Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell Time in the Surgical Management of Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A review of surgical and reconstructive techniques for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory follicular dermatological condition that typically affects the intertriginous and anogenital regions of the apocrine gland-bearing skin. The management of this chronic and recurring disease necessitates a combination of lifestyle changes, medication, and surgical approaches to achieve the best possible outcomes. While medical treatments are recommended for this multimodal disease, surgical therapy, which is the gold standard of treatment for HS, has proven to be the most effective treatment because it provides long-lasting local disease control, reduces the recurrence of lesions, and ensures complete healing of lesions. In the last decade, there has been exponential growth in research into various surgical techniques and reconstructive care, enabling patients to have more surgical options. There is a wide range of surgical management procedures available, such as incision and drainage, deroofing, excisional surgery, carbon dioxide laser therapy, and skin tissue-sparing excision with electrosurgical peeling. Among these surgical procedures, wide surgical excision is the best option since it can eradicate all the affected lesions. Meanwhile, the preferred approach to reconstruction at various anatomical locations remains debatable. Here, we review a variety of surgical treatments and reconstructive techniques for HS, particularly various flap techniques for the axillary, gluteal, and inframammary regions.

The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyze the outcome of different treatment methods after radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the treatment strategy and recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. We included all eligible patients of legal age between February 2003 and October 2021, with the diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa and the necessity for surgical treatment. All patients with surgical treatment and direct wound closure by suture were excluded. Bacterial load and flora were analyzed for primary and secondary reconstruction in combination with negative-pressure wound therapy. Patient data were analyzed for recurrence rate and remission time according to different reconstructive techniques.

Results

In 44 affected anatomical sites (n = 23 patients) we treated 15 patients with negative-pressure wound therapy. Bacterial load and flora were lower in the last wound swab of patients with multi-surgical procedures (22 localizations) compared to the first wound swab independent of the use of negative-pressure wound therapy.

Wound closure, independent of a direct and multi-stage procedure was achieved by local fasciocutaneous flaps (n = 12), secondary intention healing (n = 7), secondary intention healing with buried chip skin grafts (n = 10), or split-thickness skin grafts (n = 15). Radical excision combined with split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate in the follow-up (16%; n = 4).

Conclusion

Radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa as gold standard for surgical treatment combined with negative-pressure wound therapy as multi-stage procedures ultimately reduced bacterial load and flora in our study. The use of split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate.

Office-Based Surgical Intervention for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS): A Focused Review for Dermatologists

Easily accessible office-based procedures that require minimal resources may facilitate timely surgical management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This review focuses on excision and unroofing as two surgical HS treatments that can be tailored to the outpatient setting. Fifty-five articles were included in our review, representing 3914 patients. The majority were retrospective studies (58%, n = 32), and the studies reported data both across patients and by number of treated lesions. Recurrence rates for unroofing (14.5%) were found to be half that of excision (30%) across patients (p = 0.015) and slightly lower across lesions [20% recurrence vs 26% for excision (p = 0.023)]. Complication rates at the lesion level were also significantly associated with procedure, with rates after excision more than double those after roofing (26% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). The complication rate after combined medical and surgical therapy did not differ between procedures. Studies also suggest that continuing medical therapy in the perioperative period may be associated with improved recurrence rates, although delayed wound healing with biologic therapy has been reported. The existing data are limited by low-quality uncontrolled studies with small sample sizes, variable reporting of outcomes, and lack of uniform definitions for recurrence and remission. Further systematic prospective studies are needed to better compare complication and recurrence rates across these procedures in HS, especially in the context of concomitant medical therapy.

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: International consensus guidelines update

The use of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi‐d) has gained wider adoption and interest due in part to the increasing complexity of wounds and patient conditions. Best practices for the use of NPWTi‐d have shifted in recent years based on a growing body of evidence and expanded worldwide experience with the technology. To better guide the use of NPWTi‐d with all dressing and setting configurations, as well as solutions, there is a need to publish updated international consensus guidelines, which were last produced over 6 years ago. An international, multidisciplinary expert panel of clinicians was convened on 22 to 23 February 2019, to assist in developing current recommendations for best practices of the use of NPWTi‐d. Principal aims of the meeting were to update recommendations based on panel members' experience and published results regarding topics such as appropriate application settings, topical wound solution selection, and wound and patient characteristics for the use of NPWTi‐d with various dressing types. The final consensus recommendations were derived based on greater than 80% agreement among the panellists. The guidelines in this publication represent further refinement of the recommended parameters originally established for the use of NPWTi‐d. The authors thank Karen Beach and Ricardo Martinez for their assistance with manuscript preparation.