Fip1 is a multivalent interaction scaffold for processing factors in human mRNA 3' end biogenesis

Molecular basis of human poly(A) polymerase recruitment by mPSF

3' end processing of most eukaryotic precursor-mRNAs (pre-mRNAs) is a crucial cotranscriptional process that generally involves the cleavage and polyadenylation of the precursor transcripts. Within the human 3' end processing machinery, the four-subunit mammalian polyadenylation specificity factor (mPSF) recognizes the polyadenylation signal (PAS) in the pre-mRNA and recruits the poly(A) polymerase α (PAPOA) to it. To shed light on the molecular mechanisms of PAPOA recruitment to mPSF, we used a combination of cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) single-particle analysis, computational structure prediction, and in vitro biochemistry to reveal an intricate interaction network. A short linear motif in the mPSF subunit FIP1 interacts with the structured core of human PAPOA, with a binding mode that is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human. In higher eukaryotes, however, PAPOA contains a conserved C-terminal motif that can interact intramolecularly with the same residues of the PAPOA structured core used to bind FIP1. Interestingly, using biochemical assay and cryo-EM structural analysis, we found that the PAPOA C-terminal motif can also directly interact with mPSF at the subunit CPSF160. These results show that PAPOA recruitment to mPSF is mediated by two distinct intermolecular connections and further suggest the presence of mutually exclusive interactions in the regulation of 3' end processing.

Natural variation in the plant polyadenylation complex

Messenger RNA polyadenylation, the process wherein the primary RNA polymerase II transcript is cleaved and a poly(A) tract added, is a key step in the expression of genes in plants. Moreover, it is a point at which gene expression may be regulated by determining the functionality of the mature mRNA. Polyadenylation is mediated by a complex (the polyadenylation complex, or PAC) that consists of between 15 and 20 subunits. While the general functioning of these subunits may be inferred by extending paradigms established in well-developed eukaryotic models, much remains to be learned about the roles of individual subunits in the regulation of polyadenylation in plants. To gain further insight into this, we conducted a survey of variability in the plant PAC. For this, we drew upon a database of naturally-occurring variation in numerous geographic isolates of Arabidopsis thaliana. For a subset of genes encoding PAC subunits, the patterns of variability included the occurrence of premature stop codons in some Arabidopsis accessions. These and other observations lead us to conclude that some genes purported to encode PAC subunits in Arabidopsis are actually pseudogenes, and that others may encode proteins with dispensable functions in the plant. Many subunits of the PAC showed patterns of variability that were consistent with their roles as essential proteins in the cell. Several other PAC subunits exhibit patterns of variability consistent with selection for new or altered function. We propose that these latter subunits participate in regulatory interactions important for differential usage of poly(A) sites.

Birth of a poly(A) tail: mechanisms and control of mRNA polyadenylation

During their synthesis in the cell nucleus, most eukaryotic mRNAs undergo a two-step 3'-end processing reaction in which the pre-mRNA is cleaved and released from the transcribing RNA polymerase II and a polyadenosine (poly(A)) tail is added to the newly formed 3'-end. These biochemical reactions might appear simple at first sight (endonucleolytic RNA cleavage and synthesis of a homopolymeric tail), but their catalysis requires a multi-faceted enzymatic machinery, the cleavage and polyadenylation complex (CPAC), which is composed of more than 20 individual protein subunits. The activity of CPAC is further orchestrated by Poly(A) Binding Proteins (PABPs), which decorate the poly(A) tail during its synthesis and guide the mRNA through subsequent gene expression steps. Here, we review the structure, molecular mechanism, and regulation of eukaryotic mRNA 3'-end processing machineries with a focus on the polyadenylation step. We concentrate on the CPAC and PABPs from mammals and the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, because these systems are the best-characterized at present. Comparison of their functions provides valuable insights into the principles of mRNA 3'-end processing.

3'-End Processing of Eukaryotic mRNA: Machinery, Regulation, and Impact on Gene Expression

Formation of the 3' end of a eukaryotic mRNA is a key step in the production of a mature transcript. This process is mediated by a number of protein factors that cleave the pre-mRNA, add a poly(A) tail, and regulate transcription by protein dephosphorylation. Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) in humans, or cleavage and polyadenylation factor (CPF) in yeast, coordinates these enzymatic activities with each other, with RNA recognition, and with transcription. The site of pre-mRNA cleavage can strongly influence the translation, stability, and localization of the mRNA. Hence, cleavage site selection is highly regulated. The length of the poly(A) tail is also controlled to ensure that every transcript has a similar tail when it is exported from the nucleus. In this review, we summarize new mechanistic insights into mRNA 3'-end processing obtained through structural studies and biochemical reconstitution and outline outstanding questions in the field.