Impact of Sports Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery Rotations on Musculoskeletal Knowledge in Residency

Using the Novel Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool: A Feasibility Study

Background and objective While musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders account for a significant number of primary care and emergency department (ED) visits, there are widely recognized shortcomings and gaps in MSK education throughout medical training. Undergraduate medical education (UME) frequently fails to impart clinically relevant MSK knowledge, while many emergency medicine (EM) residency graduates report feeling unprepared to manage MSK complaints. Existing MSK assessments are not tailored to EM and may inaccurately assess specialty-specific MSK knowledge. The novel validated Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool (MEAT) holds great promise in standardizing EM MSK knowledge assessment. This trial of feasibility was conducted to assess the viability and practicality of using MEAT to evaluate MSK knowledge among incoming resident physicians in EM programs. Methods This feasibility study involved 21 incoming EM resident physicians from two programs at a single institution. MEAT was administered online during orientation, and demographic data and survey metadata were collected. UME MSK education details were obtained, and MEAT scores were analyzed. Results Participants reported no difficulties in accessing or understanding the 50-question online MEAT, resulting in a 100% response rate. The average pretest score for all interns was 29.9, with a median of 30. Most participants had documented UME MSK education, but curricular content varied widely. The participants took an average of 32 minutes to complete the assessment. Conclusions MEAT demonstrated successful implementation and high response rates, suggesting a high level of feasibility. The tool can be used to assess baseline MSK knowledge and ultimately track progression during residency with the potential for evaluating educational interventions once further validation studies have been performed. Further adoption of MEAT across multiple EM residency programs will help to enhance the tool's generalizability.

Development and National Validation of a Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool

Introduction Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints and injuries are the fourth most common primary diagnosis in the emergency department in the United States (US). Despite the prevalence and economic impact on the US healthcare system, new emergency medicine (EM) residency graduates report feeling unprepared to treat MSK complaints. Currently, there are no reported means to assess MSK knowledge in EM resident physicians. The purpose of this study is to develop a validated and peer-reviewed multiple-choice assessment tool focused on MSK knowledge relevant to EM to allow us to better assess the knowledge of resident physicians. Methods A group of EM/Sports Medicine subject-matter experts (SMEs) created an initial list of the most important MSK topics in EM to generate a relevant question bank. The questions were validated by a different group of SMEs using a three-round modified Delphi method to obtain consensus on the importance of each question. Based on these results, the assessment was formed. Results From a list of 99 MSK topics, SMEs developed a final list of 37 MSK topics relevant to EM. Following round one, free-marginal kappa was 0.58, 95% CI [0.50, 0.66], with a moderate overall agreement of 71.95%. Following round two, the calculated free-marginal kappa increased to 0.88, 95% CI [0.83, 0.92], with an overall agreement of 91.79%. Using a five-point Likert scale, a threshold of an average score less than four was used to exclude questions in round three of validation and to create a final 50-question assessment tool. Conclusion Our proposed exam, titled Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool (MEAT), was successfully validated by experts in our field. It evaluates clinically important topics and offers a tool for assessing MSK knowledge in EM resident physicians. Future studies are needed to determine the feasibility of administering the tool and to establish a baseline score among different populations within the practicing field of EM.

A Profile of Orthopedic Education in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in the United States

Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) residents throughout the United States are required to become skilled at performing a robust list of select orthopedic procedures, as well as learn how to diagnose and manage patients with musculoskeletal complaints. However, EM residency programs vary significantly in how they teach orthopedics and the content they cover. The purpose of this study was to profile the orthopedic education received by emergency medicine residents in United States residency programs. Methods We developed a survey based on accreditation requirements and The Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. The survey was designed to gather detailed information about the orthopedic education provided to EM residents. The survey was sent to EM program directors or their designees at all 263 accredited EM residency programs across the United States between October 2020 to January 2021. Results We attained a 34.6% (91 of 260) adjusted response rate with adequate representation of relevant program characteristics such as region, accreditation status, program length, size, and setting. Most (63.7%) responding programs required an orthopedics rotation during the intern year. These required orthopedic rotations were primarily four weeks in duration. The most common methods for teaching orthopedic topics included didactics (97.8%), procedures on live patients under supervision (73.3%), and assigned reading materials in textbooks or manuals (68.9%). Conclusion The orthopedic education received by EM residents in the United States is strikingly variable, with residency programs having to develop custom curricula to teach orthopedics content based on the resources available to them. Future efforts should be directed toward creating a universal curriculum that addresses accreditation and EM practice standards.

National Needs Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residencies for Musculoskeletal Knowledge

Introduction Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints and injuries account for a large percentage of presenting chief complaints to the emergency department in the United States (US). Despite the prevalence and economic impact on the US healthcare system, there is a documented deficiency in MSK education at all training and practicing levels in the US medical system. The purpose of this needs assessment is to better determine the state of MSK education in Emergency Medicine residency programs. Methods An online needs assessment form was sent to Emergency Medicine program directors in the US. Summary statistics were performed followed by an exploratory analysis. Results Data from 43 of 272 Emergency Medicine program directors that responded to this needs assessment were analyzed. Respondents ranked the importance of MSK education in Emergency Medicine on a Likert scale of 1-5 (very unimportant to very important) at a mean of 4.2. Additionally, 97.6% of respondents believe that their MSK curriculum could be improved. Seventy-nine percent of respondents were somewhat likely or highly likely to use a standardized method or tool to assess MSK knowledge. Of the top three barriers to MSK education implementation, 94.9% cited time, 56.4% cited interdepartmental relations, and 46.2% cited funding. Conclusion MSK knowledge is taught and assessed in highly variable methods across Emergency Medicine residency programs. Although efforts are being made to address the known deficiency in MSK knowledge, further research is needed to perform a larger needs assessment, study innovative MSK education modalities, and develop a standardized MSK assessment for Emergency Medicine residency training.

Impact of Sports Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery Rotations on Musculoskeletal Knowledge in Residency: An Update and Longitudinal Study

Introduction Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints and injuries account for a significant percentage of presenting chief complaints to the emergency department in the United States (US). Despite the prevalence of disease and economic impact on the US healthcare system, there is a documented deficiency in MSK education at all training and practicing levels in the US medical system. The purpose of this study is to determine MSK knowledge acquisition after an orthopedic or primary care sports medicine (PCSM) rotation in three emergency medicine (EM) residency programs at a single institution. Methods A total of 115 EM post-graduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents participated in and completed this study over five academic years. Based on existing residency program curricula, the participants were categorized into two groups. One group completed a traditional four-week Orthopedic Surgery rotation and the other group completed a four-week Sports Medicine rotation. The validated written Freedman and Bernstein MSK examination (FB-MSK) was administered to all participants at the start of residency and at completion of their rotation. Fifty-nine of the participants participated in a longitudinal secondary study over five academic years. The FB-MSK was offered to all participants every year following the completion of their rotation during their residency. Results Post-rotation scores improved regardless of which group the resident belonged to. The orthopedic group improved an average of 3.11 points (p = <0.0001, CI 2.39 to 3.82) and the average improvement in the PCSM group was 3.97 points (p = <0.0001, CI 2.81 to 5.83). The post-rotation scores were similar regardless of the group (p = 0.4287, CI -0.73 to 1.70). The amount of improvement in scores between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.209, CI -0.49 to 2.21). Of the longitudinal participants, PGY-3+ significantly scored higher than PGY-1 (p = 0.0325, 95% CI 0.165 to 3.658). Conclusion Regardless of rotation type, MSK knowledge acquisition appears to significantly improve. EM senior residents demonstrate significant MSK knowledge acquisition during residency. Further studies on a multi-institutional level are needed to account for MSK curriculum variability in residency programs.