1
|
Hahnemann L, Krämer A, Fink C, Jungk C, Thomas M, Christopoulos P, Lischalk J, Meis J, Hörner-Rieber J, Eichkorn T, Deng M, Lang K, Paul A, Meixner E, Weykamp F, Debus J, König L. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial postoperative cavities after resection of brain metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100782. [PMID: 38694237 PMCID: PMC11061678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose After surgical resection of brain metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is indicated. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the risk of local progression and neurocognitive decline compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Aside from the optimal dose and fractionation, little is known about the combination of systemic therapy and postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), especially regarding tumour control and toxicity. Methods In this study, 105 patients receiving postoperative fSRT with 35 Gy in 7 fractions performed with Cyberknife were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analysed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. Results Median follow-up was 20.8 months. One-year TIBC was 61.6% and one-year LC was 98.6%. Median OS was 28.7 (95%-CI: 16.9-40.5) months. In total, local progression (median time not reached) occurred in 2.0% and in 20.4% radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) of the cavity (after median of 14.3 months) were diagnosed. Absence of extracranial metastases was identified as an independent prognostic factor for superior OS (p = <0.001) in multivariate analyses, while a higher Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was predictive for longer OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.041). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) developed in 13% of patients. Conclusion FSRT after surgical resection of BM is an effective and safe treatment approach with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Hahnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Krämer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - C. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Jungk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - P. Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - J.W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA
| | - J. Meis
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T. Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K. Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E. Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L. König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dosimetric Parameters in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Do Flattening Filter-Free Beams Bring Benefits? A Preliminary Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030678. [PMID: 36765636 PMCID: PMC9913515 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the dosimetric results of flattening filter-free (FFF) vs. flattened (FF) treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), with the goal to highlight potential advantages of FFF beams. METHODS A group of 18 patients with brain metastases treated with fSRT (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions) were included. The dosimetric parameters evaluated were: (1) physical dosimetric parameters (number of monitor units (MUs), conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), beam on time (BOT)); (2) clinical dosimetric parameters pertaining to target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Two treatment plans were performed for all patients: one used 6 MV FFF beams and the other used 6 MV flattened beams. RESULTS A slight increase in MUs was observed for the FFF mode (+23.3 MUs). The CI showed a difference of -2.7% for the FF plans (p = 0.28), correlated with a poorer coverage of the PTV. DGI values reported in terms of PTV are in line with international recommendations and showed a +1.9% difference for FFF plans. An average BOT of 90.3 s was reported for FFF plans, which was 2.3 times shorter than that required for FF plans delivery (p ≤ 0.001). A slight decrease of PTV coverage (-1.26%, p = 0.036) for FF plans can be considered relevant, but no other significant differences were observed between the two optimizations. No statistically significant benefit of using FFF beams to reduce V20 for normal brain could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION These dosimetric results encourage the implementation of fSRT with standard flattened beams in centers where FFF linacs are not available.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mantovani C, Gastino A, Cerrato M, Badellino S, Ricardi U, Levis M. Modern Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772789. [PMID: 34796118 PMCID: PMC8593461 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent event during the course of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) disease. Recent advancements in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures result in increased incidence and earlier diagnosis of BMs, with an emerging need to optimize the prognosis of these patients through the adoption of tailored treatment solutions. Nowadays a personalized and multidisciplinary approach should rely on several clinical and molecular factors like patient’s performance status, extent and location of brain involvement, extracranial disease control and the presence of any “druggable” molecular target. Radiation therapy (RT), in all its focal (radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy) or extended (whole brain radiotherapy) declinations, is a cornerstone of BMs management, either alone or combined with surgery and systemic therapies. Our review aims to provide an overview of the many modern RT solutions available for the treatment of BMs from NSCLC in the different clinical scenarios (single lesion, oligo and poly-metastasis, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis). This includes a detailed review of the current standard of care in each setting, with a presentation of the literature data and of the possible technical solutions to offer a “state-of-art” treatment to these patients. In addition to the validated treatment options, we will also discuss the future perspectives on emerging RT technical strategies (e.g., hippocampal avoidance whole brain RT, simultaneous integrated boost, radiosurgery for multiple lesions), and present the innovative and promising findings regarding the combination of novel targeted agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors with brain irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marzia Cerrato
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen TK, Sahgal A, Detsky J, Atenafu EG, Myrehaug S, Tseng CL, Husain Z, Heyn C, Maralani P, Ruschin M, Perry J, Soliman H. Predictors of leptomeningeal disease following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intact and resected brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:84-93. [PMID: 31412120 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective was to evaluate the risk and predictors of developing leptomeningeal disease (LMD) in patients with brain metastases treated with 5-fraction hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). METHODS Patients treated with HSRT for intact brain metastases and/or surgical cavities were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Radiographic patterns of LMD were classified as focal classical, diffuse classical, focal nodular, and diffuse nodular. RESULTS HSRT was delivered, most commonly 30 Gy in 5 fractions, to 320 intracranial lesions (57% intact and 43% surgical cavities) in 235 patients. The median follow-up was 13.4 months (range, 0.8 to 60 mo). LMD developed in 19% of patients with a 1-year LMD rate of 12%. From the diagnosis of LMD, the median overall survival (OS) was 3.8 months (range, 2-20.8 mo). The most common LMD pattern was diffuse nodular (44%). No difference in OS was observed between LMD patterns (P = 0.203). Multivariable analysis identified surgical cavities at significantly higher risk of LMD compared with intact lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.24, 4.29, P = 0.008). For cavities, radiosensitive tumors (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.04, 5.35, P = 0.041) predicted for LMD, while, for intact metastases, patients receiving treatment with targeted agents or immunotherapy (TA/I) were at lower risk (OR = 0.178, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.79, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS Patients who had a brain metastasis resected were at an increased risk of LMD. OS was poor despite treatment of LMD, and no differences in OS based on the pattern of LMD was observed. Treatment with TA/I was observed to be protective against LMD and requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Heyn
- Department of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Perry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McCutcheon IE. Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prevent Local Recurrence of Brain Metastasis After Surgery: Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 128:85-100. [PMID: 34191064 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15-20 years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the dominant method for treating patients with brain metastases (BM). The role of surgery for management of large tumors also remains important. Combining these two treatment modalities may well achieve the best local control, safety, and symptomatic relief in cases of neoplasms for which resection is desirable. After 10 years of retrospective studies that suggested patients might do better if surgery were followed by early adjuvant SRS, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to compare such treatment with postoperative observation after tumor removal, and it showed significantly better local control in the former cohort, especially in smaller lesions, but no difference in overall survival. On the other hand, in the past 5 years, some groups have argued that neoadjuvant SRS before resection of BM might be superior to adjuvant SRS, while no clinical trial has yet been concluded that compares these two treatment strategies. For now, adjuvant and neoadjuvant SRS show evidence of utility in achieving better local control after surgical removal of BM in comparison with surgery alone, but no specific guidelines exist favoring one method over the other, and both should be considered beneficial in clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ahluwalia M, Baehring J, Brem H, Brem S, Butowski N, Campian JL, Clark SW, Fabiano AJ, Forsyth P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Horbinski C, Junck L, Kaley T, Kumthekar P, Loeffler JS, Mrugala MM, Nagpal S, Pandey M, Parney I, Peters K, Puduvalli VK, Robins I, Rockhill J, Rusthoven C, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Swinnen LJ, Weiss S, Wen PY, Willmarth NE, Bergman MA, Darlow SD. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1537-1570. [PMID: 33152694 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Henry Brem
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Steven Brem
- 6Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jian L Campian
- 8Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Craig Horbinski
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Larry Junck
- 14University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Manjari Pandey
- 19St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- 21The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Ian Robins
- 22University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
| | - Jason Rockhill
- 23Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Lode J Swinnen
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Post-operative radiation therapy to the surgical cavity with standard fractionation in patients with brain metastases. Sci Rep 2020; 10:6331. [PMID: 32286375 PMCID: PMC7156661 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63158-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The paradigm for post-operative cavity radiation therapy has shifted to more targeted, less morbid approaches. Single-fraction or hypofractionated radiation therapy is a common approach to treating the postoperative cavity but is associated with a local failure rate 20–40%. We employed an alternative treatment strategy involving fractionated partial brain radiation therapy to the surgical cavity. Patients with brain metastases who underwent radiation treatment 30–42 Gy in 3 Gy/fraction regimens to surgical cavity were retrospectively identified. The 6-month and 12-month freedom from local failure rates were 97.0% and 88.2%. Three patients (7%) experienced local failure at 4, 6, and 22 months. Of these, the histologies were colorectal adenocarcinoma (N = 1) and breast adenocarcinoma (N = 2). The 6-month and 12-month freedom from distant brain metastases rates were 74.1% and 68.8%, respectively, and the 6-month and 12-month overall survival rates were 84.9% and 64.3% respectively. The median overall survival was 39 months, and there were no events of late radionecrosis. Fractionated partial brain irradiation to the surgical cavity of resected brain metastases results in low rates of local failure. This strategy represents an alternative to SRS and WBRT.
Collapse
|
8
|
Alshehri SM, Alkattan K, Abdelwarith A, Alhussain H, Shaker S, Alghamdi M, Alassaf H, Albargawi A, Naimi MA, Alomair A, Althaqfi S, Alhebshi A, Alothman M, Jazieh A. Highlights on the Management of Oligometastatic Disease. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY AND PRECISION ONCOLOGY 2020; 3:34-44. [PMID: 35756179 PMCID: PMC9208385 DOI: 10.4103/jipo.jipo_24_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The understanding of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is rapidly evolving and with this comes the ability to utilize a number of modalities that excel in the localized control of disease. It has been identified that there are no clear guidelines based on high-level evidence to standardized approaches toward the management of OMD. These highlights have been developed to provide a road map for all health-care professionals who are involved in the management of OMD to support standardized patient care. Methods: The Saudi Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee is a part of the Saudi Lung Cancer Association which, in turn, is part of the Saudi Thoracic Society. Considering that lung cancer constitutes a major proportion of OMD prevalence, the committee took the initiative to develop national highlights to support the management of OMD within Saudi Arabia. The committee members are national clinical leaders who collaborated with international expertise to establish these highlights to serve as a general clinical pathway in the management of OMD. Results: Standardization of the indications to diagnose oligometastases and patient selection criteria including ineligibility criteria for treatment are the basis of the highlights. Treatment approaches including surgical and the variety of radiotherapeutical options are discussed in relation to specific oligometastatic sites. Acceptable measurements for response to treatment and the future for the treatment of OMD conclude the development of the highlights. Conclusion: These are the first national highlights addressing this important disease in oncology. The implementation of these highlights as guidelines requires a robust multidisciplinary team and access to specific technology and expertise. These highlights are based on the most recent findings within the literature but will require repeated review and updating due to this rapidly evolving field in disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salem M. Alshehri
- Department of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khaled Alkattan
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Abdelwarith
- Department of Medicine, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussain Alhussain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shaker Shaker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hossam Alassaf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Albargawi
- Department of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Al Naimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia,
| | - Ameen Alomair
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saif Althaqfi
- Department of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adnan Alhebshi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, John Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dharan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majid Alothman
- Radiation Oncology Unit, John Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dharan, Saudi Arabia
| | - AbdulRahman Jazieh
- Department of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martinage G, Geffrelot J, Stefan D, Bogart E, Rault E, Reyns N, Emery E, Makhloufi-Martinage S, Mouttet-Audouard R, Basson L, Mirabel X, Lartigau E, Pasquier D. Efficacy and Tolerance of Post-operative Hypo-Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in a Large Series of Patients With Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2019; 9:184. [PMID: 30984617 PMCID: PMC6448411 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess, in a large series, the efficacy and tolerance of post-operative adjuvant hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HFSRT) for brain metastases (BMs). Materials and Methods: Between July 2012 and January 2017, 160 patients from 2 centers were operated for BM and treated by HFSRT. Patients had between 1 and 3 BMs, no brainstem lesions or carcinomatous meningitis. The primary endpoint was local control. Secondary endpoints were distant brain control, overall survival (OS) and tolerance to HFSRT. Results: 73 patients (46%) presented with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 23 (14%) had melanoma and 21 (13%) breast cancer. Median age was 58 years (range, 22–83 years). BMs were synchronous in 50% of the cases. The most frequent prescription regimens were 24 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 52, 33%) and 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 37, 23%). Local control rates at 1 and 2 years were 88% [95%CI, 81–93%] and 81% [95%CI, 70–88%], respectively. Distant control rate at 1 year was 48% [95%CI, 81–93%]. In multivariate analysis, primary NSCLC was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death compared to other primary sites (HR = 0.57, p = 0.007), the number of extra-cerebral metastatic sites (HR = 1.26, p = 0.003) and planning target volumes (HR = 1.15, p = 0.012) were associated with a lower OS. There was no prognostic factor of time to local progression. Median OS was 15.2 months [95%CI, 12.0–17.9 months] and the OS rate at 1 year was 58% [95% CI, 50–65%]. Salvage radiotherapy was administered to 72 patients (45%), of which 49 received new HFSRT. Ten (7%) patients presented late grade 2 and 4 (3%) patients late grade 3 toxicities. Thirteen (8.9%) patients developed radiation necrosis. Conclusions: This large multicenter retrospective study shows that HFSRT allows for good local control of metastasectomy tumor beds and that this technique is well-tolerated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Martinage
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II, Lille, France
| | - Julien Geffrelot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Erwan Rault
- Department of Medical Physics, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Nicolas Reyns
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Evelyne Emery
- Neurosurgical Department, Universitary Hospital Caen, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Laurent Basson
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II, Lille, France
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II, Lille, France
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cavity volume changes after surgery of a brain metastasis-consequences for stereotactic radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:207-217. [PMID: 30386864 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1387-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For a large or symptomatic brain metastasis, resection and adjuvant radiotherapy are recommended. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) is increasingly applied in patients with a limited number of lesions. Exact target volume definition is critical given the small safety margins. Whilst technical advances have minimized inaccuracy due to patient positioning and radiation targeting, little is known about changes in target volume. This study sought to evaluate potential changes in the resection cavity of a brain metastasis. METHODS In all, 57 patients treated with HFSRT after surgical resection of one brain metastasis between 2008 and 2015 in our institution were included in this study. Gross tumor volume (GTV) of the initial metastasis and the volume of the resection cavity in the post-operative, planning, and follow-up MRIs were measured and compared. RESULTS The mean cavity size decreased after surgery with the greatest change of -23.4% (±41.5%) occurring between post-operative MRI and planning MRI (p < 0.01). During this time period, the cavity volume decreased, remained stable, and increased in 79.1, 3.5, and 17.4%, respectively. A further decrease of -20.7% (±58.1%) was perceived between planning MRI and first follow-up (p < 0.01). No significant difference in pattern of change could be observed depending on the volume of initial GTV, size of the post-operative resection cavity, initial or post-resection FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) hyper-intensity, postsurgical ischemia, or primary tumor. The resection cavities of patients with post-operative ischemia were significantly larger than resection cavities of patients without ischemia. CONCLUSION The resection cavity seems to be very dynamic after surgery. Hence, it remains necessary to use very recent scans for treatment planning.
Collapse
|
11
|
Masucci GL. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Large Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2018; 8:379. [PMID: 30333955 PMCID: PMC6176274 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Single fraction radiosurgery (SRS) treatment is an effective and recognized alternative to whole brain radiation for brain metastasis. However, SRS is not always possible, especially in tumors of a larger diameter where the administration of high dose in a single fraction is limited by the possibility of acute and late side effects and the dose to the surrounding organs at risk. Hypofractionated radiation therapy allows the delivery of high doses of radiation per fraction while minimizing adverse events, all the while maintaining good local control of lesions. The optimal dose fractionation has however not been established. This overwiew presents available evidence and rationale supporting usage of hypofractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of large brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Laura Masucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Higgins MJ, Burke O, Fitzpatrick D, Nugent KG, Skourou C, Dunne M, Javadpour M, Faul C. Stereotactic radiosurgery to surgical cavity post resection of brain metastases: Local recurrence and overall survival rates. A single-centre experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 62:726-733. [PMID: 30044047 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We reviewed local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) post intracranial SRS to cavity post resection of brain metastases at one institution, and factors affecting LC. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of adjuvant SRS at one institution from 2013 to 2016. Patient records, treatment plans and diagnostic images were reviewed. Local failure was MRI defined. Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables were analysed using Mann-Whitney tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival times and the log-rank test was used to compare differences in survival. RESULTS Forty-seven patients with 48 cavities were treated with SRS post operatively. LC rate was 69%, and the distant intracranial failure rate was 47% for entirety of the follow-up period. The 12-month freedom from local recurrence (FFLR) was 77% (63-91%). Median OS (95% CI) was 22.7 (14.6-30.8) months. Patients with a single metastasis had longer FFLR (30.1 vs 14.4 months; P = 0.014). Median interval from surgery to SRS was 6.3 weeks. Patients with interval >7 weeks had increased local recurrence (LR) (62%) than <7 weeks (37%), P = 0.025. Patients with a margin < 2 mm were more likely to experience LR (48%) than those with margin equal to 2 mm (20%); this approached statistical significance (P = 0.063). The median follow-up for all patients was 15.4 months (2-41). CONCLUSIONS We determined LC and OS post adjuvant SRS at our institution. Based on the findings of this retrospective review SRS should be given promptly post operatively with a 2 mm PTV margin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Higgins
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Orlaidh Burke
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Fitzpatrick
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Killian G Nugent
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christina Skourou
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mary Dunne
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Clinical Trials Unit, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Clare Faul
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sinclair G, Benmakhlouf H, Martin H, Brigui M, Maeurer M, Dodoo E. The role of radiosurgery in the acute management of fourth ventricle compression due to brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 2018; 9:112. [PMID: 29930878 PMCID: PMC5991270 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_387_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Approximately 20–30% of all intracranial metastases are located in the posterior fossa. The clinical evolution hinges on factors such as tumor growth dynamics, local topographic conditions, performance status, and prompt intervention. Fourth ventricle (V4) compression with secondary life-threatening obstructive hydrocephalus remains a major concern, often requiring acute surgical intervention. We have previously reported on the application of adaptive hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in the acute management of critically located metastases, a technique known to us as rapid rescue radiosurgery (3R). We report the results of 3R in the management of posterior fossa lesions and ensuing V4 decompression. Case Descriptions: Four patients with V4 compression due to posterior fossa metastases were treated with 3R by three separate gamma knife radiosurgical sessions (GKRS) over a period of seven days. Mean V4 volume was 1.02 cm3 at GKRS 1, 1.13 cm3 at GKRS 2, and 1.12 cm3 at GKRS 3. Mean tumor volume during the week of treatment was 10 cm3 at both GKRS 1 and 2 and 9 cm3 at GKRS 3. On average, we achieved a tumor volume reduction of 52% and a V4 size increase of 64% at the first follow-up (4 weeks after GKRS 3). Long-term follow-up showed continued local tumor control, stable V4 volume, and absence of hydrocephalus. Conclusion: For this series, 3R was effective in terms of rapid tumor ablation, V4 decompression, and limited radiation-induced toxicity. This surgical procedure may become an additional tool in the management of intractable posterior fossa metastasis with V4 compression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sinclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Benmakhlouf
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Martin
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Brigui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Maeurer
- Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Centre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Dodoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hartgerink D, van der Heijden B, De Ruysscher D, Postma A, Ackermans L, Hoeben A, Anten M, Lambin P, Terhaag K, Jochems A, Dekker A, Schoenmaekers J, Hendriks L, Zindler J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Patients With Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Indications, Decision Tools and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2018; 8:154. [PMID: 29868476 PMCID: PMC5954030 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most patients with BM have a limited life expectancy, measured in months. Selected patients may experience a very long progression-free survival, for example, patients with a targetable driver mutation. Traditionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the cornerstone of the treatment, but its indication is a matter of debate. A randomized trial has shown that for patients with a poor prognosis, WBRT does not add quality of life (QoL) nor survival over the best supportive care. In recent decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an attractive non-invasive treatment for patients with BM. Only the BM is irradiated to an ablative dose, sparing healthy brain tissue. Intracranial recurrence rates decrease when WBRT is administered following SRS or resection but does not improve overall survival and comes at the expense of neurocognitive function and QoL. The downside of SRS compared with WBRT is a risk of radionecrosis (RN) and a higher risk of developing new BM during follow-up. Currently, SRS is an established treatment for patients with a maximum of four BM. Several promising strategies are currently being investigated to further improve the indication and outcome of SRS for patients with BM: the effectivity and safety of SRS in patients with more than four BM, combining SRS with systemic therapy such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, shared decision-making with SRS as a treatment option, and individualized isotoxic dose prescription to mitigate the risk of RN and further enhance local control probability of SRS. This review discusses the current indications of SRS and future directions of treatment for patients with BM of NSCLC with focus on the value of SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Hartgerink
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Britt van der Heijden
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Proton Therapy Department South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alida Postma
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Monique Anten
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Karin Terhaag
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Arthur Jochems
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Proton Therapy Department South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Janna Schoenmaekers
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lizza Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Zindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Proton Therapy Department South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Babic S, Lee Y, Ruschin M, Lochray F, Lightstone A, Atenafu E, Phan N, Mainprize T, Tsao M, Soliman H, Sahgal A. To frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobilization devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:111-120. [PMID: 29363282 PMCID: PMC5849846 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Noninvasive frameless systems are increasingly being utilized for head immobilization in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Knowing the head positioning reproducibility of frameless systems and their respective ability to limit intrafractional head motion is important in order to safely perform SRS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the intrafractional head motion of an invasive frame and a series of frameless systems for single fraction SRS and fractionated/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT/HF‐SRT). Methods The noninvasive PinPoint system was used on 15 HF‐SRT and 21 SRS patients. Intrafractional motion for these patients was compared to 15 SRS patients immobilized with Cosman‐Roberts‐Wells (CRW) frame, and a FSRT population that respectively included 23, 32, and 15 patients immobilized using Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman (GTC) frame, Uniframe, and Orfit. All HF‐SRT and FSRT patients were treated using intensity‐modulated radiation therapy on a linear accelerator equipped with cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and a robotic couch. SRS patients were treated using gantry‐mounted stereotactic cones. The CBCT image‐guidance protocol included initial setup, pretreatment and post‐treatment verification images. The residual error determined from the post‐treatment CBCT was used as a surrogate for intrafractional head motion during treatment. Results The mean intrafractional motion over all fractions with PinPoint was 0.62 ± 0.33 mm and 0.45 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, for the HF‐SRT and SRS cohort of patients (P‐value = 0.266). For CRW, GTC, Orfit, and Uniframe, the mean intrafractional motions were 0.30 ± 0.21 mm, 0.54 ± 0.76 mm, 0.73 ± 0.49 mm, and 0.76 ± 0.51 mm, respectively. For CRW, PinPoint, GTC, Orfit, and Uniframe, intrafractional motion exceeded 1.5 mm in 0%, 0%, 5%, 6%, and 8% of all fractions treated, respectively. Conclusions The noninvasive PinPoint system and the invasive CRW frame stringently limit cranial intrafractional motion, while the latter provides superior immobilization. Based on the results of this study, our clinical practice for malignant tumors has evolved to apply an invasive CRW frame only for metastases in eloquent locations to minimize normal tissue exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Babic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona Lochray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Lightstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eshetu Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nic Phan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Todd Mainprize
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - May Tsao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Soliman H, Das S, Larson DA, Sahgal A. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern management of patients with brain metastases. Oncotarget 2017; 7:12318-30. [PMID: 26848525 PMCID: PMC4914287 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established non-invasive ablative therapy for brain metastases. Early clinical trials with SRS proved that tumor control rates are superior to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. As a result, WBRT plus SRS was widely adopted for patients with a limited number of brain metastases (“limited number” customarily means 1-4). Subsequent trials focused on answering whether WBRT upfront was necessary at all. Based on current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comparing SRS alone to SRS plus WBRT, adjuvant WBRT results in better intracranial control; however, at the expense of neurocognitive functioning and quality of life. These adverse effects of WBRT may also negatively impact on survival in younger patients. Based on the results of these studies, treatment has shifted to SRS alone in patients with a limited number of metastases. Additionally, RCTs are evaluating the role of SRS alone in patients with >4 brain metastases. New developments in SRS include fractionated SRS for large tumors and the integration of SRS with targeted systemic therapies that cross the blood brain barrier and/or stimulate an immune response. We present in this review the current high level evidence and rationale supporting SRS as the standard of care for patients with limited brain metastases, and emerging applications of SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David A Larson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
[Delineation of the surgical bed of operated brain metastases treated with adjuvant stereotactic irradiation: A review]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:804-813. [PMID: 29170039 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy of the surgical bed of brain metastases is a technique that comes supplant indications of adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy after surgery. After a growing number of retrospective studies, a phase III trial has been presented and validated this indication. However, several criteria such as the dose, the fractionation, the use of a margin and definition of volumes remain to be defined. Our study consisted in making a literature review in order to provide a guideline of delineation of surgical beds of brain metastases, as well as the different modalities of their implementation process.
Collapse
|
18
|
Tseng CL, Eppinga W, Seravalli E, Hackett S, Brand E, Ruschin M, Lee YK, Atenafu EG, Sahgal A. Dosimetric feasibility of the hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-linac System (MRL) for brain metastases: The impact of the magnetic field. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:273-279. [PMID: 29079310 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Revised: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the suitability of treating patients with single brain metastases using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with the MRL and to characterize the dosimetric impact at tissue-air interfaces resulting primarily from the electron return effect (ERE). MATERIAL AND METHODS 24 patients treated for intact single brain metastases were analyzed. Three radiotherapy plans with the same prescribed dose were generated for each case: (1) noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), (2) coplanar step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on the MRL in the absence (MRLB=0), and (3) in the presence of the transverse magnetic field (MRLB=1.5). The plans were evaluated using cumulative dose-volume histograms and by calculation of Paddick conformity index (CI), V100%, V12Gy minus gross tumor volume (V12Gy - GTV), and V2Gy. At tissue-air boundaries, the dosimetric impact of the magnetic field was quantified using a 5 mm rim of tissue. RESULTS All plans met the target coverage and organs-at-risk planning objectives. Differences between all investigated dosimetric parameters significantly favored the VMAT plans as compared to the MRLB=0 and MRLB=1.5 plans, except for V2Gy. The mean V12Gy - GTV and V2Gy marginally favored the MRLB=0 plans compared to the MRLB=1.5 plans (mean difference: 0.45 cm3, p = 0.0019 and 16.46 cm3, p < 0.0001, respectively). The presence of the magnetic field resulted in a statistically significant but small increase in mean dose and D2cc in the skin (0.08 Gy, p < 0.0001 and 0.6 Gy, p < 0.0001, respectively) and around air cavities (0.07 Gy, p = 0.0092 and 0.3 Gy, p = 0.0004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to generate stereotactic radiation plans that satisfy clinical requirements using the MRL in the setting of single brain metastases. The dosimetric impact of the magnetic field including the ERE at tissue-air boundaries is minor and does not negatively impact target conformity or dose gradient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Wietse Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara Hackett
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Brand
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Young K Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wernicke AG, Hirschfeld CB, Smith AW, Taube S, Yondorf MZ, Parashar B, Nedialkova L, Kulidzhanov F, Trichter S, Sabbas A, Ramakrishna R, Pannullo S, Schwartz TH. Clinical Outcomes of Large Brain Metastases Treated With Neurosurgical Resection and Intraoperative Cesium-131 Brachytherapy: Results of a Prospective Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:1059-1068. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
20
|
Ruschin M, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Tsao M, Yeboah C, Sarfehnia A, Chugh B, Kiss A, Lee Y. Investigation of irradiated volume in linac-based brain hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:117. [PMID: 28709427 PMCID: PMC5513379 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0853-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging techniques such as brain hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) involve complex cases with limited guidelines for plan quality and normal tissue tolerances. The purpose of the present study was to statistically parameterize irradiated volume independently of dose prescription, or margin to determine what spread in achievable irradiated volume one may expect for a given case. Methods We defined EXT as the total tissue within the external contour of the patient (including the target) and we defined BMP as the contour of the brain minus PTV. Irradiated volumes of EXT and BMP at specific doses (i.e. 50, 60%, etc., of the prescribed dose) were extracted from 135 single-target HF-RT clinical cases, each planned with a single-arc, homogeneous (SAHO) approach in which target maximum dose (Dmax) was constrained to <130% of the prescribed dose. Irradiated volumes were subsequently measured for cases involving 2 targets (N = 29), 3 targets (N = 7) and >3 targets (N = 10) to investigate the effect of target number. We also examined the effect of shape complexity. A series of best fit curves with confidence and prediction intervals were generated for irradiated volume versus total target volume and the resulting model was subsequently validated on a subsequent set of 23 consecutive prospective cases not originally used in curve-fitting. A subset of 30 HF-RT cases were re-planned with a well-published four-arc, heterogeneous (FAHE) radiosurgery planning approach (Dmax could exceed 130%) to demonstrate how technique affects irradiated volume. Results For SAHO, strong correlation (R2 > 0.98) was found for predicting irradiated volumes. For a given total target volume, irradiated-volume increased by a range of 1.4–2.9× for >3 versus single-targets depending on isodose level. Shape complexity had minor impact on irradiated volume. There was no statistical difference in irradiated volumes between validation and input data (p > 0.2). The FAHE-generated irradiated volumes yielded curves and prediction and confidence bands that agreed well with published data indicating that the proposed approach is feasible for cross-institutional comparisons. Conclusions A description of irradiated volume for linac-based HF-RT is proposed based on population data. We have demonstrated that the proposed approach is feasible for inter and intra-institutional comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - May Tsao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Collins Yeboah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arman Sarfehnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brige Chugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Kiss
- Research Design and Biostatistics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mahajan A, Ahmed S, McAleer MF, Weinberg JS, Li J, Brown P, Settle S, Prabhu SS, Lang FF, Levine N, McGovern S, Sulman E, McCutcheon IE, Azeem S, Cahill D, Tatsui C, Heimberger AB, Ferguson S, Ghia A, Demonte F, Raza S, Guha-Thakurta N, Yang J, Sawaya R, Hess KR, Rao G. Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1040-1048. [PMID: 28687375 PMCID: PMC5560102 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30414-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 469] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background After brain metastasis resection, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) decreases local recurrence but may cause cognitive decline. We performed this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved local tumor tumor-free recurrence rates compared to surgical resection alone as an alternative to the need for immediate WBRT. Methods The main entry criteria for the study included patients >3 years of age, with a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70, who were able to undergo an MRI scan and who had a complete resection of 1–3 brain metastases (the maximum diameter of the resection cavity had to be ≤4cm). Patients were assigned randomly to either SRS treatment of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation (OBS). Patients were stratified by histology, tumor size, and number of metastases. Patients were recruited at a single tertiary cancer center. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial NCT00950001, status: closed to new participants). Findings Between 8/13/2009 and 2/16/2016, 132 patients were randomized to OBS (N=68) or SRS (N=64), with 128 patients available for analysis. We stratified by metastasis size (maximum diameter of ≥3 cm vs. <3 cm), histology (melanoma vs. other), and number of metastases (one vs. two or three). The 12-month local tumor recurrence-free rate was 43% (OBS) (95% CI 31%–59%) and 72% (SRS) (95% CI 60%–87%) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.88, p=0.015). Interpretation This prospective randomized trial of patients undergoing surgical resection for 1–3 brain metastases indicates that SRS administered to the resection cavity significantly lowers local recurrence compared to observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection is an alternative to WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Salmaan Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen Settle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas Levine
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erik Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Syed Azeem
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudio Tatsui
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Franco Demonte
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shaan Raza
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raymond Sawaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sinclair G, Martin H, Fagerlund M, Samadi A, Benmakhlouf H, Doodo E. Adaptive hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery in the acute management of large thymic carcinoma brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8:95. [PMID: 28607829 PMCID: PMC5461566 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_391_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases often lead to serious neurological impairment and life threatening states. Their acute management remains complex, particularly in the case of rare malignancies with aggressive evolution. In large single lesions, open surgery followed by radiation to the surgical cavity is widely regarded as the best approach; yet in many cases, microsurgery is not feasible due to the lesion's critical location and/or the number of brain metastases present. We report the effects of adaptive hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery in the acute management of critically located thymic carcinoma metastases. CASE DESCRIPTION A 50-year-old male with metastatic thymic carcinoma was treated with radiosurgery for two large supratentorial brain metastases (M3 and M4) adjacent to eloquent areas and one smaller cerebellar metastasis (M2). M3 and M4 were treated with adaptive hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery, showing a dramatic volume reduction 4 weeks after treatment completion without radiation-induced side effects. Thirteen months later, two new small, threatening supratentorial lesions (M5-M6) were treated with the same technique. Interestingly, M2 (treated with standard single fraction) and M5-M6 developed local adverse radiation events. The patient's general and neurological status remained next to normal by the time of paper submission. CONCLUSION The application of adaptive hypofractionated radiosurgery in this acute setting proved effective in terms of rapid tumor ablation, with salvage of neurological functionality and limited toxicity. We have called the overall procedure rapid rescue radiosurgery (RRR). A systematic study of past and ongoing RRR-treatments is warranted and in progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Sinclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Heather Martin
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Fagerlund
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Amir Samadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hamza Benmakhlouf
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernest Doodo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Keller A, Doré M, Antoni D, Menoux I, Thillays F, Clavier JB, Delpon G, Jarnet D, Bourrier C, Lefebvre F, Chibbaro S, Darié I, Proust F, Noël G. [Risk of radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:377-388. [PMID: 28551018 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the factors that potentially lead to brain radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis conducted in two French centres, was performed in patients treated with trifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (3×7.7Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line) for resected brain metastases. Patients with previous whole-brain irradiation were excluded of the analysis. Radionecrosis was diagnosed according to a combination of criteria including clinical, serial imaging or, in some cases, histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of radionecrosis including clinical and dosimetric variables such as volume of brain receiving a specific dose (V8Gy-V22Gy). RESULTS One hundred eighty-one patients, with a total of 189 cavities were treated between March 2008 and February 2015. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3-38 months) after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. One third of patients with radionecrosis were symptomatic. Multivariate analysis showed that infra-tentorial location was predictive of radionecrosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.47-6.01; P=0.0025). None V8Gy-V22Gy was associated with appearance of radionecrosis, even if V14Gy trended toward significance (P=0.059). CONCLUSION Analysis of patients and treatment variables revealed that infratentorial location of brain metastases was predictive for radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative resection cavities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Keller
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - M Doré
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire EA 3430, fédération de médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg, université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - I Menoux
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Thillays
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - J B Clavier
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - G Delpon
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - D Jarnet
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - C Bourrier
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Lefebvre
- Laboratoire de biostatistiques, faculté de médecine, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - S Chibbaro
- Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital de Hautepierre, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - I Darié
- Service de neurochirurgie, centre hospitalier régional d'Orléans, 1, rue Porte-Madeleine, 45000 Orléans, France
| | - F Proust
- Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital de Hautepierre, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire EA 3430, fédération de médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg, université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Dams R, Park HS, Alomari AK, Ricciardi AS, Rao H, McNamara J, DiLuna ML, Bindra RS. Adjuvant hypofractionated partial-brain radiation therapy for pediatric Ewing sarcoma brain metastases: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 17:434-8. [PMID: 26636250 DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.peds15313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This case report demonstrates that hypofractionated partial-brain radiation therapy with limited margins is a reasonable approach following gross tumor resection of Ewing sarcoma metastases to the brain. The patient presented with 2 intracranial metastases treated with gross-total resection followed by radiation therapy to 30 Gy in 5 fractions. The patient experienced symptomatic treatment-related inflammatory changes with resolution after receiving dexamethasone. He remains alive at 21 months of follow-up with no evidence of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Harini Rao
- Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph McNamara
- Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael L DiLuna
- Neurosurgery, Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, and.,Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Frameless LINAC-based stereotactic radiation therapy to brain metastasis resection cavity without whole-brain radiation therapy: A systematic review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:324-330. [PMID: 26922701 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the findings from the published data of frameless stereotactic radiation therapy (RT) to the resection cavity delivered with nonrobotic linear accelerator in patients with brain metastases. METHODS The studies cited in this systematic review were identified through a search of the PubMed database, using the search terms: "stereotactic [Title/Abstract]" and "Brain [Title/Abstract]," and "Metas* [Title/Abstract]." The search was unlimited to language and publication year. RESULTS A total of 9 studies were included in our review. Stereotactic RT to the resection cavity appears to provide excellent local control rates that are comparable to framed stereotactic RT. There are various factors that influence local control. Distant intracranial control rates are poor with the use of postoperative stereotactic RT compared with local treatment (surgery or stereotactic RT) plus whole-brain RT. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic RT to the resection cavity appears to provide good local control rates and poor distant intracranial control. Postoperative treatment should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team and tailored to each case individually.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ruschin M, Lee Y, Beachey D, Yeboah C, Wronski M, Babic S, Lochray F, Nico A, Khan L, Soliman H, Sahgal A. Investigation of Dose Falloff for Intact Brain Metastases and Surgical Cavities Using Hypofractionated Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2015; 15:130-8. [PMID: 25627201 DOI: 10.1177/1533034614567277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 12/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intact brain metastases tend to be small and spherical compared to postsurgery brain cavities, which tend to be large and irregular shaped and, as a result, a challenge with respect to treatment planning. The purpose of the present study is to develop guidelines for normal brain tissue dose and to investigate whether there is a dependence on target type for patients treated with hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (HF-VMAT). METHODS Treatment plans from a total of 100 patients and 136 targets (55 cavity and 81 intact) were retrospectively reviewed. All targets were treated with HF-VMAT with total doses ranging between 20 and 30 gray (Gy) in 5 fractions. All plans met institutional objectives for organ-at-risk constraints and were clinically delivered. Dose falloff was quantified using gradient index (GI) and distance between the 100% and 50% isodose lines (R50). Additionally, the dose to normal brain tissue (brain contour excluding all gross tumor or clinical target volumes) was assessed using volume receiving specific doses (Vx) where x ranged from 5 to 30 Gy. Best-fit curves using power law relationships of the form y = ax(b) were generated for GI, R50, and Vx (normal brain tissue) versus target volume. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference in planning target volume (PTV) for cavities versus intact metastases with mean volumes of 37.8 cm(3) and 9.5 cm(3), respectively (P < .0001). The GI and R50 were statistically different: 3.4 and 9.8 mm for cavities versus 4.6 and 8.3 mm for intact metastases (P < .0001). The R50 increased with PTV with power law coefficients (a, b) = (6.3, 0.12) and (5.9, 0.15) for cavities and intact, respectively. GI decreased with PTV with coefficients (a, b) = (5.9, -0.18) and (5.7, -0.14) for cavities and intact, respectively. The normal brain tissue Vx also exhibited power law relationships with PTV for x = 20 to 28.8 Gy. In conclusion, target volume is the main predictor of dose falloff. The results of the present study can be used for determining target volume-based thresholds for dose falloff and normal brain tissue dose-volume constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ruschin
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Young Lee
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Beachey
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Collins Yeboah
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matt Wronski
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven Babic
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fiona Lochray
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anula Nico
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Luluel Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ma L, Sahgal A, Larson DA, Pinnaduwage D, Fogh S, Barani I, Nakamura J, McDermott M, Sneed P. Impact of millimeter-level margins on peripheral normal brain sparing for gamma knife radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 89:206-13. [PMID: 24725703 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2013] [Revised: 01/04/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate how millimeter-level margins beyond the gross tumor volume (GTV) impact peripheral normal brain tissue sparing for Gamma Knife radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS A mathematical formula was derived to predict the peripheral isodose volume, such as the 12-Gy isodose volume, with increasing margins by millimeters. The empirical parameters of the formula were derived from a cohort of brain tumor and surgical tumor resection cavity cases (n=15) treated with the Gamma Knife Perfexion. This was done by first adding margins from 0.5 to 3.0 mm to each individual target and then creating for each expanded target a series of treatment plans of nearly identical quality as the original plan. Finally, the formula was integrated with a published logistic regression model to estimate the treatment-induced complication rate for stereotactic radiosurgery when millimeter-level margins are added. RESULTS Confirmatory correlation between the nominal target radius (ie, RT) and commonly used maximum target size was found for the studied cases, except for a few outliers. The peripheral isodose volume such as the 12-Gy volume was found to increase exponentially with increasing Δ/RT, where Δ is the margin size. Such a curve fitted the data (logarithmic regression, R(2) >0.99), and the 12-Gy isodose volume was shown to increase steeply with a 0.5- to 3.0-mm margin applied to a target. For example, a 2-mm margin on average resulted in an increase of 55% ± 16% in the 12-Gy volume; this corresponded to an increase in the symptomatic necrosis rate of 6% to 25%, depending on the Δ/RT values for the target. CONCLUSIONS Millimeter-level margins beyond the GTV significantly impact peripheral normal brain sparing and should be applied with caution. Our model provides a rapid estimate of such an effect, particularly for large and/or irregularly shaped targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Larson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Dilini Pinnaduwage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Shannon Fogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Igor Barani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jean Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Penny Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|