1
|
Szlanka T, Lukacsovich T, Bálint É, Virágh E, Szabó K, Hajdu I, Molnár E, Lin YH, Zvara Á, Kelemen-Valkony I, Méhi O, Török I, Hegedűs Z, Kiss B, Ramasz B, Magdalena LM, Puskás L, Mechler BM, Fónagy A, Asztalos Z, Steinbach G, Žurovec M, Boros I, Kiss I. Dominant suppressor genes of p53-induced apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2024; 14:jkae149. [PMID: 38985658 PMCID: PMC11373661 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
One of the major functions of programmed cell death (apoptosis) is the removal of cells that suffered oncogenic mutations, thereby preventing cancerous transformation. By making use of a Double-Headed-EP (DEP) transposon, a P element derivative made in our laboratory, we made an insertional mutagenesis screen in Drosophila melanogaster to identify genes that, when overexpressed, suppress the p53-activated apoptosis. The DEP element has Gal4-activatable, outward-directed UAS promoters at both ends, which can be deleted separately in vivo. In the DEP insertion mutants, we used the GMR-Gal4 driver to induce transcription from both UAS promoters and tested the suppression effect on the apoptotic rough eye phenotype generated by an activated UAS-p53 transgene. By DEP insertions, 7 genes were identified, which suppressed the p53-induced apoptosis. In 4 mutants, the suppression effect resulted from single genes activated by 1 UAS promoter (Pka-R2, Rga, crol, and Spt5). In the other 3 (Orct2, Polr2M, and stg), deleting either UAS promoter eliminated the suppression effect. In qPCR experiments, we found that the genes in the vicinity of the DEP insertion also showed an elevated expression level. This suggested an additive effect of the nearby genes on suppressing apoptosis. In the eukaryotic genomes, there are coexpressed gene clusters. Three of the DEP insertion mutants are included, and 2 are in close vicinity of separate coexpressed gene clusters. This raises the possibility that the activity of some of the genes in these clusters may help the suppression of the apoptotic cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Szlanka
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamás Lukacsovich
- Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Éva Bálint
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Erika Virágh
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kornélia Szabó
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ildikó Hajdu
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Enikő Molnár
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Yu-Hsien Lin
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Ágnes Zvara
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ildikó Kelemen-Valkony
- Cellular Imaging Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Orsolya Méhi
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - István Török
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zoltán Hegedűs
- Bioinformatics Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Brigitta Kiss
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Beáta Ramasz
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Laura M Magdalena
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Puskás
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Bernard M Mechler
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adrien Fónagy
- Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Plant Protection Institute, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Asztalos
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Aktogen Hungary Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Steinbach
- Cellular Imaging Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Michal Žurovec
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Imre Boros
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - István Kiss
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Graham EL, Fernandez J, Gandhi S, Choudhry I, Kellam N, LaRocque JR. The impact of developmental stage, tissue type, and sex on DNA double-strand break repair in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 2024; 20:e1011250. [PMID: 38683763 PMCID: PMC11057719 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity, as failure to repair DSBs can result in cell death. The cell has evolved two main mechanisms for DSB repair: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR), which includes single-strand annealing (SSA) and homologous recombination (HR). While certain factors like age and state of the chromatin are known to influence DSB repair pathway choice, the roles of developmental stage, tissue type, and sex have yet to be elucidated in multicellular organisms. To examine the influence of these factors, DSB repair in various embryonic developmental stages, larva, and adult tissues in Drosophila melanogaster was analyzed through molecular analysis of the DR-white assay using Tracking across Indels by DEcomposition (TIDE). The proportion of HR repair was highest in tissues that maintain the canonical (G1/S/G2/M) cell cycle and suppressed in both terminally differentiated and polyploid tissues. To determine the impact of sex on repair pathway choice, repair in different tissues in both males and females was analyzed. When molecularly examining tissues containing mostly somatic cells, males and females demonstrated similar proportions of HR and NHEJ. However, when DSB repair was analyzed in male and female premeiotic germline cells utilizing phenotypic analysis of the DR-white assay, there was a significant decrease in HR in females compared to males. This study describes the impact of development, tissue-specific cycling profile, and, in some cases, sex on DSB repair outcomes, underscoring the complexity of repair in multicellular organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L. Graham
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Joel Fernandez
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Shagun Gandhi
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Iqra Choudhry
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Natalia Kellam
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Jeannine R. LaRocque
- Department of Human Science, School of Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang YT, Hesting LL, Calvi BR. An unscheduled switch to endocycles induces a reversible senescent arrest that impairs growth of the Drosophila wing disc. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.14.585098. [PMID: 38559130 PMCID: PMC10980049 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.14.585098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
A programmed developmental switch to G / S endocycles results in tissue growth through an increase in cell size. Unscheduled, induced endocycling cells (iECs) promote wound healing but also contribute to cancer. Much remains unknown, however, about how these iECs affect tissue growth. Using the D. melanogasterwing disc as model, we find that populations of iECs initially increase in size but then subsequently undergo a heterogenous arrest that causes severe tissue undergrowth. iECs acquired DNA damage and activated a Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, but, unlike other stressed cells, were apoptosis-resistant and not eliminated from the epithelium. Instead, iECs entered a JNK-dependent and reversible senescent-like arrest. Senescent iECs promoted division of diploid neighbors, but this compensatory proliferation did not rescue tissue growth. Our study has uncovered unique attributes of iECs and their effects on tissue growth that have important implications for understanding their roles in wound healing and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ting Huang
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Lauren L. Hesting
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sadanandappa MK, Bosco G. Parasitoid cues modulate Drosophila germline development and stem cell proliferation. Cell Rep 2024; 43:113657. [PMID: 38175752 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Environmental factors influence an organism's reproductive ability by regulating germline development and physiology. While the reproductive adaptations in response to extrinsic stress cues offer fitness and survival advantages to individuals, the mechanistic understanding of these modifications remains unclear. Here, we find that parasitoid wasps' stress signaling regulates Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. We show that fruit flies dwelling in the wasp-infested area elevate their fecundity, and the observed reproductive response is specific to Pachycrepoideus sp., a pupal parasitoid wasp. Pachycrepoideus-specific olfactory and visual cues recruit the signaling pathways that promote germline stem cell proliferation and accelerate follicle development, increasing egg production in Drosophila females. Downregulation of signaling engaged in oocyte development by shifting flies to a non-wasp-infested environment increases apoptosis of the developing follicles. Thus, this study establishes host germline responsiveness to parasitoid-specific signals and supports a predator strategy to increase hosts for infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhumala K Sadanandappa
- Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| | - Giovanni Bosco
- Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ren F, Zhou Q, Meng Y, Guo W, Tang Q, Mei J. RNA binding proteins are potential novel biomarkers of egg quality in yellow catfish. BMC Genomics 2023; 24:121. [PMID: 36927412 PMCID: PMC10018890 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09220-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Egg quality is a major concern in fish reproduction and development. An effective evaluation of egg quality prior to fertilization is helpful in improving the fertilization rate and survival rate of the larva. In this study, we aim to identify quality instructors from the combination study of fertilization rate, hatching rate, embryo malformation rate and gene expression profile. RESULTS Eggs from 25 female fish were fertilized with sperm from the same fish. The egg quality was determined by the fertilization rates, hatching rate and embryo malformation rate and divided into three categories, low-quality (< 35%), medium-quality (35 to 75%), and high-quality (> 75%). Due to the distinct difference in fertilization, hatching and embryo malformation rate between low-quality eggs and high-quality eggs, these two groups were considered for the identification of quality markers. Then RNA-seq was performed for the originally preserved eggs from the low-quality group and high-quality group. We profiled the differentially expressed genes and identified a group of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) as potential regulators. Gene function analysis indicated that most of these genes were enriched in RNA-regulated pathways including RNA processing. The RBPs were more related to egg quality from the PLS-DA analysis. Finally, gene expression was validated by qRT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS We found a cluster of RBP genes including igf2bp3, zar1, elavl1, rbm25b and related regulatory factors including yy1, sirt1, anp32e, btg4 as novel biomarkers of egg quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Ren
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Quan Zhou
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Yinglu Meng
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Wenjie Guo
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Qin Tang
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
| | - Jie Mei
- College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. .,Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, 430070, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evo-devo perspectives on cancer. Essays Biochem 2022; 66:797-815. [PMID: 36250956 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20220041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The integration of evolutionary and developmental approaches into the field of evolutionary developmental biology has opened new areas of inquiry- from understanding the evolution of development and its underlying genetic and molecular mechanisms to addressing the role of development in evolution. For the last several decades, the terms 'evolution' and 'development' have been increasingly linked to cancer, in many different frameworks and contexts. This mini-review, as part of a special issue on Evolutionary Developmental Biology, discusses the main areas in cancer research that have been addressed through the lenses of both evolutionary and developmental biology, though not always fully or explicitly integrated in an evo-devo framework. First, it briefly introduces the current views on carcinogenesis that invoke evolutionary and/or developmental perspectives. Then, it discusses the main mechanisms proposed to have specifically evolved to suppress cancer during the evolution of multicellularity. Lastly, it considers whether the evolution of multicellularity and development was shaped by the threat of cancer (a cancer-evo-devo perspective), and/or whether the evolution of developmental programs and life history traits can shape cancer resistance/risk in various lineages (an evo-devo-cancer perspective). A proper evolutionary developmental framework for cancer, both as a disease and in terms of its natural history (in the context of the evolution of multicellularity and development as well as life history traits), could bridge the currently disparate evolutionary and developmental perspectives and uncover aspects that will provide new insights for cancer prevention and treatment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Taslim TH, Hussein AM, Keshri R, Ishibashi JR, Chan TC, Nguyen BN, Liu S, Brewer D, Harper S, Lyons S, Garver B, Dang J, Balachandar N, Jhajharia S, Castillo DD, Mathieu J, Ruohola-Baker H. Stress-induced reversible cell-cycle arrest requires PRC2/PRC1-mediated control of mitophagy in Drosophila germline stem cells and human iPSCs. Stem Cell Reports 2022; 18:269-288. [PMID: 36493777 PMCID: PMC9860083 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Following acute genotoxic stress, both normal and tumorous stem cells can undergo cell-cycle arrest to avoid apoptosis and later re-enter the cell cycle to regenerate daughter cells. However, the mechanism of protective, reversible proliferative arrest, "quiescence," remains unresolved. Here, we show that mitophagy is a prerequisite for reversible quiescence in both irradiated Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). In GSCs, mitofission (Drp1) or mitophagy (Pink1/Parkin) genes are essential to enter quiescence, whereas mitochondrial biogenesis (PGC1α) or fusion (Mfn2) genes are crucial for exiting quiescence. Furthermore, mitophagy-dependent quiescence lies downstream of mTOR- and PRC2-mediated repression and relies on the mitochondrial pool of cyclin E. Mitophagy-dependent reduction of cyclin E in GSCs and in hiPSCs during mTOR inhibition prevents the usual G1/S transition, pushing the cells toward reversible quiescence (G0). This alternative method of G1/S control may present new opportunities for therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy H Taslim
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Abdiasis M Hussein
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Riya Keshri
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Julien R Ishibashi
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tung C Chan
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bich N Nguyen
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shuozhi Liu
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel Brewer
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stuart Harper
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Scott Lyons
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ben Garver
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jimmy Dang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nanditaa Balachandar
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India
| | - Samriddhi Jhajharia
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India
| | - Debra Del Castillo
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Julie Mathieu
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hannele Ruohola-Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wylie A, Jones AE, Das S, Lu WJ, Abrams JM. Distinct p53 isoforms code for opposing transcriptional outcomes. Dev Cell 2022; 57:1833-1846.e6. [PMID: 35820415 PMCID: PMC9378576 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
p53 genes are conserved transcriptional activators that respond to stress. These proteins can also downregulate genes, but the mechanisms are not understood and are generally assumed to be indirect. Here, we investigate synthetic and native cis-regulatory elements in Drosophila to examine opposing features of p53-mediated transcriptional control in vivo. We show that transcriptional repression by p53 operates continuously through canonical DNA binding sites that confer p53-dependent transactivation at earlier developmental stages. p53 transrepression is correlated with local H3K9me3 chromatin marks and occurs without the need for stress or Chk2. In sufficiency tests, two p53 isoforms qualify as transrepressors and a third qualifies as a transcriptional activator. Targeted isoform-specific knockouts dissociate these opposing transcriptional activities, highlighting features that are dispensable for transactivation but critical for repression and for proper germ cell formation. Together, these results demonstrate that certain p53 isoforms function as constitutive tissue-specific repressors, raising important implications for tumor suppression by the human counterpart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Wylie
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Amanda E Jones
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Simanti Das
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Wan-Jin Lu
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - John M Abrams
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Osterburg C, Dötsch V. Structural diversity of p63 and p73 isoforms. Cell Death Differ 2022; 29:921-937. [PMID: 35314772 PMCID: PMC9091270 DOI: 10.1038/s41418-022-00975-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The p53 protein family is the most studied protein family of all. Sequence analysis and structure determination have revealed a high similarity of crucial domains between p53, p63 and p73. Functional studies, however, have shown a wide variety of different tasks in tumor suppression, quality control and development. Here we review the structure and organization of the individual domains of p63 and p73, the interaction of these domains in the context of full-length proteins and discuss the evolutionary origin of this protein family.
Facts
Distinct physiological roles/functions are performed by specific isoforms.
The non-divided transactivation domain of p63 has a constitutively high activity while the transactivation domains of p53/p73 are divided into two subdomains that are regulated by phosphorylation.
Mdm2 binds to all three family members but ubiquitinates only p53.
TAp63α forms an autoinhibited dimeric state while all other vertebrate p53 family isoforms are constitutively tetrameric.
The oligomerization domain of p63 and p73 contain an additional helix that is necessary for stabilizing the tetrameric states. During evolution this helix got lost independently in different phylogenetic branches, while the DNA binding domain became destabilized and the transactivation domain split into two subdomains.
Open questions
Is the autoinhibitory mechanism of mammalian TAp63α conserved in p53 proteins of invertebrates that have the same function of genomic quality control in germ cells?
What is the physiological function of the p63/p73 SAM domains?
Do the short isoforms of p63 and p73 have physiological functions?
What are the roles of the N-terminal elongated TAp63 isoforms, TA* and GTA?
Collapse
|