High-Resolution CT Chest Findings in Suspected COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients With Negative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay

High resolution chest computed tomography findings in patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 pneumonia in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Background

The alarming spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a shortage of RT-PCR kits in Uganda necessitating the use of high-resolution chest Computed Tomography to guide patient management and treatment.

Main Objective

To describe the chest HRCT findings in patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 pneumonia and to compare its diagnostic accuracy to RT-PCR. .

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, chest HRCT findings of 384 patients and available RT-PCR laboratory results were reviewed and recorded in the data collection form.

Results

The commonest chest HRCT findings were bilateral ground glass opacities (78.2%). Out of the 31.7% patients that took the PCR test only 26.9% tested positive. 16 out of 17 patients who tested negative, were classified under CORADS 5.The sensitivity of chest HRCT was 90.4%, 95% CI (82.6-95.5), positive predictive value of 84.2%, 95% CI (75.6-90.7), and accuracy of 77.5%, 95% CI (71.5-87.1).

Conclusions

HRCT was found superior to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19. A patient with positive HRCT findings should be treated as COVID 19 when RT-PCR is inaccessible or results are negative. A patient with negative HRCT requires complimentary RT-PCR and possibly follow up CT scans if symptoms persist before treating for COVID 19.

Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 infection severity with ABO blood groups and RhD antigen: a case-control study

Objective

The role of ABO types and RhD antigen in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity has been investigated in several recent studies. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify the relationship of ABO and RhD types with symptomatic COVID-19 disease and determine the groups associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.

Methods

This observational case-control study was performed in 530 Iraqi-Kurdish patients with COVID-19. Among them, 184 were severe cases that required hospitalization, while 346 were mild to moderate cases that were treated at home. ABO and RhD antigen groups were compared between cases and 1698 control records from 1 year before the pandemic. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on real-time polymerase chain reaction tests and high-resolution chest computed tomography scans with the typical clinical presentation.

Results

There were no significant differences in ABO and RhD antigen distributions between the COVID-19 cases and non-COVID controls. No ABO group was associated with the risk of hospitalization as a marker of the severity of infection.

Conclusions

There was no significant association between symptomatic COVID-19 disease and any ABO group or RhD antigen type. No impact of ABO groups on hospitalization was documented.

Computed Tomography Severity Scoring on High-Resolution Computed Tomography Thorax and Inflammatory Markers With COVID-19 Related Mortality in a Designated COVID Hospital

Introduction Radiological Society of the Netherlands introduced the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and the corresponding CT severity score (CTSS) to diagnose COVID-19 severity. However, data regarding the same is very limited. Objectives The objective of this study was to correlate the computed tomography severity scoring (CTSS) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) thorax and inflammatory markers with COVID-19 related mortality. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary center between June 2020 to May 2021 among 2343 adult patients at the department of radio-diagnosis with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases who received an HRCT thorax. Data was collected retrospectively from the records regarding age, sex, and information regarding inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Information on HRCT thorax of patients was reviewed for radiological suspicion of COVID-19 related lung changes using CO-RADS scoring and severity of lung involvement using CT-severity scoring. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results The mean age was 51.69 ± 16.02 years, and most of the study participants were male (1592, 67.95%). The majority (999, 42.64%) had diabetes as a comorbidity. The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was positive in 1571 (67.05%) participants. The majority (1571, 67.05%) had a CO-RADS score of six, and only 150 (6.40%) had CO-RADS score of four. The CT severity score was normal in 147 (6.27%), mild in 724 (30.90%), moderate in 903 (38.54%), and severe in 569 (24.29%) participants. The CRP levels were moderate in 1200 (51.22%) and severe in 428 (18.27%) participants. The mean ferritin, D-dimer and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were 321.83 ± 266.42 ng/ml, 1.51 ± 0.85mg/l, and 323.05 ± 95.52pg/ml, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.25 ± 6.52 days. Most of them (1926 out of 2343, 82.20%) survived, and nearly 417 out of 2343 (17.80%) died. Out of 2343, 569 participants had severe CT severity scores, out of which 205 (36.03%) died, and 364 (63.97%) participants survived. Conclusion A positive correlation was found between CT severity scoring on HRCT thorax and inflammatory markers with COVID-19 related mortality and can be used in early diagnosis and timely management of COVID-19 positive patients.

Diagnostic Value of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Scan in COVID-19: Do We Need to Think Outside the Box?

Background and objective The ambiguous nature and high infectivity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have caused soaring morbidity and mortality worldwide. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is preferred for detecting COVID-19. However, its poor sensitivity and the emerging use of high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan for disease severity make the use of RT-PCR quite obsolete. In light of this, our study aimed to explore the beneficial role of HRCT and compare the HRCT findings across various patient demographics and parameters. Methods This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. All patients underwent a chest HRCT scan preceded by RT-PCR testing. We used the CT severity score (CTSS) of the chest to calculate disease severity. Demographical data and results of radiological findings were tabulated and compared across RT-PCR positivity, age, and gender. Independent samples t-test and chi-square test were used to analyze the data. Results Glass ground opacity was the most prevalent finding in 99% of the patients, followed by lymph node involvement, consolidation, and crazy-paving pattern. Pleural effusion was observed in only 10% of the patients while pericardial effusion and hiatal hernia were present in 5%. In RT-PCR-positive patients, the posterior basal segment of the lower lobe of the right and left lungs were found to be dominantly involved; however, the upper and middle lobes of the right lung were more commonly involved than the left lung. The mean CTSS was significantly higher in patients aged above 50 years (p<0.001). The mean CTSS of RT-PCR-negative patients was higher than that of RT-PCR-positive patients (15.18 vs. 14.31, p=0.537). Conclusion RT-PCR has a limited role in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The HRCT scan can detect typical COVID-19 findings even in patients with negative RT-PCR results. Moreover, the use of HRCT scan in determining the disease severity and extent of lung damage can lead to a better assessment of critically ill patients.