had greater impact on physical and psychological functioning in patients whose HCP made treatment decisions solely. Patients involved in decision-making reported greater satisfaction with their treatment and a better QoL. Discussion Because no single optimal therapy exists for patients with MS, treatments should be individualized with consideration of patients' preferences. Our study shows that shared decision-making is under-utilized in the management of MS and supports the benefits of patient involvement. Conclusion Patients who have an active role in treatment decision-making show improved wellbeing and QoL, and overall treatment satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Keenan
- Scientific Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Hoa H Le
- Scientific Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Kavita Gandhi
- Research and Development, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Lola Adedokun
- Research and Development, Janssen-Cilag Ltd, High Wycombe, UK
| | - Eddie Jones
- Central Nervous System, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Mia Unsworth
- Central Nervous System, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - James Pike
- Statistics & Data Analytics, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Emily Trenholm
- Central Nervous System, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robles-Sanchez MA, Moharra M, Bosch-Farré C, Hernández-Leal MJ, Montalban X, Sastre-Garriga J, Ramió-Torrentà L, Bertran-Noguer C. Views of Multiple Sclerosis Patients About Key Elements for a Decision Aid: A Qualitative Study. J Neurosci Nurs 2023; 55:164-170. [PMID: 37527935 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may experience decisional conflict during treatment choice. Shared decision making (SDM), whereby patients and health professionals, primarily nurses, collaborate in making decisions, reduces this decisional conflict. It requires understanding large amounts of information and may be complex, especially when decisions affect patients' autonomy and quality and prolongation of life. Patient decision aids are tools in facilitating SDM. This study aimed to identify the key elements from the perspective of patients with relapsing-remitting MS to create a patient decision aid in the Spanish sociocultural context. METHODS: This is a qualitative study using focus groups led by a clinical nurse specialist. Semistructured interviews included healthcare needs and demands, the SDM process, and general characteristics of a peer support program. After the transcription of interview recordings, data were analyzed by thematic analysis and a constructivist naturalistic approach. RESULTS: Patients with MS (27) from Spain participated in 4 focus groups of 90 to 120 minutes each. Three overarching themes were identified: information access to sufficient high-quality data; knowledge of available treatment options, including efficacy, adverse effects, frequency, administration route, and the impact on daily life; decision-making role, engaged versus nonengaged patients. The former require support in facilitating their active involvement in decisions, whereas the latter prefer more passive health models. CONCLUSION: The needs identified by patients with relapsing-remitting MS regarding treatment choice in the Spanish setting align with those reported by other studies. The identified themes provide valuable information to design and develop a virtual patient decision aid jointly by clinical MS nurses and patients according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration criteria. This aid will help improve understanding between nurses and patients during SDM and facilitate the process.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben-Zacharia AB, Walker B, Ross AP, Tornatore C, Edwards NC, Lipman Y, Phillips AL. Factors Associated With Disease-Modifying Therapy Adherence and Persistence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Literature Review. Int J MS Care 2023; 25:188-195. [PMID: 37720259 PMCID: PMC10503813 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMT) show published adherence rates of 27.0% to 93.8% and published persistence rates of 49.7% to 96.5%. Improvements in DMT adherence and persistence are key to optimizing MS care, and enhanced understanding could improve MS disease management and identify research gaps. This scoping literature review aims to examine the nature and findings of the literature evaluating factors associated with DMT adherence and persistence in patients with MS. METHODS Eligible articles included in the literature review were quantitative clinical studies written in English, included adherence or persistence as primary outcomes, and accounted for covariates/confounders. The articles were assessed to identify factors associated with adherence/persistence and analyzed according to DMT type (self-injectable, oral, infusion). RESULTS Fifty-eight studies (103,450 patients) were included. Study distribution by DMT type was self-injectable only (n = 41), oral only (n = 2), infusion only (n = 1), and more than 1 type (n = 14). Older age and previous DMT use were associated with increased adherence and/or persistence. Increased alcohol consumption, DMT adverse events, higher education, and higher body mass index were negatively associated with adherence and/or persistence. Greater number and severity of relapses was associated with increased adherence but decreased persistence. CONCLUSIONS Most studies examined factors associated with adherence and persistence to self-injectable DMTs. These factors should be evaluated further for oral and infusion DMTs. Insights into the modifiable factors associated with adherence and persistence could guide treatment decisions and help improve adherence and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliza Bitton Ben-Zacharia
- From Bellevue School of Nursing, Hunter College, New York, NY, USA (AB-Z)
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA (AB-Z)
| | - Bryan Walker
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA (BW)
| | | | - Carlo Tornatore
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA (CT)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alonso R, Carnero Contentti E, Graña M, Linares R, Lopez P, Mainella C, Marrodán M, Miguez J, Cassará FP, Tavolini D, Batagelj S. Shared decision making in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: A consensus based on Delphi methodology. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 70:104465. [PMID: 36565557 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision making is a way of incorporating patients' preferences and values into the decisions regarding the treatment and follow-up plan for the condition that affects them. It is currently applied mainly in the context of chronic disorders for which there is no cure available but nevertheless many therapeutic alternatives, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Current views and opinions on shared decision making for the treatment of MS are discussed in this consensus based on a modified Delphi method that included a group of neurologists from Argentina. A set of statements was defined by the experts and seeks to serve as a guide to apply this concept in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Alonso
- Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Dr. J.M. Ramos Mejía, CABA, Argentina.
| | | | - Marcos Graña
- Hospital Santa Isabel de Hungría, Guaymallén, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Ramiro Linares
- Axis Neurociencias, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pablo Lopez
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, CABA, Argentina; Swiss Medical Center, CABA, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Fatima Pagani Cassará
- Hospital Universitario Austral, CABA, Argentina; Instituto de Neurociencias, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patti F, Chisari CG, Toscano S, Annovazzi P, Banfi P, Bergamaschi R, Clerici R, Conti MZ, Cortese A, Fantozzi R, Ferraro D, Fischetti M, Frigo M, Gatto M, Immovilli P, Leoni S, Malucchi S, Maniscalco G, Marfia GA, Paolicelli D, Perini P, Serrati C, Totaro R, Turano G, Valentino P, Zaffaroni M, Zuliani C, Centonze D. Patients with multiple sclerosis choose a collaborative role in making treatment decision: results from the Italian multicenter SWITCH study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 70:104474. [PMID: 36584654 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared decision-making in complex treatment choices, highlighting the importance of the patient's rationale and motivation for switching therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different modalities of changing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, cognitive profile and attitude and preferences of patients concerning treatment choice. METHODS This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 28 Italian MS centers in the period between June 2016 and June 2017. We screened all MS patients treated with any DMT, with a treatment compliance of at least 80% of therapy administered during the 3 last months who needed to modify MS therapy because of efficacy, safety or other reasons during a follow-up visit. At the time of switching the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and the Control Preference Scale (CPS) were evaluated. According to the CPS, patients were classified as "active" (i.e. who prefer making the medical decision themselves), "collaborative" (i.e. who prefer decisions be made jointly with the physician), or "passive" (i.e. who prefer the physician make the decision). RESULTS Out of 13,657 patients recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%) patients, 69.6% were female and with mean age 40.6 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. According to the CPS score evaluation, a significant high percentage of patients (51.1%) were considered collaborative, 74 patients (22.5%) were passive, and 60 (18.2%) patients were active. Stratifying according to CPS results, we found a higher SDMT score among collaborative patients compared to active and passive ones (45.8 ± 12.3 versus 41.0 ± 13.2 versus 41.7 ± 12.8, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In this study, the CPS evaluation showed that more than 50% of patients who needed to change therapy chose a "collaborative" role in making treatment decision. Cognitive profile with SDMT seems to correlate with patients' preference on treatment decision, showing better scores in collaborative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Patti
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, via S. Sofia 78, Catania 95129, Italy.
| | - Clara Grazia Chisari
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Toscano
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, via S. Sofia 78, Catania 95129, Italy
| | - Pietro Annovazzi
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hospital of Gallarate - ASST della Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Paola Banfi
- Operative Unit of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Cortese
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy
| | | | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Neuroscience, UO of Neurology, AOU Policlinico OB, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Maura Frigo
- Neurology Department, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Maurizia Gatto
- Department of Neurology, General Regional Hospital "Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Immovilli
- Emergency Department, Neurology Unit, G. da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | | | - Simona Malucchi
- SCDO Neurologia-CRESM, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Girolama Alessandra Marfia
- Department of Systems Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical & Research Center, "Tor Vergata" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Perini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Serrati
- Operative Unit of Neurology and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rocco Totaro
- Department of Neurology, Demyelinating Disease Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Gabriella Turano
- Department of Neurology, Mondovì General Hospital, Local Health Authority CN1, Mondovì, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hospital of Gallarate - ASST della Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | | | - Diego Centonze
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Unit of Neurology - IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delayed cognitive processing and treatment status quo bias in early-stage multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 68:104138. [PMID: 36029707 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evolving therapeutic landscape requires more participation of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to assess the association between patient's self-perception, cognitive impairment and behavioral factors in treatment choices in a cohort of patients at an early stage of RRMS. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, non-interventional study including adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤18 months and receiving care at one of the 21 participating MS centers from across Spain. We used patient-reported measures to gather information on fatigue, mood, quality of life, and perception of severity of their MS. Functional metrics (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], cognitive function by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT], 25-foot walk test) and clinical and radiological data were provided by the treating neurologist. The primary outcome of the study was status quo (SQ) bias, defined as participant's tendency to continue taking a previously selected but inferior treatment when intensification was warranted. SQ bias was assessed based on participants treatment preference in six simulated RRMS case scenarios with evidence of clinical relapses and radiological disease progression. RESULTS Of 189 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 188 (99.5%) fully completed the study. The mean age was 36.6 ± 9.5 years, 70.7% female, mean disease duration: 1.2 ± 0.8 years, median EDSS score: 1.0 [IQR=0.0-2.0]). Overall, 43.1% patients (n = 81/188) had an abnormal SDMT (≤49 correct answers). SQ bias was observed in at least one case scenario in 72.3% (137/188). Participant's perception of their MS severity was associated with higher SQ bias (β coeff 0.042; 95% CI 0.0074-0.076) among those with delayed cognitive processing. Higher baseline EDSS and number of T2 lesions were predictors of delayed processing speed (OR EDSS=1.57, 95% CI: 1.11-2.21, p = 0.011; OR T2 lesions=1.50, 95% CI: 1.11-2.03, p<0.01). Bayesian multilevel model accounting for clustering showed that delayed cognitive processing (exp coeff 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09) and MS symptoms severity (exp coeff 1.28; 95% CI 1.22-1.33) were associated with SQ bias. CONCLUSION Over 40% of patients in earlier stages of RRMS experience delays in cognitive processing that might affect their decision-making ability. Our findings suggest that patients' self-perception of disease severity combined with a delay in cognitive processing would affect treatment choices leading to status quo bias early in the course of their disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vitturi BK, Rahmani A, Dini G, Montecucco A, Debarbieri N, Bandiera P, Battaglia MA, Manacorda T, Persechino B, Buresti G, Ponzio M, Inglese M, Durando P. Spatial and temporal distribution of the prevalence of unemployment and early retirement in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272156. [PMID: 35901070 PMCID: PMC9333213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to summarise the prevalence of unemployment and early retirement among people with MS and analyze data according to a spatio-temporal perspective. Methods We undertook a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, SciVerse ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. We included any peer-reviewed original article reporting the prevalence of unemployment and early retirement in the working-age population with MS. We excluded articles off-topic, with other study designs, whose study sample were unlikely to be representative of the MS population and in case of unavailability of the full text or essential information. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to measure overall prevalence estimates of unemployment and early retirement. We used meta-regression and subgroup analysis to evaluate potential moderators of prevalence estimates and the leave-one-out method for sensitivity analyses. Results Our research identified 153 studies across 29 countries encompassing 188436 subjects with MS. The pooled overall effect size for unemployment and early retirement was 35.6% (95% CI 32.8–38.4; I2 = 99.31) and 17.2% (95% CI 14.6–20.2; I2 = 99.13), respectively. The prevalence of unemployment varied according to the year of publication (p < 0.001) and there was a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of unemployment over time (p = 0.042). Regarding early retirement, only seven (31.8%) estimates obtained from studies that were published before 2010 were below the overall effect size in comparison to 27 (60.0%) estimates extracted from data published between 2010 and 2021 (p = 0.039). There was a significant difference in prevalence according to countries (p < 0.001). Psychiatric illness was an important clinical feature responsible for patients leaving the workforce in regions with a high MS prevalence. Conclusions Unemployment and early retirement due to MS remain highly prevalent, despite a slight decline in the last decade. The prevalence of unemployment and early retirement varies globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alborz Rahmani
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Occupational Medicine Unit, Genoa, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Dini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Occupational Medicine Unit, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alfredo Montecucco
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Occupational Medicine Unit, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Debarbieri
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Occupational Medicine Unit, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Bandiera
- Italian Multiple Sclerosis Association (AISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Mario Alberto Battaglia
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
- Department of Life Science, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Tommaso Manacorda
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | - Michela Ponzio
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Matilde Inglese
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI) and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research (CEBR), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Durando
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Occupational Medicine Unit, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Development and evaluation of a website with patients experiences of multiple sclerosis: a mixed methods study. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:146. [PMID: 35443631 PMCID: PMC9019288 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02663-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of management options (e.g., disease-modifying therapy, lifestyle interventions, rehabilitation) are available for persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Besides coping with the diagnosis, persons with MS have to make complex decisions, e.g., regarding disease-modifying therapies. In addition to factual information, reports of patient experiences may support other patients in their decision-making. Therefore, we developed a website presenting patient experiences illustrated by video, audio and text files. This study aimed to test the acceptability and usability of a website with patient experiences with MS. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was applied. A total of 69 participants visited the German "Patient Experiences with MS (PExMS)" website and among them, 50 persons with MS and 6 experts completed an online survey. In total, 18 participants took part in telephone interviews or focus groups. Data from the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Both quantitative and qualitative responses suggest that the PExMS website was viewed positively by patients and experts. 94% of persons with MS agreed that the information was comprehensible and reliable. 54% felt encouraged to share their health problems with others after having studied the website. 74% claimed to use the website if they had to make a decision regarding their health. Qualitative responses deduced from the website fell into 5 key themes: (1) web design, appearance, and functionality, (2) content, (3) usability, (4) satisfaction, and (5) loyalty. The search for persons of similar age and with comparable experiences was a major driving force to navigate the website. The material on the website was perceived as diverse, covering both positive and negative experiences in daily living with MS. All participants greatly appreciated having access to other people's experiences online and judged the material on the website as particularly helpful in decision-making for disease-modifying therapies. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the PExMS website might have the potential to be a useful source of audio-visual information for persons with MS. Given the lack of websites available to patients with experiential information, health care professionals may be encouraged to routinely inform patients about this website at regular appointments.
Collapse
|
10
|
Alonso RN, Chertcoff A, Eizaguirre MB, Bauer J, Leguizamón F, Curbello MC, Cassará FP, Garcea O, Carrá A, Silva BA. Decision Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: an Argentine pilot study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 61:103751. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
11
|
Sippel A, Riemann-Lorenz K, Scheiderbauer J, Kleiter I, Morrison R, Kofahl C, Heesen C. Patients experiences with multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies in daily life - a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1141. [PMID: 34686166 PMCID: PMC8539738 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07012-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Besides coping with a disease with many uncertainties, people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis face complex decisions concerning disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In an interview study, we aimed to assess patients’ experiences with DMTs. Methods Problem-centred interviews were conducted with 50 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Germany using maximum variation sampling and covering all licensed DMTs. Data were analysed thematically using deductive and inductive categories. Results 47 of 50 patients had treatment with at least one of the approved DMTs. The main themes were: (1) starting a DMT, (2) switching to another DMT, (3) discontinuing a DMT, and (4) multiple sclerosis without starting a DMT. Different intercorrelated factors influenced the decision-making processes for or against a DMT. Individual experiences with DMTs in daily life contained the effort in administration, success, and failure of DMTs, coping strategies and well-being without DMTs. The decision-making process for or against a DMT and the use of those treatments can be understood as a constant, continually shifting process, complicated by different factors, which change over time. Experiences with DMTs were characterized by attempts to handle uncertainty and to (re)gain control and integrate adaptivity into one’s life. Conclusions The study provides a rich and nuanced amount of patients’ experiences with DMTs. The findings demonstrate the importance for practitioners to look at current life circumstances of patients with multiple sclerosis when recommending a DMT and to promote and enable patients to make informed decisions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07012-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sippel
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Karin Riemann-Lorenz
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Kleiter
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke gGmbH, Berg, Germany
| | | | - Christopher Kofahl
- Patient representative, Trier, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sato K, Kondo N, Murata C, Shobugawa Y, Saito K, Kondo K. Association of pneumococcal and influenza vaccination with patient-physician communication in older adults: A nationwide cross-sectional study from the JAGES 2016. J Epidemiol 2021; 32:401-407. [PMID: 33551389 PMCID: PMC9359899 DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20200505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increasing the coverage of vaccinations recommended by the World Health Organization in the older adult population is an urgent issue, especially in the context of avoiding co-epidemics during the current coronavirus disease 2019 crisis. The aim of this study was to examine factors associated with the quality of perceived patient–physician communication and whether this variable was associated with increased odds of vaccination. Methods We used cross-sectional data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study conducted from October 2016 to January 2017. The participants were 22,253 physically and cognitively independent individuals aged 65 or older living in 39 municipalities in Japan. Multilevel logit models were used to estimate the odds of vaccination. Results Among the participants, 40.0% and 58.8% had received pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations as per the recommended schedule, respectively. People with low educational levels were more likely to have a family physician but rate their experience in asking questions lower than those with higher educational levels. Having a family physician and high rating for physicians’ listening attitude were positively associated with increased odds of pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations. High rating for patients’ questioning attitude and shared decision-making, compared to an ambiguous attitude toward medical decision-making, were positively associated with increased odds of pneumococcal vaccination. Conclusion The results suggest that promotion of having a family physician, better patient–physician communication, and shared decision-making may encourage older adults to undergo recommended vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koryu Sato
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University.,Department of Health Education and Health Sociology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo
| | - Naoki Kondo
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University.,Department of Health Education and Health Sociology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo
| | - Chiyoe Murata
- Department of Nutrition, School of Health and Nutrition, Tokai Gakuen University
| | - Yugo Shobugawa
- Department of Active Aging, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University
| | - Kousuke Saito
- Department of Active Aging, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University
| | - Katsunori Kondo
- Department of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University.,Department of Gerontological Evaluation, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rahn AC, Solari A, Beckerman H, Nicholas R, Wilkie D, Heesen C, Giordano A. "I Will Respect the Autonomy of My Patient": A Scoping Review of Shared Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care 2021; 22:285-293. [PMID: 33424485 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2020-027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Patient autonomy is a bioethical principle that was strengthened in the revised Declaration of Geneva. Shared decision making (SDM) is particularly relevant in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) because many preference-sensitive decisions have to be made during the disease course. We aimed to summarize the available evidence on SDM in the MS field and to inform future research and practice. Methods We performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE (past 5 years). Studies were included if they reported primary/secondary research and focused on SDM related to people with MS. Data were grouped into topics, with results presented in narrative form. Results From 865 references, we included 55 studies conducted mostly in Europe. Half of the studies were observational, followed by qualitative (20%), mixed-methods (17%), randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 5%), quasi-experimental (5%), and reviews (4%). Most studies addressed people with relapsing-remitting MS (85%); the remaining addressed health care professionals, patients' significant others, or a combination. We identified five main topics: decisions on disease-modifying drugs, decisions on chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency treatment, information provision and patient education, health literacy, and risk knowledge. Conclusions The high proportion of included studies on SDM in MS in Europe suggests an earlier adoption of these concepts in this area. Decisions on disease-modifying drugs was the prevalent topic. Only 5% of studies were RCTs, indicating that more research is needed to study the effectiveness of SDM interventions. Studies addressing people with primary and secondary progressive MS are also needed.
Collapse
|
14
|
AlJumah M, Alkhawajah MM, Qureshi S, Al-Thubaiti I, Ayoub O, Bohlega SA, Bushnag A, Cupler E, Daif A, El Boghdady A, Hassan A, Al Malik Y, Saeedi J, Al-Shamrany F, Shosha E, Rieckmann P. Cladribine Tablets and Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Pragmatic, Narrative Review of What Physicians Need to Know. Neurol Ther 2020; 9:11-23. [PMID: 32056129 PMCID: PMC7229040 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-020-00177-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is an emerging management concept for multiple sclerosis, whereby a short course of treatment provides long-lasting suppression of disease activity. "Cladribine tablets 10 mg" refers to a total cumulative dose of cladribine given over 2 years (henceforth referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg); it is a relatively new treatment option that is hypothesised to act as an IRT acting preferentially on the adaptive immune system. A randomised, 2-year, placebo-controlled trial (CLARITY) showed that treatment with cladribine tablets reduced indices of disease activity (relapses, lesions on magnetic resonance images, disability progression) and that this effect outlasted the pharmacologic effect of the treatment on the immune system (mainly a reduction in circulating B and T cells, with little effect on components of the innate immune system such as monocytes). CLARITY Extension, a 2-year extension to this trial, demonstrated durable efficacy, also in patients who received the standard 2-year course of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and were re-randomised to placebo for a further 2 years. Relative risk reductions for relapse rate with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg were similar for patients with or without prior high disease activity. Reductions in disability progression with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg were higher in patients with prior high relapse rates with or without prior treatment non-response. In this review, we describe the therapeutic profile of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and provide practical information on initiating this treatment option in the most appropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed AlJumah
- King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | | | - Shireen Qureshi
- Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Omar Ayoub
- King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed A Bohlega
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Areej Bushnag
- International Medical Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Edward Cupler
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulkader Daif
- King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ahmed Hassan
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yaser Al Malik
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSBU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Jameelah Saeedi
- King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, KAAUH, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Eslam Shosha
- King Khaled Hospital, Al-Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Peter Rieckmann
- Bamberg Hospital and University of Erlangen, Bamberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Colombo C, Confalonieri P, Rovaris M, La Mantia L, Galeazzi P, Silena Trevisan, Pariani A, Gerevini S, De Stefano N, Guglielmino R, Caserta C, Mosconi P, Filippini G. The IN-DEEP project "INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, Preferences": a web information model on magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2020; 267:2421-2431. [PMID: 32361839 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09864-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The IN-DEEP project aims to provide people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with evidence-based information on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and monitoring the disease through a website, and to collect their opinions on the clarity of the website's contents and its usefulness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multidisciplinary advisory board committee was set up. We investigated the experience, attitude and information needs on MRI through three meetings with 24 PwMS, facilitated by an expert researcher and an observer. We developed the website on the basis of input from PwMS and systematic reviews and guidelines, assessed with AMSTAR and AGREE II. We sought feedback from nine PwMS who pilot-tested the beta-version of the website, during a meeting and through phone interviews and judged whether the contents were clear, understandable and useful, and the website was easily navigable. The website is in Italian. RESULTS The website ( https://www.istituto-besta.it/in-deep-risonanza-magnetica2 ) provides two levels of information, different layouts and visualization of data covering MRI diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, contents on how MRI can monitor PwMS over time to determine changes in the condition and evaluate treatment effects, practical information on how to prepare for the exam, educational tools and a glossary. The website was judged clear and useful by a sample of PwMS. CONCLUSIONS The website is a tool to address PwMS information needs on the role of MRI. It could be used by neurologists to facilitate communication with PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- Laboratory of Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public Health, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Confalonieri
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Unit of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rovaris
- IRCCS Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy
| | - Loredana La Mantia
- IRCCS Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Simonetta Gerevini
- Unit of Neuroradiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Roberta Guglielmino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cinzia Caserta
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Policlinico G. Rodolico, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Laboratory of Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public Health, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Direction, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Knox KB, Saini A, Levin MC. The Dilemma of When to Stop Disease-Modifying Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review and Canadian Regional Reimbursement Policies. Int J MS Care 2020; 22:75-84. [PMID: 32410902 PMCID: PMC7204360 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) has changed the landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS) care. However, there is lack of consensus on the duration of treatment and the selection of individuals most likely to benefit from continued treatment. Current evidence, practice guidelines, health policy, and ethical considerations presented together may further inform challenging clinical decision making and future directions. The objectives of this study were to conduct a narrative review of original research and practice guideline recommendations on discontinuation of DMTs in MS; to collect information regarding Canadian regional reimbursement policies for DMT coverage in MS; and to present ethical considerations applicable to such decision making. METHODS A literature review was conducted of the MEDLINE/PubMed, OneFile (GALE), Scopus (Elsevier), and ProQuest Biological Science Collection databases. Data regarding Canadian regional reimbursement policies for DMT coverage in MS were collected from the ministry/government websites. Ethical considerations were reviewed in the context of the identified evidence, guidelines, and policies. RESULTS The literature lacks evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials that directly addresses the issue of discontinuation of DMTs in MS. Current practice guidelines advocate the vital role of patient choice in decision making. There are regional variations in Expanded Disability Status Scale criteria scores for continuing MS DMT coverage among Canadian provinces/territories. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of strong evidence on discontinuation of DMTs, shared decision making and consideration of the ethical complexities could help in the decision-making process.
Collapse
|
17
|
Pust GEA, Untiedt B, Randerath J, Barabasch A, Köpke S, Rahn AC, Hansen H, Heesen C. Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study. Int J MS Care 2020; 22:219-225. [PMID: 33177958 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Treatment adherence is fundamental in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. Adherence rates vary significantly between studies, ranging from 30% to almost 90%, depending on assessment method and medication type. This study aimed to identify patient-related categories associated with treatment modification or discontinuation in people with MS receiving either first- or second-line treatment. Methods Semistructured interviews were performed with 23 people with MS: 11 receiving first-line treatment and 12 receiving second-line treatment. Medication history, experiences with previous medications, decision-making processes regarding immunotherapy, adherence behavior, and reasons for adherence/nonadherence were explored using open-ended questions. Qualitative content analysis was performed using a combined deductive-inductive approach in building a coding frame. Differences in coding frequencies were compared between the two groups and analyzed quantitatively. Cohen's kappas of 0.76 for people with MS receiving first-line treatment and 0.64 for the second-line sample were achieved between the two coders. Results One key reason for nonadherence reported by first-line-treated people with MS was burdensome side effects, and for adherence was belief in medication effectiveness. In people with MS receiving second-line treatment, lack of perceived medication effectiveness was a key category related to changes in or discontinuation of immunotherapy. Reasons for adherence were positive illness beliefs/perceptions and belief in highly active disease. Intentional nonadherence was a major issue for first-line treatment and less relevant for second-line treatment. Conclusions These results indicate specific differences in factors mitigating adherence in people with MS receiving first- and second-line treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hoffmann JA, Bareuther L, Schmidt R, Dettmers C. The relation between memory and decision-making in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 37:101433. [PMID: 32173000 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impairments in long-term and working memory are widespread in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), setting on in early disease stages. These memory impairments may limit patients' ability to take informed and competent medical decisions, too. In healthy populations, memory abilities predict decision quality across a wide range of tasks. These studies suggest that higher working memory capacity supports decisions in cognitively taxing tasks, whereas better semantic memory facilitates decisions in tasks requiring knowledge retrieval. In individuals with MS, previous studies have linked less accurate decisions to memory deficits and reduced executive functioning, too. However, these studies focussed on decisions under risk and did not broadly assess decision making skills. We aimed to fill this gap in a cross-sectional study. METHODS Hundred thirty-seven participants with MS were recruited during their stay in an MS specialized rehabilitation centre. In a first test session, participants completed a standardized test battery for working memory and semantic memory, the inventory for memory diagnostics. In a second test session, participants filled out the Adult Decision Making Competence battery (A-DMC). This version of the A-DMC measured decision making competence on five subscales: Resistance to Framing Effects, Under/Overconfidence, Applying Decision Rules, Consistency in Risk Perception, and Resistance to Sunk Cost Effects. In addition, participants were screened for depression and cognitive fatigue. RESULTS Working memory was impaired in most participants, whereas semantic memory was not impaired. To understand which memory abilities underlie distinct components of decision making in people with MS, we used structural equation modelling. Replicating previous findings in a healthy sample, working memory capacity was associated with the ability to recall semantic knowledge. Participants with lower working memory capacity were less resistant to framing effects and adhered to decision rules less. In contrast, participants with worse semantic memory assessed their own knowledge less accurately, perceived risks less consistently, and made more errors in applying decision rules. Cognitive fatigue and depression unlikely explain these relationships. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, our study suggests that the memory problems, frequently reported in MS patients, may reach out to higher-order cognitive functions, such as decision making skills. Supporting shared decision-making and patient autonomy within MS thus requires to take memory impairments into account and to match the information provided to the patient's memory abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janina A Hoffmann
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.
| | - Lena Bareuther
- Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Zentralinstitut fuer Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ontaneda D, Tallantyre E, Kalincik T, Planchon SM, Evangelou N. Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:973-980. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
20
|
Hansen MR, Okuda DT. Precision medicine for multiple sclerosis promotes preventative medicine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019; 1420:62-71. [PMID: 29878402 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, lifelong disease, currently without a cure that is responsible for significant neurological injury in young adults. Precision medicine for MS aims to provide a more exacting and refined approach toward management by providing recommendations based on disease subtype, clinical status, existing radiological data, para-clinical data, and other biological markers. To achieve better outcomes, the three stages of care-diagnosis, treatment, and management-should be optimized. However, as the temporal profile of disease behavior is highly variable in MS, and unlike outcomes from other chronic conditions (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, etc.), should precision medicine for MS be one that focuses more on disease prevention and lifestyle modifications beyond recommendations for the use of disease-modifying therapies? As scientific advancements continue within the field of neuroimmunology, and until reliable biomarkers that predict disease outcomes are available, success may be better achieved by focusing on modifiable factors to reduce future disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison R Hansen
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, Neuroinnovation Program, Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Imaging Program, Clinical Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Dallas, Texas
| | - Darin T Okuda
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, Neuroinnovation Program, Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Imaging Program, Clinical Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bansback N, Chiu JA, Carruthers R, Metcalfe R, Lapointe E, Schabas A, Lenzen M, Lynd LD, Traboulsee A. Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:173. [PMID: 31325961 PMCID: PMC6642472 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often struggle with treatment decisions, in part due to the increasing number of approved disease modifying therapies, each with different characteristics, and also since physicians can struggle to identify which of these characteristics matter most to each individual patient. Decision uncertainty can contribute to late treatment initiation and treatment non-adherence-causes of 'undertreatment' in MS. An interactive online patient decision aid that informs patients of their options, considers their individual preferences and goals, and facilitates conversations with their physicians, could improve how patients with relapsing forms of MS make evidence-based treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE To develop and evaluate a prototype patient decision aid (PtDA) for first-line disease modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS Informed by previous studies and International Patient Decision Aid Standards guidelines, a prototype PtDA was developed for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis considering first line treatment. Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis were recruited from the University of British Columbia's Multiple Sclerosis Clinic to participate in either an online survey or a focus group. Online survey participants completed the PtDA, followed by measures of acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making, and provided general feedback. Focus group participants assessed usability of the revised PtDA. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data led to improvements of the PtDA prototype. RESULTS The prototype PtDA received high ratings for acceptability and usability, and after its use, participants reported high-levels of preparedness for decision-making. Analysis of all qualitative data identified three key themes: the need for credible information; the usefulness of the PtDA; and the importance of normalizing and sharing experiences. Nine content areas were identified for revision. Overall, participants found the PtDA to be a valuable tool for facilitating treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS This mixed methods study has led to the development of a PtDA that can support patients with RRMS as they make treatment decisions. Future studies will assess the feasibility of implementation and the impact of the PtDA on both the timely treatment initiation and longer-term adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Judy A. Chiu
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Robert Carruthers
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Rebecca Metcalfe
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6 Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Lapointe
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Alice Schabas
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | | | - Larry D. Lynd
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Anthony Traboulsee
- Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rae-Grant AD. Incorporating Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Measures Into High-Quality Cost-Effective Care for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019; 25:845-849. [DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000000726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
23
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND It seems common for patients to conceive of care in physical terms, such as medications, injections, and procedures rather than advice and support. Clinicians often encounter patients who seem to prefer more testing or invasive treatments than expertise supports. We wanted to determine whether patients unconsciously associate suggestions for invasive treatments with better care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Do patients have (A) an implicit preference and (B) an expressed preference for a physical intervention (such as a pill, an injection, or surgery) over supportive care (such as reassurance and education)? (2) What factors are independently associated with both an implicit and an expressed preference for a physical intervention over supportive care? (3) Is there a relationship between a patient's implicit preference toward or away from a physical intervention and his/her expressed preference on that subject? METHODS In this study, we approached 129 new patients in a large urban area visiting one of 13 participating surgeons divided among six upper and lower extremity specialist offices. After excluding four patients based on our exclusion criteria, 125 patients (97%) completed a survey of demographics and their expressed preference about receiving either physical treatment or support. Treatment was defined as any surgery, procedure, injection, or medication; support was defined as reassurance, conversation, and education, but no physical treatment. Patients then completed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit preferences toward treatment or support. Although other IATs have been validated in numerous studies, the IAT used in this study was specifically made for this study. Scores (D scores) range from -2 to 2, where 0 indicates no implicit preference, positive scores indicate a preference toward receiving a physical treatment is good care, and negative scores indicate a preference toward receiving supportive care is good care. According to the original IAT, break points for a slight (± 0.15 to 0.35), moderate (± 0.35 to 0.65), and strong preference (± 0.65 to 2) were selected conservatively according to psychological conventions for effect size. Patients' mean age was 50 ± 15 years (range, 18-79 years) and 56 (45%) were men. The patients had a broad spectrum of upper and lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions, ranging from trigger finger to patellofemoral syndrome. RESULTS We found a slight implicit association of good care with support (D = -0.17 ± 0.62; range, -2 to 1.2) and an expressed preference for physical treatment (mean score = 0.63 ± 2.0; range, -3 to 3). Patients who received both physical and supportive treatment had greater implicit preference for good care, meaning supportive care, than patients receiving physical care alone (β = -0.42; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.11; p = 0.008; semipartial R = 0.04; adjusted R full model = 0.13). Gender was independently associated with a greater expressed preference for physical treatment, with men expressing this preference more than women (β = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.31-1.7; p = 0.005; semipartial R = 0.06; adjusted R full model = 0.08); receiving supportive treatment was independently associated with more expressed preference for support (β = -0.98; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.23; p = 0.011; semipartial R = 0.05). An expressed preference for treatment was not associated with implicit preference (β = 0.01; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.06; p = 0.721). CONCLUSIONS Although surgeons may sometimes feel pressured toward physical treatments, based on our results and cutoff values, the average patient with upper or lower extremity symptoms has a slight implicit preference for supportive treatment and would likely be receptive. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ben-Zacharia A, Adamson M, Boyd A, Hardeman P, Smrtka J, Walker B, Walker T. Impact of Shared Decision Making on Disease-Modifying Drug Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care 2018; 20:287-297. [PMID: 30568566 PMCID: PMC6295876 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2017-070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) and adherence to treatment are an integral part of multiple sclerosis (MS) care. A collaborative process, SDM actively involves the patient, the health care provider, and an extended network in making treatment decisions. Adherence to disease-modifying drug therapies in patients with MS presents an ongoing challenge for patients and health care providers due to the chronic nature of this disease. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of SDM on adherence based on existing literature and to identify new approaches to optimizing adherence. METHODS A search was conducted using medical subject heading terms, including decision-making, adherence, shared decision-making, compliance, and patient-centered care. RESULTS Shared decision making between patients and clinicians promotes adherence to the treatment plan in MS. A proactive SDM approach is based on patient preferences, education, and engagement. Providing credible and accurate sources of information is essential for improving patient engagement. Home monitoring, computerized models, and active patient engagement are a few new approaches to improve adherence in patients with MS. CONCLUSIONS Shared decision-making interventions can have a positive effect on patient adherence to disease-modifying drug therapy in MS care. A range of new strategies is emerging that may help promote optimal disease management.
Collapse
|
25
|
Köpke S, Solari A, Rahn A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD008757. [PMID: 30317542 PMCID: PMC6517040 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with a number of important uncertainties concerning many aspects of the disease. These include diagnosis, prognosis, disease course, disease-modifying therapies, symptomatic therapies, and non-pharmacological interventions, among others. While people with MS demand adequate information to be able to actively participate in medical decision making and to self manage their disease, it has been shown that patients' disease-related knowledge is poor, therefore guidelines recommend clear and concise high-quality information at all stages of the disease. Several studies have outlined communication and information deficits in the care of people with MS. However, only a few information and decision support programmes have been published. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this updated review was to evaluate the effectiveness of information provision interventions for people with MS that aim to promote informed choice and improve patient-relevant outcomes, Further objectives were to evaluate the components and the developmental processes of the complex interventions used, to highlight the quantity and the certainty of the research evidence available, and to set an agenda for future research. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register, which contains trials from CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2017, Issue 11), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro, and clinical trials registries (29 November 2017) as well as other sources. We also searched reference lists of identified articles and contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomised controlled trials, and quasi-randomised trials comparing information provision for people with MS or suspected MS (intervention groups) with usual care or other types of information provision (control groups) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed the risk of selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, and detection bias. We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information. MAIN RESULTS We identified one new RCT (73 participants), which when added to the 10 previously included RCTs resulted in a total of 11 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria and were analysed (1387 participants overall; mean age, range: 31 to 51; percentage women, range: 63% to 100%; percentage relapsing-remitting MS course, range: 45% to 100%). The interventions addressed a variety of topics using different approaches for information provision in different settings. Topics included disease-modifying therapy, relapse management, self care strategies, fatigue management, family planning, and general health promotion. The active intervention components included decision aids, decision coaching, educational programmes, self care programmes, and personal interviews with physicians. All studies used one or more components, but the number and extent differed markedly between studies. The studies had a variable risk of bias. We did not perform meta-analyses due to marked clinical heterogeneity. All five studies assessing MS-related knowledge (505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) detected significant differences between groups as a result of the interventions, indicating that information provision may successfully increase participants' knowledge. There were mixed results on decision making (five studies, 793 participants; low-certainty evidence) and quality of life (six studies, 671 participants; low-certainty evidence). No adverse events were detected in the seven studies reporting this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Information provision for people with MS seems to increase disease-related knowledge, with less clear results on decision making and quality of life. The included studies in this review reported no negative side effects of providing disease-related information to people with MS. Interpretation of study results remains challenging due to the marked heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Köpke
- University of LübeckNursing Research Group, Institute of Social Medicine and EpidemiologyRatzeburger Allee 160LübeckGermanyD‐23538
| | - Alessandra Solari
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | - Anne Rahn
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Fary Khan
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicinePoplar RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Christoph Heesen
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Andrea Giordano
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen YY, Cheng YF, Wu CC, Chu TS. The usage of social media encouraged patients' active participation in medical decision-making: cross-sectional survey (Preprint). J Particip Med 2018. [DOI: 10.2196/11828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|