Treatment of Aggressive Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas with Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy: A Review

Current and Perspective Approaches to the Treatment of Prolactinomas

Background

Along with the presence of the 2011 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines and numerous large-scale studies on the treatment of hyperprolactinemia of different origin, there are some unresolved questions, ambiguous and sometimes contradictory points of view regarding the management of patients with prolactinomas. This overview is devoted to the analysis of the results of modern clinical studies and the approaches towards the management of hyperprolactinemia caused by prolactinoma.

Materials and methods

A systematic research of the literature for the appropriate keywords published mainly for the last 10 years was done; also, a reference list of each selected article was analysed. We included to our review the articles reporting controversial issues or new data on the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

Results

The review describes various problems arising during the treatment of prolactinoma. The presence of primary and secondary dopamine agonist resistance in each case requires an individual approach, and sometimes may include the use of the antineoplastic agent t emozolomide. The side effects of dopamine agonists are discussed, with quite rare ones, including valvulopathy, pathological psychological conditions and cerebrospinal rhinorrhea. The controversial issue of the duration and doses of the drug used to achieve a lasting effect in the treatment of prolactinomas is considered. There are some points connected with the frequency of relapses. Thus, recurrence is correlated to the duration of treatment with dopamine agonists, prolactin levels at diagnosis, and the initial tumor size. Metformin, somatostatin analogues, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin, epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists are investigated nowadays as potential alternative methods of drug treatment of prolactinomas.

Conclusion

Drug therapy with dopamine agonists makes it possible to achieve the desired results in the vast majority of patients. However, despite the proven safety of this group of medicines, the risk of side effects should still be taken into account. The therapy regimen should be determined by the clinical course of prolactinoma and the patient's response to treatment. Other options of treatment should be considered in patients intolerant to medical therapy, with contraindication or resistance to dopamine agonists, in the case of a malignant tumor. The presence of refractory to any of the applied methods of treatment and aggressive prolactinomas leads to the search for new drugs.

Comparison of the effects of medical and surgical treatments in giant prolactinoma: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinomas, which have extremely large sizes and high prolactin (PRL) values, are rarely seen. Although medical therapy is effective, surgical treatment is more frequently applied due to slightly lower response rates and compression symptoms. This study aimed to compare the medical and surgical treatment results in giant prolactinomas.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients who were followed up in our center for giant prolactinoma were included in the study, and the response rates of the patients were evaluated after the medical and surgical treatments. The treatment responses were compared in terms of tumor volume, PRL level, visual field, and pituitary function.

RESULTS

The outcomes of the 66 treatment periods (medical n = 42; surgical n = 24) in 39 patients (mean age, 47.2 years; men, 89.7%) were evaluated. The most common presentations were hypogonadism and visual defects. The mean longest tumor diameter at diagnosis was 52.2 ± 11.8 mm, and the median PRL levels were 5000 ng/mL. PRL level normalization was achieved in 69% with medical therapy, and a curative response was obtained in only two patients with surgery. Tumor volume reduction was 67% (no cure) in the medical and 75% (13% cure) in the surgical groups (p = 0.39). Improvement of visual field was 70.8% in the medical and 84.2% in the surgical group (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

In our study, it was observed that medical therapy was effective and safe in patients with giant prolactinomas. The use of surgical treatment should be limited to prolactinomas with compression or post-resistance to medical treatment in serious cases.

Macroprolactinoma causing VI, X, XII cranial nerve palsies nearly 30 years after initial treatment

A 48-year-old man was diagnosed with a large macroprolactinoma in 1982 treated with surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and bromocriptine. Normal prolactin was achieved in 2005 but in 2009 it started rising. Pituitary MRIs in 2009, 2012, 2014 and 2015 were reported as showing empty pituitary fossa. Prolactin continued to increase (despite increasing bromocriptine dose). Trialling cabergoline had no effect (prolactin 191,380 mU/L). In January 2016, he presented with right facial weakness and CT head was reported as showing no acute intracranial abnormality. In late 2016, he was referred to ENT with hoarse voice; left hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies were found. At this point, prolactin was 534,176 mU/L. Just before further endocrine review, he had a fall and CT head showed a basal skull mass invading the left petrous temporal bone. Pituitary MRI revealed a large enhancing mass within the sella infiltrating the clivus, extending into the left petrous apex and occipital condyle with involvement of the left Meckel's cave, internal acoustic meatus, jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal. At that time, left abducens nerve palsy was also present. CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis excluded malignancy. Review of previous images suggested that this lesion had started becoming evident below the fossa in pituitary MRI of 2015. Temozolomide was initiated. After eight cycles, there is significant tumour reduction with prolactin 1565 mU/L and cranial nerve deficits have remained stable. Prolactinomas can manifest aggressive behaviour even decades after initial treatment highlighting the unpredictable clinical course they can demonstrate and the need for careful imaging review.

Learning points

Aggressive behaviour of prolactinomas can manifest even decades after first treatment highlighting the unpredictable clinical course these tumours can demonstrate.Escape from control of hyperprolactinaemia in the absence of sellar adenomatous tissue requires careful and systematic search for the anatomical localisation of the lesion responsible for the prolactin excess.Temozolomide is a valuable agent in the therapeutic armamentarium for aggressive/invasive prolactinomas, particularly if they are not amenable to other treatment modalities.