1
|
Ordaz OH, Croff RL, Robinson LD, Shea SA, Bowles NP. Belonging, endurance, and resistance: Black placemaking theory in primary care. Soc Sci Med 2024; 342:116509. [PMID: 38184964 PMCID: PMC10903339 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Black-Americans continue to experience pervasive health disparities. Factors contributing to increased disease risk include a general mistrust of biomedical institutions among Black Americans. The purpose of this focus group study was to identify, among Black patients who regularly seek care from a primary provider, salient themes regarding barriers to 1) receiving quality primary care; and 2) adhering to medical recommendations. We examined transcripts of eight focus groups held remotely with 29 Black patients (aged 30-60 years) who had established primary care providers. Using grounded theory and an inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts, we identified three themes (belonging, endurance, and resistance) consistent with Black placemaking theory. Our findings suggest that reducing health disparities for Black Americans will require clinical initiatives that emphasize: 1) attention to social influences on health behavior and to features of medical institutions that mark them as White spaces (belonging); 2) recognition of, as well as sensitivity to, community awareness of the systemic and interpersonal barriers to health and safety that many Black adults endure; and 3) reframing avoidant (resistant) behaviors as protective strategies among Black patients. Examining primary care in this way-through the lens of Black placemaking theory-reveals how culturally meaningful approaches to harnessing the specialized knowledge and resilience that clearly exists among many Black communities can improve health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar H Ordaz
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Raina L Croff
- School of Medicine Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - LaTroy D Robinson
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steven A Shea
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nicole P Bowles
- Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palay J, Bolton JM, Sareen J, Hensel JM. Increasing access to specialist care with group medical visits: summary of a pilot in a post-crisis psychiatric clinic. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1127725. [PMID: 37435511 PMCID: PMC10332818 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1127725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
Background Group medical visits (GMVs) have strong evidence of acceptability and effectiveness in the management of chronic medical diseases. Adaptation of GMVs for psychiatric care has potential to increase access, decrease stigma and save costs. Despite promise, this model has not been widely adopted. Methods A novel GMV pilot was implemented for psychiatric care post-crisis among patients with primary mood or anxiety disorders who required medication management. Participants filled out PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales at each visit in order to track their progress. After discharge, charts were reviewed for demographics, medication changes and symptom changes. Patient characteristics were compared between those who attended and those who didn't. Changes in total PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores among attendees were assessed with paired t-tests. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled between October 2017 and the end of December 2018, 41 of whom consented to participate. Of those, 10 did not attend, 8 attended but did not complete, and 23 completed. Baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores did not differ significantly between groups. Significant and meaningful reductions in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores from baseline to last visit attended occurred among those who attended at least 1 visit (decrease of 5.13 and 5.26 points, respectively). Conclusions This GMV pilot demonstrated feasibility of the model as well as positive outcomes for patients recruited in a post-crisis setting. This model has the potential to increase access to psychiatric care in the face of limited resources, however the failure of the pilot to sustain highlights challenges to be addressed in future pivots.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dixit N, Sarkar U, Trejo E, Couey P, Rivadeneira NA, Ciccarelli B, Burke N. Catalyzing Navigation for Breast Cancer Survivorship (CaNBCS) in Safety-Net Settings: A Mixed Methods Study. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211038734. [PMID: 34657452 PMCID: PMC8521758 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211038734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The current number of breast cancer survivors (BCS) in the United States is approximately 3.8 million, and this number is further expected to increase with improvement in treatments. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are patient-centered tools that are designed to meet cancer survivors' informational needs about their treatment history, recommended health care, and health maintenance. However, the data on SCP benefits remain uncertain, especially in low-income and racial and ethnic minority cancer survivors. Patient navigation is an effective intervention to improve patient adherence and experience of interdisciplinary breast cancer treatment. Objectives This study sought to understand the role of lay patient navigators (LPN) in survivorship care planning for BCS in safety-net settings. Methods This study is a mixed methods pilot randomized clinical trial to understand the role of patient navigation in cancer survivorship care planning in a public hospital. We invited BCS who had completed active breast cancer treatment within 5 years. LPNs discussed survivorship care planning and survivorship care-related issues with BCS in the intervention arm over a 6-month intervention period and accompanied patients to their primary care appointment. LPNs also encouraged survivors to discuss health care issues with oncology and primary care providers. The primary objective was to assess BCS’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The secondary objectives were self-efficacy and implementation. We assessed implementation with 45–60-min semi-structured interviews with 15 BCS recruited from the intervention arm and 60-min focus groups with the oncologists and separately with LPNs. Results We enrolled 40 patients, 20 randomized to usual care and 20 randomized to LPN navigation. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the two arms in HRQOL. There was also no difference in self-efficacy between the two arms. Qualitative analysis identified implementation barriers to intervention that may have contributed to less effective intervention. Implications for Cancer Survivors Future survivorship care planning interventions need to consider: Cancer survivors’ needs and preferences, the need for dedicated resources, and the role of electronic health records in survivorship care plan delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niharika Dixit
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Urmimala Sarkar
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Evelin Trejo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Paul Couey
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Natalie A Rivadeneira
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Barbara Ciccarelli
- Cancer Navigation Program, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nancy Burke
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California Merced, Merced, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parikh M, Rajendran I, D'Amico S, Luo M, Gardiner P. Characteristics and Components of Medical Group Visits for Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Scoping Review. J Altern Complement Med 2019; 25:683-698. [PMID: 30945935 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2018.0524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Chronic health conditions are a major challenge to the health care system. Medical Group Visits (MGVs) are a valuable health care delivery model used in a variety of medical settings and patient populations. We conducted a systematic scoping review of MGV research literature for chronic health conditions to summarize the characteristics and individual components of MGVs in the United States of America and Canada. Design: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping review methodology and searched five databases using nine widely used MGV-related terms. Subjects: We included studies conducted in the United States and Canada, whose participants were >18 years old and attended an MGV conducted in a medical setting by a billable health care provider. We excluded groups related to diabetes, pregnancy, and cancer. Results: Of 3777 studies identified, we found 55 eligible studies of which 9 are randomized controlled trials and 46 are observational studies. The majority of studies were conducted in academic medical centers, were observational in design, and recruited patients using physician referrals. The three most frequently studied groups include a combination of several chronic conditions (n = 12), chronic pain conditions (n = 10), and cardiovascular disease (n = 9). Curriculum components included didactics (n = 55), experiential activities (n = 27), and socializing components (n = 12). Didactic areas include (1) medical topics such as symptoms management (n = 27) of which 14 included pain management, and (2) lifestyle/educational component (n = 33) that comprised of talks on nutrition (n = 29), exercise (n = 20), stress (n = 16), and sleep (n = 10). The top integrative medicine (IM) modalities (n = 13) included: mindfulness techniques (n = 8), meditation (n = 6), and yoga (n = 5). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the recruitment, implementation, curriculum components, and outcomes reported. Conclusion: The MGV is a model of patient-centered care that has captured the attention of researchers. IM modalities are well represented in the curriculum components of MGVs. Further investigation into the components identified by this study, may help in better targeting of group interventions to patients and contexts, where it is most likely to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasi Parikh
- 1Department of Family Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Iniya Rajendran
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Salvatore D'Amico
- 1Department of Family Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Man Luo
- 1Department of Family Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Paula Gardiner
- 3Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMass Memorial Health Care, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaughan EM, Johnston CA, Cardenas VJ, Moreno JP, Foreyt JP. Integrating CHWs as Part of the Team Leading Diabetes Group Visits: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study. THE DIABETES EDUCATOR 2017; 43:589-599. [PMID: 29047326 PMCID: PMC5753422 DOI: 10.1177/0145721717737742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of the team leading diabetes group visits. Methods This was a randomized controlled study that integrated CHWs as part of the team leading diabetes group visits for low-income Hispanic adults (n = 50). Group visits met for 3 hours each month for a 6-month duration. Main measures included baseline and 6-month clinical outcomes (ie, A1C, lipids), concordance with 8 standard of care guidelines (ie, screens for cervical, breast, and colon cancer) from the US Preventive Task Force and American Diabetes Association, and participant acceptability. Results Compared to control participants, the intervention group resulted in significantly better clinical outcomes or guideline concordance for the following areas: target A1C levels, retinal eye exams, diabetes foot exams, mammograms, and urine microalbumin. Significantly more individuals in the control group gained weight, whereas a greater number of participants in the intervention group lost weight. Intervention participants found the group visits highly acceptable. Conclusions Integrating CHWs as part a comprehensive diabetes group visit program is a feasible and effective system-level intervention to improve glycemic control and achieve guideline concordance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Vaughan
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Dr Vaughan, Dr Foreyt)
| | - Craig A Johnston
- Department of Health & Human Performance and the Texas Obesity Research Center, University of Houston, Houston, Texas (Dr Johnston)
| | - Victor J Cardenas
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (Dr Cardenas)
| | - Jennette P Moreno
- Department of Pediatrics-Nutrition SDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Dr Moreno)
| | - John P Foreyt
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Dr Vaughan, Dr Foreyt)
| |
Collapse
|