Supporting the Health and Well-Being of Indigenous Communities: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians

Racism in Pediatric Serious Illness and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research

CONTEXT

Racial disparities in health outcomes have historically impacted Black and Native American children with serious illness, yet little is known about how racism shapes the healthcare experiences of these families. To improve care experiences for this population, we must understand the myriad of ways that racism may impact their experiences with serious illness.

OBJECTIVES

1) To assess the extent to which the experiences of Black and Native American families have been captured in existing serious illness and palliative care literature and 2) explore how experiences of racism uniquely impact this population.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review and qualitative meta-synthesis of peer-reviewed articles from 1980 to 2022 that included Black and/or Native American parents' or caregivers' experiences of serious illness care. We abstracted study characteristics, and forms of racism mentioned.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 2762 articles, of which six were reviewed based on inclusion criteria. Three key themes emerged from the literature on the experiences of Black families navigating pediatric serious illness that highlight how parents navigate their future after a serious illness diagnosis; how relationships and support networks change after diagnosis; and the challenges associated with navigating grief and suffering after a diagnosis. Institutionalized racism and interpersonal racism were the most identified forms of racism experienced by Black families. None of the articles identified included Native American families.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the pressing need for further qualitative research to explore the lived experiences of racially minoritized families-especially studies focusing on the experiences of Native American families.

Racial Differences in Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Emergency Medicine Notes

OBJECTIVE

Language used by providers in medical documentation may reveal evidence of race-related implicit bias. We aimed to use natural language processing (NLP) to examine if prevalence of stigmatizing language in emergency medicine (EM) encounter notes differs across patient race/ethnicity.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort of EM encounters, NLP techniques identified stigmatizing and positive themes. Logistic regression models analyzed the association of race/ethnicity and themes within notes. Outcomes were the presence (or absence) of 7 different themes: 5 stigmatizing (difficult, non-compliant, skepticism, substance abuse/seeking, and financial difficulty) and 2 positive (compliment and compliant).

RESULTS

The sample included notes from 26,363 unique patients. NH Black patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.88), skepticism (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96), and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) compared to NH White patient notes but more likely to contain non-compliant (OR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.17-1.36) and financial difficulty (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04-1.25). Hispanic patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.58-0.80) and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.66-0.93). NH NA/AI patient notes had twice the odds as NH White patient notes to contain a stigmatizing theme (OR 2.02, 95% CI, 1.64-2.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Using an NLP model to analyze themes in EM notes across racial groups, we identified several inequities in the usage of positive and stigmatizing language. Interventions to minimize race-related implicit bias should be undertaken.

American Indian and Alaska Native substance use treatment: Barriers and facilitators according to an implementation framework

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorder (SUD) and overdose deaths are higher in the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population than in other racial/ethnic groups. Multi-level gaps hinder SUD treatment for AIAN patients. Few studies have engaged front-line clinicians and administrators of SUD treatment programs serving AIAN patients to identify barriers and facilitators to improve the implementation of effective treatment.

METHODS

We conducted key informant interviews with a diverse sample of providers and administrators of SUD treatment programs across California regarding barriers and facilitators to treatment for AIAN patients. An AIAN-majority community advisory board (CAB) guided the development of an interview guide and helped to recruit respondents from five types of SUD programs statewide. Using ATLAS.ti, the research team coded interviews and classified emergent themes as barriers and facilitators related to Outer, Inner, and Individual domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

Representatives of 13 of 15 invited SUD treatment programs participated and 9 of the 13 interviewed self-identified as AIAN. Related to Outer Setting barriers from coded interviews, a dominant barrier was policies that defund or underfund SUD treatment, especially detoxification centers. Outer Setting facilitators included consistent Indian Health Service (IHS) eligibility criteria, judicial system connections for direct treatment access, and community programs advocating SUD treatment. Key themes related to barriers for the Inner Setting were limited bed capacity, poor coordination of intake and care, and lack of telehealth technology. Facilitators integrated mental health, linkage to external resources, and culturally centered care. Individual-level barriers were negative attitudes such as SUD stigma, distrust of governmental programs, and lack of transportation while individual engagement was facilitated by programs addressing negative attitudes and providing telemedicine for remote care.

CONCLUSION

The public health threat of SUD for the AIAN population mandates the implementation of interventions and policies that facilitate care. This qualitative study with primarily AIAN clinical leaders of SUD treatment highlights opportunities to improve care at multiple CFIR levels, focusing on capacity, coordination, culturally congruent care, and community initiatives to promote engagement.