1
|
Chen Q, Ye X, Wang K, Shen H. Prediction of papillary thyroid metastases to the central compartment: proposal of a model taking into consideration other thyroid conditions. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1299290. [PMID: 38089621 PMCID: PMC10715241 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1299290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To construct risk prediction models for cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) under different thyroid disease backgrounds and to analyze and compare risk factors among different groups. Methods This retrospective study included 518 patients with PTC that was pathologically confirmed post-operatively from January 2021 to November 2021. Demographic, ultrasound and pathological data were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with CLNM in the whole patient cohort and in patients grouped according to diagnoses of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), nodular goiter (NG), and no background disease. Prediction models were constructed for each group, and their performances were compared. Results Analysis of the whole PTC patient cohort identified NG as independently associated with CLNM. The independent risk factors for patients with no background disease were the maximum thyroid nodule diameter and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System score; those for patients with HT were the maximum thyroid nodule diameter, ACR TI-RADS score, and multifocality; and those for patients with NG were the maximum thyroid nodule diameter, ACR TI-RADS score, multifocality and gender. Conclusion Background thyroid disease impacts CLNM in PTC patients, and risk factors for CLNM vary among PTC patients with different background diseases. Ultrasound is useful for diagnosing background thyroid disease, which can inform treatment planning. Different prediction models are recommended for PTC cases with different thyroid diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiong Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaofen Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
- School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Kangjian Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Haolin Shen
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seitz PK, Karger CP, Bendl R, Schwahofer A. Strategy for automatic ultrasound (US) probe positioning in robot-assisted ultrasound guided radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36584398 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acaf46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective. As part of image-guided radiotherapy, ultrasound-guided radiotherapy is currently already in use and under investigation for robot assisted systems Ipsen 2021. It promises a real-time tumor localization during irradiation (intrafractional) without extra dose. The ultrasound probe is held and guided by a robot. However, there is a lack of basic safety mechanisms and interaction strategies to enable a safe clinical procedure. In this study we investigate potential positioning strategies with safety mechanisms for a safe robot-human-interaction.Approach. A compact setup of ultrasound device, lightweight robot, tracking camera, force sensor and control computer were integrated in a software application to represent a potential USgRT setup. For the realization of a clinical procedure, positioning strategies for the ultrasound head with the help of the robot were developed, implemented, and tested. In addition, basic safety mechanisms for the robot have been implemented, using the integrated force sensor, and have been tested by intentional collisions.Main results. Various positioning methods from manual guidance to completely automated procedures were tested. Robot-guided methods achieved higher positioning accuracy and were faster in execution compared to conventional hand-guided methods. The developed safety mechanisms worked as intended and the detected collision force were below 20 N.Significance. The study demonstrates the feasibility of a new approach for safe robotic ultrasound imaging, with a focus on abdominal usage (liver, prostate, kidney). The safety measures applied here can be extended to other human-robot interactions and present the basic for further studies in medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Karl Seitz
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Informatics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rolf Bendl
- Medical Informatics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Andrea Schwahofer
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Therapanacea, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kord M, Kluge A, Kufeld M, Kalinauskaite G, Loebel F, Stromberger C, Budach V, Gebauer B, Acker G, Senger C. Risks and Benefits of Fiducial Marker Placement in Tumor Lesions for Robotic Radiosurgery: Technical Outcomes of 357 Implantations. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194838. [PMID: 34638321 PMCID: PMC8508340 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Robotic radiosurgery (RRS) allows for the accurate treatment of primary tumors or metastases with high single doses. However, organ motion during or between fractions can lead to imprecise irradiation. We sought to evaluate the risks and advantages of fiducial marker (FM) implantation regarding clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude. Complications were most common in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly lung lesions. Pneumothoraces and pulmonary bleeding were the most common complications. An increased complication rate was associated with concomitant biopsy sampling and FM implantation. Most FM migration observed in this study occurred after CT-guided placements and clinical FM insertions. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions. This study highlights the benefits of marker implantation, especially in lesions with a large motion amplitude, including hepatic lesions and lesions of the lower lobe of the lung located >100.0 mm from the spine. Abstract Fiducial markers (FM) inserted into tumors increase the precision of irradiation during robotic radiosurgery (RRS). This retrospective study evaluated the clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude of FM implantations by analyzing 288 cancer patients (58% men; 63.1 ± 13.0 years) who underwent 357 FM implantations prior to RRS with CyberKnife, between 2011 and 2019. Complications were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. The radial motion amplitude was calculated for tumors that moved with respiration. A total of 725 gold FM was inserted. SIR-rated complications occurred in 17.9% of all procedures. Most complications (32.0%, 62/194 implantations) were observed in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly in pulmonary lesions (46.9% 52/111 implantations). Concurrent biopsy sampling was associated with a higher complication rate (p = 0.001). FM migration occurred in 3.6% after CT-guided and clinical FM implantations. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic (20.5 ± 11.0 mm) and lower lung lobe (15.4 ± 10.5 mm) lesions. This study increases the awareness of the risks of FM placement, especially in thoracic lesions affected by respiratory motion. Considering the maximum motion amplitude, FM placement remains essential in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions located >100.0 mm from the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Kord
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Gueliz Acker
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Acadamy, Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-557221
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bednarz BP, Jupitz S, Lee W, Mills D, Chan H, Fiorillo T, Sabitini J, Shoudy D, Patel A, Mitra J, Sarcar S, Wang B, Shepard A, Matrosic C, Holmes J, Culberson W, Bassetti M, Hill P, McMillan A, Zagzebski J, Smith LS, Foo TK. First-in-human imaging using a MR-compatible e4D ultrasound probe for motion management of radiotherapy. Phys Med 2021; 88:104-110. [PMID: 34218199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Respiration-induced tumor or organ positional changes can impact the accuracy of external beam radiotherapy. Motion management strategies are used to account for these changes during treatment. The authors report on the development, testing, and first-in-human evaluation of an electronic 4D (e4D) MR-compatible ultrasound probe that was designed for hands-free operation in a MR and linear accelerator (LINAC) environment. METHODS Ultrasound components were evaluated for MR compatibility. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding was used to enclose the entire probe and a factory-fabricated cable shielded with copper braids was integrated into the probe. A series of simultaneous ultrasound and MR scans were acquired and analyzed in five healthy volunteers. RESULTS The ultrasound probe led to minor susceptibility artifacts in the MR images immediately proximal to the ultrasound probe at a depth of <10 mm. Ultrasound and MR-based motion traces that were derived by tracking the salient motion of endogenous target structures in the superior-inferior (SI) direction demonstrated good concordance (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.95-0.98) between the ultrasound and MRI datasets. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that our hands-free, e4D probe can acquire ultrasound images during a MR acquisition at frame rates of approximately 4 frames per second (fps) without impacting either the MR or ultrasound image quality. This use of this technology for interventional procedures (e.g. biopsies and drug delivery) and motion compensation during imaging are also being explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan P Bednarz
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States.
| | - Sydney Jupitz
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Warren Lee
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - David Mills
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - Heather Chan
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | | | | | - David Shoudy
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - Aqsa Patel
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - Jhimli Mitra
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | | | - Bo Wang
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - Andrew Shepard
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Charles Matrosic
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - James Holmes
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Wesley Culberson
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Patrick Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Alan McMillan
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - James Zagzebski
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - L Scott Smith
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| | - Thomas K Foo
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DI Franco R, Borzillo V, Alberti D, Ametrano G, Petito A, Coppolaro A, Tarantino I, Rossetti S, Pignata S, Iovane G, Perdonà S, Quarto G, Grimaldi G, Izzo A, Castaldo L, Muscariello R, Serra M, Facchini G, Muto P. Acute Toxicity in Hypofractionated/Stereotactic Prostate Radiotherapy of Elderly Patients: Use of the Image-guided Radio Therapy (IGRT) Clarity System. In Vivo 2021; 35:1849-1856. [PMID: 33910872 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of intra-fractional monitoring and correction of prostate position with the Image Guided Radio Therapy (IGRT) system can increase the spatial accuracy of dose delivery. Clarity is a system used for intrafraction prostate-motion management, it provides a real-time visualization of prostate with a transperineal ultrasound. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Clarity-IGRT on proper intrafraction alignment and monitoring, its impact on Planning Tumor Volume margin and on urinary and rectal toxicity in elderly patients not eligible for surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five elderly prostate cancer patients, median age=75 years (range=75-90 years) were treated with Volumetric Radiotherapy and Clarity-IGRT using 3 different schemes: A) 64.5/72 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions on prostate and seminal vesicles (6 patients); B) 35 Gy in 5 fractions on prostate and seminal vesicles (12 patients); C): 35 Gy in 5 fractions on prostate (7 patients). Ultrasound identification of the overlapped structures to the detected ones during simulation has been used in each session. A specific software calculates direction and entity of necessary shift to obtain the perfect match. The average misalignment in the three-dimensional space has been determined and shown in a box-plot. RESULTS All patients completed treatment with mild-moderate toxicity. During treatment, genitourinary toxicity was 32% Grade 1; 4% Grade 2, rectal was 4% Grade 1. At follow-up of 3 months, genitourinary toxicity was 20% Grade 1; 4% Grade 2, rectal toxicity was 4% Grade 2. At follow-up of 6 months, genitourinary toxicity was 4% Grade 1; 4% Grade 2. Rectal toxicity was 4% Grade 2. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy with the Clarity System allows a reduction of PTV margins, the amount of fractions can be reduced increasing the total dose, not exacerbating urinary and rectal toxicity with greater patient's compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossella DI Franco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy;
| | - Valentina Borzillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Domingo Alberti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ametrano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Petito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Coppolaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sabrina Rossetti
- Departmental Unit Of Clinical and Experimental Uro-Andrologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Departmental Unit Of Clinical and Experimental Uro-Andrologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Gelsomina Iovane
- Departmental Unit Of Clinical and Experimental Uro-Andrologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Quarto
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Grimaldi
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Castaldo
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Muscariello
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Serra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Facchini
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Unit of Medical Oncology, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, "S.M. delle Grazie" Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Muto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matrosic CK, Culberson W, Shepard A, Jupitz S, Bednarz B. 3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom. Phys Med 2021; 84:159-167. [PMID: 33901860 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark gel dosimetry measurements in a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom for intrafraction image guidance through a multi-dosimeter comparison. Once benchmarked, the study aimed to perform a proof-of-principle study for validation measurements of an ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy delivery system. METHODS The phantom was dosimetrically benchmarked by delivering a liver VMAT plan and measuring the 3D dose distribution with DEFGEL dosimeters. Measured doses were compared to the treatment planning system and measurements acquired with radiochromic film and an ion chamber. The ultrasound image guidance validation was performed for a hands-free ultrasound transducer for the tracking of liver motion during treatment. RESULTS Gel dosimeters were compared to the TPS and film measurements, showing good qualitative dose distribution matches, low γ values through most of the high dose region, and average 3%/5 mm γ-analysis pass rates of 99.2%(0.8%) and 90.1%(0.8%), respectively. Gel dosimeter measurements matched ion chamber measurements within 3%. The image guidance validation study showed the measurement of the treatment delivery improvements due to the inclusion of the ultrasound image guidance system. Good qualitative matching of dose distributions and improvements of the γ-analysis results were observed for the ultrasound-gated dosimeter compared to the ungated dosimeter. CONCLUSIONS DEFGEL dosimeters in phantom showed good agreement with the planned dose and other dosimeters for dosimetric benchmarking. Ultrasound image guidance validation measurements showed good proof-of-principle of the utility of the phantom system as a method of validating ultrasound-based image guidance systems and potentially other image guidance methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles K Matrosic
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
| | - Wesley Culberson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Andrew Shepard
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Sydney Jupitz
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Bryan Bednarz
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kieselmann JP, Fuller CD, Gurney-Champion OJ, Oelfke U. Cross-modality deep learning: Contouring of MRI data from annotated CT data only. Med Phys 2021; 48:1673-1684. [PMID: 33251619 PMCID: PMC8058228 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Online adaptive radiotherapy would greatly benefit from the development of reliable auto-segmentation algorithms for organs-at-risk and radiation targets. Current practice of manual segmentation is subjective and time-consuming. While deep learning-based algorithms offer ample opportunities to solve this problem, they typically require large datasets. However, medical imaging data are generally sparse, in particular annotated MR images for radiotherapy. In this study, we developed a method to exploit the wealth of publicly available, annotated CT images to generate synthetic MR images, which could then be used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to segment the parotid glands on MR images of head and neck cancer patients. METHODS Imaging data comprised 202 annotated CT and 27 annotated MR images. The unpaired CT and MR images were fed into a 2D CycleGAN network to generate synthetic MR images from the CT images. Annotations of axial slices of the synthetic images were generated by propagating the CT contours. These were then used to train a 2D CNN. We assessed the segmentation accuracy using the real MR images as test dataset. The accuracy was quantified with the 3D Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD) between manual and auto-generated contours. We benchmarked the approach by a comparison to the interobserver variation determined for the real MR images, as well as to the accuracy when training the 2D CNN to segment the CT images. RESULTS The determined accuracy (DSC: 0.77±0.07, HD: 18.04±12.59mm, MSD: 2.51±1.47mm) was close to the interobserver variation (DSC: 0.84±0.06, HD: 10.85±5.74mm, MSD: 1.50±0.77mm), as well as to the accuracy when training the 2D CNN to segment the CT images (DSC: 0.81±0.07, HD: 13.00±7.61mm, MSD: 1.87±0.84mm). CONCLUSIONS The introduced cross-modality learning technique can be of great value for segmentation problems with sparse training data. We anticipate using this method with any nonannotated MRI dataset to generate annotated synthetic MR images of the same type via image style transfer from annotated CT images. Furthermore, as this technique allows for fast adaptation of annotated datasets from one imaging modality to another, it could prove useful for translating between large varieties of MRI contrasts due to differences in imaging protocols within and between institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer P. Kieselmann
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Oliver J. Gurney-Champion
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown A, Pain T, Preston R. Patient perceptions and preferences about prostate fiducial markers and ultrasound motion monitoring procedures in radiation therapy treatment. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 68:37-43. [PMID: 32997897 PMCID: PMC7890917 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient experiences and preferences of image-guidance procedures in prostate cancer radiotherapy are largely unknown. This study explored experiences and preferences of patients undergoing both fiducial marker (FM) insertion and Clarity ultrasound (US) procedures. METHODS A sequential explanatory mixed method approach was used. A questionnaire (n = 40) ranked experiences from 0 to 10 (worst) in the domains of invasiveness; pain; physical discomfort; and psychological discomfort. Responses were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) obtained further insights into their perspectives and preferences and were thematically analysed. RESULTS Perceptions of invasiveness varied with 46% reporting FMs more invasive than US and 49% the same for the two procedures. The mean score for FM was 3.6 and 2.1 for US. Mean scores for pain, physical and psychological discomfort were higher for FMs with 3.3, 3.2 and 2.9, respectively, and 1.1, 1.2 and 1.7 respectively for US, only pain achieved significance (P < 0.05). Three themes emerged from the interviews: Expectations versus Experience; Preferences linked to Priorities; and Motivations. Eleven patients (50%) preferred US; however, 10 (45%) could not illicit a preference. CONCLUSION Participants found both of the FM and US image-guidance procedures tolerable and acceptable. Men's preference was elusive, suggesting a more rigorous preference methodology is required to understand preferences in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Brown
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Tilley Pain
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Robyn Preston
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Central Queensland UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu L, Oh C, Shea CR. The Treatment of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer with Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy: An Analysis of 2917 Invasive and In Situ Keratinocytic Carcinoma Lesions. Oncol Ther 2021; 9:153-166. [PMID: 33547631 PMCID: PMC8140015 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-021-00138-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction An image-guided form of superficial ionizing radiation therapy (IGSRT) is becoming a commonly used alternative to surgery for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). However, there is little literature evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of this approach. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of IGSRT in treating a large number of patients with NMSC. Methods The medical records of 1632 stage 0–II patients with 2917 invasive and in situ NMSC lesions treated from years 2017 to 2020 were reviewed. No patients had clinical evidence of regional lymph node or distant disease at presentation. Results Treatment, guided by pre-treatment ultrasound imaging to adjust radiation energy and dose, combined with a fractionation treatment schedule of 20 or more treatment fractions, was safe and well tolerated. Of 2917 NMSC lesions treated, local tumor control was achieved in 2897 lesions, representing a 99.3% rate of control. Conclusion IGSRT should be considered as a first-line option for treating NMSC tumors in suitable early stage patients. Cure rates observed in this initial period of follow-up are similar, and potentially superior with further follow-up, to traditional superficial radiation therapy (SRT) and surgical options. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00138-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lio Yu
- Radiation Oncology, Laserderm Dermatology, Smithtown, NY, USA. .,SkinCure Oncology, Burr Ridge, Illinois, USA.
| | - Chad Oh
- The Weinberg Group, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Racca L, Cauda V. Remotely Activated Nanoparticles for Anticancer Therapy. NANO-MICRO LETTERS 2020; 13:11. [PMID: 34138198 PMCID: PMC8187688 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-020-00537-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Cancer has nowadays become one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Conventional anticancer approaches are associated with different limitations. Therefore, innovative methodologies are being investigated, and several researchers propose the use of remotely activated nanoparticles to trigger cancer cell death. The idea is to conjugate two different components, i.e., an external physical input and nanoparticles. Both are given in a harmless dose that once combined together act synergistically to therapeutically treat the cell or tissue of interest, thus also limiting the negative outcomes for the surrounding tissues. Tuning both the properties of the nanomaterial and the involved triggering stimulus, it is possible furthermore to achieve not only a therapeutic effect, but also a powerful platform for imaging at the same time, obtaining a nano-theranostic application. In the present review, we highlight the role of nanoparticles as therapeutic or theranostic tools, thus excluding the cases where a molecular drug is activated. We thus present many examples where the highly cytotoxic power only derives from the active interaction between different physical inputs and nanoparticles. We perform a special focus on mechanical waves responding nanoparticles, in which remotely activated nanoparticles directly become therapeutic agents without the need of the administration of chemotherapeutics or sonosensitizing drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Racca
- Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Cauda
- Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schlüter M, Fürweger C, Schlaefer A. Optimizing robot motion for robotic ultrasound-guided radiation therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:195012. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab3bfb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
12
|
Antico M, Prinsen P, Cellini F, Fracassi A, Isola AA, Cobben D, Fontanarosa D. Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213002. [PMID: 30818345 PMCID: PMC6394960 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In prostate cancer treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), prostate motion and internal changes in tissue distribution can lead to a decrease in plan quality. In most currently used planning methods, the uncertainties due to prostate motion are compensated by irradiating a larger treatment volume. However, this could cause underdosage of the treatment volume and overdosage of the organs at risk (OARs). To reduce this problem, in this proof of principle study we developed and evaluated a novel adaptive planning method. The strategy proposed corrects the dose delivered by each beam according to the actual position of the target in order to produce a final dose distribution dosimetrically as similar as possible to the prescribed one. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our adaptive planning method was tested on a phantom case and on a clinical case. For the first, a pilot study was performed on an in-silico pelvic phantom. A "library" of intensity modulated RT (IMRT) plans corresponding to possible positions of the prostate during a treatment fraction was generated at planning stage. Then a 3D random walk model was used to simulate possible displacements of the prostate during the treatment fraction. At treatment stage, at the end of each beam, based on the current position of the target, the beam from the library of plans, which could reproduce the best approximation of the prescribed dose distribution, was selected and delivered. In the clinical case, the same approach was used on two prostate cancer patients: for the first a tissue deformation was simulated in-silico and for the second a cone beam CT (CBCT) taken during the treatment was used to simulate an intra-fraction change. Then, dosimetric comparisons with the standard treatment plan and, for the second patient, also with an isocenter shift correction, were performed. RESULTS For the phantom case, the plan generated using the adaptive planning method was able to meet all the dosimetric requirements and to correct for a misdosage of 13% of the dose prescription on the prostate. For the first clinical case, the standard planning method caused underdosage of the seminal vesicles, respectively by 5% and 4% of the prescribed dose, when the position changes for the target were correctly taken into account. The proposed adaptive planning method corrected any possible missed target coverage, reducing at the same time the dose on the OARs. For the second clinical case, both with the standard planning strategy and with the isocenter shift correction target coverage was significantly worsened (in particular uniformity) and some organs exceeded some toxicity objectives. While with our approach, the most uniform coverage for the target was produced and systematically the lowest toxicity values for the organs at risk were achieved. CONCLUSIONS In our proof of principle study, the adaptive planning method performed better than the standard planning and the isocenter shift methods for prostate EBRT. It improved the coverage of the treatment volumes and lowered the dose to the OARs. This planning method is particularly promising for hypofractionated IMRT treatments in which a higher precision and control on dose deposition are needed. Further studies will be performed to test more extensively the proposed adaptive planning method and to evaluate it at a full clinical level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Antico
- School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Philips Research, Oncology Solutions Department, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Prinsen
- Philips Research, Oncology Solutions Department, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Cellini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Istituto di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS—Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Alice Fracassi
- Philips Research, Oncology Solutions Department, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfonso A. Isola
- Philips Research, Oncology Solutions Department, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - David Cobben
- North West Cancer Centre, Altnagelvin Hospital, Derry-Londonderry, Northern Ireland
- The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Davide Fontanarosa
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou S, Luo L, Li J, Lin M, Chen L, Shao J, Lu S, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Chen W, Liu M, Liu S, He L. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:22. [PMID: 30696488 PMCID: PMC6352439 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1217-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) is an attractive option in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the potential factors influencing the accuracy of 3DUS in comparison with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in IGRT for PCa patients haven’t been clearly identified. Methods The differences between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations were analyzed over 586 and 580 sessions for 24 and 25 PCa patients treated with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation, respectively. The clinical factors that may influence registration differences were also evaluated. Results The average discrepancies between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations were − 0.28 ± 5.28 mm, − 0.16 ± 3.48 mm, and − 0.47 ± 4.31 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The discrepancies were respectively less than 5 mm longitudinally, laterally, and vertically in 64.4 and 70.1%, 84.9 and 89.2%, and 75.9 and 79.1% of the patients treated with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation, respectively. The registration differences were significantly smaller at least in one direction in patients younger than 70 years, without pelvic lymph node irradiation, guided by transperineal ultrasonography and had a bladder volume smaller than 300 mL. Conclusions Age, irradiated regions, 3DUS modality, and bladder volume are important factors that may influence the differences between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations. 3DUS guidance is more feasible for younger PCa patients with a better control of bladder volume during the treatment and those who did not undergo pelvic lymph node irradiation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sha Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Liling Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Maosheng Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jianhui Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Shipei Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yaru Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yingting Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wenfen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Shiliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Su L, Iordachita I, Zhang Y, Lee J, Ng SK, Jackson J, Hooker T, Wong J, Herman JM, Sen HT, Kazanzides P, Lediju Bell MA, Yang C, Ding K. Feasibility study of ultrasound imaging for stereotactic body radiation therapy with active breathing coordinator in pancreatic cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:84-96. [PMID: 28574192 PMCID: PMC5529166 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for high radiation doses to be delivered to the pancreatic tumors with limited toxicity. Nevertheless, the respiratory motion of the pancreas introduces major uncertainty during SBRT. Ultrasound imaging is a non-ionizing, non-invasive, and real-time technique for intrafraction monitoring. A configuration is not available to place the ultrasound probe during pancreas SBRT for monitoring. METHODS AND MATERIALS An arm-bridge system was designed and built. A CT scan of the bridge-held ultrasound probe was acquired and fused to ten previously treated pancreatic SBRT patient CTs as virtual simulation CTs. Both step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning were performed on virtual simulation CT. The accuracy of our tracking algorithm was evaluated by programmed motion phantom with simulated breath-hold 3D movement. An IRB-approved volunteer study was also performed to evaluate feasibility of system setup. Three healthy subjects underwent the same patient setup required for pancreas SBRT with active breath control (ABC). 4D ultrasound images were acquired for monitoring. Ten breath-hold cycles were monitored for both phantom and volunteers. For the phantom study, the target motion tracked by ultrasound was compared with motion tracked by the infrared camera. For the volunteer study, the reproducibility of ABC breath-hold was assessed. RESULTS The volunteer study results showed that the arm-bridge system allows placement of an ultrasound probe. The ultrasound monitoring showed less than 2 mm reproducibility of ABC breath-hold in healthy volunteers. The phantom monitoring accuracy is 0.14 ± 0.08 mm, 0.04 ± 0.1 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.09 mm in three directions. On dosimetry part, 100% of virtual simulation plans passed protocol criteria. CONCLUSIONS Our ultrasound system can be potentially used for real-time monitoring during pancreas SBRT without compromising planning quality. The phantom study showed high monitoring accuracy of the system, and the volunteer study showed feasibility of the clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Su
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Iulian Iordachita
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yin Zhang
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Junghoon Lee
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sook Kien Ng
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Juan Jackson
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ted Hooker
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Wong
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H Tutkun Sen
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Kazanzides
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Chen Yang
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kai Ding
- School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sen HT, Bell MAL, Zhang Y, Ding K, Boctor E, Wong J, Iordachita I, Kazanzides P. System Integration and In Vivo Testing of a Robot for Ultrasound Guidance and Monitoring During Radiotherapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016; 64:1608-1618. [PMID: 28113225 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2612229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We are developing a cooperatively controlled robot system for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in which a clinician and robot share control of a 3-D ultrasound (US) probe. IGRT involves two main steps: 1) planning/simulation and 2) treatment delivery. The goals of the system are to provide guidance for patient setup and real-time target monitoring during fractionated radiotherapy of soft tissue targets, especially in the upper abdomen. To compensate for soft tissue deformations created by the probe, we present a novel workflow where the robot holds the US probe on the patient during acquisition of the planning computerized tomography image, thereby ensuring that planning is performed on the deformed tissue. The robot system introduces constraints (virtual fixtures) to help to produce consistent soft tissue deformation between simulation and treatment days, based on the robot position, contact force, and reference US image recorded during simulation. This paper presents the system integration and the proposed clinical workflow, validated by an in vivo canine study. The results show that the virtual fixtures enable the clinician to deviate from the recorded position to better reproduce the reference US image, which correlates with more consistent soft tissue deformation and the possibility for more accurate patient setup and radiation delivery.
Collapse
|
16
|
Schlosser J, Hristov D. Radiolucent 4D Ultrasound Imaging: System Design and Application to Radiotherapy Guidance. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2016; 35:2292-2300. [PMID: 27164579 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2559499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound (US) is an attractive modality for image guidance due to its real-time, non-ionizing, volumetric imaging capability with high soft tissue contrast. However, existing 4D US imaging systems contain large volumes of metal which interfere with diagnostic and therapeutic ionizing radiation in procedures such as CT imaging and radiation therapy. This study aimed to design and characterize a novel 4D Radiolucent Remotely-Actuated UltraSound Scanning (RRUSS) device that overcomes this limitation. In a phantom, we evaluated the imaging performance of the RRUSS device including frame rate, resolution, spatial integrity, and motion tracking accuracy. To evaluate compatibility with radiation therapy workflow, we evaluated device-induced CT imaging artifacts, US tracking performance during beam delivery, and device compatibility with commercial radiotherapy planning software. The RRUSS device produced 4D volumes at 0.1-3.0 Hz with 60° lateral field of view (FOV), 50° maximum elevational FOV, and 200 mm maximum depth. Imaging resolution (-3 dB point spread width) was 1.2-7.9 mm at depths up to 100 mm and motion tracking accuracy was ≤ 0.3±0.5 mm. No significant effect of the RRUSS device on CT image integrity was found, and RRUSS device performance was not affected by radiotherapy beam exposure. Agreement within ±3.0% / 2.0 mm was achieved between computed and measured radiotherapy dose delivered directly through the RRUSS device at 6 MV and 15 MV. In vivo liver, kidney, and prostate images were successfully acquired. Our investigations suggest that a RRUSS device can offer non-interfering 4D guidance for radiation therapy and other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Collapse
|
17
|
Şen HT, Cheng A, Ding K, Boctor E, Wong J, Iordachita I, Kazanzides P. Cooperative Control with Ultrasound Guidance for Radiation Therapy. Front Robot AI 2016. [DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
18
|
Bazalova-Carter M, Schlosser J, Chen J, Hristov D. Monte Carlo modeling of ultrasound probes for image guided radiotherapy. Med Phys 2015; 42:5745-56. [PMID: 26429248 PMCID: PMC4567581 DOI: 10.1118/1.4929978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Revised: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To build Monte Carlo (MC) models of two ultrasound (US) probes and to quantify the effect of beam attenuation due to the US probes for radiation therapy delivered under real-time US image guidance. METHODS MC models of two Philips US probes, an X6-1 matrix-array transducer and a C5-2 curved-array transducer, were built based on their megavoltage (MV) CT images acquired in a Tomotherapy machine with a 3.5 MV beam in the EGSnrc, BEAMnrc, and DOSXYZnrc codes. Mass densities in the probes were assigned based on an electron density calibration phantom consisting of cylinders with mass densities between 0.2 and 8.0 g/cm(3). Beam attenuation due to the US probes in horizontal (for both probes) and vertical (for the X6-1 probe) orientation was measured in a solid water phantom for 6 and 15 MV (15 × 15) cm(2) beams with a 2D ionization chamber array and radiographic films at 5 cm depth. The MC models of the US probes were validated by comparison of the measured dose distributions and dose distributions predicted by MC. Attenuation of depth dose in the (15 × 15) cm(2) beams and small circular beams due to the presence of the probes was assessed by means of MC simulations. RESULTS The 3.5 MV CT number to mass density calibration curve was found to be linear with R(2) > 0.99. The maximum mass densities in the X6-1 and C5-2 probes were found to be 4.8 and 5.2 g/cm(3), respectively. Dose profile differences between MC simulations and measurements of less than 3% for US probes in horizontal orientation were found, with the exception of the penumbra region. The largest 6% dose difference was observed in dose profiles of the X6-1 probe placed in vertical orientation, which was attributed to inadequate modeling of the probe cable. Gamma analysis of the simulated and measured doses showed that over 96% of measurement points passed the 3%/3 mm criteria for both probes placed in horizontal orientation and for the X6-1 probe in vertical orientation. The X6-1 probe in vertical orientation caused the highest attenuation of the 6 and 15 MV beams, which at 10 cm depth accounted for 33% and 43% decrease compared to the respective (15 × 15) cm(2) open fields. The C5-2 probe in horizontal orientation, on the other hand, caused a dose increase of 10% and 53% for the 6 and 15 MV beams, respectively, in the buildup region at 0.5 cm depth. For the X6-1 probe in vertical orientation, the dose at 5 cm depth for the 3-cm diameter 6 MV and 5-cm diameter 15 MV beams was attenuated compared to the corresponding open fields to a greater degree by 65% and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MC models of two US probes used for real-time image guidance during radiotherapy have been built. Due to the high beam attenuation of the US probes, the authors generally recommend avoiding delivery of treatment beams that intersect the probe. However, the presented MC models can be effectively integrated into US-guided radiotherapy treatment planning in cases for which beam avoidance is not practical due to anatomy geometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Bazalova-Carter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | | | - Josephine Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Dimitre Hristov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| |
Collapse
|