Cortical excitability signatures for the degree of sleepiness in human

Considerations towards a neurobiologically-informed EEG measurement of sleepiness

Sleep is a daily experience across humans and other species, yet our understanding of how and why we sleep is presently incomplete. This is particularly prevalent in research examining the neurophysiological measurement of sleepiness in humans, where several electroencephalogram (EEG) phenomena have been linked with prolonged wakefulness. This leaves researchers without a solid basis for the measurement of homeostatic sleep need and complicates our understanding of the nature of sleep. Recent theoretical and technical advances may allow for a greater understanding of the neurobiological basis of homeostatic sleep need: this may result from increases in neuronal excitability and shifts in excitation/inhibition balance in neuronal circuits and can potentially be directly measured via the aperiodic component of the EEG. Here, we review the literature on EEG-derived markers of sleepiness in humans and argue that changes in these electrophysiological markers may actually result from neuronal activity represented by changes in aperiodic markers. We argue for the use of aperiodic markers derived from the EEG in predicting sleepiness and suggest areas for future research based on these.

Blink-related arousal network surges are shaped by cortical vigilance states

The vigilance state and the excitability of cortical networks impose wide-range effects on brain dynamics that arousal surges could promptly modify. We previously reported an association between spontaneous eye-blinks and BOLD activation in the brain arousal ascending network (AAN) and in thalamic nuclei based on 3T MR resting state brain images. Here we aimed to replicate our analyses using 7T MR images in a larger cohort of participants collected from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), which also contained simultaneous eye-tracking recordings, and to assess the interaction between the blink-associated arousal surges and the vigilance states. For this purpose, we compared blink associated BOLD activity under a vigilant versus a drowsy state, a classification made based on the pupillary data obtained during the fMRI scans. We conducted two main analyses: i) Cross-correlation analysis between the BOLD signal and blink events (eye blink time-series were convolved with the canonical and also with the temporal derivative of the Hemodynamic Response Function, HRF) within preselected regions of interests (ROIs) (i.e., brainstem AAN, thalamic and cerebellar nuclei) together with an exploratory voxel-wise analyses to assess the whole-brain, and ii) blink-event analysis of the BOLD signals to reveal the signal changes onset to the blinks in the preselected ROIs. Consistent with our prior findings on 3T MRI, we showed significant positive cross correlations between BOLD peaks in brainstem and thalamic nuclei that preceded or were overlapping with blink moments and that sharply decreased post-blink. Whole brain analysis revealed blink-related activation that was strongest in cerebellum, insula, lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and visual cortex. Drowsiness impacted HRF BOLD (enhancing it), time-to-peak (delaying it) and post-blink BOLD activity (accentuating decreases). Responses in the drowsy state could be related to the differences in the excitability of cortical, subcortical and cerebellar tissue, such that cerebellar and thalamic regions involved in visual attention processing were more responsive for the vigilant state, but AAN ROIs, as well as cerebellar and thalamic ROIs connected to pre-motor, frontal, temporal and DMN regions were less responsive. Such qualitative and quantitative differences in the blink related BOLD signal changes could reflect delayed cortical processing and the ineffectiveness of arousal surges during states of drowsiness. Future studies that manipulate arousal are needed to corroborate a mechanistic interaction of arousal surges with vigilance states and cortical excitability.

Sleep deprivation drives brain-wide changes in cholinergic presynapse abundance in Drosophila melanogaster

Sleep is an evolutionarily conserved state that supports brain functions, including synaptic plasticity, in species across the animal kingdom. Here, we examine the neuroanatomical and cell-type distribution of presynaptic scaling in the fly brain after sleep loss. We previously found that sleep loss drives accumulation of the active zone scaffolding protein Bruchpilot (BRP) within cholinergic Kenyon cells of the Drosophila melanogaster mushroom body (MB), but not in other classes of MB neurons. To test whether similar cell type-specific trends in plasticity occur broadly across the brain, we used a flp-based genetic reporter to label presynaptic BRP in cholinergic, dopaminergic, GABAergic, or glutamatergic neurons. We then collected whole-brain confocal image stacks of BRP intensity to systematically quantify BRP, a marker of presynapse abundance, across 37 neuropil regions of the central fly brain. Our results indicate that sleep loss, either by overnight (12-h) mechanical stimulation or chronic sleep disruption in insomniac mutants, broadly elevates cholinergic synapse abundance across the brain, while synapse abundance in neurons that produce other neurotransmitters undergoes weaker, if any, changes. Extending sleep deprivation to 24 h drives brain-wide upscaling in glutamatergic, but not other, synapses. Finally, overnight male-male social pairings induce increased BRP in excitatory synapses despite male-female pairings eliciting more waking activity, suggesting experience-specific plasticity. Within neurotransmitter class and waking context, BRP changes are similar across the 37 neuropil domains, indicating that similar synaptic scaling rules may apply across the brain during acute sleep loss and that sleep need may broadly alter excitatory-inhibitory balance in the central brain.

Effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability: A threshold-tracking TMS study and review of the literature

Objective

Insufficient sleep is linked to several health problems. Previous studies on the effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability using conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) included a limited number of modalities, and few inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) and showed conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability through threshold-tracking TMS, using a wide range of protocols at multiple ISIs.

Methods

Fifteen healthy subjects (mean age ± SD: 36 ± 3.34 years) were included. The following tests were performed before and after 24 h of sleep deprivation using semi-automated threshold-tacking TMS protocols: short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) at 11 ISIs between 1 and 30 ms, short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at 14 ISIs between 1 and 4.9 ms, long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) at 6 ISIs between 50 and 300 ms, and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) at 12 ISIs between 16 and 30 ms.

Results

No significant differences were observed between pre- and post-sleep deprivation measurements for SICI, ICF, SICF, or LICI at any ISIs (p < 0.05). As for SAI, we found a difference at 28 ms (p = 0.007) and 30 ms (p = 0.04) but not at other ISIs.

Conclusions

Sleep deprivation does not affect cortical excitability except for SAI.

Significance

This study confirms some of the previous studies while contradicting others.

Natural brain state change with E/I balance shifting toward inhibition is associated with vigilance impairment

The delicate balance between cortical excitation and inhibition (E/I) plays a pivotal role in brain state changes. While previous studies have associated cortical hyperexcitability with brain state changes induced by sleep deprivation, whether cortical hypoexcitability is also linked to brain state changes and, if so, how it could affect cognitive performance remain unknown. Here, we address these questions by examining the brain state change occurring after meals, i.e., postprandial somnolence, and comparing it with that induced by sleep deprivation. By analyzing features representing network excitability based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, we confirmed cortical hyperexcitability under sleep deprivation but revealed hypoexcitability under postprandial somnolence. In addition, we found that both sleep deprivation and postprandial somnolence adversely affected the level of vigilance. These results indicate that cortical E/I balance toward inhibition is associated with brain state changes, and deviation from the balanced state, regardless of its direction, could impair cognitive performance.

Depth of sedation with dexmedetomidine increases transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential amplitude non-linearly

BACKGROUND

Cortical excitability is higher in unconsciousness than in wakefulness, but it is unclear how this relates to anaesthesia. We investigated cortical excitability in response to dexmedetomidine, the effects of which are not fully known.

METHODS

We recorded transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and EEG in frontal and parietal cortex of 20 healthy subjects undergoing dexmedetomidine sedation in four conditions (baseline, light sedation, deep sedation, recovery). We used the first component (0-30 ms) of the TMS-evoked potential (TEP) to measure cortical excitability (amplitude), slope, and positive and negative peak latencies (collectively, TEP indices). We used generalised linear mixed models to test the effect of condition, brain region, and responsiveness on TEP indices.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, amplitude in the frontal cortex increased by 6.52 μV (P<0.001) in light sedation, 4.55 μV (P=0.003) in deep sedation, and 5.03 μV (P<0.001) in recovery. Amplitude did not change in the parietal cortex. Compared with baseline, slope increased in all conditions (P<0.02) in the frontal but not parietal cortex. The frontal cortex showed 5.73 μV higher amplitude (P<0.001), 0.63 μV ms-1 higher slope (P<0.001), and 2.2 ms shorter negative peak latency (P=0.001) than parietal areas. Interactions between dexmedetomidine and region had effects over amplitude (P=0.004) and slope (P=0.009), with both being higher in light sedation, deep sedation, and recovery compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential amplitude changes non-linearly as a function of depth of sedation by dexmedetomidine, with a region-specific paradoxical increase. Future research should investigate other anaesthetics to elucidate the link between cortical excitability and depth of sedation.