Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Effect of psychosocial factors on autonomic nervous system activity in patients with heart failure

Autonomic imbalance predicts worse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Managing the variables affecting heart rate variability (HRV) might improve the clinical outcomes of patients with HF. This study aimed to investigate variables affecting HRV. We assessed autonomic nervous system activity (low-frequency [Lf], high-frequency [Hf], and Lf/Hf ratio) in 60 patients with HF, employing standard measures to capture short-term HRV. To estimate the independent effects of variables such as well-known cardiac risk factors and psychosocial conditions on HRV, multivariate analyses were conducted. For psychosocial variables, we assessed depression and quality of life in patients and their family caregivers. We also assessed the self-care behavior of patients and their caregivers' burden. Depression in family caregivers and self-care behavior of patients were independently associated with a decreased Hf (β-coefficient = 0.309, P = .039 and β-coefficient = -0.029, P = .047, respectively). Depression of family caregivers and self-care behavior of patients may affect HRV in patients with HF.

Validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist device

AIMS

To evaluate the validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

DESIGN

Methodological study.

METHODS

The English version of the scale was translated into Korean, and it was then back-translated into English. Survey data were collected from 32 patients with left ventricular assist device in South Korea, and construct validity, content validity and reliability were analysed.

RESULTS

The original self-care behaviour scale comprises three domains and 33 items, whereas the Korean self-care behaviour scale comprises 27 items and five domains: device management, wound management, symptom monitoring, activated healthcare system and self-care management. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.94, and that for the five domains ranged from 0.36 to 0.90. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall scale was 0.89, and the five domains ranged from 0.71 to 0.88.

CONCLUSION

The newly evaluated scale would be valid and reliable in measure self-care behaviour for patients with a left ventricular assist device.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Patients can manage the left ventricular assist device on their own based on evidence and use it as a tool for effective communication with medical professionals.

Muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and exercise tolerance are impaired in left ventricular assist devices recipients: A pilot study

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly being used as a therapy for advanced heart failure, both as a bridge to heart transplant and, given the rapid advances in the LVAD’s functionality and safety, and constant lack in availability of donor organs, as long-term destination therapy. With the diffusion of such therapy, it is crucial to assess patients’ muscle strength, aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance, to improve their functional capacity.

Methods: 38 LVAD recipients (33 men and five women) were included. Exercise testing including a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), handgrip, isometric and isokinetic strength testing of knee and ankle flexion/extension, and Romberg balance test in three conditions (eyes open, eyes closed, double task). Given the small and heterogeneous final sample size, a mostly descriptive statistical approach was chosen.

Results: 12 participants were classified as “Obese” (BMI>29.9). The most common comorbidities were type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Only 12 participants were able to successfully complete all the assessments. CPET and isokinetic strength trials were the least tolerated tests, and the handgrip test the best tolerated. Mean VO₂ peak was 12.38 ± 3.43 ml/kg/min, with 15 participants below 50% of predicted VO₂ max, of which 6 below 30% VO₂max. Mean handgrip strength was 30.05 ± 10.61 Kg; 25 participants were below the 25° percentile of their population’s normative reference values for handgrip strength, 10 of which were below the 5° percentile. Issues with the management of the external pack of the LVAD and its influence on the test limited the validity of the balance tests data, therefore, no solid conclusions could be drawn from them. VO₂ peak did not correlate with handgrip strength or with any of the lower limb strength measures.

Conclusion: LVAD recipients show greatly reduced functional capacity and tolerance to exercise and exercise testing, with low overall strength levels. As strength variables appear to be independent from VO₂ peak, different lower limbs strength tests should be explored to find a tolerable alternative in this population, which is subjected to muscle wasting due to old age, reduced tissue perfusion, side effects from the pharmacological therapies, and prolonged periods of bedrest.

The History of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Comparison of Outcomes: HeartWare, HeartMate II, HeartMate 3, and the Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support

The utilization of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in end-stage heart failure has doubled in the past ten years and is bound to continue to increase. Since the first of these devices was approved in 1994, the technology has changed tremendously, and so has the medical and surgical management of these patients. In this review, we discuss the history of LVADs, evaluating survival and complications over time. We also aim to discuss practical aspects of the medical and surgical management of LVAD patients and future directions for outcome improvement in this population.