1
|
Al-Qudah AM, Sivaguru S, Anetakis KM, Crammond D, Balzer JR, Subramaniam K, Sadhasivam S, Shandal V, Thirumala PD. Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy Surgeries. Eur Neurol 2024; 87:242-249. [PMID: 39433042 DOI: 10.1159/000540311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) as modalities of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in predicting postoperative delirium (POD) in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery. METHODS A total cohort of 425 patients was included in this study. Medical record data were reviewed retrospectively and their documented significant IONM data were analyzed and integrated into the study for each patient. The study cohort was assessed for POD with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), and a score of >4 was positive for delirium. RESULTS Of the 425 patients who underwent CEA for carotid stenosis, 65 (15.29%) had documented significant IONM changes. Of those 65 patients with significant changes, 16 (24.61%) had POD. On the other hand, of the 360 patients without changes, 31 (8.61%) had POD. Utilizing logistic regression while adjusting for possible confounders, IONM changes were still significantly associated with POD (p value: <0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.91-7.98; adjusted odds ratio (ORadj): 3.94). Specifically, SSEP changes alone were significantly associated with POD (p value: <0.001; 95% CI: 2.36-11.08; ORadj: 5.15). CONCLUSION Significant IONM changes increase the risk of developing POD in patients undergoing CEA. Despite the low overall risk of POD after CEA in our study, it is imperative to conclude that patients with POD are twice as likely to exhibit IONM changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah M Al-Qudah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurology, UPMC Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sreeja Sivaguru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine M Anetakis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald Crammond
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Balzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathirvel Subramaniam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Varun Shandal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Parthasarathy D Thirumala
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stulberg EL, Sachdev PS, Murray AM, Cramer SC, Sorond FA, Lakshminarayan K, Sabayan B. Post-Stroke Brain Health Monitoring and Optimization: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7413. [PMID: 38068464 PMCID: PMC10706919 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Significant advancements have been made in recent years in the acute treatment and secondary prevention of stroke. However, a large proportion of stroke survivors will go on to have enduring physical, cognitive, and psychological disabilities from suboptimal post-stroke brain health. Impaired brain health following stroke thus warrants increased attention from clinicians and researchers alike. In this narrative review based on an open timeframe search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, we define post-stroke brain health and appraise the body of research focused on modifiable vascular, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors for optimizing post-stroke brain health. In addition, we make clinical recommendations for the monitoring and management of post-stroke brain health at major post-stroke transition points centered on four key intertwined domains: cognition, psychosocial health, physical functioning, and global vascular health. Finally, we discuss potential future work in the field of post-stroke brain health, including the use of remote monitoring and interventions, neuromodulation, multi-morbidity interventions, enriched environments, and the need to address inequities in post-stroke brain health. As post-stroke brain health is a relatively new, rapidly evolving, and broad clinical and research field, this narrative review aims to identify and summarize the evidence base to help clinicians and researchers tailor their own approach to integrating post-stroke brain health into their practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L. Stulberg
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
| | - Perminder S. Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
- Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Anne M. Murray
- Berman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA;
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
| | - Steven C. Cramer
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA;
- California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90067, USA
| | - Farzaneh A. Sorond
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Kamakshi Lakshminarayan
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Behnam Sabayan
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
- Department of Neurology, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
| |
Collapse
|