1
|
Clements J, Goina C, Hubbard PM, Kawase T, Olbris DJ, Otsuna H, Svirskas R, Rokicki K. NeuronBridge: an intuitive web application for neuronal morphology search across large data sets. BMC Bioinformatics 2024; 25:114. [PMID: 38491365 PMCID: PMC10943809 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05732-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroscience research in Drosophila is benefiting from large-scale connectomics efforts using electron microscopy (EM) to reveal all the neurons in a brain and their connections. To exploit this knowledge base, researchers relate a connectome's structure to neuronal function, often by studying individual neuron cell types. Vast libraries of fly driver lines expressing fluorescent reporter genes in sets of neurons have been created and imaged using confocal light microscopy (LM), enabling the targeting of neurons for experimentation. However, creating a fly line for driving gene expression within a single neuron found in an EM connectome remains a challenge, as it typically requires identifying a pair of driver lines where only the neuron of interest is expressed in both. This task and other emerging scientific workflows require finding similar neurons across large data sets imaged using different modalities. RESULTS Here, we present NeuronBridge, a web application for easily and rapidly finding putative morphological matches between large data sets of neurons imaged using different modalities. We describe the functionality and construction of the NeuronBridge service, including its user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI), extensible data model, serverless cloud architecture, and massively parallel image search engine. CONCLUSIONS NeuronBridge fills a critical gap in the Drosophila research workflow and is used by hundreds of neuroscience researchers around the world. We offer our software code, open APIs, and processed data sets for integration and reuse, and provide the application as a service at http://neuronbridge.janelia.org .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody Clements
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Cristian Goina
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Philip M Hubbard
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Takashi Kawase
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Donald J Olbris
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Hideo Otsuna
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Robert Svirskas
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Konrad Rokicki
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dorkenwald S, Schneider-Mizell CM, Brittain D, Halageri A, Jordan C, Kemnitz N, Castro MA, Silversmith W, Maitin-Shephard J, Troidl J, Pfister H, Gillet V, Xenes D, Bae JA, Bodor AL, Buchanan J, Bumbarger DJ, Elabbady L, Jia Z, Kapner D, Kinn S, Lee K, Li K, Lu R, Macrina T, Mahalingam G, Mitchell E, Mondal SS, Mu S, Nehoran B, Popovych S, Takeno M, Torres R, Turner NL, Wong W, Wu J, Yin W, Yu SC, Reid RC, da Costa NM, Seung HS, Collman F. CAVE: Connectome Annotation Versioning Engine. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.26.550598. [PMID: 37546753 PMCID: PMC10402030 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.26.550598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Advances in Electron Microscopy, image segmentation and computational infrastructure have given rise to large-scale and richly annotated connectomic datasets which are increasingly shared across communities. To enable collaboration, users need to be able to concurrently create new annotations and correct errors in the automated segmentation by proofreading. In large datasets, every proofreading edit relabels cell identities of millions of voxels and thousands of annotations like synapses. For analysis, users require immediate and reproducible access to this constantly changing and expanding data landscape. Here, we present the Connectome Annotation Versioning Engine (CAVE), a computational infrastructure for immediate and reproducible connectome analysis in up-to petascale datasets (~1mm3) while proofreading and annotating is ongoing. For segmentation, CAVE provides a distributed proofreading infrastructure for continuous versioning of large reconstructions. Annotations in CAVE are defined by locations such that they can be quickly assigned to the underlying segment which enables fast analysis queries of CAVE's data for arbitrary time points. CAVE supports schematized, extensible annotations, so that researchers can readily design novel annotation types. CAVE is already used for many connectomics datasets, including the largest datasets available to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Akhilesh Halageri
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Chris Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Nico Kemnitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Manual A. Castro
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Jakob Troidl
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, USA
| | - Hanspeter Pfister
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, USA
| | - Valentin Gillet
- Lund University, Department of Biology, Lund Vision Group, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Xenes
- Research & Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
| | - J. Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhen Jia
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Sam Kinn
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Kisuk Lee
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
| | - Kai Li
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Eric Mitchell
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shanka Subhra Mondal
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shang Mu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Barak Nehoran
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Sergiy Popovych
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Marc Takeno
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Nicholas L. Turner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - William Wong
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Wenjing Yin
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA
| | - Szi-chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - H. Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borst A, Leibold C. Connecting Connectomes to Physiology. J Neurosci 2023; 43:3599-3610. [PMID: 37197984 PMCID: PMC10198452 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2208-22.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
With the advent of volumetric EM techniques, large connectomic datasets are being created, providing neuroscience researchers with knowledge about the full connectivity of neural circuits under study. This allows for numerical simulation of detailed, biophysical models of each neuron participating in the circuit. However, these models typically include a large number of parameters, and insight into which of these are essential for circuit function is not readily obtained. Here, we review two mathematical strategies for gaining insight into connectomics data: linear dynamical systems analysis and matrix reordering techniques. Such analytical treatment can allow us to make predictions about time constants of information processing and functional subunits in large networks.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This viewpoint provides a concise overview on how to extract important insights from Connectomics data by mathematical methods. First, it explains how new dynamics and new time constants can evolve, simply through connectivity between neurons. These new time-constants can be far longer than the intrinsic membrane time-constants of the individual neurons. Second, it summarizes how structural motifs in the circuit can be discovered. Specifically, there are tools to decide whether or not a circuit is strictly feed-forward or whether feed-back connections exist. Only by reordering connectivity matrices can such motifs be made visible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Borst
- Max-Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Department Circuits-Computation-Models, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Christian Leibold
- Fakultät für Biologie & Bernstein Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Global inhibition in head-direction neural circuits: a systematic comparison between connectome-based spiking neural circuit models. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2023:10.1007/s00359-023-01615-z. [PMID: 36781446 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-023-01615-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
The recent discovery of the head-direction (HD) system in fruit flies has provided unprecedented insights into the neural mechanisms of spatial orientation. Despite the progress, the neural substance of global inhibition, an essential component of the HD circuits, remains controversial. Some studies suggested that the ring neurons provide global inhibition, while others suggested the Δ7 neurons. In the present study, we provide evaluations from the theoretical perspective by performing systematic analyses on the computational models based on the ring-neuron (R models) and Δ7-neurons (Delta models) hypotheses with modifications according to the latest connectomic data. We conducted four tests: robustness, persistency, speed, and dynamical characteristics. We discovered that the two models led to a comparable performance in general, but each excelled in different tests. The R Models were more robust, while the Delta models were better in the persistency test. We also tested a hybrid model that combines both inhibitory mechanisms. While the performances of the R and Delta models in each test are highly parameter-dependent, the Hybrid model performed well in all tests with the same set of parameters. Our results suggest the possibility of combined inhibitory mechanisms in the HD circuits of fruit flies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Court R, Costa M, Pilgrim C, Millburn G, Holmes A, McLachlan A, Larkin A, Matentzoglu N, Kir H, Parkinson H, Brown NH, O’Kane CJ, Armstrong JD, Jefferis GSXE, Osumi-Sutherland D. Virtual Fly Brain-An interactive atlas of the Drosophila nervous system. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1076533. [PMID: 36776967 PMCID: PMC9908962 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1076533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
As a model organism, Drosophila is uniquely placed to contribute to our understanding of how brains control complex behavior. Not only does it have complex adaptive behaviors, but also a uniquely powerful genetic toolkit, increasingly complete dense connectomic maps of the central nervous system and a rapidly growing set of transcriptomic profiles of cell types. But this also poses a challenge: Given the massive amounts of available data, how are researchers to Find, Access, Integrate and Reuse (FAIR) relevant data in order to develop an integrated anatomical and molecular picture of circuits, inform hypothesis generation, and find reagents for experiments to test these hypotheses? The Virtual Fly Brain (virtualflybrain.org) web application & API provide a solution to this problem, using FAIR principles to integrate 3D images of neurons and brain regions, connectomics, transcriptomics and reagent expression data covering the whole CNS in both larva and adult. Users can search for neurons, neuroanatomy and reagents by name, location, or connectivity, via text search, clicking on 3D images, search-by-image, and queries by type (e.g., dopaminergic neuron) or properties (e.g., synaptic input in the antennal lobe). Returned results include cross-registered 3D images that can be explored in linked 2D and 3D browsers or downloaded under open licenses, and extensive descriptions of cell types and regions curated from the literature. These solutions are potentially extensible to cover similar atlasing and data integration challenges in vertebrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Court
- School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingtom
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Clare Pilgrim
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Gillian Millburn
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Alex Holmes
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Alex McLachlan
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Aoife Larkin
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | | | - Huseyin Kir
- European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, United Kingtom
| | - Helen Parkinson
- European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, United Kingtom
| | - Nicolas H. Brown
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | - Cahir J. O’Kane
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingtom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Galili DS, Jefferis GS, Costa M. Connectomics and the neural basis of behaviour. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2022; 54:100968. [PMID: 36113710 PMCID: PMC7614087 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2022.100968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Methods to acquire and process synaptic-resolution electron-microscopy datasets have progressed very rapidly, allowing production and annotation of larger, more complete connectomes. More accurate neuronal matching techniques are enriching cell type data with gene expression, neuron activity, behaviour and developmental information, providing ways to test hypotheses of circuit function. In a variety of behaviours such as learned and innate olfaction, navigation and sexual behaviour, connectomics has already revealed interconnected modules with a hierarchical structure, recurrence and integration of sensory streams. Comparing individual connectomes to determine which circuit features are robust and which are variable is one key research area; new work in comparative connectomics across development, experience, sex and species will establish strong links between neuronal connectivity and brain function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana S Galili
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Gregory Sxe Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Plaza SM, Clements J, Dolafi T, Umayam L, Neubarth NN, Scheffer LK, Berg S. neuPrint: An open access tool for EM connectomics. Front Neuroinform 2022; 16:896292. [PMID: 35935535 PMCID: PMC9350508 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2022.896292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to advances in electron microscopy and deep learning, it is now practical to reconstruct a connectome, a description of neurons and the chemical synapses between them, for significant volumes of neural tissue. Smaller past reconstructions were primarily used by domain experts, could be handled by downloading data, and performance was not a serious problem. But new and much larger reconstructions upend these assumptions. These networks now contain tens of thousands of neurons and tens of millions of connections, with yet larger reconstructions pending, and are of interest to a large community of non-specialists. Allowing other scientists to make use of this data needs more than publication—it requires new tools that are publicly available, easy to use, and efficiently handle large data. We introduce neuPrint to address these data analysis challenges. Neuprint contains two major components—a web interface and programmer APIs. The web interface is designed to allow any scientist worldwide, using only a browser, to quickly ask and answer typical biological queries about a connectome. The neuPrint APIs allow more computer-savvy scientists to make more complex or higher volume queries. NeuPrint also provides features for assessing reconstruction quality. Internally, neuPrint organizes connectome data as a graph stored in a neo4j database. This gives high performance for typical queries, provides access though a public and well documented query language Cypher, and will extend well to future larger connectomics databases. Our experience is also an experiment in open science. We find a significant fraction of the readers of the article proceed to examine the data directly. In our case preprints worked exactly as intended, with data inquiries and PDF downloads starting immediately after pre-print publication, and little affected by formal publication later. From this we deduce that many readers are more interested in our data than in our analysis of our data, suggesting that data-only papers can be well appreciated and that public data release can speed up the propagation of scientific results by many months. We also find that providing, and keeping, the data available for online access imposes substantial additional costs to connectomics research.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shafer OT, Gutierrez GJ, Li K, Mildenhall A, Spira D, Marty J, Lazar AA, Fernandez MDLP. ---Connectomic analysis of the Drosophila lateral neuron clock cells reveals the synaptic basis of functional pacemaker classes. eLife 2022; 11:79139. [PMID: 35766361 PMCID: PMC9365390 DOI: 10.7554/elife.79139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The circadian clock orchestrates daily changes in physiology and behavior to ensure internal temporal order and optimal timing across the day. In animals, a central brain clock coordinates circadian rhythms throughout the body and is characterized by a remarkable robustness that depends on synaptic connections between constituent neurons. The clock neuron network of Drosophila, which shares network motifs with clock networks in the mammalian brain yet is built of many fewer neurons, offers a powerful model for understanding the network properties of circadian timekeeping. Here, we report an assessment of synaptic connectivity within a clock network, focusing on the critical lateral neuron (LN) clock neuron classes within the Janelia hemibrain dataset. Our results reveal that previously identified anatomical and functional subclasses of LNs represent distinct connectomic types. Moreover, we identify a small number of non-clock cell subtypes representing highly synaptically coupled nodes within the clock neuron network. This suggests that neurons lacking molecular timekeeping likely play integral roles within the circadian timekeeping network. To our knowledge, this represents the first comprehensive connectomic analysis of a circadian neuronal network. Most organisms on Earth possess an internal timekeeping system which ensures that bodily processes such as sleep, wakefulness or digestion take place at the right time. These precise daily rhythms are kept in check by a master clock in the brain. There, thousands of neurons – some of which carrying an internal ‘molecular clock’ – connect to each other through structures known as synapses. Exactly how the resulting network is organised to support circadian timekeeping remains unclear. To explore this question, Shafer, Gutierrez et al. focused on fruit flies, as recent efforts have systematically mapped every neuron and synaptic connection in the brain of this model organism. Analysing available data from the hemibrain connectome project at Janelia revealed that that the neurons with the most important timekeeping roles were in fact forming the fewest synapses within the network. In addition, neurons without internal molecular clocks mediated strong synaptic connections between those that did, suggesting that ‘clockless’ cells still play an integral role in circadian timekeeping. With this research, Shafer, Gutierrez et al. provide unexpected insights into the organisation of the master body clock. Better understanding the networks that underpin circadian rhythms will help to grasp how and why these are disrupted in obesity, depression and Alzheimer’s disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orie T Shafer
- Advanced Science Research Center, City University of New York, New York, United States
| | - Gabrielle J Gutierrez
- Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York City, United States
| | - Kimberly Li
- Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College, New York, United States
| | - Amber Mildenhall
- Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College, New York, United States
| | - Daphna Spira
- Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York City, United States
| | - Jonathan Marty
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
| | - Aurel A Lazar
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lazar AA, Turkcan MK, Zhou Y. A Programmable Ontology Encompassing the Functional Logic of the Drosophila Brain. Front Neuroinform 2022; 16:853098. [PMID: 35795870 PMCID: PMC9252271 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2022.853098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Drosophila brain has only a fraction of the number of neurons of higher organisms such as mice and humans. Yet the sheer complexity of its neural circuits recently revealed by large connectomics datasets suggests that computationally modeling the function of fruit fly brain circuits at this scale poses significant challenges. To address these challenges, we present here a programmable ontology that expands the scope of the current Drosophila brain anatomy ontologies to encompass the functional logic of the fly brain. The programmable ontology provides a language not only for modeling circuit motifs but also for programmatically exploring their functional logic. To achieve this goal, we tightly integrated the programmable ontology with the workflow of the interactive FlyBrainLab computing platform. As part of the programmable ontology, we developed NeuroNLP++, a web application that supports free-form English queries for constructing functional brain circuits fully anchored on the available connectome/synaptome datasets, and the published worldwide literature. In addition, we present a methodology for including a model of the space of odorants into the programmable ontology, and for modeling olfactory sensory circuits of the antenna of the fruit fly brain that detect odorant sources. Furthermore, we describe a methodology for modeling the functional logic of the antennal lobe circuit consisting of a massive number of local feedback loops, a characteristic feature observed across Drosophila brain regions. Finally, using a circuit library, we demonstrate the power of our methodology for interactively exploring the functional logic of the massive number of feedback loops in the antennal lobe.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ammer G, Vieira RM, Fendl S, Borst A. Anatomical distribution and functional roles of electrical synapses in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2022; 32:2022-2036.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
11
|
Rapti G. Open Frontiers in Neural Cell Type Investigations; Lessons From Caenorhabditis elegans and Beyond, Toward a Multimodal Integration. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:787753. [PMID: 35321480 PMCID: PMC8934944 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.787753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Nervous system cells, the building blocks of circuits, have been studied with ever-progressing resolution, yet neural circuits appear still resistant to schemes of reductionist classification. Due to their sheer numbers, complexity and diversity, their systematic study requires concrete classifications that can serve reduced dimensionality, reproducibility, and information integration. Conventional hierarchical schemes transformed through the history of neuroscience by prioritizing criteria of morphology, (electro)physiological activity, molecular content, and circuit function, influenced by prevailing methodologies of the time. Since the molecular biology revolution and the recent advents in transcriptomics, molecular profiling gains ground toward the classification of neurons and glial cell types. Yet, transcriptomics entails technical challenges and more importantly uncovers unforeseen spatiotemporal heterogeneity, in complex and simpler nervous systems. Cells change states dynamically in space and time, in response to stimuli or throughout their developmental trajectory. Mapping cell type and state heterogeneity uncovers uncharted terrains in neurons and especially in glial cell biology, that remains understudied in many aspects. Examining neurons and glial cells from the perspectives of molecular neuroscience, physiology, development and evolution highlights the advantage of multifaceted classification schemes. Among the amalgam of models contributing to neuroscience research, Caenorhabditis elegans combines nervous system anatomy, lineage, connectivity and molecular content, all mapped at single-cell resolution, and can provide valuable insights for the workflow and challenges of the multimodal integration of cell type features. This review reflects on concepts and practices of neuron and glial cells classification and how research, in C. elegans and beyond, guides nervous system experimentation through integrated multidimensional schemes. It highlights underlying principles, emerging themes, and open frontiers in the study of nervous system development, regulatory logic and evolution. It proposes unified platforms to allow integrated annotation of large-scale datasets, gene-function studies, published or unpublished findings and community feedback. Neuroscience is moving fast toward interdisciplinary, high-throughput approaches for combined mapping of the morphology, physiology, connectivity, molecular function, and the integration of information in multifaceted schemes. A closer look in mapped neural circuits and understudied terrains offers insights for the best implementation of these approaches.
Collapse
|
12
|
Scheffer LK, Meinertzhagen IA. A connectome is not enough - what is still needed to understand the brain of Drosophila? J Exp Biol 2021; 224:272599. [PMID: 34695211 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.242740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the structure and operation of any nervous system has been a subject of research for well over a century. A near-term opportunity in this quest is to understand the brain of a model species, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. This is an enticing target given its relatively small size (roughly 200,000 neurons), coupled with the behavioral richness that this brain supports, and the wide variety of techniques now available to study both brain and behavior. It is clear that within a few years we will possess a connectome for D. melanogaster: an electron-microscopy-level description of all neurons and their chemical synaptic connections. Given what we will soon have, what we already know and the research that is currently underway, what more do we need to know to enable us to understand the fly's brain? Here, we itemize the data we will need to obtain, collate and organize in order to build an integrated model of the brain of D. melanogaster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis K Scheffer
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19741 Smith Circle, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|