1
|
Zhou P, Du Y, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Li T, Tian W, Wu T, Xiao Z. Efficacy and Safety in Proton Therapy and Photon Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2328136. [PMID: 37581887 PMCID: PMC10427943 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Proton therapy has unique physical properties and higher relative biological effectiveness. However, whether proton therapy has greater benefit than photon therapy is still unclear. Objective To evaluate whether proton was associated with better efficacy and safety outcomes, including dosimetric, prognosis, and toxic effects outcomes, compared with photon therapy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton therapy singly. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for articles published through November 25, 2021, and updated to March 25, 2023. Study Selection For the comparison of proton and photon therapy, studies including dosimetric, prognosis, and associated toxic effects outcomes were included. The separate evaluation of proton therapy evaluated the same metrics. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data on study design, individual characteristics, and outcomes were extracted. If I2 was greater than 50%, the random-effects model was selected. This meta-analysis is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were organs at risk (OARs) dosimetric outcomes, prognosis (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and objective response rate [ORR]), and radiation-related toxic effects. Results A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For dosimetric analysis, proton therapy was associated with significantly reduced OARs dose. Meta-analysis showed that photon therapy was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.61; I2 = 11%), but no difference in PFS was observed. Subgroup analysis showed worse OS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.78; I2 = 34%) and PFS (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.08; I2 = 7%) in the radical therapy group with photon therapy. The pathological complete response rate was similar between groups. Proton therapy was associated with significantly decreased grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis and pericardial effusion, and grade 4 or higher lymphocytopenia. Single-rate analysis of proton therapy found 89% OS and 65% PFS at 1 year, 71% OS and 56% PFS at 2 years, 63% OS and 48% PFS at 3 years, and 56% OS and 42% PFS at 5 years. The incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation esophagitis was 50%, grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis was 2%, grade 2 or higher pleural effusion was 4%, grade 2 or higher pericardial effusion was 3%, grade 3 or higher radiation esophagitis was 8%, and grade 4 or higher lymphocytopenia was 17%. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis, proton therapy was associated with reduced OARs doses and toxic effects and improved prognosis compared with photon therapy for esophageal cancer, but caution is warranted. In the future, these findings should be further validated in randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pixiao Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Yangfeng Du
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- The Second People’s Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Mei Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Wei Tian
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| | - Zemin Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changde, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Solidum JGN, Rojo RD, Wo JY, Dee EC. Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14164045. [PMID: 36011037 PMCID: PMC9407004 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Early-stage esophageal cancer is managed surgically, with the addition of radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. Current photon-based radiotherapy results in a high treatment-related complications, due to proximal organ involvement. The anatomic location of the esophagus raises challenges due to the anatomical changes associated with diaphragmatic motion, weight loss, tumor changes, and set-up variability. These propelled the interest in proton beam therapy (PBT), which theoretically offers a reduction in the radiation exposure to healthy neighboring tissues with improvements in the therapeutic ratio. In this review, we present the role of PBT for esophageal cancer, including treatment planning, early clinical comparisons with photon-based techniques, ongoing trials, current challenges, toxicities, and issues of equity and health services. Abstract Early-stage esophageal cancer is often primarily managed surgically, with the addition of radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. However, current photon-based radiotherapy regimens and surgery results in a high incidence of treatment-related cardiac and pulmonary complications due to the involvement of proximal organs at risk. In addition, the anatomic location of the esophagus raises challenges for radiotherapy due to the anatomical changes associated with diaphragmatic motion, weight loss, tumor changes, and set-up variability. These challenges propelled the interest in proton beam therapy (PBT), which theoretically offers a reduction in the radiation exposure to healthy neighboring tissues with improvements in the therapeutic ratio. Several dosimetric studies support the potential advantages of PBT for esophageal cancer treatment however, translation of these results to improved clinical outcomes remains unclear with limited clinical data, especially in large populations. Studies on the effect on quality of life are likewise lacking. Here, we review the existing and emerging role of PBT for esophageal cancer, including treatment planning, early clinical comparisons of PBT with photon-based techniques, recently concluded and ongoing clinical trials, challenges and toxicities, effects on quality of life, and global inequities in the treatment of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jea Giezl N. Solidum
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Raniv D. Rojo
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Edward Christopher Dee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prasad RN, Miller ED, Addison D, Bazan JG. Lack of Cardiotoxicity Endpoints in Prospective Trials Involving Chest Radiation Therapy: A Review of Registered, Latter-Phase Studies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:808531. [PMID: 35223489 PMCID: PMC8863863 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.808531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chest radiation therapy (RT) has been associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in numerous studies including the landmark Darby study published in 2013 demonstrating a linear increase in cardiac mortality with increasing mean heart radiation dose. However, the extent to which cardiotoxicity has been incorporated as an endpoint in prospective RT studies remains unknown. METHODS We queried clincaltrials.gov to identify phase II/III trials in lung, esophageal, lymphoma, mesothelioma, thymoma, or breast cancer from 1/1/2006-2/1/2021 enrolling greater than 100 patients wherein chest RT was delivered in at least one treatment arm. The primary endpoint was the rate of inclusion of cardiotoxicity as a specific primary or secondary endpoint in the pre- (enrollment started prior to 1/1/2014) versus post-Darby era using the Chi-square test (p<0.05 considered significant). We also analyzed clinical trial factors associated with the inclusion of cardiotoxicity as an endpoint using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS In total, 1,822 trials were identified, of which 256 merited inclusion. 32% were for esophageal, 31% lung, 28% breast, and 7% lymphoma/thymoma/mesothelioma cancers, respectively. 5% (N=13) included cardiotoxicity as an endpoint: 6 breast cancer, 3 lung cancer, 3 esophageal cancer, and 1 lymphoma study. There was no difference in the inclusion of cardiotoxicity endpoints in the pre-Darby versus post-Darby era (3.9% vs. 5.9%, P=0.46). The greatest absolute increase in inclusion of cardiotoxicity as an endpoint was seen for lung cancer (0% vs. 6%, p=0.17) and breast cancer (5.7% vs. 10.8%, p=0.43) studies, though these increases remained statistically non-significant. We found no clinical trial factors associated with the inclusion of cardiotoxicity as an endpoint. CONCLUSIONS Among prospective trials involving chest RT, cardiotoxicity remains an uncommon endpoint despite its prevalence as a primary source of toxicity following treatment. In order to better characterize cardiac toxicities, future prospective studies involving chest RT should include cardiotoxicity endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul N. Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Eric D. Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Daniel Addison
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jose G. Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knippen S, Duma MN. [Esophageal cancer: improved prognosis with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:86-88. [PMID: 34825251 PMCID: PMC8760194 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Knippen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, (Direktorin: Prof. Dr. med. A. Wittig), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07745, Jena, Deutschland.
| | - Marciana-Nona Duma
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, (Direktorin: Prof. Dr. med. A. Wittig), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07745, Jena, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chuong MD, Hallemeier CL, Li H, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Tryggestad EJ, Yu J, Yang M, Choi JI, Kang M, Liu W, Knopf A, Meijers A, Molitoris JK, Apisarnthanarax S, Giap H, Hoppe BS, Lee P, Chang JY, Simone CB, Lin SH. Executive Summary of Clinical and Technical Guidelines for Esophageal Cancer Proton Beam Therapy From the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Subcommittees. Front Oncol 2021; 11:748331. [PMID: 34737959 PMCID: PMC8560961 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.748331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of potentially curative management of esophageal cancer (EC). However, RT can cause significant acute and late morbidity due to excess radiation exposure to nearby critical organs, especially the heart and lungs. Sparing these organs from both low and high radiation dose has been demonstrated to achieve clinically meaningful reductions in toxicity and may improve long-term survival. Accruing dosimetry and clinical evidence support the consideration of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the management of EC. There are critical treatment planning and delivery uncertainties that should be considered when treating EC with PBT, especially as there may be substantial motion-related interplay effects. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Subcommittees jointly developed guidelines regarding patient selection, treatment planning, clinical trials, and future directions of PBT for EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Erik J Tryggestad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Smith Apisarnthanarax
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jethwa KR, Haddock MG, Tryggestad EJ, Hallemeier CL. The emerging role of proton therapy for esophagus cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:144-156. [PMID: 32175118 PMCID: PMC7052753 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plays an essential role in the treatment of esophageal cancer as either curative or neoadjuvant therapy. When delivered with conventional photon-based techniques, multiple adjacent organs at risk including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, stomach, and bowel, receive considerable radiation dose which may contribute to acute and late adverse events (AEs). Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers a reduction in radiation exposure to these organs and potentially an improvement in the therapeutic ratio. Herein we discuss the emerging role of PBT for esophageal cancer, including rationale, treatment planning, early dosimetric and clinical comparisons of PBT with photon-based techniques, ongoing prospective trials, and potential areas of opportunity for the incorporation of PBT with the goal of improving outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R. Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin WC, Chang CL, Hsu HL, Yuan KSP, Wu ATH, Wu SY. Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy-Based or Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11101529. [PMID: 31658709 PMCID: PMC6826542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11101529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To date, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT with standard fractionation three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) have not been compared. In this study, the outcomes of IMRT-based concurrent CCRT and those of 3D-CRT-based CCRT were compared in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). Methods: We enrolled 2062 patients with TESCC who had received CCRT and categorized them into two groups on the basis of their treatment modality: Group 1 (3D-CRT-based CCRT) and Group 2 (IMRT-based CCRT). Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the American Joint Committee on Cancer advanced stages (≥IIIA) and 3D-CRT were significant independent predictors of poor outcomes in patients with TESCC who received definitive CCRT. Moreover, receiving IMRT-based CCRT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–0.98) was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.0223). In Group 2, aHRs (95% CIs) for overall mortality at early (IA–IIB) and advanced clinical stages were 0.91 (0.67–1.25, p = 0.5746) and 0.88 (0.77–0.99, p = 0.0368), respectively. Conclusion: IMRT-based CCRT resulted in higher survival rates in patients with advanced clinical stages of TESCC (i.e., IIIA–IIIC), namely, clinical T3, clinical T4, or lymph node involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Cheng Lin
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| | - Chia-Lun Chang
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, 106 Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| | - Han-Lin Hsu
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
- School of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| | - Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| | - Alexander T H Wu
- Ph.D. Program for Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| | - Szu-Yuan Wu
- Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan.
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan 265, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lin JB, Hung LC, Cheng CY, Chien YA, Lee CH, Huang CC, Chou TW, Ko MH, Lai YC, Liu MT, Chang TH, Lee J, Chen YJ. Prognostic significance of lung radiation dose in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:85. [PMID: 31126307 PMCID: PMC6534831 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1283-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prognostic significance of radiation dose to the lung or heart is unknown in esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodal therapy). This study aimed to determine the association between lung and heart radiation dose volumes and prognosis of esophageal cancer after trimodal therapy. Methods This study reviewed 123 esophageal cancer patients treated with trimodal therapy in two tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2015. The dose-volume histogram parameter of Vx was defined as the percentage of total organ volume receiving a radiation dose of x (Gy) or more. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were identified using Cox regression models. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to select cut-off values for dose-volume. Results Median follow-up was 28.3 months (range: 4.7–92.8 months). Median OS and progression-free survival were 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.4–40.6 months) and 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.9–30.7 months), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that lung V20 (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04–1.14; p < 0.001) and lung V5 (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.05; p = 0.03) were associated with OS when adjusting for surgical margin and pathological treatment response. The 5-year OS for patients with lung V20 ≤ 23% vs. patients with lung V20 > 23% was 54.4% vs. 5% (p < 0.001) whereas that for patients with lung V5 ≤ 56% vs. patients with lung V5 > 56% was 81.5% vs. 23.4% (p < 0.001). Mean heart dose showed no association with survival outcomes. Conclusions Lung radiation dose was independently associated with survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1283-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhen-Bin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chung Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yuan Cheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yu-An Chien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Chou-Hsien Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, E-Da Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan
| | - Tsai-Wei Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Huei Ko
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Chun Lai
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Mu-Tai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Tung-Hao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City, 50006, Taiwan. .,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
| | - Jie Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, 92, Section 2, Chung Shan North Road, Taipei, 10449, Taiwan. .,Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei city, Taiwan.
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, 92, Section 2, Chung Shan North Road, Taipei, 10449, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei city, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|