Multitarget therapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial

Inhibition of receptor interacting protein kinase-1 (RIPK1) in the treatment of murine lupus

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a type of autoimmune disease that involves multiple organs involved as well as cytokine dysregulation. The treatment of SLE is still challenging due to the side effects of the different drugs used. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is a kinase involved in T cell homeostasis and autoinflammation. Although clinical trials have shown that RIPK1 inhibition exhibits significant efficacy in different autoimmune diseases, its role in SLE remains unclear.

METHODS

MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice received RIPK1 inhibitor ZJU37 or vehicle intraperitoneally for 10 weeks. A BM12-induced chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) lupus-like model was introduced in RIPK1 D138N mice or C57BL/6 mice. Nephritis, serum autoantibody levels, dysregulation of adaptive immune response and cytokines were compared in treated and untreated mice.

RESULTS

ZJU37 alleviated the clinical features of the MRL/lpr mice including nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibody production. In addition, ZJU37 treatment reduced the proportion of double-negative T cells in the spleen and the cytokines of TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-1β in the serum. Moreover, RIPK1 D138N mice were able to prevent the cGVHD lupus-like model from SLE attack, manifesting as anti-dsDNA antibody production, the proliferation of germinal centre B cells, plasma cells, and T follicular helper cells as well as IgG and C3 deposits in kidneys.

CONCLUSION

RIPK1 inhibition has a protective effect in the mouse model of SLE and can potentially become a new therapeutic target for SLE in humans.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Clinical features of flare in Japanese patients with new-onset SLE and risk factors for SLE flare in daily clinical practice: a single-center cohort study

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical features, outcomes and risk factors of flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data were collected from patients with newly diagnosed SLE at the Fukushima Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2022. Patients who experienced a flare during the study period constituted the flare group, and their clinical features were compared with those of the no-flare group. The cumulative flare-free survival regarding several clinical items was compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier's curves. Among 387 patients with SLE, 83 patients with newly diagnosed SLE were included. Their mean age was 37.9 years, and 29 patients experienced flares during the study period. The general characteristics were similar between the two groups, with the exception of the observation period and anti-SS-A antibody positivity. Regarding therapy, a significantly increased frequency of hydroxychloroquine intake and combination with immunosuppressive agents were observed in the no-flare group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher cumulative flare-free survival in the anti-SS-A negative group and combination immunosuppressive therapy group. In conclusion, anti-SS-A positivity may be a risk factor for SLE flare. In turn, combination immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial for SLE treatment in daily clinical practice.

New and emerging therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis treatment is still based on non-specific immune suppression despite the first biological therapy for the disease having been approved more than a decade ago. Intense basic and translational research has uncovered a multitude of pathways that are actively being evaluated as treatment targets in SLE and lupus nephritis, with two new medications receiving FDA approval in the last 3 years. Herein we provide an overview of targeted therapies for SLE including medications targeting the B lymphocyte compartment, intracellular signaling, co-stimulation, and finally the interferons and other cytokines.

Impact of Glucocorticoid Dose on Complete Response, Serious Infections, and Mortality During the Initial Therapy of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Control Arms of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of glucocorticoid regimens on renal response, infections, and mortality among patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the control arms of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We included RCTs of biopsy-proven LN that used a protocolized regimen of glucocorticoids in combination with mycophenolic acid analogs or cyclophosphamide and reported the outcomes of complete response (CR), serious infections, and death. The starting dosage of glucocorticoids, tapering method, and administration of glucocorticoid pulses were abstracted. Meta-analysis of proportions, meta-regression, and subgroup meta-analysis were performed at 6 and 12 months for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty RCT arms (3,231 patients with LN) were included. The predicted rates of CR, serious infections, and death when starting on oral prednisone at 25 mg/day without pulses were 19.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3-31.5), 3.2% (95% CI 2.4-4.0), and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.4), respectively. Starting on prednisone at 60 mg/day (without pulses) increased the rates to 34.6% (95% CI 16.9-52.3), 12.1% (95% CI 9.3-14.9), and 2.7% (95% CI 0.0-5.3), respectively. Adding glucocorticoid pulses increased the rates of CR and death but not serious infections. We observed a dose-response gradient between the initial glucocorticoid dosage and all the outcomes at six months after accounting for the administration of glucocorticoid pulses, underlying immunosuppressant, and baseline proteinuria.

CONCLUSION

A higher exposure to glucocorticoids during the initial therapy of LN was associated with better renal outcomes at the cost of increased infections and death.

New guidelines and therapeutic updates for the management of lupus nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a devastating condition, striking young patients often in their prime reproductive years. Lupus nephritis is a common and serious complication occurring in roughly 50% of SLE cases, indicating a high likelihood of disease progression, morbidity, and mortality. As the early trials of steroid therapy, and later cyclophosphamide (CYC), therapeutic changes had been stagnant. Then came the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the 2000s. After the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, there had been a dearth of trials showing positive therapy results. Since 2020, new studies have emerged for lupus nephritis involving the use of anti-BLYS agents, novel calcineurin inhibitors, CD20 blockade, and antiinterferon agents. Nephrology and rheumatology society guidelines in the United States and across the world are still catching up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although therapeutic guidelines are being developed, updates that have come through have focused on improved diagnostic and monitoring guidelines. One theme is the recommendation of increasingly tight proteinuria control and firmer guidelines for the rapid induction of remission. The reality of multitarget therapy and the expectation of rapid induction for a more complete remission are being widely recognized.

SUMMARY

The need for more complete and more rapid induction and control of lupus nephritis is undisputed according to the evidence and guidelines, and the medications to achieve this are growing at a rate not seen over the prior two decades. What remains is a stepwise approach to recognize how to best optimize therapy. Based on available evidence, an algorithm for induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis used by the University of California Irvine Lupus Nephritis clinic, is recommended.

A Comprehensive and Practical Approach to the Management of Lupus Nephritis in the Current Era

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE. It is estimated that up to 60% of individuals with SLE will develop LN, which can manifest at any stage of a patient's life; however, it commonly emerges early in the course of SLE and tends to exhibit a more aggressive phenotype in men compared to women. Black and Hispanic patients are more likely to progress to kidney failure than white patients. LN is characterized by kidney inflammation and chronic parenchymal damage, leading to impaired kidney function and potential progression to kidney failure. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LN, highlighting the importance of early recognition and treatment of LN to prevent progressive, irreversible kidney damage and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the article discusses current and emerging therapies for LN, including traditional immunosuppressive agents, biological agents, and novel therapies targeting specific pathways involved in LN pathogenesis, to provide a practical guide for clinicians in properly diagnosing LN and determining a patient-centered treatment plan.

Age-associated CD4+ T cells with B cell-promoting functions are regulated by ZEB2 in autoimmunity

Aging is a significant risk factor for autoimmunity, and many autoimmune diseases tend to onset during adulthood. We conducted an extensive analysis of CD4+ T cell subsets from 354 patients with autoimmune disease and healthy controls via flow cytometry and bulk RNA sequencing. As a result, we identified a distinct CXCR3midCD4+ effector memory T cell subset that expands with age, which we designated "age-associated T helper (THA) cells." THA cells exhibited both a cytotoxic phenotype and B cell helper functions, and these features were regulated by the transcription factor ZEB2. Consistent with the highly skewed T cell receptor usage of THA cells, gene expression in THA cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus reflected disease activity and was affected by treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor. Moreover, analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data revealed that THA cells infiltrate damaged organs in patients with autoimmune diseases. Together, our characterization of THA cells may facilitate improved understanding of the relationship between aging and autoimmune diseases.

Managing Lupus Nephritis in Children and Adolescents

Lupus nephritis is an important manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, which leads to chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, and can result in mortality. About 35%-60% of children with systemic lupus erythematosus develop kidney involvement. Over the past few decades, the outcome of patients with lupus nephritis has improved significantly with advances in immunosuppressive therapies and clinical management. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of high-level evidence to guide the management of childhood-onset lupus nephritis, because of the relatively small number of patients at each centre and also because children and adolescents are often excluded from clinical trials. Children and adults differ in more ways than just size, and there are remarkable differences between childhood- and adult-onset lupus nephritis in terms of disease severity, treatment efficacy, tolerance to medications and most importantly, psychosocial perspective. In this article, we review the 'art and science' of managing childhood-onset lupus nephritis, which has evolved in recent years, and highlight special considerations in this specific patient population.

Research trends and frontiers in lupus nephritis: a bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2022

OBJECTIVES

Lupus nephritis is a prevalent renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. This study endeavors to undertake a meticulous bibliometric analysis of LN publications to comprehend the research hotspots and future directions.

METHODS

The literature on LN was acquired from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Co-occurrence and cooperative relationship analysis of authors, institutions, countries, journals, references and keywords in the publication was performed through CiteSpace, VOSviewer and a bibliometric online analysis platform. The knowledge graphs were created, and clustering and emergence analyses were performed.

RESULTS

According to the search strategy, a total of 2077 publications related to lupus nephritis (LN) have been identified, with China being the largest contributor globally. The Ohio State University emerged as the most prolific institution. Lupus is the most cited and published journal. Jan J Weening and Brad Rovin were the most prolific and cocited authors. The current research focus revolved around the "nirp3 inflammasome," "biomarker," and "voclosporin". "international society," "thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)," and "pathway" were identified to be future research hotpots by keyword burst analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This bibliometric analysis summarizes for the first time the progress of LN research (2012-2022), and qualitatively and quantitatively evaluates the bibliometric information of LN research. There has been a steady increase in the scientific literature on LN over the past 11 years, with an average growth rate of 7.27%. In this field, researchers are primarily based in China and the United States. The pathogenic mechanisms, management strategies and prognostic outcomes of LN are acknowledged as prospective research hotspots. Bibliometrically, the research status and trends of LN publications may greatly assist and be a significant reference for future research in the area.

Factors Associated with Worsening Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy in Lupus Nephritis Patients Undergoing Repeat Kidney Biopsy

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) on kidney biopsies strongly predicts progression to end-stage renal disease. However, factors associated with progression of IFTA are not known. The objective of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and histopathological factors at the time of index kidney biopsies that are associated with worsening IFTA on repeat biopsies.

Methods

Patients with LN Class I to V or mixed LN on index biopsies who underwent a clinically indicated repeat biopsy between 2004 and 2020 were identified. None-mild IFTA was defined as < 25% acreage of the interstitium affected by fibrosis and atrophy, and moderate-severe IFTA was defined as ≥ 25% of the interstitium affected. Patients with none-mild IFTA on index biopsies who progressed to moderate-severe IFTA on repeat biopsies were defined as progressors. Patients with none-mild IFTA on both biopsies were defined as non-progressors.

Results

Seventy-two patients who underwent clinically indicated repeat kidney biopsies were included, and 35 (49%) were identified as progressors. Compared to non-progressors, progressors had a higher proportion of proliferative LN (20 [57%] vs. 6 [17%], p = 0.002) and crescents (9 [26%] vs. 3 [8%], p = 0.045) on index biopsies. There was no difference regarding the time to repeat biopsy or the baseline characteristics, including eGFR, presence of hypertension and diabetes, urine protein to creatinine ratio, or the initial treatments.

Conclusions

Proliferative LN and the presence of crescents on index biopsies were associated with subsequent IFTA progression on repeat biopsies. This association indicates that glomerular damage is one of the major drivers of tubulointerstitial scarring in SLE. IFTA progression may, in turn, be the driving factor of poor treatment response and progression to chronic kidney disease.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Utility and Gaps

Despite advances in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), outcomes have remained suboptimal. Persistent disease activity, patient comorbidities and drug toxicities contribute to the accrual of progressive irreversible damage and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, similar drug doses and regimens are promulgated in the treatment guidelines for all SLE patients, despite the vast differences in patient and environmental factors that affect the drugs' metabolism and blood concentrations. This causes a disconnect between drug dosing and drug blood concentrations, which can then result in unpredictability in drug toxicities and therapeutic effects. In this review, we discuss commonly used oral immunosuppressive medications in SLE, their pharmacogenomics, and factors affecting their metabolism and blood concentrations. Further, we highlight the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in SLE, which is the first accessible step to individualising therapy.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

Multitarget therapy with a corticosteroid, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of multitarget combination therapy with a corticosteroid, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is unclear. In the present study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of multitarget therapy with a cyclical corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide regimen in patients with IMN.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned patients with IMN to receive multitarget therapy (a combination of prednisone, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil) or 6-month cyclical treatment with a corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide. The study patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of complete or partial remissions at 12 months. Adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 78 patients, 39 of whom received multitarget therapy and the other 39 cyclical alternating treatment with a corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide. At 12 months, 31 of 39 patients (79%) in the multitarget therapy group and 34 of 39 (87%) in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group had achieved complete or partial remissions (relative risk 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.21; P = .85; log-rank test). The prevalence of adverse events was significantly lower in the multitarget therapy group than in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group [46% (18 of 39) vs 74% (29 of 39); P < .05].

CONCLUSIONS

Multitarget therapy for IMN patients is noninferior to cyclical alternating treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide in inducing proteinuria remission and has a better safety profile than the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide combination.

The efficacy of immunosuppressive drugs induction therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents, specifically Voclosporin, when used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted on randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of immunosuppressant-induced therapy for LN. The random effects model was used in the analysis. I2 was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the model. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed to assess and compare the relative effectiveness and safety of various treatment protocols.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2444 patients with LN. The analysis results indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of partial remission (PR) between the drugs. However, when considering complete remission (CR), the combination of Voclosporin with MMF showed the highest remission rate, followed by Tacrolimus (TAC). Unfortunately, Voclosporin in combination with MMF had the highest risk of infection and serious infection, indicating a lower safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Voclosporin in combination with MMF demonstrated the highest efficacy as an induction therapy for LN. However, it should be noted that the risk of infection and serious infection was found to be high with this regimen. On the other hand, TAC not only showed efficacy but also had a lower risk of infection and serious infection, making it a favorable option in terms of safety. This study did' not include results on other adverse events.

Kidney involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: From the patient assessment to a tailored treatment

In the last few years, several studies have provided new evidence for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. Evidence showing dissociation between clinical and histological findings has prompted reevaluation of the role of the kidney biopsy as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. In therapeutics, four immunosuppressive schemes now have supporting evidence for use as initial therapy. Current challenges include individualized selection of the best immunosuppressive regimen, an unmet need for non-invasive biomarkers of disease activity to inform treatment responses and guide subsequent therapy, holistic patient management in this complex, multisystem disease, and ultimately the development of more targeted therapies directed at specific effector pathways driving glomerular inflammation and damage in order to improve treatment response. In this communication, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to lupus nephritis, as well as evaluation of response to therapy and disease control.

Efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy in children with lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

To analyze the efficacy and safety of multi-target therapy in children with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

In our retrospective study from January 2009 to December 2021, the multi-target therapy of glucocorticoids, MMF and tacrolimus was adopted as induction therapy or re-induction therapy for 36 LN children who had combined proliferative and membranous LN or for who were ineffective to combination therapy of glucocorticoids with IV-CYC or MMF for at least 6 months. The clinical and pathological data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The levels of 24-h urinary protein, anti-dsDNA antibody and SLE disease activity index were decreased, while the levels of albumin and complement 3 were increased after multi-target therapy. More than 90% of LN children achieved partial or complete remission within 6 months. In terms of adverse effects, there was no significant difference between the level of eGFR before and after multi-target therapy. During the follow-up period, four children had infection, two children had hyperuricemia, and one child had liver dysfunction. All of them improved after symptomatic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-target therapy could be an effective treatment option with minimal adverse effects for LN children who are refractory to initial first-line induction therapies or had combined proliferative and membranous LN.

IMPACT

The multi-target therapy of glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus was adopted in 36 children with lupus nephritis. Multi-target therapy could be an effective treatment option for lupus nephritis children who are refractory to initial first-line induction therapies or had combined proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis. Adverse effects of multi-target therapy were infrequent and minimal that can be improved by symptomatic therapy.

Efficacy and safety of novel biologics in the treatment of lupus nephritis based on registered clinical trials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of novel biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis based on a reticulated meta-analysis approach. Registered clinical trials in 4 major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials) and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched with a search time frame of build to June 2022. And we screened registered randomized controlled clinical trials of biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis according to the protocol's nadir criteria. Trials were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software to compare and rank differences in effectiveness and safety between the biologics. A total of 10 registered randomized controlled clinical trials involving 2148 subjects were included in this study. The interventions were ranked from best to worst in terms of the primary outcome indicator of effectiveness, renal complete remission: belimumab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > obinutuzumab > ocrelizumab 400 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > belimumab + rituximab > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > rituximab > anifrolumab 300 mg, belimumab was superior to placebo [OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.13, 2.70)] and anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.27, 95% CI (1.05, 10.14)], anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg was superior to anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.30, 9.76)], and all were statistically significant. The ranking of each intervention in terms of overall renal remission for secondary outcome indicators from best to worst was: obinutuzumab > belimumab + rituximab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > ocrelizumab 400 mg > belimumab > rituximab 1000 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > anifrolumab 300 mg, obinutuzumab was superior to placebo [OR = 2.27, 95% CI (1.11, 4.67)] and belimumab was also superior to placebo [OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.07, 2.27)], and all were statistically significant. In terms of safety, with a focus on serious adverse events and serious infections, the results were: Serious adverse events at 1 year of monitoring occurred better with ocrelizumab 1000 mg than ocrelizumab 400 mg [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.29, 0.89)] and were statistically different; serious adverse events at 2 years of monitoring infection adverse events occurred better with obinutuzumab than with abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg [OR = 0.24, 95% CI (0.07, 0.81)] and were statistically different. The safety of the new biologics in combination with conventional standard therapies is generally good, but it is belimumab and obinutuzumab that are most effective in achieving complete and overall remission in the kidney. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, with a registration number of CRD42021262498.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as induction therapy and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and MMF as induction therapy for LN. We systematically reviewed RCTs and prospective cohort studies with a tacrolimus dose of 3 mg daily and performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as an induction treatment for LN in comparison to MMF.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were satisfied by eight studies (five RCTs and three prospective cohort studies) with a total of 408 individuals (289 for tacrolimus vs. MMF and 119 for low-dose tacrolimus). Tacrolimus and MMF had similar complete remission rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.028; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.589-1.796; p = 0.922). The partial remission rate did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups (OR 1.400; 95% CI 0.741-2.646; p = 0.300). Tacrolimus and MMF showed no differences in proteinuria, serum albumin, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, renal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), or extra-renal SLEDAI. The incidence of infection, severe infection, leukopenia, and hyperglycemia did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups. However, herpes zoster infection was significantly less common in the tacrolimus group (OR 0.137; 95% CI 0.034-0.546; p = 0.005), whereas serum creatinine elevation was significantly higher in the tacrolimus group than in the MMF group (OR 8.148; 95% CI 1.369-48.50; p = 0.021). At 3 mg/d, tacrolimus was shown to be safe, well tolerated, and offered therapeutic benefits in all investigations.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus was comparable to MMF in terms of effectiveness and safety as an induction therapy for LN, with the exception of a reduced risk of herpes zoster infection and a rise in serum creatinine. In individuals with LN, 3 mg/d tacrolimus was proven to be efficacious and safe.

Lupus Nephritis in Children: Novel Perspectives

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus is an inflammatory and autoimmune condition characterized by heterogeneous multisystem involvement and a chronic course with unpredictable flares. Kidney involvement, commonly called lupus nephritis, mainly presents with immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis and is more frequent and severe in adults. Despite a considerable improvement in long-term renal prognosis, children and adolescents with lupus nephritis still experience significant morbidity and mortality. Moreover, current literature often lacks pediatric-specific data, leading clinicians to rely exclusively on adult therapeutic approaches. This review aims to describe pediatric lupus nephritis and provide an overview of the novel perspectives on the pathogenetic mechanisms, histopathological classification, therapeutic approach, novel biomarkers, and follow-up targets in children and adolescents with lupus nephritis.

Management of Lupus Nephritis: New Treatments and Updated Guidelines

Management of lupus nephritis has evolved considerably over the past years. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of clinical trials that form the basis for the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes and EULAR/ERA-EDTA updated guidelines and present day trials that will change the landscape of lupus nephritis therapy in years to come. In addition, we highlight the issues related to cost of therapy, resistant disease, and downstream adverse effects of specific therapies.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin or tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment for lupus nephritis

AIM

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy with MMF or cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + MMF, tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy for induction treatment in patients with lupus nephritis. To incorporate direct and indirect evidence from RCTs, we used a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four RCTs, including 936 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus + MMF substantially increased the incidence of complete remission relative to that following monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.87-4.39). Tacrolimus + MMF was also more effective than voclosporin + MMF (OR 1.43; 95% CrI 0.80-2.57). Tacrolimus + MMF showed the greatest chance of being the optimal treatment for overall response (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.942), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.558) and monotherapy (SUCRA = 0.001). In terms of safety based on severe event rates, monotherapy had the greatest chance of being the safest treatment (SUCRA = 0.903), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.517) and tacrolimus + MMF (SUCRA = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus + MMF and voclosporin + MMF were more effective than monotherapy, and tacrolimus + MMF was the most effective induction treatment for lupus nephritis patients. However, tacrolimus + MMF did pose a greater risk of serious adverse events than monotherapy.

Diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis: a summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN)

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent serious manifestation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Up to 60% of SLE patients develop LN, which has a significant impact on their quality of life and prognosis. Recent advances have improved the diagnostic approach to LN, and new drugs that block specific pathways and kidney damage progression have been developed. Several randomized and well-powered clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of these agents in terms of proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function in the medium and long term, with an acceptable safety profile and good tolerance. The combination of different therapies allows for reduction of the dose and duration of corticosteroids and other potentially toxic therapies and leads to an increase in the number of patients achieving complete remission of the disease. This consensus document carried out by the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) provides practical and updated recommendations, based on the best available evidence and clinical expertise of participating nephrologists.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remission Induction with Modified Multitarget Therapy with Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

Therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) is yet to be optimized. Standard of care for induction consists of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC) and steroids, which shows an improved outcome, but end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression, increased mortality, and therapy-related adverse effects remain a major concern. The other treatment reported to induce early remission was the multitarget therapy comprising tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroid, but infections were high in the multitarget therapy. Considering azathioprine as a potentially safer and effective alternative anti-B-cell therapy, modified multitarget therapy (MMTT) was planned replacing mycophenolate with azathioprine.

Material and Methods

A single-center, 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial comprising adults of age 18-65 years with biopsy-proven PLN was carried out. The intervention groups were 1) MMTT: tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg/day and azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day and 2) IV CYC group with a starting dose of 0.75 (adjusted to 0.5-1.0) g/m2 every 4 weeks for 6 months. Both groups received 3 days of pulse methylprednisolone followed by a tapering course of oral prednisone therapy.

Results

Among 100 randomized patients, 48 were in MMTT arm and 52 were in IV CYC arm. At the end of 24 weeks, overall remission (complete and partial) was comparable in both the arms: MMTT (86.36%) and IV CYC (87.75%). There was comparable proteinuria reduction and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score improvement with recovery of complement level C3 in both groups. Major adverse events were numerically more in the IV CYC group, including one death from pneumonia.

Conclusion

The MMTT arm is as effective as IV CYC in improving short-term outcome in PLN, with a comparable safety profile.

[Diagnostic and therapy of lupus nephritis - 2023]

The manuscript summarizes the consensus of the Austrian Society of Nephrology on the diagnosis and therapy of lupusnephritis, which is built on existing studies and literature. We discuss in detail the immunosuppressive treatment in proliferative forms of lupusnephritis (III and IV ± V) and in pure lupusnephritis V with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Furthermore, the supportive medication in lupusnephritis is summarized in the consensus. The figures were designed to provide the reader a guidance through the therapeutical approach in lupusnephritis for the daily practice.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases

The KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases represents the first update to this set of recommendations since the initial set of KDIGO guideline recommendations was published in 2012. The pace of growth in our molecular understanding of glomerular disease has quickened and a number of newer immunosuppressive and targeted therapies have been introduced since the original set of guideline recommendations, making such an update necessary. Despite these updates, many areas of controversy remain. In addition, further updates since the publication of KDIGO 2021 have occurred which this guideline does not encompass. With this commentary, the KDOQI work group has generated a chapter-by-chapter companion opinion article that provides commentary specific to the implementation of the KDIGO 2021 guideline in the United States.

A Comprehensive Literature Review on Managing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Females and Its Autoimmune Disease Associations

This review aimed to evaluate the mechanism of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, particularly in the female population, and emphasize the need for early management interventions; explore the association between SLE and two autoimmune diseases, myasthenia gravis (MG) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and their management strategies; and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in managing SLE, focusing on premenopausal females, females of childbearing age, and pregnant patients. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to achieve these objectives using various databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The collected data were analyzed and synthesized to provide an evidence-based overview of SLE, its management strategies as an independent disease, and some disease associations. The treatment should be focused on remission, preventing organ damage, and improving the overall quality of life (QOL). Extensive emphasis should also be focused on diagnosing SLE and concurrent underlying secondary diseases timely and managing them appropriately.

Current Treatment Approach, Emerging Therapies and New Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal involvement may be observed and affects the outcome. Hydroxychloroquine should be administered to every lupus patient irrespective of organ involvement. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy includes corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment, flares occur and broad immunosuppression is accompanied by multiple side effects. Flare occurrence, target organ involvement, side effects of broad immunosuppression and increased knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis as well as the availability of biologic agents has led to the application of biologic agents in SLE management. Biologic agents targeting various pathogenetic paths have been applied. B cell targeting agents have been used successfully. Belimumab, a B cell targeting agent, has been approved for the treatment of SLE. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting agent is also used in SLE. Anifrolumab, an interferon I receptor-targeting agent has beneficial effects on SLE. In conclusion, biologic treatment is applied in SLE and should be further evaluated with the aim of a good treatment response and a significant improvement in quality of life.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab therapy for patients with lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we performed a meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

We analyzed the data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of belimumab treatment on renal improvement and adverse effects. Our study included a total of six LN patients who received belimumab treatment and an additional six LN patients who received standard therapy. All participants were followed up for a duration exceeding 96 weeks to evaluate the outcomes of the treatments.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis incorporated data from three articles involving a total of 666 patients. The results of the analysis revealed that a higher proportion of patients who received belimumab treatment experienced renal improvement compared to those in the control group. The patients in belimumab group had a higher renal complete response rate and proteinuria improvement rate compared to the control group. However, belimumab treatment did not increase the renal partial response rate compared to the control group. The belimumab group also exhibited a higher proportion of patients who achieved normalization of antidouble-stranded DNA, as well as normalization of low C3 and C4 levels. In our case-control study, significant improvement in proteinuria was demonstrated with belimumab at Week 48 (p = 0.037) and at all subsequent time points (all p < 0.05). Over the course of 96 weeks, belimumab treatment was associated with renal function stabilization and an increase in C3 and C4 levels. Moreover, the use of belimumab resulted in a reduction in glucocorticoid dosage at Week 24 (p = 0.02). Additionally, patients receiving belimumab treatment had a lower risk of severe treatment-emergent adverse events, and no other significant adverse effects were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LN, the utilization of belimumab therapy has demonstrated notable improvements in renal response rates. Additionally, it has shown a decreased likelihood of serious treatment-related adverse events and a diminished need for glucocorticoid dosage when compared to the active control group.

Steroids in Lupus: Enemies or Allies

Glucocorticoids are the gold standard treatment for reducing immune activation and inflammation in a wide range of inflammatory and systemic autoimmune diseases. Glucocorticoids have potent and fast actions that quickly relieve some symptoms and lower mortality in some life-threatening conditions, but they also have side effects that limit the duration of treatment and the dose used. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the involvement of numerous organs and systems and the production of autoantibodies. Most current treatments include the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications. Glucocorticoids in SLE have been classically used not only to induce remission or treat an acute situation but also as maintenance therapy. During the last decades, new approaches to managing SLE have emerged, but corticosteroids continue to be part of all therapeutic regimes. There is more and more evidence about the side effects related to the use (or abuse) of steroids and their relationship with the accrual damage. In this manuscript, we try to make a critical review of the published literature about the benefit and side effects/damage that can be attributed to the use of glucocorticoids.

Treatment of lupus nephritis: consensus, evidence and perspectives

Despite the continuing development of immunomodulatory agents and supportive care, the prognosis associated with lupus nephritis (LN) has not improved substantially in the past decade, with end-stage kidney disease still developing in 5-30% of patients within 10 years of LN diagnosis. Moreover, inter-ethnic variation in the tolerance of, clinical response to and level of evidence regarding various therapeutic regimens for LN has led to variation in treatment prioritization in different international recommendations. Modalities that better preserve kidney function and reduce the toxicities of concomitant glucocorticoids are unmet needs in the development of therapeutics for LN. In addition to the conventional recommended therapies for LN, there are newly approved treatments as well as investigational drugs in the pipeline, including the newer generation calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents. In view of the heterogeneity of LN in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis, the choice of therapies depends on a number of clinical considerations. Molecular profiling, gene-signature fingerprints and urine proteomic panels might enhance the accuracy of patient stratification for treatment personalization in the future.

Combination strategies for lupus nephritis: facts and controversies

INTRODUCTION

There is an unmet need to improve the efficacy of therapeutic regimens in lupus nephritis (LN). Cocktail immunosuppressive therapy for the synergistic effect of individual drugs may enhance efficacy and enable dosage reduction. However, the potential increase in the risk of serious and opportunistic infections is a concern. Moreover, the timing of combination therapy, adoption of a step-up or step-down approach, and the choice of drugs is still controversial, partly related to the cost-effectiveness issue.

AREAS COVERED

Evidence of a combination of conventional, newer immunosuppressive, and biologic/targeted agents in LN.

EXPERT OPINION

Early combination of conventional regimens with anti-B cell activation factor (anti-BAFF) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) enhances the therapeutic effect without increasing serious adverse events in LN. However, combining anti-CD20 and anti-BAFF biologics appears to be less promising from the results of clinical trials. Initial combination strategy may be more cost-effective for patients at risk of treatment failure and renal function deterioration. With the availability of more options, the treat-to-target approach in LN is increasingly feasible and further studies are needed to compare the step-up and step-down approaches in the treatment of LN.

Efficacy and safety of Iguratimod as an add-on therapy for refractory lupus nephritis: A preliminary investigational study

Objectives

IGU (IGU), a novel immunomodulatory agent for rheumatoid arthritis, has been shown to be effective and safe as monotherapy in a small population with refractory lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IGU as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory LN in the context of clinical practice.

Methods

This is a single-arm observational study. We have enrolled LN patients since 2019 at Renji Hospital. All participants should have recurrent or refractory LN with at least one immunosuppressant (IS) and have a baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) &gt;1.0. After enrollment, we added IGU (25 mg twice daily) to one of their previous immunosuppressants (IS) without increasing the dose of steroids. The primary outcome was the complete renal response (CRR) in the 6th month. UPCR decrease of over 50% was defined as partial response (PR). Extended follow-up was performed after the initial 6 months.

Results

We enrolled 26 eligible participants. 11/26 patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2/3 at the baseline. The IS combined with IGU included mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and cyclosporin A. No IS change was allowed. 80.7% of patients had baseline steroids less than 0.5mg/kg daily and there was no steroids escalation during the IGU treatment. The CRR rate was 42.3% (11/26) at month 6. With a median follow-up of 52 weeks (range: 23-116 weeks), the CRR rate at the last visit was 50% (13/26) and 73.1% (19/26) of patients had UPCR decrease of over 50%. Six patients withdrew, three for no response and three for renal flare after initial CRR. One patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate worsening of over 20% and was classified as renal flare. Three mild to moderate adverse events were recorded.

Conclusions

Our investigation merits further investigation in IGU as a potentially tolerable component of combination therapy for refractory LN.

Persistent inflammation-immunosuppression-catabolism syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with persistent inflammation-immunosuppression-catabolism syndrome (PICS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with SLE who were admitted to the renal intensive care unit (ICU) for over 14 days at Jinling Hospital from July 2010 to July 2018. According to the diagnostic criteria of PICS, we divided the SLE patients into a PICS group and a non-PICS group. We performed a multivariate Cox regression analysis on the risk factors for death in these two groups by comparing the clinical features and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 96 SLE patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, including 61 patients in the PICS group and 35 patients in the non-PICS group. The PICS group patients required a longer length of stay in ICU with higher inflammatory indicators (such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and interleukin-6) and lower immune levels (such as total, CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + and CD20 + lymphocytes) compared to the non-PICS group patients (P < 0.01). Hemoglobin, platelets, serum creatinine, serum blood urea nitrogen and SLE Disease Activity Index (SLE-DAI) score in the PICS group were lower than those in the non-PICS group (P < 0.05), suggesting severe hematological injury in the PICS group and relatively severe renal damage in the non-PICS group. The rates of PICS combined with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, fungi and double infections were higher than those in the non-PICS group (P < 0.05). The 3-year survival rate was 50.82% in the PICS group and 85.71% in the non-PICS group. The 3-year renal survival rate was 32.79% in the PICS group and 51.43% in the non-PICS group. Multivariate Cox regression found that the total lymphocyte count during ICU admission was an independent risk factor for death in SLE patients with PICS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE complicated with PICS had longer ICU stays, a lower level of SLE activity, a higher risk of secondary infection and a significantly lower survival rate than non-PICS patients.

Consensus document of the Spanish Group for the Study of the Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) for the diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis

A significant number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (between 20% and 60% according to different reported series) develop lupus nephritis in the course of its evolution, which directly influences their quality of life and vital prognosis. In recent years, the greater knowledge about the pathogenesis of systemic lupus and lupus nephritis has allowed relevant advances in the diagnostic approach and treatment of these patients, achieving the development of drugs specifically aimed at blocking key pathogenic pathways of the disease. Encouragingly, these immunomodulatory agents have shown in well-powered, randomized clinical trials good clinical efficacy in the medium-term, defined as proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function, with an acceptable safety profile and good patient tolerability. All this has made it possible to reduce the use of corticosteroids and other potentially more toxic therapies, as well as to increase the use of combined therapies. The present consensus document carried out by the Glomerular Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (GLOSEN), collects in a practical and summarized, but rigorous way, the best currently available evidence about the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of lupus nephritis patients, including cases of special situations, with the main objective of providing updated information and well-founded clinical recommendations to treating physicians, to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to our patients.

Multi-target therapy in a lupus patient with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease based on the pathology of small-vessel inflammation, which can affect multiple organs. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a rare and severe complication of SLE with high mortality, most commonly seen in young women. It often appears along with clinical manifestations of sudden dyspnea, hemoptysis, and rapid onset of hypoxemia, which develops into respiratory failure and even multiple organs damage.

CASE REPORT

The case of a 28-year-old female who was diagnosed with SLE complicated with DAH is presented here. The patient, who experienced recurring DAH, responded poorly to the common therapy of high-dose glucocorticoid plus cyclophosphamide and plasma exchange. After the treatment was adjusted to a multi-target regimen of glucocorticoid, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and belimumab, the symptoms began to improve.

CONCLUSION

The multi-target regimen may be a new treatment strategy of SLE complicated with DAH.

Response to therapy at 6 months predicts long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis with poor kidney function

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether aggressive treatment would benefit lupus nephritis (LN) with poor renal function, which has been excluded from most clinical trials. We aimed at demonstrating their clinicopathological features and prognosis.

METHODS

From August 2012 to December 2018, patients with active LN with poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 15 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m²) receiving induction therapy were included. Complete response (CR) was defined as proteinuria <0.5 g/24 hours, while partial response (PR) was defined as ≥50% proteinuria reduction to subnephrotic levels (<3.5 g/24 hours), with (near) normal eGFR. The primary outcome was end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The significant variables were selected via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method to construct prediction models for ESRD and treatment response.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included. At 6 months, 18.7%, 38.3% and 43.0% of patients achieved CR, PR and no response (NR), respectively. During a median follow-up of 60 months, 40.2% ended up with reduced renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and 14.0% progressed to ESRD. The proportions of NR at 6 months were significantly higher in these patients compared with those with recovered renal function (p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, baseline eGFR ≤33 mL/min/1.73 m² (HR 3.499, 95% CI 1.044 to 11.730), fibrous crescent (HR 3.439, 95% CI 1.029 to 11.490) and NR at 6 months (HR 17.070, 95% CI 2.155 to 135.240) independently predicted ESRD (C-index 0.911, 95% CI 0.866 to 0.956). Further, baseline hypertension (HR 2.517, 95% CI 0.820 to 8.580), SLE duration>3 months (2.517, 1.012-7.226) and chronicity index (HR 1.757, 95% CI 1.371 to 2.414) predicted NR at 6 months (C-index 0.833, 95% CI 0.756 to 0.910).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LN with poor renal function, no response at 6 months predicts a poor long-term renal outcome.

Synthetic Pharmacotherapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Potential Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Safety

The pharmacological treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aims to decrease disease activity, progression, systemic compromise, and mortality. Among the pharmacological alternatives, there are chemically synthesized drugs whose efficacy has been evaluated, but which have the potential to generate adverse events that may compromise adherence and response to treatment. Therapy selection and monitoring will depend on patient characteristics and the safety profile of each drug. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the most important synthetic drugs used in the treatment of SLE, including the current treatment options (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide), review their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and, most importantly, provide monitoring parameters that should be considered while the patient is receiving the pharmacotherapy.

Lupus Nephritis: Current Perspectives and Moving Forward

Lupus nephritis is a severe organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, and its pathogenesis involves complex etiology and mechanisms. Despite significant knowledge gains and extensive efforts put into understanding the development and relapsing disease activity, lupus nephritis remains a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in lupus patients. Current therapies retain a significant unmet medical need regarding rates of complete response, preventing relapse of lupus nephritis, progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure, drug toxicity, and pill burden-related drug non-adherence. Connected to progression of chronic kidney disease are the associated risks for disabling or even lethal cardiovascular events, as well as chronic kidney disease-related secondary immunodeficiency and serious infections. In this regard, biomarkers are needed that can predict treatment response to specific drugs to enable personalized precision medicine. A series of clinical trials with innovative immunomodulatory drugs are ongoing and raise expectations for improvements in the management of lupus nephritis. Here, we review how new developments in pathogenesis connect with current and future perspectives for the management of lupus nephritis.

Novel and emerging treatment strategies for lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a key predictor for kidney failure and death in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While conventional immunosuppressive treatments have improved the outcome of LN, novel therapies continue to emerge. These new agents target specific immune-reactive cells (B cell repertoire or T lymphocytes) and crucial cytokines/signalling pathways in LN pathogenesis.

AREAS COVERED

New therapeutic approaches that target specific immune-reactive cells (B cell repertoire or T lymphocytes), crucial cytokines and their signalling pathways in LN pathogenesis.

EXPERT OPINION

Although earlier studies of rituximab fail to show benefit, a newer generation anti-CD20 biologic, obinutuzumab, is promising in LN. Inhibition of B-cell activating factor by belimumab confers superior renal response when added to the standard of care (SOC) regimens, leading to its recent approval for LN. Therapies targeting plasma cells (proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38) in LN are being developed. A newer generation calcineurin inhibitor, voclosporin, when combined with SOC, results in better renal responses in LN. Other innovative strategies include targeting type I interferon, co-stimulatory signals, complement cascade (anti-C5b) and intracellular proliferation signals (e.g. mTOR, JAK1/2, BTK). While these novel agents improve the short-term renal responses without increased toxicities, long-term data on disease progression and safety remain to be established. Patient stratification by clinical phenotypes, biomarkers and molecular profiles helps enhance the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of novel therapies of LN.

Distinct transcriptome architectures underlying lupus establishment and exacerbation

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease involving multiple immune cells. To elucidate SLE pathogenesis, it is essential to understand the dysregulated gene expression pattern linked to various clinical statuses with a high cellular resolution. Here, we conducted a large-scale transcriptome study with 6,386 RNA sequencing data covering 27 immune cell types from 136 SLE and 89 healthy donors. We profiled two distinct cell-type-specific transcriptomic signatures: disease-state and disease-activity signatures, reflecting disease establishment and exacerbation, respectively. We then identified candidate biological processes unique to each signature. This study suggested the clinical value of disease-activity signatures, which were associated with organ involvement and therapeutic responses. However, disease-activity signatures were less enriched around SLE risk variants than disease-state signatures, suggesting that current genetic studies may not well capture clinically vital biology. Together, we identified comprehensive gene signatures of SLE, which will provide essential foundations for future genomic and genetic studies.

Severe lupus nephritis in the present days

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most frequent and severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is a chronic autoimmune disease. Despite improvement in patient and renal prognosis, the disease continued to be associated with a high rate of end stage kidney disease. Along the last decades, it seems that the epidemiology of LN and its clinical presentation have progressively changed. The forms with renal insufficiency at presentation seem to have progressively reduced in developed countries in favour of more mild clinical presentations with urinary abnormalities only. To this clinical change does not correspond a less severe histological lesions, in fact, the extent of active lesions at kidney biopsy are unchanged, whereas chronic lesions are becoming less frequent and less severe. Meanwhile, new types of severe LN defined by the variable association of demographic, clinical, histological characteristics at diagnosis or during the follow-up are gradually emerging and require attention in assessing the therapy and prognosis. During the last years, randomized controlled trials have reported the efficacy of new drugs in association with standard therapy to improve the rate of short- and medium-term renal response. One of the advantages is that these results were obtained with reduced dosage of corticosteroids whose protracted use is associated with increase of chronic organ damage. Optimization of therapeutical strategies, tailored on the demographic clinical and histological characteristics, with combination of old and new drugs are urgently needed for severe LN.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with lupus nephritis: A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an anti-inflammatory drug with an unclear role in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). This systematic review evaluates the evidence for IVIg in the care of patients with LN.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic search was done in the PubMed, EMBASE, BVS and OVID databases - All EBM Reviews following the PRISMA methodology (registration in PROSPERO CRD42021236662). The variables were extracted: indications for use, dosage, partial or complete response, adverse reactions, initiation of renal replacement therapy, reduction of proteinuria, and mortality. The quality assessment was done with the "The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools for use in Systematic Reviews Checklist". In addition, synthesis reports were prepared through the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis - SWiM guide.

RESULTS

A total of 2328 articles were obtained (28 were considered for inclusion). When the studies were evaluated, IVIg therapy was found to be between 60% to 70% effective (except for patients with class V LN) with overall responses (complete + partial) even for patients who are refractory to first line treatment. Normalization (<0.5 g) of nephrotic proteinuria occurred in 24% of cases with infrequent adverse events and a mortality plus dialysis composite of 11.5% and 24.1% (most representative study).

CONCLUSION

In patients with LN refractory to conventional treatment or co-infection situations, the reported data seem to demonstrate effectiveness of IVIg therapy. There are few adverse reactions and caution is exercised when using it on patients with class V NL. However, given the lack of controlled studies with long-term follow-up, these data should be interpreted cautiously thus encouraging the development of high-quality RCTs.

Lupus nephritis: new progress in diagnosis and treatment

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multifactorial autoimmune disease that affects many organs, including the kidney. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common manifestation characterized by heterogeneous clinical and histopathological findings, and often associates with poor prognosis. The diagnosis and treatment of LN is challenging, depending largely on renal biopsy, and there is no reliable non-invasive LN biomarker. Up to now, the complete remission rate of LN is only 20%∼30% after receiving six months of standard treatment, which is far from satisfactory. Moreover, adverse reactions to immunosuppressants, especially glucocorticoids, further compromise the prognosis of LN. Biological reagents targetting autoimmune responses and inflammatory pathways, bring hope to the treatment of intractable lupus. The European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) have been working on and launched the recommendations for the management of LN. In this review, we update our knowledge in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of LN and prospect for the future potential targets in the management of LN.

Multitarget therapy versus monotherapy as induction treatment for lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aim

The safety of multitarget treatments is of concern. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of multitarget therapy as an induction treatment for lupus nephritis in comparison with monotherapy.

Methods

This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of multitarget therapies, such as voclosporin+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus+MMF, or belimumab+standard of care in comparison with MMF or cyclophosphamide (CYC) monotherapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. We performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of multitarget therapy as an induction treatment for lupus nephritis in comparison with monotherapy

Results

Six RCTs, including 1,437 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The complete remission rate was significantly higher in the multitarget therapy group than in the monotherapy group (odds ratio, 2.155; 95% CI, 1.695–2.739; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the complete remission rate was significantly higher in both tacrolimus+MMF and voclosporin+MMF groups as well as the belimumab+standard of care (SOC) than in the monotherapy or SOC group. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the multitarget therapy and monotherapy groups. However, cases of infection and pneumonia were numerically higher in the multitarget therapy group than in the monotherapy group. In addition, the incidence of menstrual disorder was significantly lower in the tacrolimus+MMF group than in the CYC group, whereas that of new-onset hypertension was considerably higher in the tacrolimus+MMF group than in the CYC group.

Conclusions

Multitarget therapy showed a higher complete remission rate than monotherapy; however, cases of infection and pneumonia were numerically more elevated in the multitarget therapy group than in the monotherapy group.